Trump Biographer: This Is the ‘Real Reason' He Hates Harvard
There's a running joke going around the White House that President Donald Trump is out for Harvard's blood because his son Barron didn't get in—one scotched by First Lady Melania Trump in an unprecedented piercing of her veil of privacy.
But presidential biographer Michael Wolff has suggested a very different explanation for Trump's vendetta: he's the one that couldn't attend the prestigious Ivy League.
Wolff, author of bestsellers Fire & Fury and this year's All or Nothing advanced the suggestion on Thursday's episode of The Daily Beast Podcast in a discussion with host Joanna Coles about his war on Harvard and other elite colleges.
'It's also odd because so many of the people around Donald Trump went to Ivy League universities. Several of them went to Harvard Business School,' Coles said. 'Obviously, JD Vance proudly went to Yale. So it does seem particularly odd, but perhaps he's also trying to stuff it to them too.'
'It's important not to lend too much calculation and planning to anything he does,' Wolff said. 'But the other thing is that, by the way, he didn't get into Harvard. So one of the Trump things is always holding a grudge against the Ivy Leagues.'
Taylor Rogers, a White House spokesperson, was critical about Wolff's claim. She did not, however, confirm on the record whether or not Trump applied to Harvard.
'The Daily Beast and Michael Wolff have lots in common—they both peddle fake news for clickbait in a hopeless attempt to amount to something more than lying losers," she said in an email. 'The President didn't need to apply to an overrated, corrupt institution like Harvard to become a successful businessman and the most transformative President in history.'
The White House has previously called Wolff 'a lying sack of s--t,' which he has laughed off.
There are no publicly available records or reports which would shed light on whether Trump did apply to Harvard in the 1960s. Published biographies have not made that assertion.
The potential that his war on Harvard is motivated by personal grudge may appear to be trivial, but his moves against the university are already at the center of high-stakes litigation and questions of motivation would be likely to be closely scrutinized by Harvard's counsel.
What is known about his higher education is that as a young boy, Trump dreamed of going to film school at the University of Southern California, a school that's also borne the brunt of his recent attacks. The institution has lost $17.5 million after Trump stripped money from federal research grants after the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights said it did not 'fulfill their obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to protect Jewish students on campus.'
After finishing high school at the New York Military Academy, Trump's dreams of attending film school were dashed. He enrolled at Fordham University in 1964, commuting to the private Catholic school in the Bronx from his family home in Jamaica Estates, Queens. 'I'd been away at school for five years, and I wanted to see my parents,' Trump said in Gwenda Blair's The Trumps: Three Generations of Builders and a Presidential Candidate, noting that the school was close to home.
According to his sister Maryanne Trump Barry, who passed away in 2023, he opted to attend Fordham because they let him in.
At Fordham, his grades were average, wrote The New York Times investigative journalists Ross Buettner and Susanne Craig in their 2024 book Lucky Loser. Trump did not make the dean's list in his first year, which only required a GPA of 3.5, or the equivalent of a B+.
After only two years at Fordham, Trump's brother Fred called in a favor. His good friend, Jim Nolan, had just taken a job at the University of Pennsylvania's admissions office.
'Freddy requested a favor. Could Nolan schedule an interview to get his kid brother into the Wharton School of Finance and Commerce?' wrote Buettner and Craig.
Nolan agreed. When Trump and his father showed up, they were gracious and warm, 'but it was all show,' Nolan added.
Nolan said that Trump's grades from Fordham were 'sufficient' to meet the Wharton standards of that era.
'I would say we probably accepted thirty, forty percent of the people who applied,' Nolan said. Only later did Wharton become the highly sought-after institution it is today, the book noted. Trump's then attorney Michael Cohen wrote to Fordham in the run-up to the 2016 election to demand that it keep his transcripts secret.
Trump graduated from UPenn in 1968 with a Bachelor of Science in economics.
Trump's two older sons, Don Jr. and Eric, went to UPenn but his son-in-law Jared Kushner attended Harvard. He was accepted months after his father, New Jersey real estate developer Charles Kushner, pledged $2.5 million to the university. Daniel Golden quoted a number of people at Kushner's high school as saying he did not have the GPA or SAT scores to get accepted into Harvard in his book, The Price of Admission.
The war on Harvard is now one of Trump's most high-profile campaigns. In April, the White House stripped the university of much of its federal funding after Harvard refused to bend the knee to the president's orders.
Trump had already succeeded in his attempts to exert control over other Ivy Leagues like Columbia, forcing them to change their policies, staff, and curriculum to stamp out rhetoric related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices or anything that was deemed anti-Israel sentiment.
On May 25, Trump demanded the 'names and countries' of all international students enrolled in Harvard, later vowing to determine 'how many radicalized lunatics, troublemakers all, should not be let back into our Country.'
'But have no fear, the Government will, in the end, WIN!' he wrote on Truth Social.
Wolff suggested that aside from potential grudge, the reality TV star's instincts as a producer are key to understanding his actions. 'He needs an enemy,' he said, adding: 'That's what make the show great, the Trump show. He picks fantastic enemies, actually. And Harvard, for all it represents, fits right into the Trump show.'
The president loves the drama, Wolff said. 'He's done what he set out to do,' he said. 'Dominate the headlines. What do you do? You go after Harvard and you go after Harvard in a way that is draconian, dramatic, and existential. It's threatening Harvard on that level.'
Wolff added that even when the higher institutions and federal judges fight back, it's all part of the president's scheme to stay in the spotlight.
'So [Harvard] will oppose this and therefore the courts will stop this from happening. But at the same time, that becomes another aspect to the Trump show,' he said. 'He forces them to play their part, which is to oppose him.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
California Democrat Calls ICE Agents 'Terrorists'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A California Democrat has branded federal immigration agents "Terrorists," in a social media post. San Diego City Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera, who represents the city's 9th District shared a photo of ICE agents on Instagram with the word "Terrorists" written across the image. In the caption of his social media post, he expressed concern about the presence of heavily armed federal agents operating in residential areas of San Diego. Newsweek has contacted U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Elo-Rivera's office for comment outside of office hours. A deportation officer with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement conducts a brief before an early morning operation, Dec. 17, 2024, in the Bronx borough of New York. A deportation officer with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement conducts a brief before an early morning operation, Dec. 17, 2024, in the Bronx borough of New York. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Why It Matters ICE remains a divisive presence in public discourse—celebrated by some as an essential tool for upholding immigration laws and vilified by others as a symbol of draconian policies. President Donald Trump has directed his administration to conduct the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, placing ICE at the center of the national debate over immigration policy. The Trump administration has granted ICE additional powers and expanded authority to conduct operations in sensitive locations such as schools and hospitals. The hard-line enforcement policy has sowed fear into vulnerable immigrant communities. What To Know "Look at this photo. This isn't a war zone—it's a neighborhood in our city," Elo-Rivera wrote in an Instagram post. "In San Diego, they've targeted parents dropping off their kids at school, people following the law inside courthouses, and workers just doing their jobs at local restaurants. "These are federal agents carrying out raids under the false pretense of 'safety,'" he added. "This isn't safety. It's state-sponsored terrorism. And anyone who cares about freedom—and true safety—should be fighting back." Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, responded to the post and said the United States is living in the "age of left-wing domestic terrorism." The Trump administration has long maintained that the "Golden Age of America" began after President Trump returned to office. Elo-Rivera responded by calling Miller "one of the most dishonest and worst people in America," noting "nothing makes me more confident in my position than knowing he hates it." The Department of Homeland Security has said that ICE agents are facing a 413 percent increase in assaults. Elo-Rivera has been an outspoken critic of ICE's presence in San Diego and has previously called for the end of federal immigration raids in the region. What People Are Saying Stephen Miller said in a post on X: "We are living in the age of left-wing domestic terrorism. They are openly encouraging violence against law enforcement to aid and abet the invasion of America." An ICE spokesperson told Fox News Digital: "Elected officials comparing ICE law enforcement agents to terrorists is SICKENING."
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Do Merit Medical Systems' (NASDAQ:MMSI) Earnings Warrant Your Attention?
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. Sometimes these stories can cloud the minds of investors, leading them to invest with their emotions rather than on the merit of good company fundamentals. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad. Despite being in the age of tech-stock blue-sky investing, many investors still adopt a more traditional strategy; buying shares in profitable companies like Merit Medical Systems (NASDAQ:MMSI). While profit isn't the sole metric that should be considered when investing, it's worth recognising businesses that can consistently produce it. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If a company can keep growing earnings per share (EPS) long enough, its share price should eventually follow. So it makes sense that experienced investors pay close attention to company EPS when undertaking investment research. It certainly is nice to see that Merit Medical Systems has managed to grow EPS by 34% per year over three years. As a general rule, we'd say that if a company can keep up that sort of growth, shareholders will be beaming. Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. Merit Medical Systems maintained stable EBIT margins over the last year, all while growing revenue 8.2% to US$1.4b. That's a real positive. In the chart below, you can see how the company has grown earnings and revenue, over time. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers. View our latest analysis for Merit Medical Systems The trick, as an investor, is to find companies that are going to perform well in the future, not just in the past. While crystal balls don't exist, you can check our visualization of consensus analyst forecasts for Merit Medical Systems' future EPS 100% free. We would not expect to see insiders owning a large percentage of a US$5.6b company like Merit Medical Systems. But we do take comfort from the fact that they are investors in the company. Notably, they have an enviable stake in the company, worth US$132m. Holders should find this level of insider commitment quite encouraging, since it would ensure that the leaders of the company would also experience their success, or failure, with the stock. If you believe that share price follows earnings per share you should definitely be delving further into Merit Medical Systems' strong EPS growth. With EPS growth rates like that, it's hardly surprising to see company higher-ups place confidence in the company through continuing to hold a significant investment. On the balance of its merits, solid EPS growth and company insiders who are aligned with the shareholders would indicate a business that is worthy of further research. However, before you get too excited we've discovered 1 warning sign for Merit Medical Systems that you should be aware of. There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Wall Street Journal
41 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
What's Good for Politicians Is Good for General Motors
General Motors CEO Mary Barra earned $29.5 million last year, and it's hard to argue that she isn't earning her keep. The automaker sold more cars in the U.S. than any other company last year, and its profits have doubled in her 11 years as CEO. Credit her ability to please her most important customers—politicians. Their command is her wish. While doubling down on manufacturing profitable gas guzzlers, Ms. Barra promoted electric vehicles to ingratiate herself to Democrats who want to eliminate the products that churn out profits for her company. She again proved her flexible principles last week by praising President Trump's auto tariffs, which the company estimates will dent its profits by $5 billion this year. 'I think tariffs is one tool that the administration can use to level the playing field,' she said. What she omitted is that the playing field has been tilted in GM's favor for decades by a 25% tariff on pickup trucks, which gives domestic automakers an effective monopoly. Also: Mr. Trump's new 25% tariffs on all cars and parts not made in the U.S. will hurt GM, but they will wallop its foreign competitors even more. In 2018 Ms. Barra got a crash course in politicking when she announced a corporate restructuring that involved closing four U.S. plants that produced low-selling sedans. Her goal was to make GM leaner and more profitable. In this she succeeded, but she blundered by not throwing a bone to Mr. Trump, who thinks CEOs answer to him.