logo
David Zweig: Closing Schools During Covid Was The Most Catastrophic Consequence Of The Interventions

David Zweig: Closing Schools During Covid Was The Most Catastrophic Consequence Of The Interventions

Fox News23-04-2025

David Zweig, investigative journalist and author, joined Brian Kilmeade to discuss his new book 'An Abundance of Caution: American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions'
Zweig spoke about the failures of public policy during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially its impact on children after school closures and how elected officials, the medical establishment working with government and the teachers unions failed their students. Zweig explained how closing schools during the pandemic was the most catastrophic consequence of the interventions and it's impact is still affecting kids to this day. Zweig pointed out that during the early days of the pandemic, the EU opened schools and with millions of students back, there was no negative consequences on the community. Zweig stressed it was not just on kids, but also no increased transmission to teachers and everyone else in the community after schools opened. Zweig took the media to task for not reporting on no negative consequences on the millions of children returning to school in the EU. The failures according to Zweig all comes back to journalists not fulfilling their most basic duty of asking questions and being skeptical of those in power.
Click here to order 'An Abundance of Caution: American Schools, the Virus, and a Story of Bad Decisions'
Watch here:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU plan would limit Chinese device makers in Europe
EU plan would limit Chinese device makers in Europe

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EU plan would limit Chinese device makers in Europe

This story was originally published on MedTech Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily MedTech Dive newsletter. European Union member states this week voted to support a plan to adopt measures that would restrict Chinese medical device makers' access to the EU market. The member states took the action, under the EU's International Procurement Instrument, after concluding an investigation in January that looked at China's practices in the public procurement market for medical devices. The investigation found that government practices unfairly encouraged Chinese hospitals to choose domestic manufacturers' products. 'The Commission has identified measures and practices in the Chinese procurement market that lead to discrimination against EU operators and EU-made supplies,' Olof Gill, commission spokesperson, said Thursday in an emailed statement. 'This discrimination also harms both the Chinese healthcare infrastructure, which is deprived of quality equipment, and EU businesses, with a high cost in terms of jobs and economic activity in the EU.' The commission has discussed its concerns with Chinese authorities. However, a satisfactory solution has not been proposed, and the EU had no other option than to tackle the issue through an IPI investigation, Gill wrote. The commission said it could not disclose the content of the draft IPI measure or next steps in the process. Chinese manufacturers would be prohibited from bidding on public procurement contracts worth more than 5 million euros for five years. In addition, no more than 50% of a contract's value may be subcontracted to Chinese entities or include Chinese-origin medical devices, MedTech Europe said in a statement. The trade group said it would provide further updates once the IPI measures are published in the EU's official journal. The EU investigation into China's medical device procurement practices was the first use of the IPI, which was introduced in 2022. Getting fair access to Chinese markets became more challenging for medical device companies after the country launched a program calling for domestically produced medical equipment to achieve 50% market penetration in county-level hospitals by 2020 and 70% by 2025, according to a statement from the European Chamber, which represents European businesses in China. European and Chinese leaders will meet in July at a summit in Beijing. Recommended Reading EU mulls retaliation after showing China's bias against foreign device firms Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Right to Repair? Army secretary pushes for access to tools, parts
Right to Repair? Army secretary pushes for access to tools, parts

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Right to Repair? Army secretary pushes for access to tools, parts

(NewsNation) — The Right to Repair is gaining a ton of momentum across the country. Earlier this month, Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll committed to including right-to-repair provisions in all existing and future contracts with manufacturers. Right to Repair is a legal right for owners of devices and equipment to freely modify and repair products such as automobiles, electronics, and farm equipment. Presently, the Army has committed to securing right-to-repair provisions in contracts. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is advocating for other military branches to adopt the requirement, addressing the long-standing repairability problems across the armed forces. Spyware suspected on iPhones of US, EU political figures: Report 'The Army's commitment to Right to Repair shows other industries that they can do the same,' she says. Last month in Washington, the Right to Repair became law after advocates had spent years trying to get it passed. In addition, a wheelchair bill in New York has also advanced, while a new bill has been introduced in Pennsylvania that covers consumer and business electronics. In 2025, 35 states — up from 30 last year — have considered Right to Repair legislation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

The latest personnel purge at the FBI adds to a destabilizing problem
The latest personnel purge at the FBI adds to a destabilizing problem

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The latest personnel purge at the FBI adds to a destabilizing problem

Among the many problems that have emerged in federal law enforcement during Donald Trump's second term is the campaign against key personnel. Indeed, there's been an unsubtle campaign to purge federal law enforcement of prosecutors and FBI officials for unsubtle political reasons. As The New York Times reported, those efforts are ongoing. The F.B.I. has targeted another round of employees who ran afoul of conservatives, forcing out two veteran agents in Virginia — one of whom is friends with a critic of President Trump — and punishing another in Las Vegas, according to several people familiar with the matter. Two of the men, Spencer Evans and Stanley Meador, are senior agents who ran F.B.I. field offices in Las Vegas and Richmond, Va. The third, Michael Feinberg, a top deputy in the Norfolk, Va., office, had ties to a former agent whom Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, identified in his book as part of the so-called deep state. The rationales behind the reported moves have varied. Evans, for example, apparently became a target after a stint at the FBI's human resources department, where he was reluctant to approve exemptions for Covid vaccines. Republicans didn't like Meador after his office issued a memo in 2023 related to possible threats from anti-abortion activists. As for Feinberg, the Times' report added that he issued a statement a couple of weeks ago, explaining that he was threatened with an investigation and the possibility of a demotion because of his friendship with Peter Strzok — who appeared on FBI Director Kash Patel's infamous 'enemies list.' On his way out, Feinberg added that the FBI as institution had begun 'to decay,' and it's easy to understand how and why he came to that conclusion. For years, the public has been bombarded with hysterical rhetoric from Republican conspiracy theorists who insisted that the FBI — one of the most politically conservative institutions in the federal government and an agency that has literally never had a Democratic director — had secretly become 'weaponized' by rascally liberals hellbent on targeting poor, unsuspecting victims on the right. The baseless claims never made sense, though the FBI's Trump-appointed leadership is now engaging in many of the same political efforts that Republicans long claimed to oppose. On the 11th day of Trump's second term, for example, NBC News reported, 'Trump administration officials have forced out all six of the FBI's most senior executives and multiple heads of FBI field offices across the country,' in part as retribution for the president having faced federal criminal charges in 2023 and in part to punish officials involved in Jan. 6 cases. It was the first such purge on Team Trump's revenge tour, but it was hardly the last. The Times added in a separate report earlier this week, 'Behind the scenes, [Patel's] vision of an F.B.I. under President Trump is quietly taking shape. Agents have been forced out. Others have been demoted or put on leave with no explanation. ... The actions have obliterated decades of experience in national security and criminal matters at the F.B.I. and raised questions about whether the agents taking over such critical posts have the institutional knowledge to pursue cornerstones of its work.' I don't know if the bureau will ever recover from the efforts to Trumpify it, but I know that recovery won't happen anytime soon. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store