Opinion - Trump versus Obama: ‘Fundamental transformation' is in the eye of the beholder
On Oct. 30, 2008, just days before the presidential election, Barack Obama stood before a crowd in Columbia, Missouri, and uttered the line that sent Republicans into a frenzy: 'We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.'
To conservatives, that line wasn't just annoying — it was something akin to blasphemy. Transform America? Change who we are and what we stand for? The outrage came fast and furious. Republicans lined up to say, 'We don't need fundamental change. We don't need to tear down what makes this country great.'
Those were the days when 'principles' were still something people claimed to care about, the key word being 'claimed.'
Fast forward to now, and we've got another president who wants to fundamentally transform America. Only this time, it's not the guy who campaigned on hope and change. It's the one who sues pollsters whose numbers he doesn't like, sues news networks whose coverage he doesn't like and wants to impeach federal judges whose rulings he doesn't like. He has even gone after law firms that had the audacity to offend our president because they represented clients he didn't like.
If he had his way, Canada would be our 51st state. NATO? Out the window. Allies? Alienated. Chaos? Right here at home, courtesy of the commander-in-chief.
And yet, this time around, the same people who gasped for air over Obama's 'transformative' language are — how do I say this gently? — eerily silent. The same party that once warned us against changing the fundamental fabric of the country is now applauding the president who is changing the fabric of the country. The double standard isn't just obvious — it's embarrassing.
Meanwhile, Democrats — who once gave Obama a standing ovation for his grand vision — are now warning us that President Trump is a fascist for trying to do the exact same thing. So yes, if you're keeping score at home, the party that once loved transformation now hates it, and the party that once hated it now can't get enough. Let me know when your head stops spinning.
But this isn't really about Obama or Trump. It's about something deeper, something we've lost along the way: principles.
I've written about this before, and I'll keep writing about it, because it's the story of our political era. We don't argue ideas anymore — we just root for the color of the uniform. Red jerseys versus blue jerseys. That's what politics has become. And to paraphrase that great line from 'The Treasure of the Sierra Madre' — 'We don't need no stinking principles.'
Sure, politics has always been divisive. Nothing new about that. But what is new is the complete and utter collapse of consistency. If your guy does it, it's fine. If the other guy does it, it's tyranny. If your team wins, it's democracy in action. If the other team wins, it's the end of the republic.
I guess it's possible that I'm making too much of this. Maybe the hypocrisy has always been there and it just feels worse now because of social media, cable news and the 24/7 outrage machine. But I don't think so.
I think we've crossed a line where principles no longer guide our politics — only blind loyalty to our team does. And when blind loyalty becomes the only principle, don't be surprised when the whole thing starts to fall apart.
So no, this isn't just about Obama in 2008 or Trump in 2025. It's about what we're willing to tolerate and what we're willing to ignore — and whether we still believe in anything bigger than winning.
Because if we don't, then we're not only transforming America — we're unraveling it.
Bernard Goldberg is an Emmy and an Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University award-winning writer and journalist. He is the author of five books and publishes exclusive weekly columns, audio commentaries and Q&As on his Substack page. Follow him @BernardGoldberg.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
Iranian Leader Says 'The Battle Begins' As Trump Pushes 'Unconditional Surrender' (Live)
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a warning to Israel in a social media post early on Wednesday, saying 'the battle begins,' a few hours after President Donald Trump directly threatened him and demanded an 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER,' triggering speculation about U.S. military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. In a statement on his main X handle, Khamenei said, 'In the name of Haidar, the battle begins.' The Iranian leader followed that up with a post on his official English language account saying: 'We must give a strong response to the terrorist Zionist will show the Zionists no mercy.' Trump reportedly talked with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday evening, following a meeting with security officials, according to Axios. Trump warned on Truth Social earlier Tuesday: 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' referring to Khamenei, who is increasingly isolated after Israel assassinated several of his top generals. Trump said Khamenei is 'safe' and 'we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,' adding 'our patience is wearing thin.' 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' Trump said in an earlier post, writing that 'Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured stuff. Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.' In a third post Tuesday morning, Trump called for an 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' On Monday, Trump told reporters onboard Air Force One on the way back to the U.S. from the summit in Canada he wanted to see an end to Iran's nuclear program and said he's 'not too much in the mood to negotiate now.' Trump also warned Iran against targeting U.S. personnel or assets, saying if that happens 'we'll come down so hard, it'd be gloves off...I think they know not to touch our troops.' Trump attacked French President Emmanuel Macron on Truth Social, describing him as 'publicity seeking' after he said Trump was flying out of the G7 summit early to work out a cease fire between Israel and Iran and 'then kick-start broader discussions.' Trump said Macron 'has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire,' and claimed it was something 'Much bigger than that.' Trump departed the G7 Summit early and returned to Washington on Monday night to 'attend to many important matters,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Trump said earlier on Monday evening: 'Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON…Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' The president then blamed the situation on Iran's refusal to sign 'the 'deal' I told them to sign,' and added: 'What a shame, and waste of human life. When asked about the post, Trump said: 'I want people to be safe…That's always possible something could happen. I just want people to be safe.' It came after Israel's military issued evacuation warnings impacting around 330,000 people in the Iranian capital as it struck some parts of the city—including the main compound of Iran's state broadcaster, which was captured in a live show. In a post on X, Leavitt said Trump was leaving the summit early 'because of what's going on in the Middle East.' Shortly before he left Canada, the president told reporters Iran 'want to make a deal, and as soon as I leave here, we're going to be doing something. But I have to leave here.' Fox News reported on Monday evening that Trump had asked his national security to be present in the Situation Room when he returns to the White House. A U.S. official told reporters earlier on Monday Trump would not sign a draft statement of G7 leaders, which included a call for de-escalating the Israel-Iran conflict. The president eventually agreed to sign it after some changes were made to the statement's 'initial draft language,' according to the New York Times. The final statement notes: 'We, the leaders of the G7, reiterate our commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East.' The statement affirms Israel's 'right to defend itself,' describes Iran as the 'principal source of regional instability and terror,' and notes 'Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.' It also calls for a resolution of the ongoing crisis and 'a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a cease fire in Gaza.' In a post on X, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi signaled he was open to talks resuming talks with the U.S. if Israel's strikes on Iran were halted. 'If President Trump is genuine about diplomacy and interested in stopping this war, next steps are consequential. Israel must halt its aggression, and absent a total cessation of military aggression against us, our responses will continue. It takes one phone call from Washington to muzzle someone like Netanyahu. That may pave the way for a return to diplomacy,' he wrote. The post also attacked Netanyahu, calling him a 'war criminal.' Lawmakers Make Bipartisan Push To Restrict Trump From Going To War With Iran (Forbes) Iranian Missiles Cause 'Minor Damage' To US Embassy In Tel Aviv—Israel Targets Elite Quds Force HQ (Forbes) Israel Attacks Iranian State TV During Live Broadcast (Forbes)
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'This Blows': Stephen Colbert Mocks Trump's Failed Attempt To 'Save Face'
'Late Show' host Stephen Colbert said President Donald Trump's trip to Canada this week for the G7 summit 'did not go smoothly' as he unveiled a trade deal with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Trump tried to show off the document, but ended up dropping many of the pages. Colbert broke out his Trump impression. 'Five-second rule, I can still eat it!' he cracked. Colbert said 'Trump tried to save face' by blaming the wind, but 'Late Show' host was skeptical of that explanation given the lack of any evident wind. 'Sure, wind always makes things fall straight down,' he said. 'We all remember when an apple fell on Sir Isaac Newton's head and he declared, 'This blows.'' See more in his Tuesday night monologue:


Boston Globe
39 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A kinder, gentler Trump over certain immigrants? Fat chance.
In the same way, we have so many terrific, hard-working immigrants here who have proved they help our economy. Wouldn't it be wise to figure out a way to keep them here, regardless of the industry they're in? Advertisement No question, deport violent criminals and gang members. Republicans don't have a lock on that notion. During his two terms, Barack Obama, dubbed the Jerry Morris Marshfield