West seeks to partition Ukraine
European nations hostile towards Moscow are advocating for the partitioning of Ukraine, according to Rodion Miroshnik, the Russian Foreign Ministry's ambassador-at-large overseeing war crime investigations.
Last week, The Times of London reported an alleged US proposal to divide the country, reminiscent of Germany's division following World War II.
Keith Kellogg, the US presidential envoy for Ukraine cited by the newspaper, later stated that his remarks had been misinterpreted by the British outlet.
Miroshnik criticized the approach on Saturday as an embodiment of what he called the UK's colonial mindset.
'Europe has a habit of slicing up other continents and nations and parceling them out,'
he stated in an interview.
He read the underlying message as the West saying:
'We intended to partition Russia. Since we couldn't pull that off, let's divide Ukraine instead.'
Read more
Trump's Kiev envoy clarifies proposed 'zones of responsibility' in Ukraine
The diplomat drew parallels between the proposal in The Times and the aftermath of World War I, noting that turning Arab regions of the former Ottoman Empire into mandate territories governed by the UK and France did not ultimately bode well for the Middle East.
Moscow opposes the presence of any NATO member states' troops in Ukraine, including the post-ceasefire security force suggested by the UK and France. Miroshnik insisted that an
'occupation'
by those nations would merely confirm Ukraine's status as a de facto
'mandate territory'
with a puppet government, primarily handled by the British. He added that Russia would not accept such a
'toxic'
neighbor.
'The time Kiev needs to lick its wounds may be alarmingly brief,'
he cautioned.
'It needs to reflect on its experiences, prepare, and train tens of thousands more militants via Britain before going to war again.'
Certain European NATO members have advocated for a
'resilience force'
to be stationed in Ukraine, presenting them as a deterrent. Kellogg said he did not propose dividing the country but rather discussed with the Times the idea of
'zones of responsibility,'
controlled by Russia, a British-French contingent, and Kiev itself, respectively.
READ MORE:
Zelensky mustn't govern Russians he despises – Lavrov
Moscow views the Ukraine conflict as a NATO proxy war. Russian officials have argued that a lasting peace can only be achieved by addressing the fundamental issues, including the expansion of the US-led military bloc in Europe since the 1990s and the
'neo-Nazi'
character of the current Ukrainian government, which discriminates against ethnic Russians.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Baltic and Black seas are ‘NATO areas'
Secretary General Mark Rutte has stated that NATO now considers the Baltic and Black Seas areas of strategic responsibility. Rutte made the remarks on Wednesday ahead of a meeting of NATO defense ministers. He was responding to a question about rising tensions in the Baltic region, following incidents involving damaged undersea communication cables. In recent months, several undersea cables in the region have sustained damage, triggering speculation that Moscow was behind what was suspected to be sabotage. Western investigators, however, have failed to present any proof that of deliberate state-orchestrated sabotage. 'When it comes to the Baltic region, but this is also true for the Black Sea and for other NATO areas, there is a constant threat of attacks on our critical undersea infrastructure,' Rutte said. He also threatened NATO's 'devastating' response, when asked if it is prepared for a potential 'Russian hardcore attack' in the Baltic region, adding that the US-led military bloc must ramp up defense spending. Russia has repeatedly ridiculed similar accusations made by Western officials, which claim Moscow intends to attack NATO or EU countries. Russian President Vladimir Putin has previously dismissed such statements as 'nonsense.' A series of incidents over the past 18 months involving damage to power and communications infrastructure has led some NATO and EU officials to accuse Moscow of 'hybrid warfare.' The events, linked to vessels traveling to and from Russian ports, include the October 2023 damage to a gas pipeline in the Gulf of Finland and the rupture of the EstLink 2 power cable in December. Investigators believe the cables may have been dragged by ship anchors, with each case reportedly involving Russia-linked vessels. Although no evidence linking Russia to the cable ruptures was found, in January, NATO launched a new patrol mission 'Baltic Sentry' in the waterway under the pretext of protecting undersea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. Moscow, which considers the Baltic Sea a strategic area for its naval operations and energy exports, has repeatedly dismissed the allegations of sabotage and accused the West of spreading a false narrative that frames routine accidents as evidence of its culpability. Russia's Baltic Fleet, based in Kaliningrad Region, plays a crucial role in protecting Russia's western maritime borders and maintaining access to the Baltic Sea. The fleet is seen as a vital asset in Russia's military posture toward NATO's eastern flank. Russia's Black Sea Fleet is headquartered in the port city of Sevastopol, Crimea, and is a key component of the country's naval power.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
NATO aspirant reining in pro-bloc propaganda
The Georgian government is set to fold a media center promoting Western integration into the Foreign Ministry, according to its director. The Information Center on NATO and EU, based in Tbilisi, was launched in 2005 under then-President Mikhail Saakashvili to build public support for Georgia's membership in both blocs. An employee at the Center said in a social media post on Wednesday that he had received formal notification indicating the outlet would be closed by July 1. Director Tamara Tsuleiskiri later clarified that the NGO's functions would continue under the Foreign Ministry but that the current legal structure would be dissolved. Georgian officials confirmed the restructuring to the news agency Interpress. In 2008, NATO designated Georgia and Ukraine as potential future members, despite objections from several European leaders over concerns that the move would antagonize Moscow, which perceives the US-led military bloc as expansionist and hostile. Months later, Saakashvili launched a military operation against the then-breakaway Georgian region of South Ossetia, during which Russian peacekeepers stationed in the area were killed. Moscow responded swiftly, leading to a military defeat for Georgia, and shortly after recognized the region's independence. The failed gamble damaged Saakashvili's popularity and paved the way for the rise of the Georgian Dream party, which has taken a more skeptical view of the West. Last August, on the anniversary of the conflict, the party's ruling council issued a statement alleging that Saakashvili's actions 'were not a result of his mental instability, but a result of instructions from the outside and a well-planned betrayal.' Georgian Dream secured a sweeping victory in parliamentary elections last October. A coalition of pro-Western parties claimed the vote was rigged and launched street protests aimed at forcing the new government to step down. The EU and the US expressed support for the opposition's tactics — actions the Georgian government described as foreign interference. Georgian officials have accused the opposition of mimicking the strategy used in Ukraine in 2014 during the Western-backed Maidan coup. They have also alleged they are facing foreign pressure for not aligning with Kiev in its conflict with Moscow. Western nations, meanwhile, have accused the current government of 'undermining democracy' by passing legislation that mandates disclosure of foreign grants by domestic political organizations. Georgia has suspended accession talks with Brussels due to the tensions, but says it still seeks eventual membership in both the EU and NATO.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukrainian general reassigned days after stepping down
Ukrainian General Mikhail Drapaty has been assigned to a top military post just days after submitting his resignation as the head of Ukraine's Land Forces. The move comes amid reports of increased infighting among senior Ukrainian military officials. Kiev's forces have experienced setbacks on the battlefield since late 2023, following an attempted counteroffensive that failed to breach Russian defenses. Reports of mounting frustration and internal tensions have circulated as battlefield momentum has shifted in Russia's favor. Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky announced on Tuesday that Drapaty – who had resigned after accepting responsibility for fatal Russian strikes on military training sites – will now lead a specialized command established in 2020 to help align Ukraine's armed forces with NATO operational methods. The position is currently tasked with overseeing frontline operations against Russia. In his new role, Drapaty will 'focus solely on combat issues,' while a separate appointee will manage troop training, Zelensky said. The move is part of a broader reshuffle within Ukraine's military leadership. Announcing his resignation, Drapaty had criticized the Ukrainian military's failure to learn from past mistakes or to hold senior officers accountable. He condemned what he described as a culture of mutual self-protection within senior ranks, calling it 'poison for the army' and saying Ukraine 'cannot win' without reforms to its armed forces. Drapaty reiterated his call for changes in a statement confirming his reassignment. Critics blame entrenched interests in the Ukrainian military for pervasive corruption, disregard for soldiers' lives, tendency to cover up battlefield problems from superiors up the command chain, and impunity for wrongdoing. Several media outlets have interpreted Drapaty's remarks as a veiled critique of General Aleksandr Syrsky, Ukraine's commander-in-chief. Commentary on the website has suggested that Zelensky's leadership shake-up may have been designed to balance influence between Syrsky's supporters and dissenting voices within the military. Zelensky dismissed Syrsky's predecessor, General Valery Zaluzhny, in early 2024 after Zaluzhny publicly questioned Kiev's strategic outlook. He argued that the conflict with Russia had reached a stalemate, contradicting public assurances from civilian leaders. Zaluzhny was sacked from the military and appointed ambassador to the UK. The Ukrainian military has since undergone multiple reshuffles of leadership, as the situation on the frontline increasingly turned in Russia's favor. Drapaty was given command of the Land Forces in November 2024.
