logo
Getting rid of internal trade barriers requires a 'surgical approach,' says Furey

Getting rid of internal trade barriers requires a 'surgical approach,' says Furey

Yahoo09-02-2025

N.L. Premier Andrew Furey showed off a Newfoundland Chocolate Company chocolate bar as an example of some of the local products available in the province. (Mark Cumby/CBC)
Newfoundland and Labrador's premier says he's all for more internal trade, but getting rid of long-standing barriers is easier said than done.
While speaking with reporters earlier this week, Andrew Furey called internal trade "the billion-dollar bill on the floor that no one wants to pick up."
"It's very difficult. It's historic. It's territorialism to a certain extent. It's not as straightforward as it appears," he said. "I think that we should all be, as premiers, looking to eliminate those barriers. But it is certainly not as easy as it sounds."
As U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff rhetoric escalated over the past month, some of Canada's premiers have pointed to internal trade as one potential alternative to the U.S. market.
On Thursday, the Atlantic Chamber of Commerce sent a letter to the four Atlantic premiers, asking them to dismantle trade barriers.
The chamber's CEO, Rhonda Tulk-Lane, said she wants provincial and federal leaders to look at barriers they can eliminate quickly.
"Businesses are blue in the face talking about cutting red tape," she said.
Anita Anand, federal minister of transport and trade, has said eliminating internal trade barriers could lower prices by up to 15 per cent, increase productivity by up to seven per cent and add up to $200 billion to Canada's economy.
Anita Anand told reporters in Halifax on Wednesday that Ottawa could eliminate longstanding internal trade barriers within 30 days. (Jean Laroche/CBC)
During an event in Halifax on Wednesday, a reporter asked Anand if Ottawa could deal with those barriers in 30 days. She said yes.
"We are making incredible, fast-paced progress with all of the provinces and territories," Anand said.
Years in the making
Provincial and federal leaders have acknowledged internal trade barriers for years, but have been slow in eliminating them.
In 2017, all provinces and territories signed onto the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, but that agreement also includes a list of exemptions for each province. According to the Montreal Economic Institute, Newfoundland and Labrador fell near the middle of the pack as of 2023, with 18 exceptions.Each province also has its own rules, and differing standards for things like safety gear, vehicle weight and winter tires. There are also regulatory barriers governing products like alcohol.
Justin Fong, co-owner of Quidi Vidi Brewery in St. John's, said getting into the market in other provinces can be challenging because of the way beer is taxed.
"It varies from province to province and which province you are shipping to from which other province," he said.
Justin Fong, co-owner at Quidi Vidi Brewery in St. John's, said getting into the market in other provinces can be tricky because of differing rules. (Henrike Wilhelm/CBC)
Furey said alcohol is one example of a product governed by interprovincial trade rules that aren't easy for government to eliminate. Changing the rules governing beer could make it easier for companies to get into the Newfoundland and Labrador market, but at the potential detriment of local brewers.
Conversely, Furey said barriers related to the trucking industry, specifically regarding labour mobility, could be more quickly eliminated
"I think we need to be more surgical, to bite off the ones that we can actually tackle and actually deal with," he said.
AnnMarie Boudreau, CEO of the St. John's Board of Trade, said ironing out the issues with provincial trade could be a silver lining to the threat of U.S. tariffs, which has created uncertainty in the Canadian economy for weeks.
"Finding ourselves in a situation like this should absolutely give us the courage to make some of the tough decisions that we may not have prioritized in the past," she said.
Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter here. Click here to visit our landing page.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Middle East de-escalation must be priority after Israel attacks Iran: Anand
Middle East de-escalation must be priority after Israel attacks Iran: Anand

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Middle East de-escalation must be priority after Israel attacks Iran: Anand

OTTAWA - Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand says de-escalation 'must be the priority' after Israel attacked Iranian missile and nuclear sites Friday and Iran warned of 'severe punishment' in retaliation. The Israeli strike involved more than 200 aircraft and about 100 targets, according to Israel's military. Iran confirmed the deaths of three of its top military leaders and launched more than 100 drones at Israel in response, but Israel said the drones were being intercepted outside the country's airspace. Israeli leaders describe the attack as a pre-emptive strike to head off an imminent threat of Iran building nuclear bombs, but Iran maintains its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only. Anand says on social media that Canada 'remains deeply concerned by the threat posed by Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program.' The foreign affairs minister urges 'all parties' to avoid further action that could destabilize the region and says that all Canadians in the area should exercise a 'very high degree' of caution and follow the advice of local authorities. - With files from The Associated Press. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Jack Mintz: Don't expect big economic gains from lower interprovincial barriers
Jack Mintz: Don't expect big economic gains from lower interprovincial barriers

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Jack Mintz: Don't expect big economic gains from lower interprovincial barriers

Canada is in an economic bind. U.S. tariffs on aluminum, steel, autos and non-CUSMA products aren't going away soon. U.S. President Donald Trump and his cabinet secretaries clearly like tariffs, both for the revenue they generate and for the boost they give critical U.S. industries. Canada now needs a Plan B to grow an economy that has stagnated for a decade. One approach is to strengthen the economy by removing interprovincial barriers to trade. The One Canadian Economy bill introduced last week will remove half of federal internal barriers and advance nation-building projects. The provinces are making new agreements to remove barriers. That's all good. Removing barriers to trade in goods and services will help put Canadian economic resources to more profitable use. The question is whether it will reap the $200 billion in economic gains that Prime Minister Mark Carney mentioned in his briefing on the new bill last week. Doubt that the gains will be large comes from a new paper by Jonathan Deslauriers, Robert Gagné and Jonathan Paré of HEC Montréal. Recent studies have estimated that the removal of interprovincial trade barriers would lead to a GDP gain of seven per cent, after accounting for transport costs and the distance between provinces. That work is innovative, but it does not identify which barriers have such a noticeable impact on GDP. It's certainly not trade in beer. The studies that generate such big numbers typically assume that, absent barriers and transport costs, provinces would all have the same split between imported and domestic goods. That's obviously wrong: consumers have different preferences, income and access to international markets. Taking such variables into account would make the estimated economic loss attributed to interprovincial barriers much smaller. So far, there hasn't been much correlation between reducing barriers and growing GDP. The 1994 Agreement on Internal Trade did not lead to a noticeable increase in interprovincial trade as a share of GDP. Nor did its successor, the 2017 Canadian Free Trade Agreement. In fact, we have seen the opposite: interprovincial trade fell from a quarter of GDP in 1984 to less than a fifth by 1999 and has remained relatively flat ever since. On the other hand, international trade, measured by exports plus imports, grew from half of GDP in 1989 to four-fifths in 2001, though it has since fallen back to about two-thirds, where it is today. Canadian businesses have found it more economic to trade with American regions than other provinces, despite requiring custom clearance and facing other hassles — though these became less burdensome with Canada-U.S. Free Trade starting in 1989 and NAFTA in 1994. Despite the border frictions that remain, international trade is much more important to Canada than interprovincial trade. One reason why is that although our internal agreements have dismantled some barriers they are not based on a general principle of mobility of goods, services, people and capital, as found in the European Union treaty. Instead, there are many agreed 'exceptions.' The general ones include taxation, Aboriginal policies, preserving water resources, providing social services and protecting language and culture. Each province also lists its own exceptions to existing or future measures. For example, many have maintained barriers to mobility for law professionals, licensed practical nurses, dental hygienists and social workers. In some cases, these barriers could be relaxed but in others, like law, training is partly specific to the province. Harmonizing trucking rules across provinces could boost GDP but differences in road and bridge structures limit what can be done. Even if trade barriers are removed, it is not hard to recreate them in other ways. After Alberta lowered mark-ups on Alberta-made craft beer but not 'imports' from other provinces, the courts ruled that the province had violated Section 121 of the Constitution Act, which prohibits custom duties and tariffs on goods coming from other provinces. (Full disclosure: I was an expert witness in that case on the winning side.) But the province could instead have favoured its own craft industry with tax incentives for investment and other costs. Other provinces, including B.C., Ontario, Nova Scotia and Quebec, have done that, either with concessionary excise tax rates or various tax incentives or grants. It's not exactly consistent with provinces signing new internal trade agreements. King has an easier job with throne speech than Carney We can't afford another lost decade Of course, if U.S. tariffs remain in place, our exports to the U.S. will fall and internal trade could rise. The auto industry currently exports 1.4 million autos to the United States, while Canadian consumers import over four-fifths of their autos from CUSMA partners or Europe and Asia. More internal trade will only happen, however, if Canadian businesses are competitive with goods and services imported from Asia, Europe and other regions, and they may not be without protectionist tariffs. If we really want to strengthen the Canadian economy, we'll get a bigger impact from deregulation, tax reform, resource development, infrastructure and other pro-competitive policies. Don't put too much faith in out-sized economic gains from removing selected interprovincial barriers.

Leaders on Canada's expanded G7 guest list to tackle climate, economy and security
Leaders on Canada's expanded G7 guest list to tackle climate, economy and security

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Leaders on Canada's expanded G7 guest list to tackle climate, economy and security

OTTAWA — Canada is bringing the world to Alberta for the G7 leaders summit in Kananaskis. As summit host, Prime Minister Mark Carney can invite any leaders he chooses — even those from countries outside the G7 club — as he attempts to shape Canada's foreign policy and global geopolitics. When asked on June 7 to explain how Canada decided on the list of non-G7 leaders to invite, Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand said the government was seeking a discussion of "very serious issues that affect the global economy and the geostrategic environment." Here's a closer look at the names on Carney's guest list. Australia Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is a willing partner for Canada as it tries to shore up its trade and defence links across the Indo-Pacific. Both countries have shared values and small populations, and depend on a global rules-based system of trade to export large amounts of resources. In March, Carney announced a deal was in the works to have Ottawa partner with Australia on an early-warning radar detection system to use in the Arctic and across the U.S. border. Brazil President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has tried to partner with countries across the Global South while advancing democracy and environmental protection. He'll be taking those themes to the COP30 summit in the Amazon this November. His office claimed this week that Carney will be attending that summit — Ottawa has yet to confirm. Brazil's president, widely known as Lula, has echoed Canadian concerns about online misinformation since a foiled coup plot in 2022. India Carney's most controversial invitation has been to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is arriving in Canada less than a year after the RCMP accused agents of his government of playing a role in "widespread violence" in Canada. Sikh separatist groups note that this month marks two years since the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, which Canada has linked to New Delhi. India insists these claims have no substance. Sikh groups have promised to stage large protests during the G7 summit. But regional experts argue Canada should advance trade relations with the world's most populous country and commit to structured talks on security instead of derailing the entire relationship. Canada has promised to raise transnational repression at the summit, and the Asia Pacific Foundation has argued Ottawa and New Delhi should commit to law-enforcement talks on both that issue and India's concerns about violent extremism. Indonesia President Prabowo Subianto will attend the summit after years of Ottawa pursuing deeper ties with Indonesia — a demographic and economic giant in the Indo-Pacific. Canada and Indonesia signed a free-trade agreement last year and Ottawa aspires to sell small-scale nuclear technology to the island nation as it helps to develop small reactors for northern Canadian communities. Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum deliberated for more than three weeks before accepting Carney's invitation to attend the G7. Sen. Peter Boehm, who has played a key role in numerous G7 summits, noted that Sheinbaum does not travel abroad often and might have chosen to come based on the likelihood of a meeting with Trump and Carney or to make progress on the tariffs issue. "There's the possibility of having a short trilateral on the side," he said. The ideal outcome would be a clear timeline for the coming review of the North American trade deal known as CUSMA, Boehm said, along with some immediate progress. For example, "if we can make a deal that will allow everyone to step back and say, 'well, we got something out of that and, tariffs are coming down.'" South Korea President Lee Jae-myung is eager to present South Korea as a stable, democratic country following a turbulent period that started with the former president declaring martial law last December. The country has since maintained the rule of law and elected a leader who promised to reverse policies that sought to end gender-equality programming. South Korea has long aspired to join the G7 and argues that its economic and regional clout is similar to that of G7 member Japan. Ottawa and Seoul have pledged deeper co-operation on maritime security, critical minerals and the environment. In November, South Korea will host the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum, and Canada's prime minister has attended every APEC summit over the past two decades. South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa will host the separate G20 summit in November — a much larger and more diverse group than the G7 that also tends to see less consensus. Boehm said the G20 host can act as a bridge to the G7 by making the topics and outcomes at the smaller summit more relevant to the needs of developing countries. Ramaphosa has attended previous G7 meetings and was in the room when Canada sought action on oceans protection at its 2008 summit. Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy might get another chance to speak with U.S. President Donald Trump in Alberta, as Washington continues to push for an end to the war that started with Russia's 2014 seizure of Crimea and escalated to a full-scale invasion in 2022. Ottawa and its peers fear the U.S. is too obliging to Moscow and that a bad deal will only create more instability in Europe. Ukraine has credited Canada with trying to advance Kyiv's cause at the G7. Canada has been leading efforts aimed at forfeiting Russian assets held in Western countries to help finance Ukraine's defence, with limited success. United Arab Emirates The Canadian Press has learned that Carney invited the United Arab Emirates to attend the G7 summit, which could mean UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan comes to Alberta. But as of Thursday evening, Abu Dhabi had not said whether it had accepted Canada's invitation. A readout Thursday from Carney's office said the two leaders spoke and discussed "opportunities to deepen bilateral collaboration in these sectors," and committed to remaining in contact. Canada has described the wealthy Gulf country as "a critical partner" in humanitarian efforts such as foreign aid projects and the resettlement of vulnerable Afghans. Sudanese groups have ccriticized Canada for not publicly calling out the UAE for its role in arming the Rapid Support Forces, a paramilitary the U.S. has accused of carrying out a genocide in Sudan. The UAE has strenuously denied involvement in the conflict. Not coming: Saudi Arabia Carney also invited Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to the G7 summit, but Canadian officials said Thursday morning the country will not be attending. "The attempt will be for the prime minister to meet with as many of the leaders as possible," said an official briefing media on background, who said there was no complete list of invitees as of Thursday morning. Ottawa and Riyadh restored full diplomatic ties in May 2023, five years after the Liberal government's public comments on women's rights led Saudi Arabia to expel Canada's ambassador. The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency says the Crown prince ordered the 2018 assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. Saudi Arabia is among Canada's largest export destinations for military equipment. International organizations Canada could welcome NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and World Bank President Ajay Banga to the summit, Boehm said, and possibly even the secretary general of the United Nations or leaders of the World Trade Organization and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. A federal official said Thursday that Canada's G7 presidency has involved work with other groups, including the African Union and the Gulf Co-operation Council. It's not known if leaders of those groups will be present. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025. Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store