Auctioning Hudson's Bay artifacts with First Nations significance would be 'morally irresponsible': chief
As Hudson's Bay heads to court seeking permission to auction off 1,700 pieces of art and more than 2,700 artifacts, the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs is requesting a halt to the sale of items that may belong to or be linked with First Nations people.
A letter by Grand Chief Kyra Wilson to the monitor for Hudson's Bay, which is operating under court protection from creditors under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, said there is "deep concern" over the potential auction of artifacts from its collection.
"Given the nature and scope of HBC's long-standing relationship with First Nations, it is likely, if not certain, that many of the artifacts slated for auction are of profound cultural, spiritual, and historical significance to First Nations people," Wilson said in the letter on Tuesday.
"Selling these items at auction without full transparency and consultation with impacted First Nations would not only be morally irresponsible but also represent a continuation of the colonial dispossession of First Nations' lands and belongings that the HBC directly profited from for centuries."
It is still unclear what specific artifacts could be included in the auction beyond the 355-year-old royal charter that launched the company.
Hudson's Bay announced Wednesday it will liquidate all of its remaining stores and has previously said an auction "is the most transparent, fair and efficient approach to monetize the art collection while recognizing and protecting its cultural and historical significance."
In addition to halting the sale or transfer of artifacts with possible links to First Nations, Wilson requested the full catalogue of items being considered for liquidation be made public.
She also said there should be a First Nations-led review process.
"These artifacts are not simply 'valuable assets' or one-of-a-kind collectibles, but pieces of living history, some of which may be sacred, stolen from First Nations or properly First Nations-owned," she wrote.
Others have asked the company to transfer its royal charter to a public archival institution such as the Archives of Manitoba to ensure its preservation, rather than risk it being sold to a private buyer.
The charter, granted by King Charles II in 1670, is "one of the most significant archival documents that exists in Canada," said Cody Groat, chair of the Canada Advisory Committee for Memory of the World, which is under the umbrella of the Canadian Commission for UNESCO.
Groat called the document "foundational" to discussions around political governance in Canada and treaty negotiations with Indigenous people.
That's because the charter, which established Hudson's Bay as a fur trading company, also granted it "semi-sovereign rights" which allowed it to operate both "as a business entity and as a colonial government at the same time," Groat said.
"So when we look at this, it's not just a document that established a business. It's a document that really created a unique political colonial structure in Canada."
Other Hudson's Bay artifacts have previously been donated to the Archives of Manitoba. In 2007, those received UNESCO's Memory of the World designation, meant to safeguard documents of historical and cultural importance.
But the charter, which has remained in the company's possession, hasn't received that recognition.
Groat said that to be designated, an item must be assessed to have been properly preserved according to archival conservation standards, and the general public must have reasonable access to it.
"What we're calling for is a recognition that this should not be viewed as just another corporate asset," he said.
"If a private corporation buys it, it could be designated, but it entering a public institution is kind of how we know it's going to be preserved in a way that it ought to be preserved."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
New Mexico appeals court rejects lawsuit against oil and gas regulators
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — A New Mexico appeals court rejected a lawsuit alleging that the nation's No. 2 oil-producing state failed to meet constitutional provisions for protecting against oil and gas industry pollution, in an opinion Tuesday. Environmental advocates vowed to appeal the matter to the state's top court. A panel of three judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals found that it was beyond the judiciary's authority to weigh whether the pollution controls are adequate, writing that they'll defer to the Legislature to balance the benefits of environmental regulation with natural resources development. The 2023 lawsuit from a coalition of environmental groups was the first to invoke the constitution's pollution-control clause, a 1971 amendment requiring that New Mexico prevent the contamination of air, water and other natural resources. 'While plaintiffs correctly observe that, as the 'Land of Enchantment,' the state's beauty is central to our identity, we cannot ignore the long history of permitting oil and gas extraction within our borders,' the panel wrote, invoking the state motto. 'If anything, the law, history, and tradition of our state demonstrates that resource extraction must be considered alongside, and must coexist with, pollution control legislation.' Gail Evans, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity and lead counsel on the case, said Tuesday's opinion would dismiss the case entirely if unchallenged and 'displays a fundamental misunderstanding of our constitution and constitutional rights.' She said plaintiffs intent to appeal to the state Supreme Court. 'Fifty years ago, New Mexico voted to amend the constitution and to provide protections from industry pollution and the court has found today that the amendment — the pollution control clause — is essentially meaningless, and that has to be wrong,' Evans said. The court challenge comes as New Mexico's state government rides a wave of record income from development in the Permian Basin, one of the world's most productive, oil-producing regions. Oil-related revenue collections underwrite a considerable amount of the state's budget, including public education. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's administration is policing the industry with regulations that target methane and other emissions. But the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups say these efforts are not enough and that the state is failing to enforce existing pollution-control measures. Attorneys for the Democratic-led Legislature and environmental regulators said the lawsuit threatened their constitutional authority. Appeals Judge Katherine Wray issued an additional concurring opinion, expressing further limitations of the pollution control clause.
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
RioCan Successfully Transitions the RioCan-HBC Joint Venture into a Receivership Process to Preserve and Maximize the Value of its Assets
Article content TORONTO — RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust ('RioCan' or the 'Trust') (TSX: announced today that a receivership process has been established to protect the interests of RioCan and the other stakeholders in the RioCan-HBC Joint Venture (the 'JV'). The receivership proceeding will create a structured process within which RioCan can work with a receiver and other stakeholders to advance and execute solutions for the JV's properties to benefit the JV and its stakeholders. This includes activities such as dispositions, re-leasing and advancing potential redevelopment opportunities of individual properties. RioCan's exposure to Hudson's Bay Company ('HBC'), whether as a limited partner, secured lender or guarantor of certain JV obligations remains unchanged as a result of the receivership proceeding. For further information on the JV, please refer to RioCan's press release dated March 18, 2025, RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust Provides Update on Hudson's Bay Company's CCAA Filing. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) has granted RioCan's application to appoint FTI Consulting Canada Inc. ('FTI' or the 'Receiver') as the receiver over all of the assets and properties of the JV. The JV's receivership proceeding will be a single proceeding that focuses solely on the JV's assets, and advanced in parallel with the HBC Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ('CCAA') proceeding. Article content FTI, as the Receiver, will immediately take steps and actions with respect to the JV and its assets in order to preserve and maximize value for the benefit of RioCan and other JV stakeholders. FTI has extensive experience in restructurings and court-appointed receivership proceedings. FTI will oversee the affairs of the JV specifically, managing the process independently of the HBC CCAA proceeding. Pursuant to the court order appointing the Receiver, the JV's leasehold and 100% owned properties will benefit from a stay of proceedings to allow the Receiver and its stakeholders sufficient time to take such steps as are necessary to effectively deal with the JV's assets. The co-owned properties of the JV will continue to be managed by RioCan in the normal course. Article content About RioCan Article content RioCan is one of Canada's largest real estate investment trusts. RioCan owns, manages and develops retail-focused, mixed-use properties located in prime, high-density transit-oriented areas where Canadians want to shop, live and work. As at March 31, 2025, our portfolio is comprised of 177 properties with an aggregate net leasable area of approximately 32 million square feet (at RioCan's interest). To learn more about us, please visit Article content This News Release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. This information reflects RioCan's objectives, our strategies to achieve those objectives, as well as statements with respect to management's beliefs, estimates and intentions concerning anticipated future events, results, circumstances, performance or expectations that are not historical facts. Forward-looking information can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as 'outlook', 'objective', 'may', 'will', 'would', 'expect', 'intend', 'estimate', 'anticipate', 'believe', 'should', 'plan', 'continue', or similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Such forward-looking information reflects management's current beliefs and is based on information currently available to management. All forward-looking information in this News Release is qualified by these cautionary statements. Forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future events or performance and, by its nature, is based on RioCan's current estimates and assumptions, which are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in the ' Risks and Uncertainties ' section in RioCan's MD&A for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and in our most recent Annual Information Form, which could cause actual events or results to differ materially from the forward-looking information contained in this News Release. Although the forward-looking information contained in this News Release is based upon what management believes are reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that actual results will be consistent with this forward-looking information. Article content The forward-looking statements contained in this News Release are made as of the date hereof, and should not be relied upon as representing RioCan's views as of any date subsequent to the date of this News Release. Management undertakes no obligation, except as required by applicable law, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust Article content
Montreal Gazette
3 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
First Nations heads urge Quebec to scrap forestry reform bill
Quebec Politics QUEBEC — Representatives of the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador urged a provincial legislature committee on Tuesday to abandon a forestry reform bill that would reserve large swaths of the province's forests for logging. AFNQL Chief Francis Verreault-Paul and three other leaders called on the government to work with them to develop a new bill from scratch because they say Bill 97 does not respect First Nations' ancestral rights. The proposed legislation would divide the province's public forest land into three zones: conservation zones, multi-purpose zones and forest development zones where the forestry industry is prioritized. Lucien Wabanonik, chief of the Anishnabe council of Lac Simon, said the idea of handing over a third of forests to industry is a non-starter in the eyes of First Nations. 'We want to collaborate. But not on the basis of your bill,' he said. 'We reject your bill. We can't restart on a foundation that's already broken.' Instead, he urged the government to 'start again ... this time with us First Nations as co-builders.' The bill tabled this spring by Natural Resources Minister Maïté Blanchette Vézina specifies that activities that 'restrict the carrying out of forest development activities' would be prohibited in the development zones, as would the implementation of conservation measures. The goal of the bill is to protect communities that rely on the forest industry amid an uncertain economic context, including a trade war with the United States, the minister said in April. Blanchette Vézina wrote in a recent memo that the government hopes at least 30 per cent of public forests in each region will become development zones by 2028. In a news conference in April, she described the idea as a 'triad,' with the forest being split into three parts of approximately equal size. However, a spokesperson for the minister told The Canadian Press that this number was intended for 'guidance principles.' 'Regional forest managers, taking into account local and regional realities, will determine the percentage of priority forest management areas,' Émilie Savard wrote in an email. The AFNQL told the committee the bill represents a 'major step backward' for reconciliation with First Nations, stating that it would be privatizing one third of their territory for industrial interests. 'Protecting biodiversity and our way of life, and respecting the ancestral rights of First Nations, this is not an option that governments can choose to opt in or out of,' Verreault-Paul told the hearing. Verreault-Paul also said First Nations did not feel that there had been a true consultation on the legislation. Blanchette Vézina, in response, highlighted how the government had taken numerous steps to draft the bill. 'If 14 meetings, parallel tables, a discussion table on the future of the forest, a national table where we can talk nation-to-nation to look at amendments for a bill, that is not suitable, then what will be suitable?' she asked. The text of the bill sets out measures on consultation with Indigenous communities, 'including the drawing up of an Indigenous community consultation policy by the Minister of Natural Resources and Forests and a process harmonizing the activities pursued by Indigenous people with the forest development activities provided for by the specific forest planning.' Jérôme Bacon St-Onge, the vice-chief of the Innu Council of Pessamit, said true consultation requires the government to do more than just listen to the concerns of First Nations. 'We can discuss, but without integrating them into the draft of the bill I think we're going around in circles, and will once again promote the degradation of our forests, which are central to our identities as First Nations,' he said. Bacon St-Onge said the goal of forestry reform should prioritize conservation over the interests of the forest industry, and should likely set aside 60 per cent of forests for that purpose. The committee's review began Thursday and it is hearing from unions, forestry companies, groups representing municipalities as well as outdoor outfitters and Indigenous leaders. The process continues Wednesday.
