Top 9 Nuclear-Armed Nations In 2025; India Ranks At …., Pakistan At ….; Check Full List
photoDetails english 2898986 https://zeenews.india.com/photos/world/top-9-nuclear-armed-nations-in-2025-india-ranks-at-pakistan-at-check-full-list-2899025 Updated:May 10, 2025, 02:27 PM IST
1 / 9
As of early 2025, nine countries collectively hold around 12,331 nuclear warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists (FAS). While Russia and the U.S. continue to lead the global count, countries like China, India, and Pakistan are steadily expanding their arsenals amid rising geopolitical tensions. Here's a closer look at the countries with nuclear weapons and how India and Pakistan stack up. Russia – 5,449 Nuclear Warheads
2 / 9
Russia holds the largest nuclear stockpile in the world, with approximately 5,449 nuclear weapons. Despite dismantling some decommissioned warheads, it still maintains the highest number of deployed and reserve weapons. This extensive arsenal is a core pillar of its defense strategy and global power status. United States – 5,277 Nuclear Warheads
3 / 9
The U.S. ranks second with 5,277 nuclear warheads. Its arsenal includes land-based missiles, submarine-launched warheads, and aerial bombs. While it continues to pursue disarmament diplomacy, the U.S. is also modernizing its aging nuclear triad to stay ahead in deterrence capabilities. China – 600 Nuclear Warheads
4 / 9
China has increased its nuclear stockpile to around 600 warheads in 2025. It is actively working on expanding and diversifying its missile systems. Its nuclear buildup reflects Beijing's desire for strategic balance with the U.S. and India, and its growing assertiveness in global geopolitics. France – 290 Nuclear Warheads
5 / 9
France possesses around 290 nuclear warheads, relying mainly on submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and air-based delivery systems. France maintains its nuclear forces independently and views them as essential for national and European defense. United Kingdom – 225 Nuclear Warheads
6 / 9
The UK holds a stockpile of 225 nuclear warheads, most of which are deployed on Trident submarines. While it has reduced its arsenal over time, recent strategic reviews have called for expanding and modernizing the system, reflecting renewed security concerns in Europe. India – 180 Nuclear Warheads
7 / 9
India is ranked 6th, with a nuclear arsenal of approximately 180 warheads. Guided by a "No First Use" policy, India's strategy emphasizes minimum credible deterrence. However, rising regional tensions, particularly with China and Pakistan, have led to greater investment in nuclear delivery systems. Pakistan – 170 Nuclear Warheads
8 / 9
Pakistan comes next with an estimated 170 nuclear warheads in 2025. Its doctrine focuses on deterring conventional conflict with India and includes short-range tactical nuclear weapons. Pakistan has been actively increasing its arsenal, citing national security concerns. Israel (90) & North Korea (50)
9 / 9
- Israel is believed to possess around 90 nuclear warheads, although it neither confirms nor denies this. It follows a policy of nuclear ambiguity.
- North Korea, despite sanctions, has built a stockpile of 50 nuclear warheads, with continued missile testing raising global alarms.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump surrendering to Putin? US Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia says NATO's eastward expansion can be stopped
Will Trump say yes to Putin? Live Events Trump can take a strong stand (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump 's administration is ready to discuss NATO's expansion eastwards to meet one of the major demands of his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin before the ceasefire in the war against Ukraine. Lt Gen Joseph Kellogg (retd), the US Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia, in an interview to ABC News admitted that Ukraine's proposal to join the western military alliance is one of the points that Russia has been raising during the has been firm on stopping Ukraine from becoming a NATO member, which the Russians believe is a red line that should not be crossed. Gen Kellogg stated that the issue of Ukraine's desire of joining NATO is not even being discussed within the military bloc."Well I think, it's a fair concern and we have said that repeatedly. We have said that that to us Ukraine coming into NATO is not on the table. And we're not the only country that says that. You know I can probably give you four of the countries in NATO and it it takes 32 of the 32 to allow you to come into NATO. We've seen other countries say "we're not too sure about that." And that that's one of the issues that Russia will bring up, and they're only talking Ukraine. They're talking the country of Georgia, they're talking Moldova," Gen Kellogg replied when about what Russia's the US Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia quickly added that the decision on NATO's proposed expansion was only for President Trump to take. "We can stop the expansion of NATO coming close to your (Russian) border. That's a security concern from them. But that's a presidential decision. It's not my decision to make, and these are things we go to the President and say Mr President this is what we talked about. This is what everybody's willing to do. Are you willing to accept that, are you willing to go with it. Then you know hopefully then we'll have a negotiation," he asserted."Hopefully then we'll have a negotiation, a discussion between President Trump, President Putin and (Ukrainian) President (Volodymyr) Zelenskyy, and get an end state to this and stop the killing."The two warring sides - Ukraine and Russia - have shared their memorandums with the US team which will now create a single document before the talks in Türkiye's capital Istanbul on Monday (June 2). Officials from the UK, France and Germany, too, would be part of the a big confidence-building measure Ukraine and Russia exchanged 1,000 POWs each after talks on May 16. But things have moved slowly with the Russian side pressing on with its over three-year-long offensive against Kellogg also highlighted that the two sides have lost a massively large number of troops and civilians in the war which has at times threatened to engulf the entire European continent."Their numbers on both sides when you add them together both wounded and dead are conservatively are about 1.2 million. That is a stunning number I mean this is war at an industrial strength level," he also cautioned Putin against underestimating President Trump and voiced the US administration's"President just said this week that that Putin is playing with fire by refusing to engage in these ceasefire talks even as he's saying this Russian forces are making small gains on the battlefield. So what happens when Putin plays with fire? Well, I think it's a huge mistake to do that with Donald Trump, I think one of the things you want to one thing you should never underestimate Donald Trump. The second is never put him in a position that he thinks he's being used and and I think his frustration is that he's put forward some reasonable proposals and reasonable discussions, and he's seen a level of of unreasonableness that really frustrates him. It frustrates me as well," he launched its special military offensive, the term used for Moscow for attacking Ukraine, in February 2022 and the war has dragged on with both sides indulging in a bruising battle. In spite of NATO nations supplying western weapons to Ukraine, Kiev has been unable to push back the Russian too, has been unable to achieve his stated aim of "denazifying" Ukraine which is about overthrowing the Zelenskyy government and capturing all the Russian speaking regions of the country. He has also on several occasions threatened the western world of a nuclear war if they intervened in the war directly.
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Wall Street fears foreign tax in budget bill may reduce allure of US assets
Wall Street analysts are cautioning that a tax targeting foreign investors in the U.S. budget bill progressing through Congress could end up weighing on demand for U.S. Treasuries and the dollar. ADVERTISEMENT The U.S. House of Representatives last week approved a sweeping tax and spending bill that includes the possibility of imposing a progressive tax burden of up to 20% on foreign investors' passive income, such as dividends and royalties. The levy, included in section 899, would be paid by entities or individuals from countries that impose taxes the U.S. considers unfair. If it is also approved by the Senate, it could raise $116 billion in taxes over ten years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. "We see this legislation as creating the scope for the U.S. administration to transform a trade war into a capital war if it so wishes," George Saravelos, head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, said in a note on Thursday, adding the new tax could have an adverse impact on demand for U.S. Treasuries. If passed by the Senate, the rising tax rate on foreigners' investments would come at a time global investors have started to question so-called "U.S. exceptionalism," or its unique ability to outperform other financial markets, amid growing fiscal deficits and a new trade policy based on tariffs. Morgan Stanley said in a note that the new tax would weaken the dollar, as it would reduce the foreign appetite for U.S. assets. ADVERTISEMENT Morgan Stanley's strategist Michael Zezas singled out European investors with passive income in the U.S. as particularly vulnerable to the tax. The bank did not provide any estimate for the impact. According to law firm Davis Polk, nations that could be considered "discriminatory foreign countries" include many that are part of the European Union, as well as India, Brazil, Australia and United Kingdom. ADVERTISEMENT The White House did not immediately comment on the impact of the new tax burden. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's mixed signals on Russia cloud European strategy
European countries, aiming for deeper economic sanctions to push Russia into a ceasefire in Ukraine, struggle with US President Donald Trump's ambivalent attitude on the issue, analysts say. Trump has expressed impatience accusing Russian President Vladimir Putin of "playing with fire" and made threats, but does not seem to follow them up with action, they say. Diplomatic efforts to end the war, now in its fourth year, have intensified in recent weeks, with Putin being accused of stalling on peace talks. The Wall Street Journal and CNN both reported that Trump was now considering fresh sanctions against Russia, while stressing that he could still change his mind. On Wednesday, Trump expressed his frustration with Moscow, but also appeared to kick the can down the road by saying he would determine within "about two weeks" whether Putin was serious about ending the fighting. As the EU prepares a fresh package of sanctions against Moscow, the bloc's 18th, the chances of coordinated international sanctions, flagged by French President Emmanuel Macron during a visit to Kyiv with the German, British, and Polish leaders on May 10, seem increasingly remote. German media reported Tuesday that recent discussions between Europeans and Americans about Russia's evasion of sanctions had failed. "It seems that European hopes for joint action with the Americans... will once again be disappointed," said the Sueddeutsche Zeitung daily, citing an internal German foreign ministry document about an EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting in Brussels last week. The document cites EU sanctions envoy David O'Sullivan as saying that transatlantic coordination on Russian sanctions had collapsed. Even G7 cooperation had "lost momentum," the newspaper said in its report based on the document. Led by Paris, Berlin and London, Europeans are pitting their proactive stance against Washington's apparent passivity, said Sven Biscop, an expert at the Egmont Institute, a Belgian think tank. When Trump announced direct negotiations with Putin without Kyiv or Brussels, and when Ukraine's future NATO entry was ruled out, "the EU indicated it would continue its process of Ukraine's accession, arm it even after a hypothetical ceasefire, maintain sanctions, and deploy reassurance forces," he noted. "We deploy our levers but cannot force Trump to use his, or compel Putin to give up the war. We do not have that power," he said. Phillips O'Brien, strategy expert at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, suspects that European leaders have become victims of "maybe the greatest example of political gaslighting in US foreign policy history". Despite all Trump's posturing on imposing sanctions on Russia, "he clearly has no intention of doing so", O'Brien said. Europeans, meanwhile, are in favour of a plan by US Senator Lindsey Graham, who has called for a "secondary" sanctions plan, including a 500-percent tariff on countries importing Russian fossil fuels and raw materials. They hope that a US constitutional provision for a "discharge petition" wins the day, which would allow the sanctions bill to be adopted independently of the executive branch. This would put Trump at arm's length from any sanctions move, allowing him to remain in a non-committal "mediation position", said a European diplomat who declined to be identified. This stance confirms a new reality that Europeans are having to navigate: Washington now positions itself halfway between its traditional western European allies and Russia. This could, down the road, allow Trump to wash his hands of the conflict altogether if negotiations go nowhere just like he did on the North Korea issue in 2019, during his first term. "The question is no longer whether the United States will go rogue but what kind of rogue it will become," said Michael Beckley, a political scientist at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, an American think tank. "Will it be a reckless, hypernationalist power that lashes out, cuts ties, and pursues limited gain at great long-term cost? Or can it channel its strength into a more strategic posture?", he asked. On Friday, Macron said that Washington faces a "credibility test" over its response to Russia dragging its feet on a Ukraine ceasefire. burs-dt-dla/jh/as
