
Judge Orders HHS to Restore Jobs in Health Monitoring Program for West Virginia Coal Miners
A West Virginia federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to reverse the terminations of nearly 200 workers who oversee a health monitoring program for coal miners after they were laid off last month.
Judge Irene C. Berger of the District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia granted a preliminary injunction compelling HHS to restore all personnel to the Respiratory Health Division of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in Morgantown, West Virginia.
Workers in the division are responsible for screening and reviewing medical examinations submitted by outside providers to determine whether there is evidence that miners have developed a respiratory ailment called pneumoconiosis, more commonly known as black lung disease.
'Testing for, diagnosing, preventing, and researching black lung is a highly specialized field—it simply is not possible to transfer the duties of the RHD employees to others without a period of transition and training,' the judge wrote in her ruling.
'Losing the services of these experienced and dedicated employees is an aspect of the irreparable harm to the miners and the public that cannot and should not be ignored.'
Berger ordered HHS to continue its Coal Workers Health Surveillance Program within NIOSH after finding the department lacked the authority to 'unilaterally cancel' it.
Related Stories
5/14/2025
5/13/2025
Additionally, the judge ordered the restoration of a program called Part 90, which allows miners who present evidence of pneumoconiosis to transfer to less dusty jobs, without a reduction in pay, to protect them from continued exposure.
Berger's decision comes after nearly 200 workers at the NIOSH facility were placed on administrative leave in April as part of restructuring within HHS. It's part of wider cost-cutting efforts by the Trump administration that have seen thousands of federal employees across various departments laid off.
Berger did not specify in her order exactly how many of the jobs must be restored within the health division.
Lawsuit Alleges Workers Left Without Critical Protections
The ruling was issued in response to a lawsuit filed against HHS and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in April by Harry Wiley, a Raleigh County electrician who works in coal mines.
According to the lawsuit, Wiley was diagnosed with black lung disease in November 2024. Federal law mandates that regular health screenings be made available to coal miners.
Wiley argued the job cuts at the Respiratory Health Division meant NIOSH was unable to review applications or offer job transfers, which in turn left him and other miners without critical protections guaranteed under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.
Berger agreed, writing in her ruling that 'uncontroverted evidence before the Court overwhelmingly establishes that the mandatory statutory duties cannot effectively be fulfilled without an injunction terminating' the job cuts.
She ordered that, in the event of reorganization, there be no 'pause, stoppage or gap in the protections and services mandated by Congress in the Mine Act and the attendant regulations for the health and safety of miners.'
Berger added that HHS failed to present evidence that employees with the qualifications necessary to operate the health monitoring unit screening for black lung exist elsewhere in HHS.
HHS also presented no evidence that individual employees or groups of employees could be terminated without impacting NIOSH's ability to perform the mandatory duties set forth in the Mine Act and other regulations, she said.
The judge gave Kennedy 20 days to submit written certification proving that HHS has complied with the court's order.
The Epoch Times has contacted a spokesperson for HHS for comment.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
RFK Jr. Will Shrink The Substance Abuse And Mental Health Services Administration. Here's What That Means For Public Health
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 13: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks after being sworn in as Secretary of ... More Health and Human Services in the Oval Office at the White House on February 13, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by) Under Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration will be consolidated with other organizations into a new Administration for a Healthy America, or AHA. The SAMHSA has already lost a third of its staff of 900 employees from the dramatic downsizing of the HHS. In addition, President Trump's budget bill will cut $1 billion from the agency's budget. The SAMHSA was created in 1992 by bipartisan legislation in Congress and signed by then President George H.W. Bush. With an $8 billion budget, it provides crucial mental health and addiction services across all of America, largely through federal grants administered by individual states. Key initiatives of the agency include grants supporting community-based treatments, the 988 crisis helpline, naloxone distribution programs and the administration of methadone clinics. Although the future of mental health care remains uncertain under the new AHA, dissolving the SAMHSA will have major effects on public health. Here's how. For starters, massive layoffs and restructuring breeds chaos, disruption and workforce turmoil. As in other agencies where highly qualified seasoned professionals have been asked to resign or retire across the HHS, so too could expert mental health professionals who are essential in combating addiction and mental health conditions like depression and anxiety. With less qualified experts to treat mental health conditions, more Americans could suffer from drug overdoses and mental conditions like schizophrenia. The restructuring and consolidation of mental health services into the new AHA could undermine addiction treatment and evidence-based medicine. As an example, SAMHSA regulates methadone clinics and promotes evidence-based treatments like Buprenorphine and Naloxone to treat opioid addiction. RFK Jr., on the other hand, is known to tout unconventional treatments that have no basis in science. He has proposed implementing the use of camps and farms where people experiencing addiction would be sent to recover. These types of interventions have no basis in science and may reverse decades of progress in addiction treatment. There has already been a nearly 27% decrease in drug overdoses in America comparing 2024 to 2023, according to the CDC. If RFK Jr. were to implement such initiatives into the AHA, this would erode scientific integrity for the advancement of addiction and mental health treatments. A shift from evidence-based to 'wellness-centric' models of treatment could leave many Americans without access to high-quality proven scientific treatments. Dismantling the SAMSHA will also affect vulnerable populations, particularly the 60 million Americans that live in rural parts of the country. Rural communities rely on SAMSHA grant funding for addiction treatment and mental health services, according to NPR. With massive funding cuts on the order of $1 billion, Americans living in these areas will have less resources and funds to fight off addiction and mental health conditions. Consolidating an organization that specializes in mental health care into a broader agency will weaken the mental health infrastructure in America. In its announcement document, the HHS states, 'Transferring SAMHSA to AHA will increase operational efficiency and assure programs are carried out because it will break down artificial divisions between similar programs.' But how similar exactly are the programs? The SAMHSA, which focuses on addiction and mental health conditions, is drastically different than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health which focuses on health hazards related to the workplace. Despite having two very different focuses, both agencies will be consolidated under RFK Jr.'s AHA. The shrinking of the SAMHSA marks a notable shift in national policy. Although proponents of the move may site reduced bureaucratic overlap and streamlined coordination of health efforts in support of the AHA, the move represents a fundamental change in how America will approach addiction and mental health. Scientists, public health officials and the American people will be watching closely whether evidence-based treatments are promoted and if further progress will be made with respect to decreasing drug overdoses.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr's ‘Maha' report found to contain citations to nonexistent studies
Robert F Kennedy Jr's flagship health commission report contains citations to studies that do not exist, according to an investigation by the US publication Notus. The report exposes glaring scientific failures from a health secretary who earlier this week threatened to ban government scientists from publishing in leading medical journals. The 73-page 'Make America healthy again' report – which was commissioned by the Trump administration to examine the causes of chronic illness, and which Kennedy promoted it as 'gold-standard' science backed by more than 500 citations – includes references to seven studies that appear to be entirely invented, and others that the researchers say have been mischaracterized. Related: Key takeaways: RFK Jr's 'Maha' report on chronic disease in children Two supposed studies on ADHD medication advertising simply do not exist in the journals where they are claimed to be published. Virginia Commonwealth University confirmed to Notus that researcher Robert L Findling, listed as an author of one paper, never wrote such an article, while another citation leads only to the Kennedy report itself when searched online. Harold J Farber, a pediatric specialist supposedly behind research on asthma overprescribing, told Notus he never wrote the cited paper and had never worked with the other listed authors. The US Department of Health and Human Services has not immediately responded to a Guardian request for comment. The citation failures come as Kennedy, a noted skeptic of vaccines, criticized medical publishing this week, branding top journals the Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine and Jama as 'corrupt' and alleging they were controlled by pharmaceutical companies. He outlined plans for creating government-run journals instead. Beyond the phantom studies in Kennedy's report, Notus found it systematically misrepresented existing research. Related: RFK's health report omits key facts in painting dark vision for US children For example, one paper was claimed to show that talking therapy was as effective as psychiatric medication, but the statistician Joanne McKenzie said this was impossible, as 'we did not include psychotherapy' in the review. The sleep researcher Mariana G Figueiro also said her study was mischaracterized, with the report incorrectly stating it involved children rather than college students, and citing the wrong journal entirely. The Trump administration asked Kennedy for the report in order to look at chronic illness causes, from pesticides to mobile phone radiation. Kennedy called it a 'milestone' that provides 'evidence-based foundation' for sweeping policy changes. A follow-up 'Make our children healthy again strategy' report is due in August, raising concerns about the scientific credibility underpinning the administration's health agenda.


The Hill
21 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump stokes fear, confusion with pulled emergency abortion guidance
The Trump administration sowed confusion and fear among physicians with its move this past week to rescind Biden-era guidelines to hospitals that provide life-saving abortions. While the move doesn't change the law, doctors and reproductive-rights advocates fear it will have a chilling effect on health care workers in states with abortion bans, ultimately harming pregnant women. Earlier this past week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced they would rescind guidance issued during the Biden administration, which reinforced to hospitals that under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA,) abortions qualify as stabilizing care in medical emergencies. Emergency rooms in states with abortion bans have been struggling since the 2022 overturning of Roe v. Wade to understand when they can legally provide emergency abortions. After President Trump pulled the Biden-era guidance seeking to clarify that question, emergency room doctors will experience 'more confusion' and 'more fear,' according to health and legal experts who spoke with The Hill. 'Clinicians are scared to provide basic medical care, and this care is clearly in line with medical ethics … medical standards of care, and they're being put in this situation where they can't win,' said Payal Shah, director of research, legal and advocacy at Physicians for Human Rights. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, at least 13 states have enacted near-total abortion bans, according to data from the Guttmacher Institute. There are exceptions in these states when continuing a pregnancy poses a threat to the health or life of the mother. However, most of the language in state laws is unclear on how that determination is made, resulting in instances of emergency rooms denying care. Doctors in states like Idaho, Texas and Tennessee have filed lawsuits requesting that lawmakers clarify when an abortion is allowed to save the life of a pregnant person. The doctors and patients involved in the lawsuits argue that state laws do not adequately protect pregnant patients in emergencies. Many of these states have severe punishments for doctors who violate abortion bans, like steep fines and prison time. 'For clinicians, there is actually no safe way to navigate this in this moment, and ultimately, that's how these laws are designed,' Shah said. 'They're designed to cause chaos and confusion. They're often written in ways that don't use medical terminology.' Without clear guidance, pregnant women suffer and sometimes die, as ProPublica has reported. One striking example of this is the 2023 case of Kyleigh Thurman, a Texas woman who was repeatedly denied care for a nonviable pregnancy after days of experiencing bleeding and pain. Health care workers discovered that she had an ectopic pregnancy, which is when a fertilized egg implants and begins to grow outside of the uterus, usually in a fallopian tube. Ectopic pregnancies are never viable and are life-threatening if not treated properly. It wasn't until her OB/GYN 'pleaded to hospital staff that she be given care,' that the hospital administered a shot ending her pregnancy, according to a complaint filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of Thurman. The shot came too late, and the ectopic pregnancy ruptured Thurman's right fallopian tube, which was then removed. 'If a patient is actively hemorrhaging or experiencing an ectopic pregnancy which is also life-threatening, doctors need that clear guidance that yes, EMTALA applied,' said Autumn Katz, associate director of U.S. litigation at the Center for Reproductive Rights. A federal investigation into Thurman's case found that the Texas hospital violated EMTALA, according to a recent letter from the CMS. 'I finally got some justice,' Thurman said in a statement. 'I hope this decision will do some good in encouraging hospitals to help women in situations like mine.' Hospitals that violate EMTALA are subject to heavy fines and, in some extreme cases, risk losing a portion of their Medicare and Medicaid hospital funding, according to the National Institutes of Health. Former President Biden leaned on the law to preserve access to emergency abortion across the country, leading to a legal fight with Idaho, which has a strict abortion ban. The Supreme Court last year dismissed the case, declining to rule on the merits of a politically charged case. The rescinding of these guidelines also means hospitals that violate the law will likely not be investigated as often as they were under previous administrations, according to Shah. That lack of punitive risk means that hospitals could be incentivized to deny life-saving care for patients. 'The standard of EMTALA is pretty high,' said Katherine Hempstead, senior policy adviser at Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 'This kind of takes that layer of reassurance away, and it will make a lot of providers feel very vulnerable.'