Downtown business files suit, claims streetscape project damaged property
ASHLAND A downtown business has filed a lawsuit against the City of Ashland, former engineer and contractors tasked with completing the Winchester Avenue Streetscape Project, claiming the city refused to rectify damages partly due to the store owner's opposition to the project.
The owners of Lara's Bridals & Formals filed a complaint in Boyd County Circuit Court late last month against the city, former Director of Engineering Steve Cole, Allard Excavation, LLC, and Palmer Engineering Company, outlining negligence and tortious interference with business relations, negatively impacting business inventory and profits.
Per the plaintiffs, sidewalk removal adjacent to their property, located at the corner of Winchester Avenue and 15th Street, was done so without proper drainage or erosion controls, resulting in water infiltration to the business's basement each time it rained in the spring of 2024 — during the time frame the plaintiffs allege the streetscape project was 'expedited.'
Per the suit, the shop owners had multiple conversations with city officials, including former City Manager Mike Graese, Cole and representatives with Allard Excavation and Palmer Engineering, but that no actions were taken that remedied the water infiltration.
The alleged inaction was a breach of the city and project overseer's 'duty of reasonable care' to the business, including the installation of 'defective or improper materials, such as brick pavers over sand which exacerbated water intrusion into the subject property.'
Specifically, plaintiffs allege the city (through their supervision of engineer Cole), ignored or inadequately responded to the repeated complaints, as Cole allegedly refused to follow recommendations of Allard and Palmer to identify the cause of pooling water, which seeped down the walls and collected in the basement of the dress shop after contractors unsealed a former coal chute that extended beneath the concrete sidewalks.
'Defendant City knew or should have known the defendants Allard and Palmer, in concert or coordination with Cole, had improperly planned, designed, supervised and implemented the streetscape project and negligently accelerated the completion of (the project) in December 2023, posing an unreasonable and foreseeable risk of damage to the plaintiffs and others similarly situated within the City of Ashland,' the complaint reads.
Furthermore, dress shop representatives claim after raising numerous concerns with the ongoing water infiltration, in April 2024, parties associated with each defendant, including Graese and Cole, 'arrived at the subject property unannounced and questioned Plaintiff in an aggressive manner that suggested that she had in some way caused the water infiltration.'
With the alleged problems still unresolved, the complaint alleges the city's current Economic Development Specialist, Eden McKenzie, 'acknowledged that, as a result of the streetscape project, both the Putnam Building and Highlands Museum had nearly identical water infiltration damage as that of the subject property,' but that possible remedies weren't initiated, as the City of Ashland, 'did not like the options to repair the damages.'
According to the dress shop owners, a forensic engineer with Allard's insurance provider recommended 'restoring the sidewalk to its original condition,' which the city allegedly would not approve, in addition to denying requests to excavate under the sidewalk to identify issues that 'could be coming from aging clay pipes beneath Winchester Avenue.'
In addition to allegations of negligence in supervising the project, the shop owners are suing for overall nuisance claims, alleging the streetscape rehaul interfered with daily functionality of the shop, as the project 'has caused unreasonable and substantial annoyance and interference with plaintiffs' ability to use and enjoy the property.'
As for the claim of tortious interference with business relations, Lara's claims all defendants part of the suit 'disrupt(ed) customer access to the subject property and refus(ed) to take reasonable corrective measures to mitigate the entrances to the business being inaccessible for extended periods of time.'
Issues accessing the business include pooling water in front of the store and water infiltration 'created a hazardous environment for employees and patrons, all of which resulted from the streetscape project.'
Dress shop representatives claim their issues weren't just related to poor supervision and execution, but went unresolved seemingly out of spite, claiming 'Defendant city ... was intentional, purposeful and upon information and belief, undertaken by defendant city to punish the plaintiff for her early opposition to the streetscape project.'
The plaintiffs added the defendants' 'intentional and improper conduct was designed to advantage their own interests in completing the streetscape project.'
In summary, the business owners claim the result has caused physical damage to the property, including mold formation, damages to interior walls and fixtures, standing water and structural and or foundations issues like sink holes.
Those physical issues allegedly resulted in damage to business inventory, fixtures and personal property, a loss of business revenue and profits.
As of Monday, only Palmer Engineering's response to the complaint has been filed, in which they say excavation or demolition 'was specified by the contract documents for the project and Palmer denies any allegations inconsistent with the contract documents for the project.'
In other words, Palmer claims its actions were conducted as outlined in the contracted outline from the city.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts
Congressional Republicans are gearing up for a major test of how easily they can lock in cuts sought by President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said he aims to have the House act swiftly on approving Trump's request for more than $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding. That package is expected to hit the floor this week. 'We haven't done anything like this in a while, so this is probably, in some ways, a test run,' House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told reporters. Trump last week sent Congress a request for $8.3 billion in cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and foreign aid, and more than $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides some funding to NPR and PBS. The request kick-starts a process that would allow Republicans to claw back funds for a list of programs on the administration's chopping block with just a simple majority in both chambers. That means Republicans wouldn't require Democratic votes in the Senate if they can stay mostly unified in greenlighting what's known as a rescissions package. But it's been decades since Congress has approved such a request to yank back funds previously greenlighted by lawmakers. Trump tried to use the same process to rescind funds in his first term but was unsuccessful, despite Republicans controlling the House, Senate and White House at the time. Republicans are bullish that this time will be different, however. '[Trump's] done this before, and they've got a great team, I think, in place,' Cole said. 'They've thought about these things a lot in the time in between his first and his second term.' 'They just seem to me to be much more sure-footed, and there's no question, the president has much more influence inside the Republican Party than he had during his first term,' Cole added. Still, some Republicans have expressed concerns about parts of the request. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) voiced opposition last week to cutting the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), saying Wednesday that the idea makes 'no sense' to her 'whatsoever.' 'Given the extraordinary record of PEPFAR in saving lives, it has literally saved millions of lives, and so I do not see a basis for cutting it,' she said. And not all Republicans are thrilled by the proposed cuts to public broadcasting in the plan, which calls for rescinding $535 million in both fiscal 2026 and 2027. 'You go to rural America, public television is how you get emergency broadcasting and all that kind of stuff,' Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a spending cardinal, said Thursday. 'I look at Idaho Public Television, they're a great organization, and we don't see the politics that some states do in them, or at least they believe they see that and stuff.' However, Simpson said he still intends to support the overall package. 'I don't think in the long run, the rescissions are going to hurt them, because we're talking about the advanced appropriations and stuff like that.' 'What they're concerned about is, and should be, is the next year's appropriation process and stuff,' he continued. On its website, DOGE estimates that it's racked up $180 billion in savings as of June 3 through a combination of efforts like asset sales, contract cancellations and renegotiations, 'fraud and improper payment deletion, grant cancellations' and workforce reductions. And White House budget chief Russell Vought signaled further special requests to lock in more DOGE cuts could be on the way when pressed on the matter during a budget hearing last week, particularly as the administration's ongoing efforts to shrink the government have been tangled up in courts. But he also said it's 'very important' for this first package of cuts to pass, adding, 'If it does, it'll be worth the effort and we'll send up additional packages.' 'We are very anxious to see the reception from a vote standpoint in the House and the Senate,' Vought said, though he added, 'I'm less concerned about the House as I am in the Senate.' Some Republicans see the package introduced this week as potentially the easiest one to deal with, as many in the party have been critical of foreign aid and funds going to outlets like PBS and NPR, which they've accused of political bias. In a statement promoting the package on the social platform X, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) on Friday touted the president's request as cutting '$9.4 BILLION in wasteful spending' while holding 'bureaucrats accountable to the American people.' The package would target dollars for items like migration and refugee assistance that the administration says support activities that 'could be more fairly shared with non-U.S. Government donors,' USAID efforts they say have been used to 'fund radical gender and climate projects,' and development assistance they argued 'conflict with American values' and 'interfere with the sovereignty of other countries,' among other rescissions. Funding would also be eliminated for the United Nations Children's Fund, U.N. Development Program and the U.N. Population Fund under the proposal, as well as the World Health Organization and 'portions of the U.N. Regular Budget for the U.N. Human Rights Council and the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.' Democrats, meanwhile, have come out in strong opposition to the plan, accusing Trump of seeking political retribution and undermining foreign assistance efforts. They've also signaled trouble down the line when it comes time for both sides to negotiate a funding deal for fiscal 2026 — when Democratic support will likely be necessary to keep the government open in early fall. 'It's going to make it very difficult for us to do bipartisan bills if we believe that he's just going to send rescissions over for whatever they want or don't want in a bipartisan agreement,' Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, told The Hill this week. 'They need Democratic votes.' There's been some GOP frustration over the administration's handling of the annual funding work as well, as lawmakers on both sides have pressed the White House for more information about its budget plans in recent weeks. 'If we're getting to the point where we are right now, where we have a [funding stopgap], where we don't really have spend plans that are meaningful, now we have the administration transferring to the Congress their desires with rescission,' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a senior appropriator, said. 'I don't want to be a committee that no longer has a purpose. The role that we play is significant.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
GOP braces for first ‘test run' on codifying DOGE cuts
Congressional Republicans are gearing up for a major test of how easily they can lock in cuts sought by President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said he aims to have the House act swiftly on approving Trump's request for more than $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding. That package is expected to hit the floor this week. 'We haven't done anything like this in a while, so this is probably, in some ways, a test run,' House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told reporters. Trump last week sent Congress a request for $8.3 billion in cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and foreign aid, and more than $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which provides some funding to NPR and PBS. The request kickstarts a process that would allow Republicans to claw back funds for a list of programs on the administration's chopping block with just a simple majority in both chambers. That means Republicans wouldn't require Democratic votes in the Senate if they can stay mostly unified in greenlighting what's known as a recissions package. But it's been decades since Congress has approved such a request to yank back funds previously greenlit by lawmakers. Trump tried to use the same process to rescind funds in his first term but was unsuccessful, despite Republicans controlling the House, Senate and White House at the time. Republicans are bullish that this time will be different, however. '[Trump's] done this before, and they've got a great team, I think, in place,' Cole said. 'They've thought about these things a lot in the time in between his first and his second term.' 'They just seem to me to be much more sure-footed, and there's no question, the president has much more influence inside the Republican Party than he had during his first term,' Cole added. Still, some Republicans have expressed concerns about parts of the request. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) voiced opposition last week to cutting the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), saying Wednesday that the idea makes 'no sense' to her 'whatsoever.' 'Given the extraordinary record of PEPFAR in saving lives, it has literally saved millions of lives, and so I do not see a basis for cutting it,' she said. And not all Republicans are thrilled by the proposed cuts to public broadcasting in the plan, which calls for rescinding $535 million in both fiscal 2026 and 2027. 'You go to rural America, public television is how you get emergency broadcasting and all that kind of stuff,' Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a spending cardinal, said Thursday. 'I look at Idaho Public Television, they're a great organization, and we don't see the politics that some states do in them, or at least they believe they see that and stuff.' However, Simpson said he still intends to support the overall package. 'I don't think in the long run, the rescissions are going to hurt them, because we're talking about the advanced appropriations and stuff like that.' 'What they're concerned about is, and should be, is the next year's appropriation process and stuff,' he continued. On its website, DOGE estimates that it's racked up $180 billion in savings as of June 3 through a combination of efforts like asset sales, contract and cancellations and renegotiations, 'fraud and improper payment deletion, grant cancellations' and workforce reductions. And White House budget chief Russell Vought signaled further special requests to lock in more DOGE cuts could be on the way when pressed on the matter during a budget hearing this week, particularly as the administration's ongoing efforts to shrink the government have been tangled up in courts. But he also said it's 'very important' for this first package of cuts to pass, adding, 'If it does, it'll be worth the effort and we'll send up additional packages.' 'We are very anxious to see the reception from a vote standpoint in the House and the Senate,' Vought said, though he added, 'I'm less concerned about the House as I am in the Senate.' Some Republicans see the package introduced this week as potentially the easiest one to deal with, as many in the party have been critical of foreign aid and funds going to outlets like PBS and NPR, which they've accused of political bias. In a statement promoting the package on X, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) on Friday touted the president's request as cutting '$9.4 BILLION in wasteful spending' while holding 'bureaucrats accountable to the American people.' The package would target dollars for items like migration and refugee assistance that the administration says supports activities that 'could be more fairly shared with non-U.S. Government donors,' USAID efforts they say have been used to 'fund radical gender and climate projects,' and development assistance they argued 'conflict with American values' and 'interfere with the sovereignty of other countries,' among other rescissions. Funding would also be eliminated for United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), UN Development Program and the UN Population Fund under the proposal, as well as the World Health Organization, and 'portions of the UN Regular Budget for the UN Human Rights Council and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.' Democrats, meanwhile, have come out in strong opposition to the plan, accusing Trump of seeking political retribution and undermining foreign assistance efforts. They've also signaled trouble down the line when it comes time for both sides to negotiate a funding deal for fiscal year 2026 – when Democratic support will likely be necessary to keep the government open in early fall. 'It's going to make it very difficult for us to do bipartisan bills if we believe that he's just going to send rescissions over for whatever they want or don't want in a bipartisan agreement,' Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, told The Hill this week. 'They need Democratic votes.' There's been some GOP frustration over the administration's handling of the annual funding work as well, as lawmakers on both sides have pressed the White House for more information about its budget plans in recent weeks. 'If we're getting to the point where we are right now, where we have a [funding stopgap], where we don't really have spend plans that are meaningful, now we have the administration transferring to the Congress their desires with rescission,' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), a senior appropriator, said. 'I don't want to be a committee that no longer has a purpose. The role that we play is significant.'
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Pinky Cole Names Tech Tycoon Lauren Maillian President Of Slutty Vegan
Slutty Vegan Founder and CEO Pinky Cole is starting a new chapter—and she's not turning the page alone. In a move that signals bold intentions and even bolder execution, Cole has appointed Lauren Maillian as president of the wildly popular plant-based brand. Maillian officially began her role June 4. 'This is the first time that I have an all-woman staff in my corporate, which is super, super exciting,' Cole shared. 'Especially when I think about who I am to Black women entrepreneurs in America… I know it's gonna be great.' Her optimism hits harder when you understand what she's had to rebuild. Earlier this year, Pinky was involved in a serious car accident that left her physically injured and emotionally shaken. That same season, she quietly lost control of her company—an experience she has since described as one of the most humbling chapters of her entrepreneurial journey. 'I lost the company February 13th. I bought the company back March 28th. And now today, I've appointed my President of Slutty Vegan—who is the second president ever, and the first Black woman.' The leadership shift comes as the brand moves forward into its next phase, which Cole calls Slutty Vegan 2.0. For Pinky and Maillian, it's also a full-circle moment nearly a decade in the making. Their earliest encounter was fairly random and easy to overlook. 'Our very, very, very first encounter was very informal,' Maillian recalled. 'We were both speaking that same year, which I believe was 2017, for John Hope Bryant at the Operation Hope conference, at the bottom of the escalator. That was the very first time. And that same day I had my very first Slutty Vegan burger too.' Cole confirmed the memory: 'I actually remember that now. And it was you and your husband at the bottom of the escalator… and then after that was Indianapolis, right, Lauren?' The two reconnected recently at Kim Blackwell's ExcelerateHER event. That's when the conversation turned from admiration to action. 'It literally felt like business love at first sight,' Cole said. 'I need somebody that can come in and just be my right hand and really take the business to the next level… And today actually is Lauren's first day.' For Maillian, joining Slutty Vegan wasn't just a professional decision—it was personal. 'I remember even saying, like, 'Can I invest? Is there room for me?' I wanted to be a part of Pinky's vision. I wanted to be a part of the way that she was lighting the industry on fire,' she said. With 20+ years of business leadership, including time in VC, media, tech, and food and beverage, Maillian sees this moment as one of alignment: 'This is also very personal for me… very synergistic with the life that I lead and allowing me to show up as Lauren Maillian wholly and fully in every part of my personal and professional life.' 'There's someone very important on Pinky's team that I've worked with… on some really big deals,' Maillian said. 'Everything just clicked for us… And what risk-taking and generating the right rewards looks like. So yeah, full circle in so many ways.' Cole emphasized the significance of their leadership dynamic: 'In Slutty Vegan 1.0, it was very man-heavy… This is a new energy. It's a new opportunity to show that women are dynamic—especially Black women.' And it's not just about identity—it's about execution. 'I am rah rah, this raw energy that is in your face, loud and vibrant,' Cole said. 'I think that Lauren will bring a sense of sophistication and calmness to everything… She can take those ideas and execute them in a way where they can be scalable. And that's literally what has been missing.' Slutty Vegan's growth plan is expansive—and VOAGIES, Cole's new plant-based sub concept, is just the beginning. 'We are reworking systems,' Cole shared. 'Stabilization is important right now… and then we get back into growth mode: CPG, hyper growth, scale, verticals. Now we're putting it on steroids.' Maillian's focus? Innovation through tech, consumer experience, and operational precision. 'We're certainly going to be recreating a playbook of how to be able to build and scale excellence… Every store, every social media interaction, every piece of merch. That is something that is going to be a large part of my focus in the next quarter.' When asked what advice she would share with other Black women looking to build their business, Maillian shared a powerful reflection: 'You don't get everything you deserve, but you definitely deserve everything you get. And that is how I feel in this season.' Pinky Cole echoed that sentiment with her own testimony: 'There are going to be people, places, and things that tell you that you can't do it… Six months ago was the roughest season of my life. And now I'm entering the best season of my life.' RELATED CONTENT: Pinky Cole Switches It Up Again—This Time, It's All About Plant-Based Hoagies Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
