5 things to know about Native Hawaiian rights in 2025
HONOLULU (KHON2) — In early 2025, new executive orders from Washington, D.C. put Native Hawaiian programs under a shadow of fear. What looked like a wave of federal changes against diversity, equity and inclusion sparked confusion and concern across Hawai'i.
For many, the worry was simple but heavy: Would the federal government still recognize its obligations to Native Hawaiians?
DOGE cuts hit Native Hawaiian programs
That fear reached classrooms, healthcare clinics, housing programs and small businesses. For Native Hawaiian advocates, it was more than a question about policy. It was a question about identity and survival.
But something else happened, too. A quiet, strategic form of advocacy unfolded behind the scenes. Leaders asked questions that mattered. Congress stepped in with sharp reminders. And in time, one agency responded clearly.
Now, as the situation continues to evolve, Native Hawaiians are walking forward with clarity, caution and the deep understanding that their rights are rooted in law, not trends.
Local political analyst Stan Fichtman provided details on what has been happening, and KHNON2.com caught up with Kumu Bradford Lum, former Chair of the Hawaiian Affairs Caucus, to better understand how we got here and what comes next.
Here are the top things to know about Native Hawaiian rights under the 2025 DEI bans.The executive orders signed in January were aggressive. They attempted to circumvent Congress end federal DEI programs by removing funding tied to critical race theory and gender identity and pushed a version of 'merit-based' hiring that left out equity concerns.
These orders did not name Native Hawaiians directly. But the broad language caused alarm. Many wondered if Hawaiian immersion schools, ʻohana-focused health programs or Native-specific small business supports would be cut.
Kumu Lum said Native Hawaiian leadership has been deliberate in drawing a line.
'As far as Native Hawaiian issues, we are doing our best not to be part of the DEI,' Kumu Lum said. 'We are distinguishing ourselves as separate and not be lumped together.'
The United States Department of Education backed that distinction in April. In a response to the National Indian Education Association, the department clarified that Native Hawaiian, American Indian and Alaska Native programs are not considered DEI.
That clarification helped. According to Fichtman, the relief was immediate. Yes, you can still be Native Hawaiian; and yes, the federal government still has a responsibility to you.
The reason Native Hawaiian programs are still standing has nothing to do with DEI. It has everything to do with history.
Fichtman indicated that this is about trust obligations going back to Prince Kūhiō and the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. Native rights are grounded in federal law, not DEI policy; so, dismantling DEI doesn't dismantle those obligations.
Kumu Lum puts it this way: 'As Native Hawaiians, Native Americans and Native Alaskans, we are all Indigenous peoples of America.'
Hence, that status comes with legal commitments that cannot be erased by a single executive order.
Those obligations span housing, education, economic development and health. They are based on trust relationships, not political preference. That legal framework is what protected many Native Hawaiian programs from being swept up in the DEI rollback.
In early February, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska sent a letter to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. It was direct. Would the new DEI bans affect Native Hawaiian, Native American and Alaska Native programs?
Hawai'i's Senator Brian Schatz, who co-leads the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, helped drive that message. Their letter pointed to law, not ideology.
This is where the quiet power of Congress shows up, Fichtman said. A single letter, sent on official committee letterhead, can redirect an entire agency's interpretation of an executive order.
OMB never replied. But the Department of Education did. That response, though indirect, was enough to protect key Native Hawaiian programs, for now.
The Education Department clarified its position. Other agencies have not.
'We are concerned,' Kumu Lum said. He listed key programs that could be harmed: '$30 million could be affected. Small Business Administration Native 8(a) Business Development Programs. Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act. Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. And the Native Hawaiian Education Act, which will impact Hawaiian immersion schools and other Native Hawaiian education programs.'
Then there's the Native Hawaiian Health Care Act. Kumu Lum called that out specifically. 'We are truly concerned on Native Hawaiian Health Care Act.'
Without formal guidance from agencies like the Department of the Interior or Health and Human Services, those fears remain real.
Kumu Lum said it clearly: 'We now have to wait and see what happens and be prepared to what will happen and to find alternative options to accommodate our needs for our Hawaiian keiki, students, parents and kūpuna.'
The DEI orders never erased Native identity. But they tested it.
Fichtman indicated that this was not just a shift in policy. Rather, it was an existential question. People were wondering, 'Can we still legally be Native Hawaiian in the eyes of the federal government?'
What brought the answer wasn't a protest. It wasn't a court ruling. It was a carefully written letter, grounded in law, backed by legacy and followed by another from a federal department.
Advocacy doesn't always need to be loud to be effective, Fichtman said. Sometimes, the work is done in conference rooms, not headlines.
Kumu Lum's view carries that same message. Native Hawaiian advocates will continue distinguishing their programs from DEI and continue watching how federal agencies interpret the law. They will also continue protecting what matters most, our keiki, our parents and our kūpuna.
You can access Fichtman's political analysis at politicshawaii.com. You can find out more about the Hawaiian Affairs Caucus by clicking .
Check out more news from around Hawaii
The story is not finished. But as 2025 moves ahead, Native Hawaiians are walking with the same strength that guided their ancestors: clarity, kuleana and aloha.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Panama's president appeals to a higher power as nearly 2 months of protests roil nation
PANAMA CITY (AP) — Panama's José Raúl Mulino appealed to a higher power on Friday, calling in an archbishop and a rabbi to deliver a message to striking banana workers after nearly two months of social protest that have roiled the country. Mulino has said he won't reverse controversial changes to Panama's social security system, courts have deemed the strike illegal and top banana Chiquita Brands fired nearly 5,000 striking workers last month in Panama's western Bocas del Toro province. But nothing has stopped the protests. So at his weekly news briefing Friday, Mulino said he had met with Archbishop José Domingo Ulloa and one of Panama's leading Jewish figures, Rabbi Gustavo Kraselnik, to enlist them as intermediaries. He gave Ulloa a personal letter to bring to Francisco Smith, leader of the striking banana workers' union. In the letter, Mulino said, he committed to send proposed legislation to the Congress that would be favorable for the country's banana sector, above all its workers. But he conditioned the proposal on former workers lifting their protest. There was precedent for the maneuver. In 2022, Ulloa brokered a dialogue that eased protests over the high cost of fuel and food. In 2018, Ulloa mediated a dispute between parts of the government. Smith, secretary general of the Banana Industry Workers Union, had said earlier Friday before Mulino's announcement that he was open to dialogue. Union leaders planned to travel to the capital Monday to meet with the president of the National Assembly and present a list of demands. He insisted, however, that changes be made to the social security reform. Smith, who has led the protest in western Bocas del Toro province, has said the social security reform passed in March threatens the special privileges laid out for banana workers in another law, covering things like subsidies and labor protections. The impact has been acute. Chiquita Brands said last month they had lost at least $75 million before announcing a temporary halt to their operations in Panama. Demonstrations have not been limited to the banana workers, to Bocas del Toro or even to the social security changes. At various times teachers, construction workers and students have protested as well. On Thursday, border police clashed with protesters who had blocked a highway in eastern Darien province, leaving injured on both sides.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Stock Falls Amid Musk Vs Trump Feud
Tesla TSLA shares had their worst day since March, falling 14% on Thursday as the feud between Elon Musk and President Trump continues to heat up, and is making international headlines. In the aftermath of his 130-day term ending as a special government employee, Musk has publicly criticized the Trump administration's budget reconciliation bill after previously heading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Despite losing favoritism in the White House, Tesla shareholders have previously called on Musk to focus his attention back on the leading EV maker amid declining sales. Underlying this is that having a CEO push a political agenda had disrupted public sentiment, with Tesla facing significant losses of more than $100 million this year regarding vandalism at its dealerships and EV charging stations, which spilled over from nationwide protests targeting Elon Musk. This also created a somewhat unnecessary way for General Motors GM and Ford F to potentially take more share of the domestic EV market, with the public outcry of the 'Tesla Takedown' movement coming as the DOGE cut thousands of federal jobs at the discretion of the world's wealthiest person. Adding fury to Musk's frustration with President Trump's budget reconciliation bill is that it will eliminate tax credits for electric vehicles that have benefited Tesla and other EV manufacturers, while undermining his cost-cutting efforts as head of the DOGE. However, harsh criticism and a personal vendetta against the Trump administration could, of course, make Tesla the target of harsher EV regulations in the U.S., with the President threatening to take away the company's government contracts. Furthermore, this comes on the heels of recent reports that Tesla's sales have continued to decline in Europe, as sales in May fell 45% year over year in the U.K. and 36% in Germany amid rising competition from Chinese EV brands such as BYD and XPeng XPEV. Notably, BYD has surpassed Tesla as the top-selling EV brand in Europe. Most concerning to technical traders is that TSLA has fallen below its 50-day simple moving average (Green Line) of $292 a share, which is lower than its 200-day SMA (Red Line) of $310 due to the recent volatility in the stock. Generally, the 200-day SMA is lower than the 50-day SMA when a stock is in an uptrend and higher than the 50-day SMA when a stock is in a downtrend, as in Tesla's case. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Also suggesting more risk ahead for Tesla stock, and correlating with news of declining sales in Europe, is that fiscal 2025 and FY26 EPS estimates are noticeably lower in the last month and have now dropped 25% and 18% over the last 60 days, respectively. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Considering the short-selling strategy has paid off with TSLA of late, with it noteworthy that Tesla has led the Zacks Short Sale List with +20% gains after borrowing shares at $358.91 on Tuesday, May 27. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The back-and-forth spat between Elon Musk and President Trump won't do any favors for Tesla's outlook. Unfortunately, TSLA lands a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) at the moment in correlation with the trend of declining earnings estimate revisions. Eventually, this could end up being a lucrative buying opportunity for TSLA down the road, but a dispute between the world's most powerful and wealthiest person could drag down the broader market as well, with Tesla dragging the Nasdaq down roughly 1% on Thursday. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Ford Motor Company (F) : Free Stock Analysis Report General Motors Company (GM) : Free Stock Analysis Report XPeng Inc. Sponsored ADR (XPEV) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Panama's president appeals to a higher power as nearly 2 months of protests roil nation
PANAMA CITY (AP) — Panama's José Raúl Mulino appealed to a higher power on Friday, calling in an archbishop and a rabbi to deliver a message to striking banana workers after nearly two months of social protest that have roiled the country. Mulino has said he won't reverse controversial changes to Panama's social security system, courts have deemed the strike illegal and top banana Chiquita Brands fired nearly 5,000 striking workers last month in Panama's western Bocas del Toro province. But nothing has stopped the protests. So at his weekly news briefing Friday, Mulino said he had met with Archbishop José Domingo Ulloa and one of Panama's leading Jewish figures, Rabbi Gustavo Kraselnik, to enlist them as intermediaries. He gave Ulloa a personal letter to bring to Francisco Smith, leader of the striking banana workers' union. In the letter, Mulino said, he committed to send proposed legislation to the Congress that would be favorable for the country's banana sector, above all its workers. But he conditioned the proposal on former workers lifting their protest. There was precedent for the maneuver. In 2022, Ulloa brokered a dialogue that eased protests over the high cost of fuel and food. In 2018, Ulloa mediated a dispute between parts of the government. Smith, secretary general of the Banana Industry Workers Union, had said earlier Friday before Mulino's announcement that he was open to dialogue. Union leaders planned to travel to the capital Monday to meet with the president of the National Assembly and present a list of demands. He insisted, however, that changes be made to the social security reform. Smith, who has led the protest in western Bocas del Toro province, has said the social security reform passed in March threatens the special privileges laid out for banana workers in another law, covering things like subsidies and labor protections. The impact has been acute. Chiquita Brands said last month they had lost at least $75 million before announcing a temporary halt to their operations in Panama. Demonstrations have not been limited to the banana workers , to Bocas del Toro or even to the social security changes. At various times teachers, construction workers and students have protested as well. Authorities have said they'll withhold the pay of 15,000 treachers for their strike. On Thursday, border police clashed with protesters who had blocked a highway in eastern Darien province, leaving injured on both sides. In addition to the social security changes, demonstrators have protested a security agreement giving U.S. troops access to some Panamanian facilities and efforts to reopen a massive copper mine. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .