Breaking the Stigma: Understanding Mental Health and Addiction
Although the perspective regarding mental health and substance addiction is slowly shifting, there is still a significant lack of support available when it comes to confronting these issues.
While public resources are available for patients suffering from mental health issues or substance use disorder, demand exceeds supply, and many people still dismiss the mental health needs of others.
The stigma surrounding addiction and mental health affects people's willingness to seek support in any form.
Reaching out to friends and family members can pose social consequences among crowds that reinforce negative stigmas regarding addiction and mental health discourse.
Because of this, we need to help others understand why addiction is classified as a chronic brain disease, and how stigmatising mental health discourse perpetuates self-destructive tendencies among South African communities.
One of the first steps towards overcoming addiction, not just as an individual but as a community, is by encouraging the understanding of mental illnesses and diseases.
Substance use disorder, or addiction, goes hand in hand with mental health issues and forms a mutually destructive relationship.
While some cases show that mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and more can lead to drug or alcohol addiction, there are also many examples of substance addiction leading to the development of mental health issues.
This is particularly evident in South Africa, where lower-income communities experience higher rates of addiction (particularly alcoholism) and mental health issues.
When considering economic disparity, social issues, infrastructural problems, and more, it's unsurprising that the country is facing an uphill battle.
A study from 2022 suggests that 1 in 4 people in South Africa are suffering from depression or anxiety, and that 1 in 3 will suffer from mental health disorders in their lifetime.
As the evidence shows, South Africa faces a myriad of battles on the mental health front.
Some of the most common causes of mental health issues in South Africa can be attributed to: Social problems : Social problems such as crime, antisocial behaviour, and racism are extremely prevalent in South Africa. These can cause a great deal of stress and lead to the development of neurological issues such as anxiety disorder, depression, PTSD, and more.
: Social problems such as crime, antisocial behaviour, and racism are extremely prevalent in South Africa. These can cause a great deal of stress and lead to the development of neurological issues such as anxiety disorder, depression, PTSD, and more. Economic issues : Economic issues such as financial and housing insecurity can exacerbate mental health problems, leading to issues such as anxiety or depression among those who are in a constant state of worry and stress.
: Economic issues such as financial and housing insecurity can exacerbate mental health problems, leading to issues such as anxiety or depression among those who are in a constant state of worry and stress. Geographical boundaries: South Africans who live in rural areas may face more challenges when it comes to accessing health or medical facilities. This can lead to physical and mental conditions deteriorating as they fail to receive adequate care.
South Africa has some of the highest rates of alcohol consumption in the world.
People are exposed to alcohol at very young ages in South Africa, suggesting that 12% of teenagers reportedly engage in drinking before the age of 13, and rates of alcohol drinkers among high schoolers reach as high as 69% in some studies.
Here are some of the causes of substance addiction: Pre-existing mental health issues : Pre-existing mental health issues, such as depression or anxiety,y may lead to developing coping mechanisms in the form of drug and alcohol consumption. The short-term dopamine release experienced by psychoactive substances, and diminished inhibition, can temporarily relieve the person of these symptoms and instead experience euphoria.
: Pre-existing mental health issues, such as depression or anxiety,y may lead to developing coping mechanisms in the form of drug and alcohol consumption. The short-term dopamine release experienced by psychoactive substances, and diminished inhibition, can temporarily relieve the person of these symptoms and instead experience euphoria. Socioeconomic issues : If someone is facing financial or occupational insecurity, they may turn towards substances to relieve them of any external stress.
: If someone is facing financial or occupational insecurity, they may turn towards substances to relieve them of any external stress. Prenatal alcohol exposure : Some people are more vulnerable to developing substance addiction, particularly in low-income communities. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is a condition where the baby develops a substance dependence because its mother engages in drug or alcohol consumption throughout pregnancy.
: Some people are more vulnerable to developing substance addiction, particularly in low-income communities. is a condition where the baby develops a substance dependence because its mother engages in drug or alcohol consumption throughout pregnancy. Culture: If a culture enables binge drinking or drug use, it will naturally expose people to the effects of addiction. Young people anywhere in the world are subject to peer pressure and respond to social rewards to a high degree. In this case, the social reward comes from fraternising and establishing yourself among others by engaging in binge drinking and drug culture. Many people who are sober or don't engage in drug and alcohol consumption may experience some form of social isolation, especially among the younger demographic.
If a culture enables binge drinking or drug use, it will naturally expose people to the effects of addiction. Young people anywhere in the world are subject to peer pressure and respond to social rewards to a high degree. In this case, the social reward comes from fraternising and establishing yourself among others by engaging in binge drinking and drug culture. Many people who are sober or don't engage in drug and alcohol consumption may experience some form of social isolation, especially among the younger demographic. Accessibility: Some studies show a strong correlation between the number of sources of availability and how much people engage in alcohol consumption. If a person has much greater access to drugs or alcohol, they're more likely to consume them frequently.
Here are some of the most common cultural and social stigmas surrounding addiction and mental health issues, and why they exist.
Many people believe mental health issues and even discussing mental health issues to be a sign of weakness.
Often, this is rooted in not only a lack of education but also the high expectations of masculinity and how men must be strong in a patriarchal community.
Due to this pervasive but incredibly toxic mindset, people suffering from mental health issues are reluctant to seek professional support or even support from close family and friends.
Whether someone worries that their friends will see them as 'weak' or another thinks it will reflect poorly on their image as a parent, stigmas prevent people from taking the necessary steps towards recovery because of the social ramifications.
The misconception that addiction is a lifestyle choice isn't uncommon at all. Although substance addiction is categorised as a chronic brain disease, some people still attribute the disease to someone's lack of discipline.
Addictive substances affect people differently, with some people being at much higher risk at developing a form of dependence.
Genetic, physical, psychological, and environmental factors play a significant role in someone's vulnerability to substance addiction.
When someone is suffering from addiction, they can experience physical and psychological withdrawal symptoms, which aren't only discomforting but can be fatal.
Common withdrawal symptoms include headaches, depression, vomiting, diarrhoea, hallucinations, and even seizures.
The consequences of stigmatising addiction and mental health issues are various and counter-intuitive to the local community: Delayed or avoided treatment : The stigmas surrounding mental health issues may mean that someone is too afraid to seek emotional or professional help. Instead of recovering, their condition will worsen, and their health will deteriorate.
: The stigmas surrounding mental health issues may mean that someone is too afraid to seek emotional or professional help. Instead of recovering, their condition will worsen, and their health will deteriorate. Worsened condition and suicide ideation : The person's condition will continue to worsen until they are either coerced to seek treatment at an addiction detox treatment centre, or consider suicide as an alternative relief from their struggles
: The person's condition will continue to worsen until they are either coerced to seek treatment at an addiction detox treatment centre, or consider suicide as an alternative relief from their struggles Overdosing and death : When an addicted person relapses, they will often consume similar quantities of drugs or alcohol to what they're used to. However, their bodies may not be able to handle such quantities following a period of withdrawal, leaving them at greater risk of overdosing or even death.
: When an addicted person relapses, they will often consume similar quantities of drugs or alcohol to what they're used to. However, their bodies may not be able to handle such quantities following a period of withdrawal, leaving them at greater risk of overdosing or even death. Emotional and economic strain: The economic and social burden of addiction can wreak havoc on communities. Not only are public health facilities struggling to cope with surging demands, but friends and family members will suffer dramatically due to their loved one's ill health.
Here are some of the ways we can break the stigma and support our loved ones and community members suffering from mental health issues and substance addiction: Non-judgmental support: Each case of addiction or mental health issue is different, and we should encourage sympathy. Even if we aren't able to offer licensed or professional guidance or we don't have any direct experience with these conditions, being non-judgmental can encourage them to be more open and seek support.
support: Each case of addiction or mental health issue is different, and we should encourage sympathy. Even if we aren't able to offer licensed or professional guidance or we don't have any direct experience with these conditions, being non-judgmental can encourage them to be more open and seek support. Offer resources : There is a wealth of resources which can be of use to those suffering from addiction or mental health conditions, particularly those of South African Depression and Anxiety Group (SADAG), the South African National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (SANCA), and SAFMH. Support groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous and SMART Recovery are fellowship groups that also offer synchronised meetings with other people struggling with addiction.
: There is a wealth of resources which can be of use to those suffering from addiction or mental health conditions, particularly those of South African Depression and Anxiety Group (SADAG), the South African National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (SANCA), and SAFMH. Support groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous and SMART Recovery are fellowship groups that also offer synchronised meetings with other people struggling with addiction. Attend a support group : Support groups such as AA and NA allow you to attend support sessions with an addicted loved one. This can offer a tremendous amount of support, especially in the first few sessions when your addicted loved one isn't entirely comfortable attending by themself.
: Support groups such as AA and NA allow you to attend support sessions with an addicted loved one. This can offer a tremendous amount of support, especially in the first few sessions when your addicted loved one isn't entirely comfortable attending by themself. Reach out to professionals : Reaching out to professionals, whether those working at a drug and alcohol rehab, licensed therapists, or South African-based mental health helplines, can help you understand more of how you can support your loved one. Not only will you discover new and helpful resources, but you can learn about managing relapse triggers and introducing healthy coping mechanisms to your loved one.
: Reaching out to professionals, whether those working at a drug and alcohol rehab, licensed therapists, or South African-based mental health helplines, can help you understand more of how you can support your loved one. Not only will you discover new and helpful resources, but you can learn about managing relapse triggers and introducing healthy coping mechanisms to your loved one. The SAFER Initiative: WHO's SAFER initiative promotes a set of interventions which can reduce alcohol consumption and the harm it causes in South African communities. Although it is difficult to enforce these rules as individuals, abiding by and encouraging SAFER initiatives can greatly reduce the adverse effects of alcohol.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Most South African farmers are black: why Trump got it so wrong
There are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers,says the authors Image: Karen Sandison/ Independent Newspapers When world leaders engage, the assumption is always that they engage on issues based on verified facts, which their administrative staff are supposed to prepare. Under this assumption, we thought the meeting at the White House on 21 May between South Africa's president, Cyril Ramaphosa, and US president Donald Trump would follow this pattern. Disappointingly, the televised meeting was horrifying to watch as it was based on misrepresenting the reality of life in South Africa. Issues of agriculture, farming and land (and rural crime) were central to the discussions. What is clear to us as agricultural economists is that the skewed views expressed by Trump about these issues originate in South Africa. This includes Trump's statement: 'But Blacks are not farmers.' In our work as agricultural economists, we have, in many pieces and books (our latest titled The Uncomfortable Truth about South Africa's Agriculture), tried to present South Africans with the real facts about the political economy policy reforms and structural dimensions of South African agriculture. Writing on these matters was necessary given that official data – agricultural census 2017, as well as the official land audit of 2017 – all provide an incomplete picture of the real state and structure of South African agriculture. The reason is that the agricultural census, which is supposed to provide a comprehensive and inclusive assessment of the size and structure of the primary agricultural sector, and the land audit, which was supposed to record the ownership of all land in South Africa, are incomplete in their coverage. The incomplete and inaccurate official data provides fertile ground for radical statements by the left and the right – and novices on social media. This is why South Africa has to deal with falsehoods coming from the US. These include Trump's statement that black people are not farmers in South Africa. South Africa is to blame for providing inaccurate data to feed these false narratives. The facts presented here should allow a more nuanced interpretation of South Africa's farm structure. Firstly, there are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers. And not all white commercial farm operations are 'large-scale', and not all black farmers are 'small-scale', 'subsistence' or 'emerging'. Most farm operations can be classified as micro, or small in scale. This is important so that one doesn't view South Africa's agriculture as mainly white farmers. Indeed, we are a country of two agricultures with black farmers mainly at small scale and accounting for roughly 10% of the commercial agricultural output. Still, this doesn't mean they are not active in the sector. They mainly still require support to expand and increase output, but they are active. The facts In the wake of the circus in the Oval Office, we were amazed by the total silence of the many farmers' organisations in South Africa. We have not seen one coming out to reject all of Trump's claims. The only thing we can deduce from this is that these falsehoods suit the political position of some farmer organisations. But at what cost? Will many of their members be harmed by trade sanctions or tariffs against South Africa? The US is an important market for South Africa's agriculture, accounting for 4% of the $13.7 billion (R247bn) exports in 2024. When Ramaphosa highlighted the fact that crime, and rural crime in particular, has an impact on all South Africans and that more black people than white people are being killed, Trump's response was disturbing, to say the least: 'But Blacks are not farmers'. This requires an immediate fact check. We returned to the text from our chapter in the Handbook on the South African Economy we jointly prepared in 2021. In the extract below, we discuss the real numbers of farmers in South Africa and try to provide a sensible racial classification of farmers to denounce Trump's silly statement. As highlighted earlier, the two latest agricultural censuses (2007 and 2017) are incomplete as they restricted the sample frame to farm businesses registered to pay value added tax. Only firms with a turnover of R1 million qualify for VAT registration. We were able to expand the findings from the censuses with numbers from the 2011 population census and the 2016 community survey to better understand the total number of commercial farming units in South Africa. The Community Survey 2016 is a large-scale survey that happened between Censuses 2011 and 2021. The main objective was to provide population and household statistics at municipal level to government and the private sector, to support planning and decision-making. Data from the 2011 population census (extracted from three agricultural questions included in the census) shows that 2 879 638 households out of South Africa's total population, or 19.9% of all households, were active in agriculture for subsistence or commercial purposes. Only 2% of these active households reported an annual income derived from agriculture above R307 000. This translates into 57 592 households that can be considered commercial farmers, with agriculture as the main or only source of household income. This corresponds in some way with the 40 122 farming businesses that are registered for VAT as noted in the 2017 agricultural census report. If we use the numbers from the agricultural census it is evident almost 90% of all VAT-registered commercial farming businesses could be classified as micro or small-scale enterprises. If the farm businesses excluded from the census are accounted for under the assumption that they are too small for VAT registration, then the fact still stands that the vast majority of all farm enterprises in South Africa are small family farms. Graphic Image: Source: StatsSA There are, however, 2 610 large farms (with turnover exceeding R22.5 million, which are responsible for 67% of farm income and employed more than half the agricultural labour force of 757 000 farm workers in 2017. Graphic Image: Source: StatsSA (2020b) – based on additional analysis of the 2016 Community Survey Another way to get to farm numbers is to use the 2016 Community Survey. Using the shares as shown in Table 2, we estimate there are 242 221 commercial farming households in South Africa, of which only 43 891 (18%) are white commercial farmers. (This is very much in line with the VAT registered farmers but also acknowledging the fact that many white farm businesses are not necessarily registered for VAT.) Let's consider only the agricultural households with agriculture as their main source of income, surveyed in the 2016 community survey. We end up with a total of 132 700 households, of whom 93 000 (70%) are black farmers. This reality is something that policy makers and farm organisations find very difficult to deal with and it seems that Trump also found this too good to be true. We have tried here in a long winded way to deal with farm numbers and how to get to a race classification of farmers in South Africa. In the end we trust that we have managed to show that there are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers. Their share in total output is smaller than that of their white counterparts. The National Agricultural Marketing Council puts black farmers' share of agricultural production as roughly 10%. But these numbers are also incomplete and largely an undercount. It will always be challenging to get to the real number of black farmers' share of agricultural output as nobody would ever know whether the potato or the cabbage on the shelf came from a farm owned by a black farmer or a white person but operated by a black farmer, for example. As South Africans know, the labour on farms, in pack houses, distribution systems and retail are all black. So, the sweat and hard work of black South African workers are integral to the food supply chain in South Africa. Let's get these facts straight and promote them honestly. The Conversation Image: Supplied
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
The poverty that haunts the country
We need to get our economy to grow and create more jobs to close the poverty gap. While we attack each other on social media and in the letters columns of newspapers – over everything from Donald Trump to racism and B-BBEE – the reality is that we are, by our very access to these media, a privileged part of South African society regardless of our colour. But, we don't go to bed hungry every night, like a shocking one in four of our compatriots do. Statistics for last year show that 22.2% of households considered their access to food inadequate or severely inadequate, with the worst food access problems in the Northern Cape (34.3%), the Eastern Cape (31.3%), Mpumalanga (30.4%), and KwaZulu-Natal (23.9%). ALSO READ: Poverty, child labour and violence push boys out of school, says Unesco Those figures – along with the proportion of individuals receiving social grants – are a stark illustration of the poverty that haunts South Africa and of the huge gulf between the haves and the have-nots. The proportion of the population relying on government handouts increased from 12.8% in 2003 to 30.9% in 2019 and surged to 40.1% last year, due to the introduction of the special Covid social relief of distress grant. Many of the poorest households are headed by women, a group in our country likely to be less educated and employable, not to mention being disproportionately high numbers of crime victims. It would be easy for the heartless capitalists to say 'get a job!', when this is simply not possible for many. So that is why it is essential that the government continue to operate this social safety net. Those same capitalists should know that hungry people are angry people and that when they have nothing to lose, violence will mean nothing to them. ALSO READ: World Bank: 2% growth won't ease SA's poverty, unemployment We need to get our economy to grow and create more jobs to close the poverty gap. But we need to stop taxpayers' money, which could save lives, from being looted.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
We are an evil and irresponsible nation, write our readers
As an evil nation, we got what we deserved The US President went out to humiliate the South African President. The issue of farmers and the 'genocide' of which they are victims as white people was clearly not on the agenda. The agenda focused on 'resetting relations and bilateral matters', according to the presidency. However, it is surprising that Ramaphosa invited white golfers and the minister of agriculture. That can only mean that South Africans were always wary of giving Trump an excuse to bring up the white farmer genocide. Nonetheless, the South African government received what it deserved. Also, the media, which has long protected Ramaphosa, received what it deserved. Trump humiliated all South Africans, so there was no chance to play great public relations. Indeed, the entire concept of a democratic South Africa that is 'non-sexist', 'non-racial', and has the 'sweetest Constitution and free media' facade has been exposed as the satanic lie it has always been. And the 'self-proclaimed' guardians of democracy known as the South African media were caught off guard, and Trump accused them of concealing the alleged genocide. The democratic government has done an excellent job of concealing the fact that the majority of people are Christians, the majority of violence victims are Black men, and the majority of marginalised people are Black. It hid God's role in South Africans' resolve to end apartheid. The government and biased media highlighted a few examples of Black and foreign pastors as the face of a 'rotten Christianity' and a God unneeded in our constitutional democracy, while ignoring the positive work of churches and pastors. This nation has hidden God from its children's education and attempted to justify xenophobia by citing frustration among the people. Many evil things have occurred in this country, but all have one common theme: to humiliate the God of Christians and demonstrate that we can do so through our secular Constitution! South Africa was becoming so arrogant in its devil-may-care attitude and 'Madiba magic' nonsense that it thought it could take it to the ICJ and get its way, just as it had done with Christianity and people like Bushiri. However, it has been exposed for the emptiness and hypocrisy that define it, as no one can be above their spirituality. As a Christian nation, South Africa's ethos and political stance should be based solely on Christianity, including championing human rights at the International Court of Justice. | Khotso Moleko Bloemfontein Let's sacrifice in solidarity with others Across the globe, countless countries have borne the brunt of war, devastating conflicts leaving behind a trail of destruction and despair. As we Muslims approach Eidul Adha, consider prioritising helping war victims, like in Gaza, by reducing personal extravagance, desire, overconsumption, and donate to bona fide humanitarian aid organisations. People in Gaza are facing enormous suffering and lack basic necessities like food, water, medical supplies and other human necessities. Currently, easing the suffering, pain and poverty in Gaza is the need of the hour and it is the time when help is most needed. Moreover, not only during Eid but also beyond Eid, as Muslims and human beings, we must lower the voice of our luxuriousness as around us are people in great agony and sorrow. The situation in Gaza has assumed apocalyptic proportions with hundreds of civilians being butchered on a daily basis. Those who are not killed by the Zionists regime face the grim and painful prospect of death through starvation. With humanitarian aid and commercial supplies blocked, nearly half a million people are facing imminent starvation. Let us do our best to assist. Besides prayers and aid we need to request the UN Security Council, EU and other nations to send in military support to stop apartheid Israel's egregious military offensive in Gaza and occupied Palestine. | MOHAMED SAEED Pietermaritzburg Investment in ESG is irresponsible It is saddening to note that the Coronation Fund Managers Stewardship Activities Report uncritically embraces the false globalist ideology of ESG (environmental social governance). Proudly the Coronation Fund Managers declare that they 'assess and advocate for improvements in their climate change strategies.' Clearly, despite Coronation's research capacity, they have wittingly or unwittingly allowed themselves to be shepherded by the controlled sirens of pliant science and the mass media in believing that human activity can influence climate change. Uncorrupted science and history have proved that warming periods occurred in millennia before fossil fuels were being widely used as they are today. Uncorrupted science has also shown that temperature changes occur as a result of the inconsistency of the earth's elliptical path around the sun and the slight variations that occur in the earth's tilt. So ignoring true science and history is really inexcusable. But what is worse is the agenda of the climate change globalists. It requires investing in the hugely expensive green deal – lithium powered vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels. It ignores the vast environmental damage the extraction of lithium causes and the unreliability of wind turbines with their terrible toll on bird life. By taking punitive action against what they condemn as carbon polluters like Sasol, the ESG disciples push up the cost of living and exacerbate impoverishment. Of course if they studied the science and history of carbon dioxide they would note that although it comprises less than one percent of the atmosphere, it is vitally important for plant and vegetation growth. The part of the Stewardship Report that shows double standards is Coronation's eye on the possible oil and gas bonanza off the Namibian coast. For all their green commitment, the allure of profitable investment in fossil fuel exploitation beckons. Although the Stewardship Report is silent on the social aspect of ESG, it needs to be pointed out that it concerns DEI – diversity, equity, inclusion. One wonders how that squares with Coronation's commitment to 'responsible investment' when it is a fact that the criterion of merit is excluded in the application of DEI policy. Given US President Donald Trump's administration's recognition of the globalists' green deal for the scam it is, in keeping with their commitment to responsible investment, Coronation's Fund Managers ought to be ditching ESG and focusing on the massive fossil fuel exploitation that is about to take off in the US. | DUNCAN DU BOIS Bluff DAILY NEWS
