A president toys with overturning democracy
Opinion
'Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom warned on Tuesday night in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's actions in the Los Angeles protests.
Demonstrations began last week in that city after Immigration and Customs Enforcement raided several city locations to arrest people allegedly involved in illegal immigration to the United States and other violations. Trump has ordered in the National Guard and the military in response.
For those of us who are a certain vintage, news of the unrest in Los Angeles brought up a lot of memories. Who can forget the hours of live television coverage over almost a week in 1992 as the world watched Los Angeles erupt in riots following the acquittal of four police officers for the beating of Rodney King. People died, more were injured and there was billions of dollars in property damage. The carnage was brought into everyone's living room, as television stations disrupted their regular programming to provide up-to-the-minute coverage.
Damian Dovarganes / The Associated Press files
A man walks past a burned-out car after a night of protests in downtown Los Angeles on Monday.
Today's protests are not the same, yet because of what they represent, we should be paying close attention.
Here's why. What is happening in Los Angeles is not only egregiously hypocritical, it's also the death of the fundamentals of democracy.
First, some perspective. In 1992, then-president George Bush called in the National Guard to help quell protesters at the request of the Los Angeles mayor and the California governor. He invoked the Insurrection Act.
Last Friday, protests began in Los Angeles, in protest to immigration raids targeting undocumented workers. These demonstrations were called peaceful for the most part by LAPD. Even the city's mayor downplayed the vandalism, vowing that those who did cause damage would be prosecuted.
Saturday, Trump deployed 4,000 members of the National Guard to the city. Rather than using the Insurrection Act, Trump used a provision that allows the National Guard to be called in by the president in situations where authorities can't execute the country's laws. However, this provision also specifies that the order must be issued through the governor of the state.
This is an overstep. Not one person has been killed. The protests have been limited to a small area in the city of Los Angeles. There has been no widespread damage to buildings or homes, although on Tuesday some looting was reported. More importantly, the governor of California did not ask for the National Guard to be called upon.
California's attorney general announced Monday that the state is suing both Trump and his defence secretary for the deployment of the National Guard. Attorney General Rob Bonta wrote in a news release: 'Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion. The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the president's authority under the law — and not one we take lightly. We're asking a court to put a stop to the unlawful, unprecedented order.'
On Tuesday, Trump ordered 700 marines to be deployed, ostensibly to protect federal buildings. This, at a cost of about US$134 million, during a time of cutbacks at all levels of national spending.
Meanwhile, also on Tuesday, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued a curfew for a portion of the city's downtown to keep a lid on the situation citing vandalism and looting. Bass has suggested the city is at a tipping point. One wonders if Trump's actions have only added gasoline to the fire.
Not one to dial down the rhetoric, Trump suggested he may consider invoking the Insurrection Act, similar to Bush in 1992. It's one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a U.S. president.
He also called the protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy' later in a speech.
Tuesdays
A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world.
This is the same president who in his second day in office, pardoned the individuals involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, attacks on the Capitol Hill building in Washington D.C. and commuted the sentences for 14 individuals convicted or otherwise charged with engaging in the separate seditious conspiracies.
The hypocrisy is staggering.
The current protests in Los Angeles share some similarities with the 1992 riots and as they continue, they may become more disruptive and more violent. However, their importance suggests that we should be paying attention to them.
What we're seeing play out is the demise of democracy where the rule of law, the right to protest and the sovereignty of state power is overturned by the agenda of an all too-powerful leader.
Shannon Sampert is a political scientist. shannon@mediadiva.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
34 minutes ago
- CTV News
Marines take over some security in L.A. while cities across U.S. prep for ‘No Kings' rallies
Police confront a protesters outside City Hall during protests over federal immigration enforcement raids on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Ethan Swope) LOS ANGELES — After a week of protests over federal immigration raids, about 200 Marines moved into Los Angeles on Friday to guard a federal building in the city while communities across the country prepped for what's anticipated to be a nationwide wave of large-scale demonstrations against U.S. President Donald Trump's polices this weekend. The Marine troops with rifles, combat gear and walkie-talkies took over some posts from National Guard members who were deployed to the city after the protests erupted last week. Those protests sparked dozens more over several days around the country, with some leading to clashes with police and hundreds of arrests. The Marines had not been seen on Los Angeles city streets until Friday. They finished training on civil disturbance and have started to replace Guard members protecting the federal building west of downtown, so the Guard soldiers can be assigned to protect law enforcement officers on raids, the commander in charge of 4,700 troops deployed to the L.A. protests said. The Marines moved into Los Angeles before Saturday's planned 'No Kings' demonstrations nationally against Trump's policies, which will also happen the same day as a military parade in Washington, D.C., when troops will march and tanks will rumble through the streets of the nation's capital. The Marines' arrival also came a day after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that had directed Trump to return control of Guard troops to California. The judge had ruled the Guard deployment was illegal, violated the Tenth Amendment, which defines the power between state and federal governments, and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The judge did not rule on the presence of the Marines. Military mission Some 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed to Los Angeles this week. Hundreds have provided protection to immigration agents making arrests. Another 2,000 Guard members were notified of deployment earlier this week. None of the military troops will be detaining anyone, Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, the commander of Task Force 51 who is overseeing the 4,700 combined troops, said. 'I would like to emphasize that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities,' Sherman said. 'Rather, they'll be focused on protecting federal law enforcement personnel.' Roughly 500 National Guard members have been used to provide security on immigration raids after undergoing expanded instruction, legal training and rehearsals with the agents doing the enforcement before they go on those missions. By mid-afternoon Friday, more than a dozen Marines were stationed outside the 17-story Wilshire Federal Building, replacing some members of the National Guard at various entrances. They mostly appeared to be checking tickets from members of the public who were there to renew their passports. The building is the same place Democratic U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla on Thursday was forcefully removed from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's news conference and handcuffed by officers as he tried to speak up about the immigration raids. There were no protesters around the building. Occasionally, a passing driver shouted from their window, registering a mix of anger and support for the military presence. Sherman said the U.S. Marine Corps is responsible for guarding U.S. embassies overseas so they are well-trained on how to defend a federal building. California vs. Trump California Gov. Gavin Newsom has called the troop deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and a power grab by Trump, and he has gone to court to stop it. The president has cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' A federal judge said in a ruling late Thursday that what is happening in Los Angeles does not meet the definition of a rebellion and issued an order to return control of the Guard to California before the appeals court stopped it from going into effect Friday. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump thanked the appeals court Friday morning. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now,' he said. The court will hold a hearing on the matter Tuesday. Under federal law, active-duty forces are prohibited by law from conducting law enforcement. The Trump administration has characterized the city as a 'war zone,' which local authorities dispute. Recent protesters have drawn a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city. There have been about 500 arrests since Saturday, mostly for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries. An 8 p.m. curfew has been in place in a 1-square-mile (2.5-square-kilometre) section of downtown. The city of Los Angeles encompasses roughly 500 square miles (1,295 square kilometres). Protests have ended after a few hours with arrests this week largely for failure to disperse. No Kings The 'No Kings' demonstrations are planned in nearly 2,000 locations around the country, according to the movement's website. A flagship march and rally is planned for Philadelphia, but no protests are scheduled to take place in Washington, D.C., where the military parade will be held. Participants are expected to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation, organizers say. In Florida, state Attorney General James Uthmeier warned that any protesters who become violent will be dealt with harshly. States face questions on deploying troops Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors in a statement called Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' Washington state Gov. Bob Ferguson took to social media Friday to call for peaceful protests over the weekend, to ensure the military is not sent to the state. 'Don't give him an excuse to try and federalize the National Guard like he did in California,' he said. Military parade The military parade in Washington which Trump had unsuccessfully pushed for during his first term - will also feature concerts, fireworks, NFL players, fitness competitions and displays all over the National Mall for daylong festivities. The celebration Saturday also happens to be Trump's birthday. The Army expects as many as 200,000 people could attend and says putting on the celebration will cost an estimated US$25 million to $45 million. Article by Amy Taxin, Lolita C. Baldor and Jake Offenhartz. Taxin reported from Santa Ana, Calif. Baldor contributed from Washington.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court won't reconsider its ruling upholding a $5 million civil judgment against President Donald Trump in a civil lawsuit alleging he sexually abused a writer in a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. In an 8-2 vote Friday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's petition for the full appellate court to rehear arguments in his challenge to the jury's finding that he sexually abused advice columnist E. Jean Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. Carroll testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store's dressing room. A three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the verdict in December, rejecting Trump's claims that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan's decisions spoiled the trial, including allowing two other Trump sexual abuse accusers to testify. The women said Trump committed similar acts against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump denied all three women's allegations. In an opinion Friday, four judges voting to reject rehearing wrote: 'Simply re-litigating a case is not an appropriate use' of the process. 'In those rare instances in which a case warrants our collective consideration, it is almost always because it involves a question of exceptional importance,' or a conflict between precedent and the appellate panel's opinion, Judges Myrna Pérez, Eunice C. Lee, Beth Robinson and Sarah A.L. Merriam wrote. All four were appointed by President Joe Biden, Trump's one-time Democratic rival. The two dissenting judges, Trump appointees, Steven J. Menashi and Michael H. Park, wrote that the trial 'consisted of a series of indefensible evidentiary rulings.' 'The result was a jury verdict based on impermissible character evidence and few reliable facts,' they wrote. 'No one can have any confidence that the jury would have returned the same verdict if the normal rules of evidence had been applied.' Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement: 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today's decision.' 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation,' said Kaplan, who is not related to the judge. Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. He briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial last year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir. Kaplan presided over both trials and instructed the second jury to accept the first jury's finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. Arguments in that appeal are set for June 24. The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done. ___
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
All eyes on Donald Trump: Leaders' guide for G7 summit in Kananaskis
Article content What he wants to avoid: Anything that might upset the U.K.-U.S. trade deal which is still to be implemented. Starmer wants the accord to come into force as soon as possible so that the U.K. doesn't run the risk of falling victim to future tariff threats. He also wants to steer clear of an disputes between Trump and Carney, which the U.K. is liable to get sucked into because Canada is part of the British Commonwealth. Article content What he really fears: Getting caught at the scene of the crime. If Trump does something outrageous that would put Starmer in a bind: speak out and he risks retaliation from the White House, keep quiet and he could look weak at home. And the British press will be asking him to comment on whatever Trump does throughout. Article content Article content What she wants: Italy's prime minister just wants to get in and out of Banff unscathed. She has a good relationship with Trump and a good relationship her European colleagues and has no major policy goals for this meeting. With her domestic situation looking slightly delicate, her aim is to make sure nothing rocks the boat. Article content Article content What they want: The EU's two main representatives will be focused on Ukraine and on trade. They want to persuade Trump to drop his opposition to their plan to lower the price cap on Russian oil and they are also looking for the strongest backing that they can for Ukraine's future independence and military support, and clarity on global trade. Article content What they want to avoid: Any curveballs from Trump and his trade advisers that might throw their tariff negotiations off track. Article content What they really fear: A major blow-up before the NATO summit. European leaders will be treading on eggshells until they have secured Trump's renewed commitment to defend NATO allies.
