
New Zealand's tourism campaign is not the world's worst – and I should know
Having worked in the advertising industry for a while, I can tell you that creating a great ad is a lot more difficult than skewering a bad ad. That's partly why I left a full-time gig in adland to focus on writing. Although the bigger reason, if I'm honest, is that I wrote a column saying I was going to quit my stupid advertising job before actually quitting, and my boss saw it and reacted as you might expect.
But my poor life choices are not the point; the point here is other people's poor choices, namely those of some marketers in New Zealand. You see, the people at Tourism New Zealand are facing international ridicule for a new advertising campaign – with the tagline 'Everyone must go!' – designed to entice Australians to visit.
What is so bad about the ad? According to a Guardian article on the backlash, a number of opposition politicians and social media users reckon it sounds like a clearance sale. Well, yes, that was sort of the point! Congratulations to all the critics, you figured out the underlying idea. Other naysayers think it sounds like a plea for people to use the toilet – an interpretation that may say more about them than the campaign. Perhaps the most legitimate criticism, however, is that the country is seeing record emigration and so this feels tone-deaf.
If any of the people at Tourism New Zealand feel stung by the criticism, they should take heart – they are not even close to being in the Most Unfortunate Tourism Campaign hall of fame. Top prize probably goes to the Hong Kong tourism board for ads with the tagline 'Hong Kong will take your breath away' that went out shortly before the Sars epidemic. Vilnius (the capital of Lithuania) gets an honourable mention in the Shamelessly Tasteless category for a 2019 campaign where it called itself the 'G-Spot of Europe' because 'nobody knows where it is, but when you find it – it's amazing'.
Frankly, I think the New Zealand advert is a success. Everyone is talking about it, after all. And it certainly has me thinking about a trip down under. But then again, it is winter in Trump's America: the wind chill is high and the fascism factor even higher. I would go absolutely anywhere right now.
Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Iranian graduate student faces decision about future after Trump's travel ban
President Trump's travel ban has left tens of thousands of international students in limbo, including Iranian graduate student Nazanin Hashemian, who fears she may never reunite with her husband and children. Barred from bringing her daughters to the U.S. and uncertain if she'll be allowed to stay, she says the ban has turned her life upside 13, 2025


Scottish Sun
2 days ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Son of Concorde' bosses reveal over 600 routes could see flight times HALVED including 3.5-hour trips from UK to US
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MAKERS of a supersonic plane have revealed there are more than 600 global routes where Concorde-style speedy flights could slash flying times by as much as half. And a 3.5 hour trip between the UK and US is "absolutely" possible, the company told The Sun. 2 2 The "Son of Concorde" reached supersonic speeds in January Credit: Boom Technology Boom Technology has been testing its XB-1 test jet which managed to fly faster than the speed of sound in January. One of the hurdles they've overcome from supersonic flying is the sound. The firm's jet, aptly dubbed the "Son of Concorde", has no audible sonic boom. A number of orders from the likes of American Airlines, United Airlines, and Japan Airlines have already been made for Boom Technology's passenger jet model, Overture. Read more about flights SPEED OF SOUND 'Son of Concorde' test pilot reveals update on jet's first supersonic flight President Trump recently signed an executive order effectively lifting a 52-year ban on civil supersonic flight over land in the US. "While Boom is pleased to see the regulatory pathways to supersonic flight clearing, Boom's business case has never been predicated on regulatory change," a spokesperson for Boom told The Sun. "There are over 600 global routes that are economically viable for supersonic flight—even without going supersonic over land. "Now that rules are being updated to allow boomless supersonic flight over land in the US, additional routes will benefit from speedups. "Boom's supersonic airliner, Overture, will fly transatlantic routes, such as New York to London, at its full cruising speed of Mach 1.7 over water – about twice as fast as today's conventional airliners." "Boomless Cruise enables Overture to fly at speeds up to Mach 1.3 over land without an audible boom - up to 50% faster than subsonic jets - reducing US coast-to-coast flight times by up to 90 minutes. I'm a Boom supersonic test pilot - my day job is testing a new generation of Concordes "International routes with overland segments can also benefit from increased speeds." The company also revealed that Overture "remains on target" to get certification from relevant bodies including the FAA by the end of the decade so it can carry passengers. Bosses are aiming to roll out the first Overture in three years, and be flight testing in four. To accomplish that, they expect production of the first aircraft in the "Superfactory" to start next year. WHY DID CONCORDE FAIL? CONCORDE was the supersonic passenger jet considered the ultimate luxury in air travel. Air France and British Airways announced they would be retiring their fleet of Concorde planes on April 10, 2003. The plane had its first commercial flight on January 21, 1976, so was retired after 27 years of service and 50,000 flights. Several reasons led to the decision to retire Concorde. Air France and British Airways cited low passenger numbers and high maintenance costs. By the early noughties, the planes were outdated and expensive to run, despite being incredibly advanced when they were first introduced almost three decades previously. The 9/11 terrorist attack in 2001 majorly impacted passenger numbers, as people opted not to fly. Passenger numbers also fell after an Air France Concorde crashed just minutes after taking off from Paris in July 2000. The disaster killed all 109 people on board and four others on the ground. The plane ran over a small piece of metal on the runway, which burst a tyre and caused an engine to ignite. It was also the only aircraft in the British Airways fleet that required a flight engineer. Image credit: Alamy By the end of this year, they expect to produce thrust during fully-operational engine core tests for Overture's bespoke engine, Symphony. "Boom's current order book accounts for the first five years of production at the Overture Superfactory in North Carolina," the spokesperson added. "Airlines have been very receptive to Overture and the competitive advantages of supersonic travel. "In fact, the passenger research we have conducted indicates that 87% of passengers are willing to switch from their preferred airline in order to gain access to supersonic travel."


Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
Ireland has a US border — it could help travellers nervous about Trump's America
Bleary eyes, hours-long lines, and a deep-rooted rumbling of irrational anxiety. The US has a reputation for intimidating border control. There's something about passing through immigration when you land at JFK that makes you wonder if you've accidentally smuggled 30 kilos of coke into your hand luggage. But international travellers arriving from a select group of airports, including Ireland's Dublin and Shannon, breeze through customs — without an American passport. That's because the Irish airports are two of 15 in the world that offer US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Preclearance, which allows travellers to clear US immigration – and the headache that comes with it – before they board. Unless you make a habit of flying from an airport that offers it, preclearance is unlikely to be on your radar. But travelling via Dublin could ease stress for anyone nervous about flying to the US right now. Fuel your wanderlust with our curated newsletter of travel deals, guides and inspiration. Sign up here. So, now you know there has been a US border in Dublin Airport for more than 30 years. Preclearance as a concept, though, has been around much longer. It was first introduced in 1903 for ferry passengers arriving in the US from Victoria, Canada, before being extended to air travel in the 1950s. It's arranged via legal treaty, and in practice, that means that when you arrive on US soil, you do so as a domestic passenger — free to bypass the usual border inspections and skip straight to baggage reclaim. Queues tend to be shorter at preclearance, because there are generally less people passing through. Experts say it can save you hours. Another advantage is that, if the worst occurs and you are refused boarding, you won't be deported — if you live in Ireland, you're already at home. If you're coming from the UK or Europe, at least you're still on the right side of the Atlantic. Preclearance also exists at airports in Aruba, Bermuda, Abu Dhabi and the Bahamas, as well as nine airports in Canada. But Dublin was the first outside of North America — a decision based on the long history of diplomatic relations between Ireland and the USA. Travellers have no choice in the matter — essentially, if you're flying to the USA from Dublin, you have to go through preclearance in the Irish capital. It's worth noting that the workers who process your documents are US border control agents, not Irish airport staff. Some CPB agents are dual-nationals. However it's important to remember they are all American citizens, working for the US government – now the Trump administration – overseas. The main difference is that CBP officers working in Ireland are unarmed, in accordance with Irish law. Metro's Lifestyle Editor, Kristina Beanland, travelled to the Windy City via Dublin in 2023 and shared this account of her trip. 'My friends and I, who had travelled from London, arrived at a small corner of Dublin airport, where there was no one else apart from us and a few customs officers. 'But the strangest part was that you suddenly felt like you were in the USA. There were American accents and uniforms with the stars and stripes on the arm, and signs signalling that you were approaching a US border. 'It was weird, and felt like a slightly annoying stop on the journey – that is, until we arrived at O'Hare and were rewarded with a breezy stroll off the flight, straight to pick up our suitcases and into the waiting cab. In total, it probably took less than an hour to get from the plane to Michigan Avenue. 'That said, on the way home, stopping in Dublin was annoying. We'd already gone through American border control in Chicago, and the stopover was a result of having to take the same inbound route back. 'Fast-forward two years though, and we're living in a world where Donald Trump is President. The idea of passing through a US border that's only a 50-minute flight from home, somehow feels a lot less stressful than doing so on actual American soil.' Rolling out preclearance on foreign soil is not a decision for the US alone. Host nations must see the benefit. Niall Kearns, airport director at Ireland's Shannon Airport, told CNN last year that it's good for business. Fifteen airports outside the US have a US preclearance border: Dublin (Ireland) Shannon (Ireland) Aruba Hamilton (Bermuda) Abu Dhabi (UAE) Nassau (Bahamas) Calgary (Canada) Edmonton (Canada) Halifax (Canada) Montreal (Canada) Ottawa (Canada) Vancouver (Canada) Winnipeg (Canada) Toronoto (Canada) Prince Rupert (Canada) Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, scrutiny has ramped up at the US border, with travellers detained and deported due to visa mix-ups and even content saved on their phones. In February, British graphic artist Rebecca Burke, 28, was detained for 19 days after TSA agents said she had been working in the US illegally (she was doing odd jobs for a host family in return for free accommodation, and no money had exchanged hands). In April, two German tourists were deported after their trip to Hawaii was deemed 'suspicious' because they hadn't booked a hotel. A Lebanese man who is a US citizen (with an American wife) was also detained when he tried to return home after a weekend trip to Canada. In March, an unnamed French scientist was denied entry to the States after airport immigration officers searched his phone and found messages critical of the Trump administration. Last month, Turkish-American streamer Hasan Piker claimed he was detained and questioned for two hours by US Customs and Border Protection agents at Chicago's O'Hare Airport after returning from France. He said agents interrogated him about his political views, including his stance on Trump and Gaza. Piker said the questioning felt 'deliberate'. On Wednesday, the US president resurrected a controversial travel ban from his first term in the White House: a proclamation that bans citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States. Tariffs, travel bans, mass firings – if there's one thing you can be sure about with Donald Trump, it's that he'll make news. Constantly . That's even the case here in the UK, where most of his decisions have no direct impact. But is all that coverage stopping Brits from hopping across the pond for a vacation? If you look at the dry numbers from the US National Travel and Tourism Office, you might think the answer is no. In January, the month of Trump's second inauguration, the number of UK visitors to the US was 5% higher than the previous January. More Trending February and April saw more Brits going to the US than in the same months in 2024, suggesting that far from putting people off, we may even be more keen to visit the country when it's run by Trump. ABTA, the British trade association for the travel industry, tells a similar tale. They 'haven't seen any significant changes in terms of UK-US travel post-Trump administration', a spokesperson told Metro, with 'no noticeable shifts away' from the States. But that may not be the full story. You can read our political reporter Craig Munro's analysis here. MORE: Zelensky refutes Trump's take on war and calls Putin 'murderer who came to kill the kids' MORE: Donald Trump calls Elon Musk 'the man who has lost his mind' and won't talk to him MORE: Teenager dies after inhaling cleaning product in social media 'dusting' challenge