&w=3840&q=100)
Trump's MIGA push for Iran: Potus hints at regime change if Khamenei can't 'make Iran great again'
US President Trump publicly hinted at replacing Iran's regime — if it can't 'make Iran great again' — adding uncertainty to an already tense situation in the Middle East, though his administration does not appear fully confident in the idea. read more
The Trump administration sent mixed signals to Iran on Sunday — with some US officials suggesting they were open to restarting talks after a surprise attack on three nuclear sites, while President Donald Trump raised the prospect of regime change.
'It's not politically correct to use the term 'Regime Change', but if the current Iranian regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a regime change???' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'MIGA!!!' The post marked a reversal from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference, in which he detailed the aerial strikes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth stated.
The Trump administration has been delivering mixed messages to Iran – issuing tough, threatening remarks while simultaneously calling for renewed dialogue. This has created uncertainty over whether the president is trying to provoke Iran or unintentionally deepening the conflict with Israel.
Prior to Trump's post on Sunday afternoon, his vice president, defence secretary, top military adviser, and secretary of state all projected confidence that any fallout would be manageable, and that Iran's relatively weaker military would eventually drive it back to the negotiating table.
Hegseth had stated that America 'does not seek war' with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes had given Tehran an opportunity to return to negotiations with Washington.
However, the situation is not entirely within Washington's control. Tehran retains several levers it could use in response to the airstrikes, potentially escalating the conflict in the Middle East with global consequences.
Iran could block oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, launch attacks on US bases in the region, carry out cyber-attacks, or accelerate its nuclear programme – which may now be seen as more essential following the US assault.
This raises the question of whether the strikes will usher in a more brutal phase of warfare or lead to revived diplomacy out of caution. Domestically, the attacks quickly spilled into American politics, with Trump using part of his Sunday to criticise his opponents in Congress.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Having addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, Trump returned to social media on Sunday to lambast Representative Thomas Massie, who had criticised the president for acting without specific congressional authorisation.
'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the bomb right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!),' Trump posted on Truth Social.
At a joint Pentagon briefing, Hegseth and Air Force General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated that 'Operation Midnight Hammer' involved decoys and deception, and encountered no Iranian resistance.
Caine said the operation's objective – destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan — had been achieved.
'Final battle damage assessments will take time, but initial indications show all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Caine added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump hints at regime change, says 'Make Iran Great Again': Top points
US President Donald Trump has made another U-turn on his stance on the Israel-Iran conflict, suggesting the possibility of a regime change in Tehran days after denying it. In a post on X, Trump wrote: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" On Sunday, the US launched strikes on three key nuclear programme sites in Iran, with Trump saying that the sites were 'completely and fully obliterated'. Iran vowed retaliation, with the country's parliament approving the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to Western ships. Here are the top developments on the Israel-Iran conflict: 1. Hostilities between Israel and Iran continued on Monday, with both countries exchanging missile strikes. According to an Israeli military spokesperson, Israeli fighter jets targeted military positions in western Iran. Earlier, Iranian missile attacks caused significant damage in Tel Aviv, injuring numerous civilians and destroying buildings. 2. The Israeli military announced that its forces had targeted several Iranian military locations on Sunday. "Approximately 20 (Israeli air force) fighter jets conducted intelligence-based strikes using over 30 munitions on military targets in Iran," the Israeli army stated on Telegram, as reported by AFP. The strikes focused on 'storage and missile launching infrastructure sites', in addition to 'military satellites and radar sites'. Amid reports of strikes in Tehran, air defence systems were activated in central areas of the Iranian capital, according to local media cited by Reuters. 3. At a UN Security Council emergency session, Acting US Ambassador Dorothy Shea reiterated Trump's warning that any Iranian aggression — either direct or through its proxies — against American personnel or assets would result in strong retaliation. 4. Russia's UN envoy Vassily Nebenzia condemned the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, warning they had opened a 'Pandora's box' with unpredictable outcomes. He said Moscow had offered to mediate but claimed the US showed no interest in peaceful dialogue. Nebenzia warned of a potential large-scale conflict with dangerous global consequences if de-escalation efforts failed. 5. Iran accused the US of derailing diplomatic efforts by bombing its nuclear infrastructure. Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran's envoy to the UN, said the Iranian military would determine the 'timing, nature and scale of Iran's proportionate response". He also alleged that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had influenced President Trump to escalate tensions and involve the US in another costly regional conflict. 6. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi voiced concern over the rising tensions, warning that the US strikes could worsen the Israel-Iran standoff. However, he said that diplomacy remained possible and called on Iran to permit inspectors to verify the country's 4,400 kg stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 per cent. 7. Amid growing regional instability, India's evacuation drive continued. The Ministry of External Affairs confirmed the safe return of 311 Indian nationals from Mashhad to New Delhi on June 22. This brings the total number of evacuated citizens to 1,428. 8. Global oil markets reacted sharply, with Brent crude prices surging up to 5.7 per cent, hitting $81.40 a barrel. The US strikes on Iran's main nuclear sites sparked fears of potential disruptions in energy supply from West Asia. 9. US Vice President JD Vance said that the United States was targeting Iran's nuclear programme — not the country itself. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear programme,' Vance said on NBC's Meet the Press with Kristen Welker. He credited the strikes with setting Iran's nuclear ambitions back by several years and criticised Tehran for failing to negotiate in good faith. 10. On Saturday, Iran's Health Ministry reported that Israeli strikes had resulted in around 400 deaths and left around 3,056 people injured. (With agency inputs)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
World braces for Iran's response after US airstrikes signal new era
The unprecedented US airstrikes on Iran have set traders and governments worldwide on edge, as the Islamic Republic warns of retaliation and Israel shows no sign of letting up in its assault. President Donald Trump's decision to deploy bunker-busting bombs, Washington's first direct military action against Iran after decades of hostility, has pushed the Middle East into uncharted territory and raised geopolitical risk in a world economy already facing severe uncertainty over his trade war. Oil rose almost 6 per cent when markets opened Monday morning in Asia, with analysts warning $100 a barrel is in sight depending on Iran's further response to the conflict, which began June 13 with a surprise attack by Israel. The US dollar pushed higher, stock futures fell and Bitcoin slid below $100,000 for the first time since early May. At the United Nations on Sunday, Iranian Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani told an emergency Security Council meeting that the 'timing nature and scale' of Tehran's response 'will be decided by its armed forces.' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi earlier said the country reserves all options to respond. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which answers to the Iran's supreme leader, signaled US military bases in the region could be targeted. Trump has vowed to meet any retaliation with force 'far greater' than the US strikes on the nuclear sites. He also floated the possibility of regime change in Iran, although US and Israeli officials Sunday stressed that isn't their aim. Police in New York, Washington and Los Angeles increased patrols at religious institutions, diplomatic facilities and public spaces. Officials cited no immediate credible threats but highlighted the need for vigilance. The Department of Homeland Security said the Israel-Iran war has placed the US in a 'heightened threat environment' through Sept. 22. It's still unclear how successful the US strikes were in eliminating Iran's most heavily protected enrichment site at Fordow. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which officially has the task of monitoring Iran's program, told the UN Security Council on Sunday that no one yet knows the condition of the facility, nor the location of Iran's more than 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent. Any move by Tehran to harass traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a major artery for global crude and natural gas, has raised the specter of a spike in energy prices at a fragile moment for the global economy. 'An expanding conflict adds to the risk of higher oil prices and an upward impulse to inflation,' Bloomberg Economics analysts including Ziad Daoud wrote in a report. Naval forces in the region warned that ships, especially US-linked vessels, could be at heightened risk. Greece, home to more oil-tanker capacity than any other nation, cautioned its ship owners to think again if they're considering entering the Persian Gulf. Two supertankers both capable of hauling about 2 million barrels of crude U-turned in the Strait of Hormuz, entering the waterway then abruptly changing course on Sunday. British Airways and Singapore Airlines canceled flights to the Persian Gulf, increasing aviation disruptions in the region. While the US action was condemned by the likes of Russia and China, even allies such as UK and France distanced themselves from Trump's decision. Iran, meanwhile, finds itself isolated. Tehran's top allies — Russia and China — are offering only rhetorical support, while the militia groups Tehran has armed and funded for years are refusing or unable to enter the fight. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged in a news conference to continue Israel's military campaign in Iran as well as in the Gaza Strip. The Israel Defense Forces said Sunday it hit a surface-to-air missile launcher in Tehran, while in western Iran, Israeli jets struck infrastructure for storage and missile launches as well as satellites and military radar sites.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Hundreds protest in The Hague against Nato, days before it hosts summit
Hundreds of people have protested against Nato and military spending and against a possible conflict with Iran, two days before a summit of the alliance in The Hague that is seeking to increase allies' defense budgets. Let's invest in peace and sustainable energy, Belgian politician Jos d'Haese told the crowd at a park not far from the summit venue on Sunday. Although billed as a demonstration against Nato and the war in Gaza, protesters were joined by Iranians who held up banners saying No Iran War, the day after the United States launched attacks against three of Iran's nuclear sites. We are opposed to war. People want to live a peaceful life, said 74-year-old Hossein Hamadani, an Iranian who lives in the Netherlands. Look at the environment. Things are not good. So why do we spend money on war? he added. The Netherlands is hosting the annual meeting of the 32-nation alliance starting Tuesday, with leaders scheduled to meet Wednesday. The heads of government want to hammer out an agreement on a hike in defence spending demanded by US President Donald Trump. The deal appeared largely done last week, until Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Snchez wrote to Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte that committing Madrid to spending 5 per cent of its gross domestic product on defence "would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive. US allies have ramped up defence spending since Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago, but almost a third of them still don't meet Nato's current target of at least 2 per cent of their gross domestic product. The summit is being protected by the biggest ever Dutch security operation, code named Orange Shield," involving thousands of police and military personnel, drones, no-fly zones and cybersecurity experts.
