How women's advocates are using the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial to talk to players about consent
A month after the start of the high-profile sexual assault trial of five former junior hockey players in London, Ont., advocates against gender-based violence are using the proceedings to teach young men about consent and their responsibilities as role models for others.
"I think for young men and for hockey players, they're watching what these five defendants have gone through and they won't want to be in that position," said Allison Preyde, the manager of prevention and education at Anova, the gender-based violence centre in London.
"They don't want to be dragged through that to put their careers on the line so we're having conversations about how to make situations safer and what situations aren't worth the risk."
Former hockey teammates Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote are each charged with sexual assault. McLeod is additionally charged with being a party to the offence.
In June 2018, they were in London for a gala to celebrate their teams' world junior gold medal win earlier that year. After a night of drinking at a local bar, McLeod went home with a woman, known in court proceedings as E.M., for consensual sex. He later invited his teammates to his room to have sexual relations with the woman, something she says she didn't consent to.
Their trial started April 22 and included the nine-day testimony and cross-examination by five defence teams of E.M., who said she at times went along with what the men wanted because she was scared and had never been in a similar situation. In the witness box, she described her mind separating from her body as a coping mechanism.
Evidence presented at trial included text messages sent by McLeod inviting his teammates to his hotel room for group sex, and the players texting each other in the days and weeks following the incident when police and Hockey Canada began investigating, assuring each other that they did nothing wrong.
Consent, the Crown has said, is at the heart of the case.
"We talk a lot about power imbalances, and how that power can be used for good because our position is that athletes are not bad or that sports are bad," said Hanna McGee, the Youth Outreach Coordinator at the Saffron Centre, a sexual assault centre in Sherwood Park, Alberta.
McGee developed a program called Consent in Sport, which delivers education to athletes as young as 13, including those in the British Columbia Hockey League.
"Often, athletes don't even realize the significance of their social status, their influence, even in small communities where they're highly regarded and treated like celebrities. With a lot of that power comes a lot of responsibility," McGee said.
Being on a sports team can mean making friends for life, but can also make it difficult to speak up and stop negative behaviour, McGee said.
"It's absolutely crucial in the world of sports to be able to lean on our teammates and lean on our coaches. But it can turn into a harmful groupthink, where we can deflect responsibility, we can act without autonomy, we can blame others for our actions. How you act and carry yourself is going to follow you forever," she said.
"The trial provides an opportunity for us to really think about the significance of impact over intent and thinking about consent being truly freely given and truly ongoing."
In 2016, the Ontario Hockey League launched a program called Onside, which consists of a two-hour mandatory training program that teaches players and team staff about their responsibility to demonstrate respect for women. Local sexual assault and gender-based violence centres are supposed to deliver the course to OHL teams.
But Preyde, who has delivered the Onside seminar to members of the London Knights junior hockey team in the past, said consent training has to start much earlier.
"Particularly for people who are in the culture of sports and in locker rooms, having those conversations as early as possible is key," she said.
"We need to get them thinking about, 'What does consent mean? What is healthy? What is not healthy? What does it mean to be a good friend? 'The lack of that conversation early on really sets up junior hockey players for a really touch time, not just as people who are potentially assaulting, but for people who are at risk of assault, too."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
23 minutes ago
- News24
Another Diddy ex testifies to ‘obligation' in coerced, choreographed sexual encounters
A key witness, 'Jane,' has provided graphic testimony in the federal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs, alleging coercive sexual encounters. Combs allegedly orchestrated disturbing acts involving multiple women, with testimony also backing claims made by ex-girlfriend Casandra Ventura. The trial has featured intense courtroom moments, including accusations of witness manipulation by Combs and shocking allegations from witnesses about violent and exploitative behaviour. A key witness took the stand in the federal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs Thursday, giving graphic detail of choreographed sexual encounters with the music mogul that were allegedly coercive, testimony that's core to the prosecution's case. The woman, who is speaking in court under the pseudonym Jane, began delivering testimony that is expected to last for days and which so far mirrors descriptions provided by another marquee witness against Combs, his ex-girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Combs, 55, faces upwards of life in prison if convicted of racketeering and sex trafficking crimes. Both Jane and Ventura are key witnesses to the latter charges. Jane took the stand after some courtroom drama: the judge threatened to remove Combs after he was 'looking at jurors and nodding vigorously' while a different witness testified. Calling Combs's behaviour 'absolutely unacceptable,' Judge Arun Subramanian said, 'It cannot happen again.' READ | 'Sometimes I scream in my sleep': Witness claims Diddy dangled her from 17th-story balcony Communications between a defendant and a jury are strictly prohibited. The court had been hearing testimony from Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Ventura's who had alleged that Combs dangled her from a 17th-story balcony before throwing her against furniture. Combs's gestures to the jury took place as Bongolan was under tense questioning from his defence team, who sought to cast her as an unreliable witness who abused drugs. 'Hotel nights' Jane's testimony was highly anticipated: she began by detailing how she had met Combs through a friend who was dating him at the time. But he came on strongly to Jane, she said, and when her friend got engaged to someone else, she began seeing Combs romantically. Their relationship began in earnest during a whirlwind five-day date at a Miami hotel, she said, describing Combs - as many others during the trial have - as 'larger than life.' READ MORE | Hush money bombshell: Hotel worker testifies Diddy paid to bury Cassie assault video 'I was pretty head over heels for Sean,' she told jurors. Several heady months followed, including a romantic trip to Turks and Caicos and the Bahamas in February 2021. She said Combs first gave her illicit drugs on that trip. When the vacation ended, he wired her $10 000 because she had been unable to work - at the time, she was creating content for brands on social media - and was a single mother. Jane silently collected herself and held her face in a tissue as she described how her blissful early days with Combs took a sharp turn in May 2021 when he began talking about his fantasies of seeing her with other men. She acquiesced because she wanted to make Combs happy, she said, and to her surprise, he arranged for another man she dubbed Don to meet them at a hotel that very night. AFP Jane thought the experience was a one-time thing, but she said instead, it became 'a door I was unable to shut.' The 'hotel nights' became a regular feature of their relationship, Jane told jurors, even when she said she didn't want it. 'He was just dismissive,' she said, saying that approximately 90 percent of their relationship became a pattern of her having sex with other men under Combs's direction. Full-time job Jane's descriptions of the 'hotel nights' - her provocative attire that Combs requested, red mood lighting, heavy drug use and copious baby oil - closely tracked with the testimony that Ventura gave on the stand of what she called 'freak-offs.' Jane said that the amount of time she spent getting ready for hotel nights with Combs, which he demanded at a moment's notice and sometimes flew her to, meant she did not work. Money from Combs and child support from her previous relationship were essentially her only income, she said. That testimony echoed Ventura's, who had said her freak-offs with Combs came to feel like a full-time job. Combs put Jane up in a home in Los Angeles for $10 000 a month, she said, and when she spoke against hotel nights, he would bring up that point. ALSO READ | 'You post the great times': Witness asked to defend Instagram posts in Sean Combs trial 'My feeling of obligation really started to stem from the fact that my partner was paying my rent,' she said. Jane told jurors their relationship continued up until Combs's arrest in September 2024. Prosecutors say he ran a criminal enterprise of high-ranking employees and bodyguards who enforced his power with illicit acts, including kidnapping, bribery and arson. Along with Ventura and Jane, witnesses have included former employees of Bad Boy Enterprises, Combs's company. Jane's testimony will continue on Friday. The trial is expected to last at least another month.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Regulators tackle influencers promoting ‘rouge' financial products as legal action begins
Global regulators, including the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), have launched a coordinated effort to shield social media users from misleading promotions by financial influencers, or "finfluencers." The international crackdown, which began on 2 June, involves regulators from Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Italy, and the United Arab Emirates. In the UK, the FCA has issued 50 warning alerts, which the regulator said will result in more than 650 take down requests on social media platforms and more than 50 websites operated by unauthorised finfluencers. Additionally, the FCA has sent seven "cease and desist" letters and invited four finfluencers for interviews. The FCA, supported by the City of London Police, has also made three arrests and initiated criminal proceedings against three individuals. Finfluencers are social media personalities who promote financial products and share advice with their followers. This international action aims to ensure they operate within regulatory boundaries, protecting consumers from potential financial harm. Many are acting legitimately and not breaking any laws – but others may tout products or services illegally and without authorisation through online videos and posts, where they use the pretence of a lavish lifestyle, often falsely, to promote success, the regulator said. The FCA said it has also made thee arrests with the support of the City of London Police and authorised criminal proceedings against three people. Steve Smart, joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: 'Our message to finfluencers is loud and clear. They must act responsibly and only promote financial products where they are authorised to do so – or face the consequences.' Meanwhile, the Treasury Committee said it had sent a letter to Meta, owners of Facebook and Instagram, asking for information on its approach to financial influencers. The committee said the correspondence follows evidence from FCA officials to the committee in April that it had taken Meta up to six weeks to act on alerts on individual influencers. The committee has asked Meta to set out to it why 'it has taken you on occasion up to six weeks to respond to a takedown request from the Financial Conduct Authority?' It has also asked Meta in the letter to set out the number of days allowed to elapse in which posts that the FCA requested to be taken down have remained online. The request covers the past 12 months and the committee has asked for a reply by June 20 2025. The FCA said that consumers should check its warning list before making any decision about how to invest their money. Its InvestSmart page contains information to help people make investment decisions. Sam Richardson, deputy editor of Which? Money, said: 'With more people turning to social media for investment advice, so-called finfluencers can be the deciding factor in make-or-break financial decisions for many people. 'They can be based anywhere in the world, so it's good to see the FCA working with other regulators on this crackdown.' He added: 'We highly recommend that anyone looking for information before investing includes well-established and reputable sources in their research, and if seeking financial advice they obtain it from professionals or companies that are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Chess: Carlsen targets last classical hurrah at Stavanger after defeat against Gukesh
Magnus Carlsen's shock loss to Gukesh Dommaraju was the world No 1's first classical defeat by a classical world champion since he lost to Vishy Anand 15 years ago at the 2010 London Classic. It spoilt what should have been a winning position for him at Stavanger, where he was poised to break clear of the field. There are now suggestions that this will be Carlsen's farewell appearance in classical. He told Take Take Take: 'It's a long time since I enjoyed a classical tournament.' Meanwhile, though, Carlsen could go out on a high on Friday afternoon when he and Gukesh fight for first prize in the final round at Stavanger (4pm start), with Hikaru Nakamura and Fabiano Caruana also still in contention. Advertisement Scores are Carlsen (Norway) 15, Gukesh (India) 14.5, Nakamura (US) 13, Caruana (US) 12.5, Arjun Erigaisi (India) 11.5, Wei Yi (China) 8. Last round pairings are Erigaisi v Carlsen, Caruana v Gukesh, Wei v Nakamura. The cream of the world's chess players will come to the Novotel London West Hotel, Hammersmith next week, for the World Rapid and Blitz championships, with an opportunity for Londoners to watch them in action. Play is daily from 1.30pm to 8.30pm from Wednesday 11 June to Sunday 15 June. Tickets are limited, and priced accordingly. There are expected to be 55 teams, many of them English, with such well-known names as Nakamura and Ian Nepomniachtchi, playing 12 rounds of rapid and a mixed format of blitz chess. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have entered strong national teams, but the strongest of them all are the top seeds, WR, which is short for Wadim Rosenstein, a German millionaire who has hired the elite including Nakamura and Nepomniachtchi to play for him, with himself as the captain. The WR squad also includes two of the best women players, Hou Yifan and Alexandra Kosteniuk. Other familiar names are Alireza Firouzja, Nigel Short, Anand, and Erigaisi, but there will be no Carlsen, as the Norwegian has fallen out with Fide. Advertisement England will have numerous teams, amounting to an impressive defence of national honour. Seeded 9th are Malcolm's Mates(ECF international director, Malcolm Pein) which is effectively the England team of Luke McShane, Gawain Jones, Michael Adams, Nikita Vitiugov, Elmira Mirzoeva on the women's board, and a 1900-rated amateur. Seeded 19th are e-therapeutics containing several GM blitz specialists plus England's 10-year-old Bodhana Sivanandan who is strong in fast play. Seeded 24th are Wood Green, runners-up in the British 4NCL League. Seeded 26th are Sharks 4NCL, another strong 4NCL team, while 26th are Sassy Seniors, a 50+ England team led by two grandmasters. Several of the English teams will be composed predominantly of young players who will be looking eagerly for chances of giantkilling, so some sharp attacking games will be likely. A new name to look out for is Russia's Roman Shogdzhiev, who has become the youngest ever international master at age 10. Last week's strong Cambridge tournament was won jointly by the eight-time British champion Michael Adams and by the former Australian and New Zealand blitz champion Brandon Clarke, who both totalled 7.5/9. Clarke's final round win was achieved with the Hungarian Dragon Sicilian in only 21 moves. Advertisement The game is an offbeat line, which Black knew better than White. The engine assesses White's 16th as the decisive error and much prefers 16 0-0-0. Over three years of the Cambridge tournament Adams has now won first prize, alone or jointly, every time and has played 27 games without defeat. This was an impressive performance by a man in his 50s against predominantly younger rivals and testifies to the Cornishman's excellent judgment of the pace of a tournament, knowing when to press and when to take an occasional short draw. His closest rival throughout the three years has probably been Dan Fernandez, as the younger grandmaster continues his campaign for a place in the England team. The other England players seem to have tacitly accepted that Cambridge is Adams's personal kingdom. The major prizes at Cambridge are £1500-£750-£600, as against £6,000-£3,000-£2,000-£1500 for the British Championship at Liverpool in August, for which Vitiugov and Jones have already entered, while prizes for the English Championship at Warwick in July are £2,000-£1250-£750, so that is probably a factor. 3975: 1 Bxh6+! Kxh6 (if 1…Kg8 2 Bxf8 Bxf8 3 Nxg6 wins) 2 Nxf7+! Qxf7 3 Rxe7! and if Qxe7 4 Qxg6 mate.