Godzille enters the fray: Let the local government elections games begin
That's not my opinion, but that of ChatGTP, responding to my question as to what would happen to a municipality if a toxic leader were to parachute in and take over. And the 'toxic' label was also not attached by this writer but by former Joburg mayor Herman Mashaba.
'When a toxic leader from outside takes over the mayoral position in a municipality, the effects can ripple through nearly every aspect of local governance and community life.'
Of course, the paratrooper leader in question is none other than DA Federal Chair Helen Zille, otherwise known as Godzille to those who view her as a political version of that fearful half-gorilla-half-whale fictional monster.
And this isn't just a dream – or a nightmare for those scared of her – it can actually happen in a matter of months. The Cape-based never-say-die disruptor can easily move in with her sister or someone like that, and qualify as a resident of the once-shiny City of Gold. Dealing with the party's primaries – the mayoral candidate screening and interviews – would be a breeze. I wouldn't be surprised to see her smiling assassin face on the ballot paper and the street posters. And with her GNU wheeling and dealing experience, she can easily take over the hot seat – depending, of course, on what the people say during the upcoming elections.
The crumbling city that is still Mzansi's economic hub does indeed require some drastic shake-up, but I fear Godzille would shake it beyond repair. But let's all just watch and see – especially those of us watching from a distance but with hopes of seeing the rot come to a stop and things turn around.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump can keep national guard deployed to Los Angeles for now, appeals court rules
A US appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of national guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court's ruling blocking the mobilisation. The 9th US circuit court of appeals' decision does not mean the court will ultimately agree with Trump, but it means he will maintain command of the guard for now. On Thursday, San Francisco-based US district judge Charles Breyer found Trump's deployment of the guard was unlawful. Breyer had ordered the national guard to return to the control of California governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Judge temporarily bars Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles
In a major blow to the Trump administration, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on said the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion.' Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterizing the protests as a rebellion. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote. The Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling. Trump summoned military troops to Los Angeles to support a civilian police operation over the objection of Newsom, an extraordinary and rarely used measure. The ruling came hours after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to 'liberate' Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarization generated by Trump's approach to immigration enforcement and use of presidential power. Trump summoned first the National Guard, then the Marines, to help federal police forces guard federal buildings from protesters and to protect federal immigration agents as they pick up suspected violators. Trump has defended his decision, saying if he had not done so the city would be in flames. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence and restricted to a few city blocks. California also requested that Breyer bar troops from participating in arrests or patrolling communities, as well as to limit the military to protecting federal buildings and personnel. But the judge said it was too soon to rule on that question because it was not clear whether the military was actually engaging in law enforcement activities. The Trump administration denied that the National Guard was participating in law enforcement. Some 700 U.S. Marines will be on the streets of the city by Thursday or Friday, the military has said, to support up to 4,000 National Guard troops. Breyer did not order any immediate change to Trump's deployment of U.S. Marines, over whom Trump has more direct authority as commander-in-chief. But Breyer wrote that the Trump administration's 'use of the National Guard and the Marines comes into conflict with California's police power' and that 'restraining the President's use of military force in Los Angeles is in the public interest.' In his ruling, Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters and depriving the state of California of the ability to use the Guard for other purposes, such as fighting fires and drug smuggling. Breyer noted that Trump's deployment threatened other states as well by upsetting the balance of power between federal and state governments. Newsom said at a press conference he expected the ruling to stand on appeal. Trump, Newsom said, 'is not a monarch, he is not a king and he should stop acting like one.' (Reporting by Brad Brooks, Sandra Stojanovic, Omar Younis, Jane Ross and Arafat Barbakh in Los Angeles, Luc Cohen and Dietrich Knauth in New York, and Idrees Ali in Washington; Additional reporting by Costas Pitas, Christian Martinez, Ryan Jones, Ted Hesson, Abhirup Roy and Alexia Garamfalvi; Writing by Daniel Trotta and James Oliphant; Editing by Saad Sayeed, Ross Colvin, Mary Milliken, Nick Zieminski, Diane Craft and Edwina Gibbs)
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Gayton McKenzie and Liam Jacobs clash in heated exchange over NAC appointment and party politics
Minister Gayton McKenzie has responded to reports claiming he is ghosting important committee meetings Image: Gayton McKenzie/Facebook What started as a debate over political appointments escalated into a war of words this week, with Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie accusing DA MP Liam Jacobs of disrespectful conduct and veiled political bias. The clash was triggered during a parliamentary committee meeting where Jacobs questioned McKenzie's decision to appoint Eugene Botha—a fellow member of the Patriotic Alliance (PA)—as chair of the National Arts Council (NAC). Jacobs also claimed that McKenzie had previously removed PA members from Parliament, a charge the minister flatly denied, calling such an action a 'thuggish act.' 'We must investigate whether there is actual ethics that can be found in this. We must investigate the potential of conflict of interest,' Jacobs said. 'I want to understand his understanding as to why a member of the PA became the chair of the board, being a member of the PA while he, as a minister, is a member of the PA. What is the rationale?' McKenzie asserted the appointment was lawful and rejecting Jacobs' concerns as a political attack cloaked in moral language. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'Jacobs knows that I haven't breached any act or law, hence he's talking about ethics. My ethics and his ethics are different. Ethics are debatable. Some people say it's ethical to have an abortion, other people say it's unethical. We are not dealing with what he feels and what I feel. He admitted that the Act allows me to appoint Eugene Botha,' McKenzie said. He went further, pointing out what he sees as hypocrisy in Jacobs' criticism. 'Two, he talks about my party membership. I'm going to give him a name: Tim Harris. Tim Harris was previously a member of the DA. He served as a DA member of the National Assembly. He held other DA-related positions. He was the CEO of Wesgro. Now he mustn't come here and say it has never happened where a party member is part of a board. Our constitution does not disallow you from becoming a member of a board. Our constitution is very clear—political affiliation is your right.' Tensions escalated as Jacobs pushed for clarity on whether McKenzie saw a potential conflict in leading the panel that appointed Botha. 'Chairperson, I would like to ask the minister: does he contend that there might be a conflict of interest between himself, the person leading the interview panel, and the chairperson of the board?' Jacobs asked. McKenzie dismissed the notion, calling it "laughable". 'Does knowing someone equate to conflict of interest? That is laughable. I know him. I know you. Knowing someone does not equal conflict of interest.' Democratic Alliance's (DA) member of the portfolio committee on Department of Sports, Arts and Culture Image: Facebook/Liam Jacobs
