Chinese buyers selling knockoffs of Russian military gear back to Russia and Ukraine, authorities say
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Chinese nationals have been caught smuggling Russian military gear out of the country before reselling knockoffs back to Russia, authorities have told Russia's Izvestia newspaper.
The items included bulletproof vests and uniforms that had been reversed-engineered and reproduced with inferior material, customs officials said.
Why It Matters
The West has accused China of keeping Russia's sanctions-hit economy afloat since President Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with bilateral trade reaching record highs thanks to a spike in oil and gas deals. The United States and European Union also alleged that China is supplying dual civilian-military use goods that support Russia's wartime industries.
While China has in recent decades surpassed its northern neighbor in military might, it had long studied Russian military systems—from missiles and jets to air defenses platforms—to modernize the People's Liberation Army.
Newsweek reached out to the Russian and Chinese foreign ministries by email for comment.
What To Know
Cross-border shipments of dual-use goods soared following the start of the Russia-Ukraine war, prompting Moscow to place a ban on the export of products with military applications, according to Izvestia. The restriction carries criminal charges of up to seven years in prison.
Earlier this month, a 25-year-old Chinese man was arrested in Moscow after law enforcement seized two tactical vests he had attempted to send home by mail, the paper said. Another student was detained in December after being found with body armor, armored plates, bullet casings and other equipment in his university dormitory. The man claimed he had purchased the gear through online ads.
An officer of the Russian National Guard Troops takes part in an operation to check drivers' documents in Melitopol, Zaporozhie region, on April 9, 2025. Konstantin Mihalchevskiy
An officer of the Russian National Guard Troops takes part in an operation to check drivers' documents in Melitopol, Zaporozhie region, on April 9, 2025. Konstantin Mihalchevskiy
Sputnik via AP
Ruslan Shapiev, head of Russian defense contractor RUSARM, attributed the spike in illegal exports to growing demand for counterfeit goods and pricing disparities between countries, according to Izvestia.
The market for military goods is saturated due to international trade and postal loopholes, Shapiev said. Cheaper Chinese knockoff equipment and uniforms have also been found in the possession of Ukrainian troops, he said, suggesting the items were flowing to both sides of the conflict.
What People Are Saying
Ruslan Shapiev, general director of RUSARM, told Izvestia: "There's nothing wrong with [China's] helmets, but their body armor is questionable. The design and ergonomics leave much to be desired. Russian gear is more expensive but better, and people will always choose quality."
"China views Russia as a country with deep military experience. They watch everything—our gear, our processes. Russian uniforms on the market today can rival or exceed foreign models."
Guo Jiakun, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, told reporters: "China welcomes all efforts towards a ceasefire, which is a necessary step towards peace. It is hoped that the parties concerned will continue to resolve the crisis through dialogue and negotiation."
What's Next
Despite President Donald Trump's pledge to end the war in Ukraine within his first 100 days in office, negotiations have stalled, with Putin rejecting a U.S.-proposed 30-day ceasefire.
Following talks in Paris with Ukrainian and European officials, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Friday that the administration may have to "move on" if no breakthrough is reached.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Red states are forcing public schools to go MAGA
In Oklahoma, new social studies standards sound like they were written by loyal followers of President Trump. The standards include teaching high school students about 'discrepancies' in the 2020 presidential election, including discredited theories related to the 'security risks of mail-in balloting, sudden batch dumps, an unforeseen record number of voters, and the unprecedented contradiction of 'bellwether county' trends.' Students will also be asked to 'identify the source of the COVID-19 pandemic from a Chinese lab,' begin learning about the teachings of Jesus in the second grade and the 'ways that individuals can be patriotic' in preschool. After being accepted by the Oklahoma legislature, the new standards have sparked litigation and bitter debate. Oklahoma is by no means alone in remaking public education in hyperpartisan and, in our view, dangerously misguided ways. In an era of extreme political polarization, nothing succeeds like excess. As the pendulum has swung to the right, red state officials — acting under the banner of 'parental rights' and anti-'woke' ideology — have outdone one another in adopting restrictive instructional mandates related to religion, gender, sexuality, race and U.S. history. In 2023, Texas became the first state to permit school districts to use chaplains to counsel students during the school day. This year, the Texas legislature passed a bill allowing school districts to set aside time daily for prayer and religious study. Louisiana and Arkansas passed laws requiring classrooms in every public school to display the Ten Commandments. (On Friday, the conservative Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the Louisiana law was unconstitutional.) Kentucky has prohibited instruction on human sexuality and sexually transmitted diseases before fifth grade and barred instruction on gender identity or sexual orientation. Iowa banned instruction on sexuality or sexual orientation before sixth grade and prohibited school libraries from carrying books depicting sex acts. In a backlash to the social justice activism that followed George Floyd's murder in 2020, at least 18 states passed laws banning the teaching of 'critical race theory' and restricting how teachers talk about racism, sexual orientation, gender identity and other 'divisive concepts.' Other 'educational gag orders' prohibit teachers from discussing 'controversial issues of public policy or social affairs.' If such teaching is permitted, the rules require teachers to 'strive to explore such issues from diverse and contending perspectives.' Even though two-thirds of Americans oppose book bans, books 'are disappearing' from K-12 classrooms and libraries across the country in an 'unprecedented flood' driven by 'punitive state laws' and 'pressure campaigns.' Florida has led the way. In what may become a blueprint for federal policy, the state adopted a series of laws, regulations and executive orders that 'privilege some parents' ideological preferences above all others, tie the hands of educators, and limit students' access to information.' Florida has banned the teaching of 'any concept that promotes, advances, or compels individuals to believe discriminatory concepts'; prohibited spending state funds on diversity, equity and inclusion programs; barred classroom discussion of gender identity through third grade; pulled hundreds of books that describe 'sexual conduct' or are deemed age inappropriate from school shelves; and encouraged parents to object to instructional materials they deem immoral or harmful. According to a 2024 Washington Post survey, 38 states have adopted laws either restricting or expanding teaching on race, racism, gender or history. Although some, such as a 2021 Rhode Island law mandating instruction on 'African Heritage and History,' reflect progressives' priorities, fully two-thirds of the laws are restrictive, and 90 percent of those were passed in states that voted for Trump in 2020. Conservatives insist that restrictive laws are necessary to combat 'woke' indoctrination and protect the rights of parents to educate their children in accordance with their values. Liberals argue that 'inclusive curricula' are required to enable all students to thrive. In addition to striking down Louisiana's Ten Commandment's statute, federal judges are considering challenges to many of the other red state instructional mandates. In the past, school districts have usually had wide latitude in instruction, an approach that is more responsive to the educational priorities of local communities than statewide mandates. After all, even the reddest and bluest states have plenty of residents (in places like Austin, Texas and upstate New York) who dissent, often vigorously, from the majority's agenda. The current burst of state regulation is unprecedented, and it is having a profound impact on the education of America's kids. What students are told about the subjects that most divide the country increasingly depends on whether they attend school in a blue state or a red one — almost certainly exacerbating polarization. All this has a dramatic chilling effect on teachers. According to a 2023 survey, 65 percent of teachers have restricted their instruction on 'political and social issues,' twice the number subject to restrictive state laws. For most of American history, one could claim that Newton's Third Law of Motion — for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction — has applied to politics as well. So Americans might expect that ideological extremes in state educational policy will eventually be reversed. But if U.S. institutions do not preserve the norms, practices and principles of democracy, we may discover — when it's too late — that Newton's Third Law no longer applies. Glenn C. Altschuler is the Thomas and Dorothy Litwin Emeritus Professor of American Studies at Cornell University. David Wippman is emeritus president of Hamilton College.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Hard-Hitting World Leaves EU Soft Power Stranded
Last week, with uncertainty raging over whether the US would join Israel in striking Iran, Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto delivered an elegy for a soft-power Europe that looked stranded in a hard-power world. 'We talk about Europe as if Europe counted for something,' he said. 'But its time is over, and I say it with sadness.' It turned out to be a fitting prelude to the weekend's events as Europe's last-ditch push for diplomacy with Tehran ended with American bombers striking Iranian nuclear sites. It speaks to wider anxiety over Europe's geopolitical future as drones and missiles continue to pound Ukraine, tensions rise in the Taiwan strait and the Middle East erupts. Yes, the combination of Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump has finally stung the European Union out of complacency, with the prospect of rearmament projects worth €800 billion ($920 billion) sending share prices soaring and industrial capacity whirring into life. German weapons maker Rheinmetall AG, for example, is outperforming tech darling Nvidia Corp. and taking Gucci parent Kering SA's place on the Euro Stoxx 50 index. Yet at the same time, we're a long way from a European defense worthy of the name.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
NATO ships are at rising risk. Top commanders tell BI it's time to rethink naval defense.
NATO warships are sailing into a dangerous new era of naval warfare in which the threats are growing fast, two senior alliance commanders recently told Business Insider. From the Black Sea to the Red Sea, the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have exposed key vulnerabilities and shown NATO what its naval forces need to operate in risky environments. Dangers to warships these days include threats like hostile drones, missiles, and other naval vessels, capabilities built on rapidly advancing combat technology. So what does NATO need? Layered defenses, cheaper ways to destroy enemy threats, and deeper ammunition stockpiles. Vice Adm. James Morley, the deputy commander of NATO's Joint Force Command Norfolk, told BI that Ukraine and the Red Sea "have revealed the need to be ready to deal with a higher level of intensity than we had previously scaled for, both in terms of stock and in terms of time on the front line." In the Black Sea, Ukrainian forces have repeatedly used domestically produced naval drones to damage and destroy Russian warships, showing the risks that relatively cheap, asymmetric combat solutions pose to conventional naval forces. Far away, at the southern end of the Red Sea, the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen have launched missiles and drones at merchant vessels and NATO warships defending international shipping lanes. In its efforts to fend off the Houthi attacks, the US Navy has faced its most intense combat since World War II, US officials have previously said. Morley said NATO warships are at a higher risk because of the number of global actors who are prepared to use military force. Weapons proliferation has given actors who might previously have been unable to threaten advanced navies a new ability to do so. In the case of the Houthis, for instance, the group's missile attacks have raised the level of danger in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden to a level not seen in years. The situation is different in Europe, where NATO warships have not been shot at but tensions are running high. There have been several incidents with Moscow that raise the level of risk. 'The mindset needs to be layered defense' Surface warships face an expanding range of threats, from anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles and torpedoes to enemy aircraft and drones. Some weapons now in play only recently saw combat for the first time. The high operational tempo in the Red Sea has informed Western military planners about what limitations they face regarding magazine capacity, weapons inventory, and reloading capabilities. Morley said that as the weaponry that can threaten warships increases, so must the defensive capabilities aboard the vessels in danger. It's important to invest in missile stockpiles and ensure that NATO defense industrial bases can produce enough and ships can carry enough should they sail into a fight. The days "of driving around with a silo of ammunition that never gets used is sadly now in the past," he said, explaining that "ships routinely come back from the Red Sea, for example, having expended ammunition, and they need to be resupplied and then get back out on patrol." US Navy warships, for instance, have expended significant quantities of SM-series interceptor missiles for air defense. Air defense isn't just about numbers. It's also about dollars. The rise of inexpensive strike drones — some just tens of thousands of dollars apiece — as a tool of naval warfare has NATO forces trying to figure out how they can cheaply defeat these threats without wasting a surface-to-air missile costing millions. The aim is to bring the cost difference between the threat and the interceptor much closer to parity. "I think the mindset needs to be layered defense," Morley said. Warships need the expensive, higher-end missiles to deal with sophisticated threats. But breaking the cost-curve challenge means having a range of capabilities so complex interceptors aren't expended on the simple threats. American Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, for instance, are kitted with options like the M2 Browning .50 caliber machine guns, Mark 38 turret systems, five-inch artillery cannons, and a variety of surface-to-air missiles. These weapons allow the warships to confront a range of threats, though some options, like the deck guns, come with drawbacks, such as permitting threats to get much closer to warships than desired. Big platforms aren't obsolete Adm. Pierre Vandier, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, who oversees alliance modernization efforts, said emerging technologies, like drones, have created new problems for larger platforms like warships, as has been the case in the Black Sea. Anything that exists on the water could effectively be hit. Vandier identified uncrewed systems as one of the biggest changes in naval warfare over the past decade and said one risk is that a warship could be overwhelmed by a swarm of drones. "You need to find ways on the ships to be protected from that and to engage multiple targets at the same time," he said. That could be kinetic, involving a physical strike, or some alternative, like electronic warfare. NATO is working to incorporate lessons learned from Ukraine and the Red Sea into its combat training. At last month's Formidable Shield 25 exercise, US sailors practiced using the deck guns to shoot down small quadcopter drones that they could face in a swarm attack. They also practiced defending against uncrewed surface vehicles like the ones Ukraine has used to batter Russia's Black Sea fleet. Exercises such as Formidable Shield allow allied navies to practice navigating air defense challenges and learn how to engage cheaper threats with cheaper defenses, thus saving the more expensive methods for the higher-end threats. Despite the growing number of threats to warships, Vandier said the rise of drones doesn't necessarily render them obsolete. Aircraft carriers, the flagships of a fleet, can project force globally with embarked aviation. They travel in heavily defended strike groups, making the carriers particularly formidable and hard to reach for enemy attacks. "To get to a carrier, you have layers," Vandier said. "It's a battle between the shield and the sword. My personal feeling is that the story is not finished for the big platforms. Not yet."
