logo
Andrea Jenkyns: The opera-singing ex-Tory MP's journey from working in Greggs to a radical Reform UK mayor

Andrea Jenkyns: The opera-singing ex-Tory MP's journey from working in Greggs to a radical Reform UK mayor

Independent02-05-2025

Just a week ago Dame Andrea Jenkyns still did not know whether she would be ruled eligible to stand to be mayor of Greater Lincolnshire.
But now, with the question marks over her residency status still hanging over her, the former Tory MP turned Reform defector is suggestion putting migrants in tents and stopping energy secretary Ed Miliband covering East Anglia's fields with solar panels.
But the events of the last seven days are not unusual for a rightwing politician who has courted controversy in a headstrong political career which has given her opponents plenty of ammunition.
Whether it is flipping the bird at protesters outside Downing Street while going in to mark Boris Johnson's departure as prime minister, or ending Ed Balls ' political career, Dame Andrea has never been far from the drama.
The beauty queen
It all started when 16-year-old Andrea Jenkyns left school in Beverly, Humberside after her GCSEs and got herself a job serving pasties and sausage rolls at Greggs.
At 18 though, her father persuaded her to start competing in beauty pageants and her public career really began on the stage of Miss UK, where she was a finalist.
The desire to perform has never left her, even beyond politics, and many years later as a good soprano she would release her own album and perform live in the UK, Europe and Asia, including for the former prime minister of Pakistan.
Defeating Ed Balls
Her political career could not have begun in a more spectacular fashion in 2015. Having been a county councillor in Boston, Lincolnshire, Dame Andrea was asked to run against former Labour cabinet minister Ed Balls in the Morley and Outwood seat on the edge of Leeds.
Mr Balls clearly thought he had the seat in the bag and instead focussed local campaigning in trying to oust the then Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg in nearby Sheffield.
It came as a shock to everyone when in the early hours of the morning on 7 May 2015, Jenkyns was declared the winner and in effect ended the political career of a man who had been expected to challenge for the Labour leadership.
The hardcore Brexiteer
Once in parliament it became clear that Jenkyns was firmly on the right of the Tory party. She quickly joined the European Research Group of hardcore Brexiteers and became a big cheerleader for Boris Johnson.
After the 2016 EU referendum she pushed for a no-deal Brexit, and in 2018 she became the first person with a government position to quit her job in Theresa May's premiership in protest over trying to compromise with the EU.
Such was her strong support for Brexit that the millionaire Nigel Farage ally Arron Banks gave £2,000 for her 2019 election campaign, in a much-criticised move. Jenkyns was accused of trying to help entryism into the Conservatives.
Flipping the bird
Almost all of her nine-year parliamentary career was spent on the backbenches with little appetite to trust her with a ministerial job.
But as dozens of ministers quit Boris Johnson's government in protest over Partygate lockdown boozing in Downing Street and the Chris Pincher scandal, Dame Andrea was appointed a junior education minister.
She was always a fan of Johnson and on the day he departed as prime minister, she became the image of Tory contempt when she was pictured flipping the bird at protesters on her way into Downing Street to hear his farewell speech.
Mr Johnson was grateful, though, making sure she got her damehood in his resignation honours list.
Finding love in the Commons
While Boris Johnson was her leadership love in politics, Dame Andrea had also found love with one of her colleagues Jack Lopresti who fell for her despite being on the moderate One Nation side of the Tories.
Lopresti left his family for her and they had a son in 2017, marrying in December that year.
But things fell apart quite quickly and in 2024 she announced they had divorced.
Lopresti was last heard of joining the Ukrainian army to help in the war against Russia having also lost his seat in the election last year.
Off and then on with Reform
Jenkyns relationship with Reform has been typically hot and cold. Ahead of the 2024 election she accused Reform of trying to bribe her to defect to them. She then had a bitter feud with party leader Richard Tice after she was deliberately targeted by Reform to lose her Morley and Leeds South West seat which she duly did.
The animosity did not stop her from turning up as a guest at Nigel Farage's 60th birthday party ahead of the election last year in what was seen as a sign that she would eventually switch. She was pictured with Farage and Arron Banks.
Then as a seatless ex-Tory MP, she became Reform's 100,000th member and was declared as the mayoral candidate for Greater Lincolnshire - the county where her political career began as a councillor in Boston.
But even then things were not settled between her and Reform. Dame Andrea's public support for Boris Johnson on X (formerly Twitter) upset party chairman Zia Yusuf who then suddenly started doing interviews on how the ex-Tory PM would never be welcome in Reform.
Victory in Lincolnshire
Dame Andrea's first reaction on winning was to complain about the 'smear campaign' against her by her opponents. Having picked up 42 per cent of the vote, she was more concerned about the questions which had been asked about if she was eligible to stand.
While she was cleared by the returning officer to stand as a candidate there is a possibility that her vague residency qualifications could become the subject of another legal challenge.
Now she has won though and is backed by a likely Reform majority on the county council, the sleepy East Anglian county could become a real testbed for Reform rightwing policies.
Already she is discussing putting illegal migrants in tents. She is also likely to try to stop renewable energy sources be it wind or solar farms being allowed in the county.
More interesting will be the Lincolnshire version of DOGE in slashing costs and cutting services that Mr Farage wants.
Lincolnshire's farmers and fishing communities may be worried about having a vegetarian animal rights activist in charge.
But overall Lincolnshire now will be the real test of whether Reform is a party fit to govern. And Dame Andrea will become the face of that.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Readers' Letters: Reform's policies are not far right, they're common sense
Readers' Letters: Reform's policies are not far right, they're common sense

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Readers' Letters: Reform's policies are not far right, they're common sense

Reform has plenty to offer moderate voters, says reader Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... David Hamill (Letters, 9 June) writes that Reform is preaching 'far right poison' while the new Hamilton MP, Davy Russell, stated that 'the poison of Reform is not us', although 7,000 of his constituents voted for Reform. Anas Sarwar has described Nigel Farage as a 'pathetic little man'. Inflammatory language has no place in political debate I doubt if any of the Farage haters have ever looked at Reform's policies, which are available for all to read online in a 28-page document. They challenge much of the current policy consensus across Labour, the SNP and the Conservatives and I suppose that is what so enrages those who do not believe that this consensus has failed Britain and Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The party's aspirations include cutting migration, with the UK already having a population density of 300 people per square kilometre; stopping the Bank of England paying £35 billion a year in quantitative easing interest; lifting the income tax starting rate to £20,000; cutting the 6,700 EU laws still in use hindering growth; abolishing corporation tax for 1.2 million SMEs; scrapping net zero, saving billions; reforming the NHS to cut waiting times, but keeping it free at the point of use; putting bobbies back on the beat; removing transgender ideology from schools; and reviewing diversity, equality and inclusion policies. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and Deputy Leader Richard Tice at a press conference in Aberdeen last week (Picture:) These are not far right polices, there are simply sensible policy proposals which much of the electorate regard as common sense. Too many of our politicians fear to speak out against their party policies which they know are wrong. William Loneskie, Oxton, Lauder, Berwickshire Denial duo What do David Hamill and First Minister John Swinney have in common? Following the Hamilton election they are both in denial. Mr Hamill says 'three-quarters of the voters in Hamilton want nothing to do with the pernicious, far-right poison preached by Reform' but neglects to say that 87 per cent of the electorate didn't vote for the SNP. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Swinney says 'the SNP is in the process of recovery', but with a swing away from the SNP of 16.8 per cent, what does he think will constitute a full recovery? Bruce Proctor, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Turn the tide Ian Murray MP wants to 'turbocharge' the economy with nuclear power (your report, 9 June). A far cleaner, cheaper, low-tech way to cut electricity prices would be to harness the tides. A 2021 paper to the Royal Society claimed that a Severn Barrage alone could supply 6-7 per cent of UK demand; sling road/rail across the dams and it's a double bonus. Scotland, with its indented coast, would be ideal for such projects, in particular the Black Isle firths, where the boost to the northern economy would be significant, and the Invergordon to Nairn drive cut by a whopping 15 miles. George Morton, Rosyth, Fife Nuclear nod A long time ago I used radioactive isotopes to study smallpox and an antiviral agent that had the potential to stop it in its tracks. Ever since I have made it my business to evaluate the safety of nuclear reactors and nuclear waste, and have concluded that with the exception of the Soviet Union, our obsessional attention to safety in their design and use means that it has not been possible to ascribe any health harm to humans from them, unlike coal waste at Aberfan or oil extraction like Piper Alpha, or, worst of all, climate change-causing CO2 waste generated by burning fossil fuels. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So I consider the SNP and Greens' antinuclear policies based on arguments about safety (your report, 9 June) to be evidentially wrong. In any case, they will soon be overtaken by events. When the gas has run out and the wind doesn't blow, to prevent blackouts Scotland will be obliged to import electricity generated by nuclear reactors from England. Hugh Pennington, Aberdeen It's over, John In addition to points raised in The Scotsman's report on John Swinney's BBC Sunday Show interview (9 June) he was still touchingly clinging to the independence panacea, citing polls claiming 54 per cent support for the SNP. That doesn't stack up with Hamilton. On a turnout of 44 per cent the SNP got 30 per cent of the votes. That's only 14 per cent of the total electorate. Applying these numbers to the 4.3 million voters in Scotland their 2014 Indyref total of 1.6m votes plummets by one million to around 600,000. Come on John, you know it's over, so why not publicly announce you're jacking it in. Then Holyrood 2026 can be about which party has the best policies and candidates to halt our health, education, worklessness, Net Zero and public services nosedive. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Who cares? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Otto Inglis (Letters, 9 June) writes an excellent assessment of the Hamilton by-election, but for all the analysis and comment, it should be noted that almost 56 per cent of the electorate could not be bothered to vote, so really don't care who represents them in the Scottish Parliament. Malcolm Parkin, Kinnesswood, Perth and Kinross Spad news The SNP have announced that their bill for Spad services in the previous year has been a jaw-dropping £1.7 million of our taxes. In any case, considering the party's image plunged to rock bottom in the period, they should be asking for their – our – money back. Alexander McKay, Edinburgh Do nothing I recall, many years ago, being on a course to help senior doctors to become managers in the NHS, as if there weren't enough of them already! We were taught that among the many actions that might be employed to solve any problem there was always the 'do nothing' option. I am currently suffering from a progressive and untreatable lung condition. I am in constant distress due to shortness of breath which is only partially relieved by Oxygen therapy. I can do little more physical activity than shuffle around my house and the condition is putting extra strain on my heart. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last week, still being of sound mind, I obtained, with no problem, a form I can carry around which says that should I have a cardiac arrest, I do not wish to be resuscitated. Here is a perfect example of a problem where doctors can, without risk of retribution, apply the 'do nothing' option, while at the same time, not reneging on their Hippocratic oath, which says 'first do no harm'. While the assisted dying issue rages on, could not resuscitating be construed as doing just that, by the back door? (Dr) S R Wild, Edinburgh Reform Forces Introducing the Defence Review, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer repeated words he heard on HMS Vanguard, 'nothing works unless we all work together'. Money is short. The Defence Secretary John Healey spoke of 'defence reform' and he should question the need for three services. Most of the RAF's 30,000 personnel are in the UK, as are most of its 500 aircraft (including 46 support aircraft, 37 helicopters, 160 trainers, 90 gliders). The RAF has 75 per cent of all MoD aircraft and 50 per cent of frontline aircraft, the other half being Army or Navy. Only 20 per cent of RAF personnel have flying duties, most of its 'aviators' are ground crew or support staff, yet 20 per cent are officers – including 40 air marshals and 100 air commodores. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Most RAF operations support land forces, some support Maritime Britain. With 60 uniformed personnel for every aircraft, trainer and glider, the £10 billion-plus a year RAF, with its ten display teams, seems overmanned and under-employed. In times of plenty all this may be justifiable – it's not today. Defence costs too much to maintain three services. Unsentimental reorganisation of HM Forces would help make them 'battle-ready', providing huge savings, advancing the government's 'defence dividend'. There is no need for a separate air force. An army and navy with RAF air assets and personnel transferred would see defence emerge leaner and more cost-effective and, importantly, be operationally more efficient with no loss of air capability. 'Nato first' would be better achieved by the UK being tasked as the principal maritime power in the eastern Atlantic, the land powers of the Continent providing the principal armies. The Defence Review should prompt radical change here and in Nato. Lester May (Lieutenant Commander, Royal Navy – retired), Camden Town, London Power babies Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Rarely has the saying 'the love of money is the root of all evil' borne such lethal purchase than during the monumental falling out between Donald Trump and Elon Musk this past week. It seems a long time ago that Musk and his fellow oligarchs made up a billionaire front row for Trump's inauguration as president. Their fallout has been a long time coming, not helped by Musk's infamous Nazi-style salute on that occasion. He never recovered from the deserved barb that he was unelected, all the while wielding a hacksaw indiscriminately through whole swathes of US life in the notorious DOGE. It says everything about US politics that the Democrats would now even consider taking Musk's money. The whole affair stinks of two-uber rich big babies tossing their grown-up toys out of the pram. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman

Courage on the seas, silence on our shores over Gaza
Courage on the seas, silence on our shores over Gaza

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Courage on the seas, silence on our shores over Gaza

Scottish Green Party co-leader Lorna Slater In the early hours of yesterday morning, the world witnessed yet another brazen violation of international law by the Israeli government. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Madleen, a UK-flagged humanitarian aid vessel, was intercepted by Israeli forces in international waters while en route to Gaza. Aboard were 12 peace activists, including high-profile figures such as climate activist Greta Thunberg, Irish actor Liam Cunningham and French MEP Rima Hassan. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This ship was not a threat, Israel knew that before it had even left port. It carried no weapons, only vital humanitarian supplies - food, water and medicine for the besieged people of Gaza. Greta Thunberg with part of the crew of the ship Madleen Yet, despite the clear protections of international maritime law, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Israeli forces boarded and seized the vessel in a violent, nighttime raid. Let us be clear, this was not just an attack on a ship. It was an attack on humanitarian principles, on international law and on the right of civilians to live free from siege and starvation. It was an attempt to silence the growing global demand for justice and dignity for Palestinians. Scotland and indeed the UK, cannot look away. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The presence of global figures like Thunberg and Cunningham on the Madleen highlights the international scale of concern over the continued blockade of Gaza and is putting the strongest of spotlights on Israel's actions facilitating arguably the worst humanitarian crisis in the world. We must not allow the UK Government's silence to imply consent. Successive governments have remained complicit in the face of clear war crimes, continuing to arm and support the Israeli regime while turning their backs on the victims of its actions. With a UK vessel now seized and its passengers detained, the Labour government's refusal to speak out is both shameful and dangerous. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We cannot claim to stand for peace, human rights and the rule of law while funding, arming and enabling a regime that so flagrantly violates all three. We must demand action. The blockade of Gaza must end. The UK must halt all arms sales to Israel, suspend military cooperation and stand on the side of humanity. The Madleen's mission was to shine a light on the suffering of Gaza and the complicity of the international community in its ongoing tragedy. That light is now brighter than ever. What happens next will show whether the world is willing to act or merely watch. Lorna Slater, Scottish Green party co-leader​​

The signs from Labour are more welfare cuts in Spending Review
The signs from Labour are more welfare cuts in Spending Review

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

The signs from Labour are more welfare cuts in Spending Review

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (centre), Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) and Ed Miliband, Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary (left), during a visit to St Fergus Gas Terminal, a clean power facility in AberdeenshirePicture: Jeff J Mitchell/PA Wire This week's UK Spending Review presents a stark choice: a continuation of Westminster austerity or a long-overdue shift toward investment in people, services and the economy. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... So far, signs from the Labour Government suggest more of the same cuts that have already failed families for over a decade. As always, it is the most vulnerable in our society who will pay the price. With household bills high and public services already stretched, now is the time for serious, compassionate action. Yet Labour has refused to rule out real-terms cuts to affordable housing, police recruitment, and local government funding. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At the same time, the UK Government is pressing ahead with damaging welfare reforms – including proposed cuts to disability benefits, the continuation of the two-child benefit cap, and delays to anti-poverty action like the long-promised child poverty taskforce. All of this risks worsening the cost-of-living crisis and driving already struggling families into deeper hardship, especially in communities already hit hardest by past austerity measures. The SNP has laid out a clear and achievable alternative. The Chancellor must fully reverse planned welfare cuts, protect public services and unlock investment in clean energy and economic growth. In particular, Labour must finally deliver full and immediate funding for Scotland's Acorn carbon capture project – a vital climate initiative that has faced years of Westminster delay. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK Government must also fully cover the cost of its increase to employer National Insurance, which threatens to drain frontline budgets in areas like health, social care and education. Scotland is already delivering targeted, effective support – and the evidence speaks for itself. According to new House of Commons Library research, nearly two million families across the UK would be lifted out of poverty if Labour adopted SNP policies: a UK-wide rollout of the Scottish Child Payment, scrapping the two-child cap, and ending the bedroom tax. Under the SNP, Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling. The Scottish Child Payment alone delivers £27.15 per eligible child per week – a direct boost to family incomes that is helping to turn the tide on child poverty across our communities. By contrast, the UK Government's own impact assessment shows that proposed cuts to disability benefits could push a further 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – into poverty. Families affected stand to lose £4500 a year on average. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And despite repeated calls from campaigners, Labour MPs have failed to back even basic reforms, like abolishing the two-child limit, voting against it in the House of Commons just last year – a decision that remains indefensible in the face of rising need. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has made clear that, without new revenue, the UK Government's current fiscal rules mean public spending will fall in real terms across most departments. That includes justice, local government and housing – all critical areas already under severe strain. If the Chancellor refuses to invest and clings to outdated austerity thinking, the consequences will be felt in every community across the UK for years to come. In Scotland, the SNP is focused on lifting people out of poverty and building a fairer, greener, more resilient economy. But we cannot shield families indefinitely from the consequences of Westminster choices. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour must use this Spending Review to deliver the funding and flexibility Scotland needs – not double down on the failed cuts that brought us here in the first place. MSP for Edinburgh Central and Constitution, External Affairs and Culture Secretary

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store