US shipbuilding in a ‘perpetual state of triage,' watchdog says
The U.S. Navy is hoping to nearly double the amount of battle force ships in oceans around the world within the next three decades — a jump from 296 ships, including submarines, aircraft carriers and destroyers, to 381.
The current state of American shipbuilding, however, is sorely in need of a complete overhaul if that plan is to be achieved, according to recent testimony and a new government watchdog report.
'It is way past time that we get after it,' Dr. Brett A. Seidle, acting assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition, told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday.
'Simply put, we need more ships delivered on time and on budget and we are challenged in both of these arenas. Costs are rising faster than inflation and schedules on multiple programs are delayed one to three years late.'
The same day as Seidle's testimony, the Government Accountability Office released a report detailing 20 years' of lackluster progress in U.S. shipbuilding. Not enough ships are being built, newly constructed ships are failing to function as expected and ships are being delivered up to three years later than ordered, the report said.
While the Navy nearly doubled its shipbuilding budget during the last two decades, it failed to reach its planned ship count, according to GAO.
Seidle offered ideas for solutions during his testimony Tuesday, including 'increased modernization, infrastructure investment, better workforce hiring and retention, and improved supply chain performance.'
In a statement to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Shelby S. Oakley, a director at GAO, said that unrealistic expectations of costs and timing has diverted resources and introduced delays in shipbuilding, with the result that Navy programs and shipbuilders have been 'effectively made to operate in a perpetual state of triage.'
'We found that Navy ships cost billions more and take years longer to build than planned while often falling short of quality and performance expectations,' Oakley said.
Since 2015, GAO has made 90 recommendations to the Navy to improve shipbuilding. Only 30 of those have been partially or fully addressed to date.
Shipyards, military clinics exempted from Pentagon hiring freeze
Shipbuilding is a complex process. To build a ship takes eight phases on average, from the award of a contract to design and construction phases, and eventually ending in launch and delivery of the vessel. The Navy currently has 92 ships under contract with 56 actively undergoing construction, according to the Defense Department.
The GAO's grim report comes at a time when the current administration has announced plans to create a new White House Office of Shipbuilding, and the DOD has prioritized a focus on the Indo-Pacific region across all branches.
In February, the cruiser San Diego made a historic visit to the Japanese port of Ishigaki to strengthen ties, while throughout March and April, the U.S. Army's Project Capstone 5 exercise is expanding its focus to include scenarios about the Indo-Pacific region.
The U.S. Naval Forces Central Command in Bahrain also hosted Vigilant Resolve, a 'first-of-its-kind' exercise involving mass casualty, a shelter-in-place order and the evacuation of noncombatants — preparing naval personnel and U.S. partners for a large-scale international emergency response.
'I fervently believe our Navy has never been more important than it is right now,' Seidle told lawmakers this week. 'The United States projects its presence around the globe via our blue-water Navy, impacting geopolitical decisions on a daily basis and helping to maintain our way of life.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Today in History: June 8, Trump indicted on classified document charges
In 1789, in an address to the US House of Representatives, James Madison proposed amending the Constitution to include a Bill of Rights. In 1949, George Orwell's novel '1984' was first published. In 1966, a merger was announced between the National and American Football Leagues, to take effect in 1970. In 1967, during the Six-Day War, 34 American crew members were killed when Israel attacked the USS Liberty, a Navy intelligence-gathering ship in the Mediterranean Sea. (Israel later said the Liberty had been mistaken for an Egyptian vessel.) In 1968, US authorities announced the capture in London of James Earl Ray, the suspected assassin of civil rights leader the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. In 1978, a jury in Clark County, Nev., ruled the so-called 'Mormon Will,' purportedly written by the late billionaire Howard Hughes, was a forgery. Advertisement In 1995, US Marines rescued Captain Scott O'Grady, whose F-16C fighter jet had been shot down by Bosnian Serbs on June 2. In 2009, North Korea's highest court sentenced American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee to 12 years' hard labor for trespassing and 'hostile acts.' (The women were pardoned in early August 2009 after a trip to Pyongyang by former President Bill Clinton.) In 2017, former FBI Director James Comey, testifying before Congress, asserted that President Trump fired him to interfere with Comey's investigation of Russia's ties to the Trump campaign. In 2021, Ratko Mladić, the military chief known as the 'Butcher of Bosnia' for orchestrating genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in the Balkan nation's 1992-95 war, lost his final legal battle when UN judges rejected his appeal and affirmed his life sentence. In 2023, PresidentTrump was indicted by a grand jury in Miami on 37 felony counts related to the alleged mishandling of classified documents that had been moved to Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Florida home. (The case against Trump was abandoned following Trump's November 2024 presidential election victory.)
Hamilton Spectator
38 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London
BEIJING (AP) — U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs. Both sides agreed in Geneva last month to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession . Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. Technology is a major sticking point The latest frictions began just a day after the May 12 announcement of the Geneva agreement to 'pause' tariffs for 90 days. The U.S. Commerce Department issued guidance saying the use of Ascend AI chips from Huawei , a leading Chinese tech company, could violate U.S. export controls. That's because the chips were likely developed with American technology despite restrictions on its export to China, the guidance said. The Chinese government wasn't pleased . One of its biggest beefs in recent years has been over U.S. moves to limit the access of Chinese companies to technology, and in particular to equipment and processes needed to produce the most advanced semiconductors. 'The Chinese side urges the U.S. side to immediately correct its erroneous practices,' a Commerce Ministry spokesperson said. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wasn't in Geneva but will join the talks in London. Analysts say that suggests at least a willingness on the U.S. side to hear out China's concerns on export controls . China shows signs of easing up on rare earths One area where China holds the upper hand is in the mining and processing of rare earths . They are crucial for not only autos but also a range of other products from robots to military equipment. The Chinese government started requiring producers to obtain a license to export seven rare earth elements in April. Resulting shortages sent automakers worldwide into a tizzy. As stockpiles ran down, some worried they would have to halt production. Trump, without mentioning rare earths specifically, took to social media to attack China. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted on May 30. The Chinese government indicated Saturday that it is addressing the concerns, which have come from European companies as well. A Commerce Ministry statement said it had granted some approvals and 'will continue to strengthen the approval of applications that comply with regulations.' The scramble to resolve the rare earth issue shows that China has a strong card to play if it wants to strike back against tariffs or other measures. Plan to revoke student visas adds to tensions Student visas don't normally figure in trade talks, but a U.S. announcement that it would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students has emerged as another thorn in the relationship. China's Commerce Ministry raised the issue when asked last week about the accusation that it had violated the consensus reached in Geneva. It replied that the U.S. had undermined the agreement by issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China and saying it would revoke Chinese student visas. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the ministry said in a statement posted on its website. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a May 28 statement that the United States would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' More than 270,000 Chinese students studied in the U.S. in the 2023-24 academic year. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Gen Z Doesn't Seem To Care About Protesting Against Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "Where the f*** is Gen Z?" asked TikTok creator @djangita in a video, which has at the time of reporting been viewed 2.3 million times, filmed at a protest in April. Since the reelection of President Donald Trump, thousands of people have turned out at protests across the country, including the "Not My Presidents Day" demonstrations in February, "Hands Off!" protests in April and "May Day" protests last month. And while protest movements have historically been driven by young people, the crowds at these protests seem noticeably older. So, where is Gen Z? Has the generation committed to a life of tradwives and the manosphere, leaving activism behind? Are they simply disenfranchised? Or has activism taken on a new meaning for a generation raised on tech? Newsweek spoke with experts to find out more. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Where Is Gen Z, politically? Looking at the perceived absence of Gen Z from the protest scene, the easy conclusion to make is they're not protesting Trump because they support him. The reality is a bit more complicated. As with much of American politics, where Gen Z sits politically is in a state of sharp polarization. Trump has had a significant amount of support from young men, having secured 55 percent of the vote from men aged 18 to 29 in 2024. There is, though, a wide gender gap in this age group, with 61 percent of women from the same demographic having voted for Vice President Kamala Harris. As of late April 2025, though, polling found that Trump's support among Gen Z had tailed off since the election, with 37 percent approving of him and 58 percent disapproving. Shifting Protest Culture It's not that young people are completely absent from political protests. "Young people's participation in major protests on issues like gun violence after the Parkland school shooting in 2018, racial justice after the George Floyd murder in 2020 and the Israel-Palestine conflict in the past two years have been a major feature of this generation's political engagement," Alberto Medina, communications team lead at the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), told Newsweek via email. But there's been a recent shift, and the image of an angry young person at a protest could now be relegated to the historical archives. "At the hands-off rally, there was a very clear demographic representation that excluded younger people," Dana Fisher, director of the Center for Environment, Community & Equity and a professor at America University, told Newsweek, adding that young people are "just not turning up at these mainstream protest events." As for why, Fisher said: "Young people are feeling really frustrated with the political process. They're feeling really frustrated with the two-party system in America, and they have lost confidence in the notion that democracy in America can work for them." She recounted an interaction with a young student in her research team who put it bluntly, telling her: "Young people have given up on democracy in America." And young people's relationship with activism is changing, too. Newsweek spoke with Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run for Something, about this. "We have to consider that over the last year and a half, or last two years, when Gen Z has showed up to protest at college campuses in the last year in particular around what's happening in Gaza, they have been harangued, harassed, kicked out of school," Litman said. "They have faced incredible consequences. "I think the culture of protest, even in the last two years, has changed drastically." The current conflict between Israel and Hamas began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched an attack on Israel in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage. Israel retaliated and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to eradicate Hamas. The Gaza Health Ministry reports that at least 54,677 Palestinians have been killed since the conflict began, and there is a widespread humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with nearly all of the population having been displaced, according to the U.N. Students at universities across America have protested the conflict, with Columbia University becoming the epicenter of pro-Palestinian protests last spring. Protests have led to arrests, unrest and concerns have been raised about antisemitism. Commitment To Other Causes But just because Gen Z isn't out on the streets protesting Trump doesn't mean they're not out on the streets protesting. "A lot of young people who were engaged in all sorts of activism [are] shifting their focus to Gaza in the past year, year and a half since the violence broke out," Fisher told Newsweek. Newsweek spoke with Hatem Abudayyeh, national chair of the U.S. Palestinian Community Network (USPCN) about Gen Z presence at pro-Palestine protests. "We're still organizing protests every single week, and we still have a lot of college students, and even high-school-age students, Gen Z kids, who are coming to those," he said. "College-age young people and campus organizers and activists have been a part of all the social justice movements in the United States for decades." Pointing to the encampments and college protests, he said: "That clearly was something that not only the Palestine Support Movement had not seen in the United States before, but none of the social justice movements had seen [it] in the U.S. before since probably the Vietnam War era," and described Israel vs. Palestinians as "the Vietnam War issue of this era." New Era Of Activism It seems that activism, and political engagement itself, is changing significantly for young people. "It's evolving," Litman said. "Not all activism is flashy. It doesn't always make for a compelling video or photo. That doesn't mean it doesn't work." "In the first Trump administration, protesting was one of the primary ways that people showed their anger at Trump. And that was good for that moment. But we also saw the limits of that as a tactic. Gen Z is thinking about different ways that they can make their voice heard. "We're seeing young people be really intentional about the ways in which they can move the needle," Litman added, pointing to consumer activism and social media activism and highlighting that Trump cares about the latter. Medina told Newsweek:"Engagement online can serve as an entry point for youth to learn about and find opportunities to engage in issue advocacy or other forms of political participation. The key is ensuring that those opportunities are available and accessible to young people, that the structures and support systems are in place for youth to get involved and find political homes. "Young people are looking for opportunities to learn, to be heard and to have an impact on issues they care about. That process can begin with a post on social media but requires more sustained support that can empower youth to do more than be passive consumers of political ads or information." And beyond the discourse online or on the streets protesting, Litman highlighted one thing young people are clearly thinking about: running for office, she said. "Run for Something has had nearly 50,000 young people raise their hands to say they want to run for office in the last seven months," she said. "We've had more people raise their hands since the election than we did in the first three years of Trump's first term."
