Aide's rise under Hegseth scrutinized in White House, Pentagon
Pete Hegseth's 100-day tenure as defense secretary has brought an unceremonious end to the careers of numerous top military officers - but it has also created unexpected avenues for advancement, including for one Marine who has thrown his lot in with the controversial Pentagon chief.
Biden-era officials say they were flabbergasted when Ricky Buria, a respected officer who worked closely with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, abruptly set aside a promising future in uniform to assume a political position as a senior adviser to Hegseth, whose security lapses and anti-diversity agenda have fueled widespread calls from Democrats, and at least one Republican, to resign.
Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post.
The change in course by Buria, who had been seen as a rising star in the Marine Corps, underscores the different ways in which Hegseth's disruptive approach is impacting the military ranks, summarily ousting at least nine senior officers, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, while creating unconventional - and professionally risky - opportunities for others.
It also illustrates how the increasingly politicized climate enveloping what has been one of America's most independent institutions has created risks even for allies of the defense secretary, as White House officials and other Republicans voice concern about Buria - even after his recent, unexpected retirement - because of his association with Austin and his status as one of the few top aides who span the administrations.
'In a place with a lot of purity tests,' one person familiar with the issue said, 'that could be a kiss of death.'
Buria did not respond to a request for comment. Neither did spokespeople for Hegseth.
Some Republicans loyal to the president have sought to block the elevation of Buria, whom officials say Hegseth has openly considered for his next chief of staff following a purge of top aides, by alerting the White House to his background, said two people familiar with the issue. Officials there have begun to ask questions about him, one of those officials said. Like others, they spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters.
Buria, an MV-22 pilot who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, has emerged as a top contender for one of the Pentagon's most powerful jobs only months after being named as Austin's junior military aide. In a prestigious but unglamorous role, a junior military aide typically acts as a defense secretary's 'body man,' shadowing him at the Pentagon or overseas, getting his meals and ensuring necessary documents are in hand for meetings or public remarks. The job exposes officers to top-level operations and typically opens doors leading to the military's highest ranks.
Former officials who worked alongside Buria in the Biden administration said the Marine was usually the first person to greet Austin at the Pentagon in the morning and would typically remain until the retired general was ready to go home. They described Buria as competent and focused, and said he never gave any indication about his political views or suggested he disagreed with Biden-era policies.
'He was an absolute professional,' one former official said.
When Austin stepped down in January, Buria posted words of praise and gratitude for some of the outgoing secretary's political aides, including deputy Pentagon press secretary Sabrina Singh.
'I can't wait to serve with you again,' Buria wrote on LinkedIn.
When Hegseth arrived at the Pentagon in January, Buria quickly became close with the former Fox News host and his wife, Jennifer, according to people familiar with the inner workings of Hegseth's team. They attributed that partly to Buria's role, in which he saw Pete Hegseth daily and traveled with him on weekends to Tennessee, where the Hegseths own a home. Hegseth, who came to his role with little Washington experience, also bounced ideas off Buria, they said.
His stature in Hegseth's circle grew in February when Hegseth fired Buria's boss, Air Force Lt. Gen. Jennifer Short, whom Austin had appointed as senior military aide, another nonpartisan role typically held by a three-star military officer who bridges administrations and has often gone on to be promoted to a high-profile job.
Her firing left a vacancy that Hegseth let Buria fill temporarily. As such, he was seated alongside Hegseth for bilateral meetings with foreign dignitaries, an unusual move for an officer of his rank. His relative influence expanded again when, in a sign of upheaval among his top advisers, Hegseth's chief of staff, Joe Kasper, stepped aside and other senior aides were forced out amid a leak investigation.
That Buria had assumed Short's role rubbed some the wrong way at the Pentagon, where hierarchy and tradition can be sacrosanct. Generals and other military staff grumbled about Buria, who was promoted to the rank of colonel only last fall, delivering curt messages from Hegseth to officers far more senior, two officials said.
The arrival in April of Army Lt. Gen. Christopher LaNeve as Hegseth's new senior military assistant shifted the dynamics again. Buria was due to return to his less-influential role, which people familiar with the issue said made the prospect of leaving the military for an advisory position appealing despite the controversy that has largely defined Hegseth's stewardship of the institution.
'It was going to be hard for him to step back into the JMA role,' one person familiar with the issue said, using an acronym for junior military assistant. 'He was telling certain folks that he was willing to retire and become a civilian person all the way back in March.'
Buria's move appears all the more surprising because of the stark contrast between the two men he has served in the Pentagon's executive suite: Austin, a reserved retired four-star general who largely avoided the spotlight after becoming the first African American defense secretary, and Hegseth, a former National Guard major and conservative TV personality who has routinely attacked critics on social media and focused on rooting out the military's diversity programs.
Despite Democrats' criticism of Hegseth, he has remained defiant - and President Donald Trump has voiced his support.
'I have so much confidence in him,' Trump told supporters in Michigan on Tuesday night. 'The fake news is after him, really after him, but he's a tough cookie. They don't know how tough he is.'
Some former officials who praised Buria's performance under Austin questioned whether his gamble would pay off.
'It seems like a miscalculation, with Hegseth on the ropes,' one former official said.
'He went from being in a low-key, safe position under Hegseth to a white-hot dangerous one,' said another.
Former officials noted that successful chiefs of staff at the Pentagon, with its budget of more than $800 billion and a famously unwieldy bureaucracy, often have broad experience across government agencies and Congress, credentials many military officers lack.
Given Hegseth's lack of experience in Washington policymaking, 'he really needs ballast in the team underneath him,' one of the former officials said.
For Buria to retire with his current rank, a consideration with significant implications for his retirement pay, he would need to either serve as a colonel for two years or seek and receive a waiver from the Defense Department, defense officials familiar with the issue said.
In recent days, Buria has stepped out as a voice for the 'Make America Great Again' movement, setting up a social media account on X and boosting posts from Hegseth, the White House and other administration accounts that boast about Trump's record and tout the military's expanded role on the southern border and its steps to tighten fitness standards for troops.
He has also echoed attacks by Trump and Hegseth on the media, a frequent target of both officials when they face criticism.
'Results…not fake news!' Buria wrote. 'Thank you President Trump for your clear leadership!'
Related Content
You can read with a cat on your lap at this bookstore, then adopt the cat
What does it take to beat an evil empire? 'Andor' knows.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Toby Doeden, conservative Aberdeen businessman, files for South Dakota governor
A second expected entrant to South Dakota's distant gubernatorial race has filed with the state. Aberdeen businessman and conservative activist Toby Doeden filed a statement of organization for "Toby Doeden for South Dakota," a statewide gubernatorial candidate committee established on May 22, according to the South Dakota Secretary of State's website. Doeden has scheduled an event at 5 p.m. CDT, May 28, at Wylie Park Pavilion in Aberdeen. He is expected to publicly announce his campaign for the governor nomination there. Jessica Post, general manager of 5-Star Management LLC, an Aberdeen property management company, is listed as committee treasurer. Doeden is the president of Doeden Investment Group, an investment firm, which includes Post on its staff page. Doeden is the chair of Dakota First Action, a statewide political action committee that boosted populist and anti-carbon pipeline candidates into the state legislature in 2024. Doeden has never held a political office, and he refers to himself as a "successful businessman, a bold conservative, and a dedicated family man" on his website. Politically, Doeden presents a conservative option that aligns with President Donald Trump's "America First" policies and sits farther to the right than other prominent South Dakota's Republicans, like Gov. Larry Rhoden and U.S. Rep. Dusty Johnson, both of whom are anticipated to run for governor but have yet to publicly announce campaigns. Doeden would be the second to enter South Dakota's contest for the job after state House Speaker Jon Hansen, who announced his run for governor along with Speaker Pro Tempore Karla Lems as lieutenant governor in April. Doeden's PAC entered hot water with the state's Republican establishment in October 2024 when he refused to cancel a speaking engagement with then-Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson of North Carolina at Dakota First Action gala event. Robinson was accused of writing several controversial statements on an online board in the 2000s, including calling himself a "black NAZI," CNN reporting. More: Mark Robinson drops speaking slot at SD fundraiser to help with hurricane recovery amid scandal Robinson later dropped the speaking engagement of his own accord and provided a pre-recorded video in order to assist in North Carolina's disaster response following 2024's Hurricane Helene. He later dropped a lawsuit against the network for its reporting. This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: South Dakota governor election: Aberdeen's Toby Doeden joins race
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judges reportedly eye new security measures as Trump's rhetorical attacks get worse
In the run-up to Election Day 2024, Donald Trump invested a fair amount of time in condemning those who criticize judges — as if his own rhetorical record didn't exist. Such criticisms, the Republican said in August, are 'probably illegal.' Two weeks later, he went a little further, adding that judicial criticisms should be 'illegal.' If that wasn't quite enough, Trump — who'd spent years publicly chastising judges — went so far as to declare, 'These people should be put in jail the way they talk about our judges.' A lot has changed since then. In an all-caps Memorial Day screed posted to his social media platform, for example, the incumbent president condemned 'USA-hating judges who suffer from an ideology that is sick and very dangerous for our country.' The Republican went on to refer to unnamed judges as 'monsters who want our country to go to hell.' The inflammatory rhetoric was not a one-off; presidential comments like these have become quite common of late. In March, for example, Trump also wrote, 'Radical Left Judges could very well lead to the destruction of our Country! These people are Lunatics, who do not care, even a little bit, about the repercussions from their very dangerous and incorrect Decisions and Rulings. ... The danger is unparalleled!' Radical condemnations like these are creating a dangerous environment in which judges, and even their family members, are increasingly concerned about their personal safety. Reuters reported in March that U.S. marshals warned that federal judges are facing 'unusually high threat levels as tech billionaire Elon Musk and other Trump administration allies ramp up efforts to discredit judges who stand in the way of White House efforts.' The good news is that federal judges already enjoy the protection of the U.S. Marshals Service. The bad news is that the U.S. Marshals Service reports to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Justice Department — which currently answers to the same president who's accused federal judges of being 'monsters' and 'lunatics' who are creating existential risks for the nation. In April, The New York Times reported on a recent meeting of the Judicial Conference, which oversees the administration of the federal courts. The article noted, 'Behind closed doors at one session, Judge Richard J. Sullivan, the chairman of the conference's Committee on Judicial Security, raised a scenario that weeks before would have sounded like dystopian fiction, according to three officials familiar with the remarks, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations: What if the White House were to withdraw the protections it provides to judges?' Over the weekend, The Wall Street Journal published a related report: Amid rising tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary, some federal judges are beginning to discuss the idea of managing their own armed security force. The notion came up in a series of closed-door meetings in early March, when a group of roughly 50 judges met in Washington for a semiannual meeting of the Judicial Conference, a policymaking body for the federal judiciary. There, members of a security committee spoke about threats emerging as President Trump stepped up criticism of those who rule against his policies. The reporting, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, echoed the Times' article, noted that some federal judges 'worried that Trump could order the marshals to stand down in retaliation for a decision that didn't go his way.' To that end, some jurists are reportedly weighing the possibility of the judiciary creating its own security force, while Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey is pushing new legislation that would shift control of the U.S. Marshals Service to the courts from the DOJ. A Justice Department spokesperson described these concerns as 'absurd.' That said, this is the same Justice Department led by a Trump loyalist who's also used highly provocative rhetoric related to the courts, including a recent interview in which the attorney general said judges who rule against Trump's agenda are 'deranged.' As part of the same conservative media appearance, Bondi even raised the prospect of arresting more judges. Given the circumstances, can you blame members of the judiciary for eyeing some systemic concerns? Judge John Coughenour of the Western District of Washington, who's had a SWAT team called on him, told the Journal that the proposal to move the Marshals under judiciary was a 'wonderful idea.' 'There's never been any reason in the 43 years that I've been on the bench to worry that the Marshals Service would do whatever was appropriate — until recent years,' Coughenour said. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump threatens to withhold federal funding from California over transgender athlete
President Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened to withhold federal funding from the state of California over a transgender athlete's participation in an upcoming sporting event — the latest example of the president trying to use funding as leverage to enact his agenda. 'Please be hereby advised that large scale Federal Funding will be held back, maybe permanently, if the Executive Order on this subject matter is not adhered to,' the president wrote in a post on Truth Social, alluding to his February executive order banning transgender women from competing in women's sports, which delivered on one of his key campaign issues. The president added that he will speak to California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom later Tuesday. CNN has reached out to the White House and the governor's office. Newsom — who's recently taken aim at a number of causes popular among progressives — has previously said that transgender athletes playing in women's sports is 'an issue of fairness' in a break from most Democrats' position on the topic. 'Well, I think it's an issue of fairness. I completely agree with you on that. It is an issue of fairness. It's deeply unfair,' Newsom said in a podcast episode with conservative activist Charlie Kirk in March. Trump referred to those comments in his Truth Social post Tuesday, writing, 'The Governor, himself, said it is 'UNFAIR.' I will speak to him today to find out which way he wants to go???' Trump added: 'In the meantime I am ordering local authorities, if necessary, to not allow the transitioned person to compete in the State Finals. This is a totally ridiculous situation!!!' He did not name the athlete. Trump's executive order, titled 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports,' leans on compliance with Title IX, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities that receive funding from the federal government, as well as federal engagement with the private sector. The Justice Department in April sued Maine over its refusal to comply with Trump's order, alleging that the state is violating Title IX and ramping up the administration's feud with Democratic Gov. Janet Mills. Trump had earlier threatened to strip Maine of its federal funding should the state not comply with his directive.