
Tanzania bans opposition party from fighting polls
Tanzania's election commission had disqualified the main opposition party from contesting the national elections due later this year. The reason cited was that CHADEMA, the opposition party, did not sign the code document by Saturday.
Also, the leader of CHADEMA, TIndu Lissu, has been charged with treason because he asked the people while addressing a rally that they should not take part in the elections because the government is not carrying out the electoral reforms which would make the elections a fair process.
The opposition believes that the electoral process as it exists now favours the party in power. Ramadhani Kailima, director of elections at the Independent National Elections Commission, said, 'Any party that did not sign the code of conduct will not participate in the general election.' He also said the ban would extend to by-elections to be held till 2030. President Samia Suluhu Hassan is accused of cracking down on the political opposition, which she denies.
The rights groups and the opposition have pointed to a series of abductions and killings as evidence of the government's crackdown on dissidents. The government has opened investigations into the killings and kidnappings. Hassan's ruling party, Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), says it respects human rights.
The charges of treason brought against Lissu have been based on the address he gave to his party supporters. The chargesheet quoted from his speech: 'It is true we say we will prevent the election. We will inspire rebellion. That is the way to get change...So we are going to spoil this election. We are going to really disrupt...We are going to spoil it very badly.'
It is to be seen whether these remarks of political defiance can be termed treasonous. The chargesheet says that Lissu made these statements in the capital, Dar-es-Salaam. Lissu's lawyer Rugemelaza Nshala said, 'You cannot separate these charges from politics. He was doing campaigns to educate Chadema supporters, but they have turned it into charges.'
When Hassan came into office after winning the election in 2021 she had promised to undo some the repressive measures adopted by her predecessor John Magufuli. And she did win plaudits for her liberalising stance. But criticism has mounted against her of late.
Even as political tensions seem to be on the rise, Tanzania and India are co-hosting largescale multilateral exercises under the Africa India Key Maritime Engagement (AIKME), and the participating countries are Comoros, Djibouti, Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles and South Africa.
While the Indian contingent is led by the Indian Navy, that of Tanzania is led by Tanzanian People's Defence Force (TPDF). So, Tanzania is taking the lead in a pan-African initiative, which is also a reflection of the country's status among the African countries.
The question does arise whether Tanzania, and it is not alone, can balance the internal political conflicts which are not surprising in a democracy, and its external profile as an influential player in the emerging continent of Africa. Suluhu has tried to open up the country internally and externally. Internally she had lifted the ban on political rallies that her predecessor had imposed when she became president in 2021. And externally she had tried to open up Tanzania to the world by encouraging tourism.
In many African countries, politics becomes polarised in no time. The opposition suspects that the ruling party manipulates to stay in power, and in protest it raises the rhetoric of resistance. And the governments react with alacrity. This seems to be pattern in the ban on CHADEMA and the arrest of Lissu. Both sides will have to pull back from the brink as it were to keep the democratic processes alive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
20 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Pakistan hikes defence budget 20%, but overall spending is cut
Pakistan Tuesday hiked defence spending by 20% following last month's deadly conflict with India. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the increase as part of the budget for the fiscal year 2025-26, in which overall spending will be cut by 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion). Pakistan and India were pushed to the brink of war earlier this year after a gun massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir, marking the biggest breakdown in relations between them since 2019. Weeks of tension followed, culminating in missile and drone strikes that resulted in dozens of fatalities on both sides of the border. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the government was allocating 2.55 trillion rupees ($9 billion) for defense compared with 2.12 trillion rupees in the previous budget. India in February increased its defense spending by 9.5%. Sharif told the Cabinet: "All economic indicators are satisfactory. After defeating India in a conventional war, now we have to go beyond it in the economic field as well.' Opposition members of the National Assembly verbally abused Aurangzeb, chanting slogans, throwing scrunched-up copies of the budget at him, whistling, and banging their desks as he gave his address. The coming year's defense allocation is considerably more than the government's expenditure on higher education, agricultural development, and mitigating climate-related risks, to which Pakistan is especially prone. Associated Press


Gulf Today
20 hours ago
- Gulf Today
This is how Trump has become America's bully-in-chief
Eric Lewis, The Independent The Trump administration makes clear nearly every day that the rule of law is for chumps. It has been nearly three months since they deported 137 Venezuelans without hearings to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador, where they are being held indefinitely in horrific conditions. Others have been deported to third countries with which they have no connection. Many have been deported in clear violation of federal court orders enjoining the administration from doing so. Judges have repeatedly held that deportation without notice and a hearing is illegal. The administration has claimed to have no power to obtain the return of people sent, even in defiance of court order, because they are no longer in the United States. Eight detainees were being sent to South Sudan, one of the world's worst conflict zones. A Boston judge said it was "unquestionably in violation of this court's order". Rather than returning them, the Trump administration diverted the plane to another African country wracked by conflict, Djibouti, where they are held in a shipping container. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Venezuelan that the administration admitted had been deported by mistake, and had been cleared to remain in the United States because of a legitimate fear of gang violence, was accused by Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, of being an MS-13 gang member himself. Secretary Noem declared that he would never return to the United States. On Friday, the Trump administration were somehow able to obtain the consent of El Salvador's President to send him back, but only after a quick indictment was obtained accusing him of being a human trafficker, based on a 2022 traffic stop where other migrants were in his van. For more than three years Garcia checked in monthly with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who knew of the traffic stop and saw no wrongdoing. This is the backdrop of the protest and violence that has erupted in California in recent days. It appears to foreshadow the next stage of lawlessness and a movement toward governing by emergency decree. Unlike the January 6 riots at the Capitol, the protests in Los Angeles were largely peaceful. To be sure, there were incidents of violence, a classic situation calling for police intervention. Five LAPD officers suffered minor injuries, none life-threatening. No ICE injuries were reported. That was not good enough for the Trump administration, which nationalized the California National Guard over the objections of the governor and mayor of Los Angeles and now Trump has called in the Marines. It is unclear how they will deployed and under what authority. The Trump administration is simultaneously seeking to suppress dissent with massive force, escalate and provoke confrontation and argue that blue state officials are too incompetent or too "woke" to enforce the law. As Trump wrote on Truth Social, "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" He tried to mobilize the military during the George Floyd protests, but the Secretary of Defense declined. Not so today. For Trump, the military is being transformed into an extension of domestic political power, not a force to defend the country against outside enemies. The consistent thread is hostility to any alternative center of power. The administration has already arrested a judge, a mayor and a member of Congress — and Trump stated that he would support arresting California Governor Newsom. Trump's "big, beautiful bill" contains a provision depriving courts of jurisdiction to hold executive branch officials in contempt of court orders, so the judiciary can be ignored with impunity. Trump and his spokespeople have attacked judges who have decided cases against him as "USA-Hating" "monsters" who want the country to "go to hell." He cannot conceive that the 185-plus rulings against him so far were based on the law rather than inherently treasonous conduct by judges, including judges he appointed, requiring impeachment or worse. It is all an elaborate dance to intimidate the judiciary into avoiding a full-our war with the administration. Last week, the head of the FBI ordered a major diversion of investigative resources because his predecessor posted a photo of rocks on social media that formed the numbers 8647 (86 being a restaurant term meaning removed from the menu and 47 being President Trump's Presidential number). FBI Director Patel said: "Do you know how many agents I've had to take offline from chasing down predators, fentanyl traffickers, terrorists because everywhere across this country, people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of the United States is a joke and they can do it because he did it?" He seemed unaware that his job was to investigate serious crimes, not to suppress the political opinions of his adversaries by suggesting that their anti-Trump posts were homicidal threats. All of these actions are of a piece to undermine the rule of law, a principle that should not be controversial. It is an age-old, essentially conservative principle not tied to specific ideology. Judges are to apply the facts to clear and accessible laws and to apply them without bias for or against any litigant. It only requires a judicial and legal function that are independent from executive power or interference. But even the most minimal check on executive power is anathema to the Trump agenda. Since the early days of America, the judiciary has had the critical role to "say what the law is," and it has often taken very conservative, indeed at times reactionary views, upholding slavery, segregation and internment of citizens. Conservatives have poured billions of dollars into vetting and ensuring a conservative judiciary. But that is not good enough; this administration needs complete control and to win every case. Leonard Leo, the arch-conservative who has done more than anyone to pack the courts with conservative judges, was called out by Trump as a "sleazebag" who "hates America" because many of his touted appointees actually felt compelled to follow the law. The rule of law — a set of guardrails for neutrality, honesty and judicial independence — is the precondition for avoiding tyranny. As Benjamin Nathans wrote in his Pulitzer Prize-winning 'To The Success of Our Hopeless Cause,' there were 753 trials of Soviet political dissidents during the Brezhnev years that resulted in 753 convictions (and no acquittals). For Trump, a 753-0 record in political trials raises no questions; it is how the system should work. This destruction of rule of law infrastructure is a feature, not a bug, of ambitious authoritarians. Go after the judges; go after the lawyers; and use the power of investigation and criminal indictment as yet another chainsaw, not just to put your political enemies in jail if you can, but to intimidate your opponents into silence. And bring out the big guns, to show everyone who controls the most massive fire power the world has ever known. This is where we are today. The rule of law is the last impediment to absolute power. And it is now under siege. It will be difficult to put this bedrock structural principle of justice back in place when he is done.


Al Etihad
2 days ago
- Al Etihad
Indian smuggler stopped with possums, lizards, tarantulas
10 June 2025 19:01 MUMBAI (AFP)Indian customs officers made the latest "significant" seizure of endangered wildlife from a passenger arriving from Thailand, a government statement said, carrying nearly 100 creatures including lizards, sunbirds and tree-climbing officers said the passenger, who was also carrying two tarantula spiders and tortoises, had "exhibited signs of nervousness" on arrival at India's financial capital seizure comes after a passenger was stopped smuggling dozens of venomous vipers, also arriving from Thailand, earlier in seized included iguanas, as well as a kinkajou or honey bear -- a small raccoon-like animal from Mexico's rainforests -- as well as six "sugar gliders", a gliding possum found in released by the customs unit showed the six sugar gliders huddled together in a basket, as well as a box crammed with lizards."In a significant operation, customs officers... intercepted an Indian national... leading to the seizure of multiple live and deceased wildlife species, some of which are protected under wildlife protection laws", the Ministry of Finance said in a statement late trade monitor TRAFFIC, which battles the smuggling of wild animals and plants, on Tuesday warned of a "very troubling" trend in trafficking driven by the exotic pet than 7,000 animals, dead and alive, have been seized along the Thailand-India air route in the last 3.5 years, it officers seized dozens of snakes and several turtles from an Indian national flying from Thailand earlier in June. Among them were several spider-tailed horned vipers, a venomous species only described by scientists in 2006 and classed as "near-threatened" by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). In February, customs officials at Mumbai airport also stopped a smuggler with five Siamang gibbons, a small ape native to the forests of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.