
Tesla's Robovan Was The Hidden Gem In 2024's Robotaxi Teaser
Interior of a Robovan with seating for 14
Tesla
There was tons of coverage about Tesla's October 2024 reveal of plans for a 'Cybercab'--followed later by Tesla stating its aspiration to launch some sort of 'toe in the water' service with it in June of 2025 in Austin, TX. But also revealed at the same time was a larger, almost bus-sized vehicle called the 'Robovan,' about which almost nothing has been said, both by Tesla, and by analysts.
Since 2008, I've been writing about the importance of the shared-ride van, which I originally termed the 'robotjitney' and later 'vansit' to the future of transportation in cities, and indeed predict these concepts to be the 21st century next generation of transit, replacing conventional rail/bus approaches. I suspect that Tesla is developing similar concepts.
On-demand vans, vanpools, jitneys and other unscheduled or semi-schedule medium sized shared vehicles are not new, but they can generate something new when combined with the private transportation of small robotaxis. Vanpools are arguably the most efficient form of transit in the USA because they tend to run only when full.
Whenever you try to group people together on a ride, in order to save money, energy or road space, you require compromise from the ideals of a private vehicle. People no longer leave exactly when they want, take the fastest route for them, and normally don't go door-to-door. They pause to let others on and off and may compromise on many other things to get that advantage of sharing.
The more people you try to group together, the greater the compromise. And it's likely to not be linear–as you double the riders, people must compromise even further. Once a vehicle gets too big, it becomes too great, and people seek alternate modes, reducing the load factor and reducing all those gains of efficiency and cost you were sharing for. It's fairly obvious that if you could choose between one big bus every 30 minutes or a van every 5 minutes, the vans would get many more riders because of the higher frequency, fewest stops and less compromise. Even though a full bus is more efficient than the 6 vans, the overall efficiency will likely be higher due to the higher ridership. There is a 'sweet spot' of vehicle size, though we don't know exactly where it is, and it varies based on the situation. It's bigger than a car and smaller than a bus or train. In the past, vehicles all needed drivers, and so the 'six van' solution wasn't possible because it needed six drivers. That's change number one. Tesla has shown the Robovan featuring 14 seats.
Tesla's van could just run regular scheduled routes with greater frequency, and it would be a win, but that's just the start. The real value comes when you make shared travel that's 95% as good as private travel at ⅓ the cost and 1/10th the road capacity requirements. A shared travel service that people of all incomes want to use, that offers everything that 20th century transit offered and far more.
Early experiments with shared rides, like UberPool already weren't doing great when Covid killed them. UberPool rides offered only modest discounts and often long detours. But consider a shared ride that requires no detour and only a minute or two delay from a private ride. That's possible through having the ride shared only on the portion of the trip that everybody will travel, and taking the personal start and end in a private vehicle. A van taking people all going to the same broad area can stop where their routes would diverge, where private cars are already waiting, and a 30 second transfer gets them directly to their destination.
That wasn't possible with human drivers. Robots don't mind waiting, and they don't mind doing short 1km trips. (You have to pay Uber drivers a minimum fee around $8 to do a short trip, while for robots the cost is mostly the distance they travel.)
Tesla's robovan looks like a small bus, but other designs are possible, including giving people private compartments and private doors on the side, for an experience to match a private car.
Imagine a trip on this type of transit. You travel from your own door in a private car, leaving within just a few minutes of your desired time. It takes you to a lot with a robovan already waiting, get into your reserved private seat or compartment, and in 30 seconds everybody is riding in the carpool lane on the arterial. Where it stops, another small private car is waiting for you to finish the trip. You pay a fraction of the cost, having shared the cost of most of the trip with 14 others, and due to the carpool lane, you get there faster than your private car would have. The wealthy can pay more for a more luxurious van, but all can afford it, and it uses less energy and has more capacity than 20th century transit.
This becomes the norm at rush hour, or when anybody wants to save a lot of money any time of the day on longer trips.
A lot opens up in shared transport when you don't need to hire a driver for each vehicle, and don't need to have fixed routes and fixed schedules. Which is what the various automated vans, buses and shuttles being made, including Tesla's Robovan, can mean. Those who have looked at the robotaxis from Waymo and Zoox and others, and the CyberCab concept, have lamented that 'this is just more cars,' should understand that it is not just more cars.
Of course, Tesla's Robovan was just a concept. While Tesla claims it will make the CyberCab in 2026 (pending making their Full Unsupervised Self Drive work) they have said little about the van. They published CG concepts of the van with 14 seats, or a disabled ramp, or a school bus, or serving as a restaurant, a camper or a service van. Others have made group vehicles but mainly use testing them as transit replacement and shuttles. So we have some time before this arrives. Tesla, unfortunately, is not a major contender in the race for self-driving software, though their position as a hardware builder is strong. Their brand has suffered some damage, particularly with the urban dwellers who might use such a van.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Musk can both hurt each other in their feud. Here's how.
An explosive breakdown in the relationship between President Donald Trump and his biggest political donor turned part-time employee, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, has been foreshadowed since their alliance first took shape. When Trump brought Musk along for the ride as he moved back into the White House, the looming question was always how long the two could possibly stay in sync. After all, neither the most powerful person in the world nor the richest person on Earth is known for keeping his ego in check. The main thrust of the Trump-Musk feud boils down to who can assert dominance over the other. In the intense back-and-forth that had everyone glued to their screens Thursday, we saw bullies used to getting their way desperately trying to find leverage over each other. But unlike the flame wars of old, where internet trolls would hurl insults at each other across message board forums, Trump and Musk can do serious damage to each other in the real world — and to the rest of us in the process. Musk first gained access to Trump through his vast fortune; he donated almost $300 million during last year's election and hasn't been afraid to throw his money around in races this year. Though he said in May he would be 'spending a lot less' on funding political races, he has also been quick to threaten pumping money into the midterms should lawmakers back the massive budget bill currently working its way through the Senate. And Musk has made clear that he expects a return on his investments, having already snidely claimed on his X platform that Trump would have lost and Democrats would have taken Congress without his backing. Trump is reportedly more focused on the midterms than he was during his first term, worried that a new Democratic majority would lead to more investigations and/or a third impeachment. While he's already sitting on $600 million to help hold on to a GOP majority, Musk's money could throw a spanner in the works, especially if he follows through on his public musing about bankrolling a third party to 'represent the 80% of Americans in the middle.' Though Trump has his own social media platform, Truth Social, X remains a much louder microphone to amplify Musk's messaging to the right, including his supposed 'bombshell' about Trump's presence in the Jeffrey Epstein files. (Musk provided no evidence for the claim and Trump has previously denied any involvement with Epstein's criminal behavior.) Trump, in turn, has threatened Musk's lucrative government contracts, which would include billions of dollars funneled toward his SpaceX company, as well as the subsidies that Tesla receives for its electric car production. Musk responded by warning about cutting off access to SpaceX launches, which would potentially cripple NASA and the Defense Department's ability to deploy satellites. But that would prove a double-edged sword for Musk, given how large a revenue stream those contracts have become. By Thursday evening, Musk had already backed down from his saber-rattling about restricting access to the Dragon space capsule, but he could change his mind again. That he made the threat in the first place has raised major alarm bells among national security officials. The Washington Post reported Saturday that NASA and the Pentagon have begun "urging [Musk's competitors] to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft" to lessen his chokehold on the industry. Notably, Trump isn't alone in his fight against Musk, though as ever those wading into the brawl have their own motives. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon took the opportunity to launch a broadside against Musk. 'People including myself are recommending to the president that he pull every contract associated with Elon Musk,' Bannon told NBC News on Thursday night. Bannon requested that 'major investigations start immediately' into, among other things, Musk's 'immigration status, his security clearance and his history of drug abuse.' There are already several federal investigations of Musk's companies that have been underway for years, which critics had previously worried might be stonewalled due to his influence with Trump. While the extremely public breakup makes for high drama and more than a little schadenfreude, the pettiness masks a deeper issue. The battle Musk and Trump are waging is predicated on both wielding a horrifying amount of unchecked power. In a healthy system of government, their ability to inflict pain on each other wouldn't exist, or at least such an ability would be severely blunted. Musk being able to funnel nearly unlimited amounts of spending into dark money super PACs is an oligarchical nightmare. Trump using the power of the presidency to overturn contracts and launch investigations at a whim is blatant authoritarianism in action. In theory, there are still checks to rein each of them in before things escalate much further. Musk's shareholders have been unhappy with his rocky time in government, and the war of words with Trump sent Tesla's stock price tumbling once more. Trump needs to get his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' passed into law and — next year — ensure Congress doesn't fall into Democrats' hands. Trump and Musk have incentives, then, to stay in each other's good graces despite their wounded pride. Trump made clear to NBC News in an interview Saturday that he has no real interest in patching things up with Musk, warning that there will be "very serious consequences" if his one-time ally funds Democratic campaigns. Even if the two eventually reach a détente, it's unlikely to be a lasting peace, not so long as one feels his authority is challenged by the other. The zero-sum view of the world that Trump and Musk share, one where social Darwinism and superior genetics shape humanity, doesn't allow for long-term cooperative relationships. Instead, at best they will return to a purely transactional situationship, but one where the knives will gleefully come back out the second a new opening is given. Most importantly, there is no protagonist when it comes to the inciting incident in this duel, as a total victory won't benefit the American people writ large. Trump wants Congress to pass his bill to grant him more funding for deportations and to preserve his chances of staying in power. Musk wants a more painful bill that will slash the social safety net for millions. No matter what the outcome is as they battle for supremacy over each other, we're the ones who risk being trampled. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Retail Investors Pile Into Tesla (TSLA) After 14% Plunge on Trump-Musk Rift
Retail traders aggressively bought Tesla (TSLA, Financials) shares Thursday after the stock plunged 14.3%its 11th worst day since going publicamid a very public feud between CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump. The stock rebounded 5.6% Friday to around $299.14. Vanda Research data showed self-directed investors net purchased $201.3 million of Tesla shares after trading $2.6 billion in volume, making it the second-most bought stock by that group. Traders also poured $41.5 million into the Direxion Daily 2x Bull ETF, a leveraged fund that tracks Tesla. Despite the sharp selloff, the options market showed little panic. Tesla's 30-day implied volatility rose to 77, up from earlier levels but well below the 106.1 peak in April. Chris Murphy of Susquehanna said some traders capitalized on the volatility by selling puts, a sign of confidence that the slide might stabilize. Buy the dip is the overwhelming sentiment, said Marco Iachini of Vanda, citing social media scans on Reddit and X, where Tesla remains a retail investor favorite. Tesla shares had surged 90% following Trump's election win in November, but are now down about 37% from their Dec. 17 peak. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Elon Musk's Father Says Feud With Trump 'a Mistake'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk's father Errol has called his son's feud with President Donald Trump a "mistake," saying the pair "have been under incredible stress for five months." Why It Matters The world has watched the dramatic fallout between Trump, one of the most powerful men on the planet, and Elon Musk, the world's richest man. It started with Musk's criticism of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which he called "outrageous," "pork-filled," and a "disgusting abomination." Things escalated when Elon Musk claimed on social media, without providing evidence, that Trump was named in files about child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in 2019—something the White House has denied. What To Know Errol Musk was in Moscow to speak at the Future Forum 2050, a conference on Russia's development, when he spoke about his son's ongoing battle with the president. He told Russian media that Elon Musk's actions had been "a mistake," according to the national daily newspaper Izvestia. "They've been under incredible stress for five months. Give them a break," Errol Musk said. "They had to get rid of the opposition, try to restore normalcy, focus on ordinary matters, and so on. They're exhausted and tense, so something like this isn't unusual." He went on to say that he believes his son and Trump will come to a resolution soon. His remarks came after Trump said that the Tesla CEO would face "very serious consequences" if the tech billionaire started to fund Democrats in the wake of their fallout. "If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that," Trump told NBC News in a phone interview. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that." President Donald Trump, right, with Elon Musk in the Oval Office at the White House on May 30, 2025, in Washington D.C. President Donald Trump, right, with Elon Musk in the Oval Office at the White House on May 30, 2025, in Washington D.C. AP When asked if he had any desire to repair the relationship between the pair, Trump said "No," adding that he "would assume" that their relationship was over after the very public dispute. Trump added that Musk had been "disrespectful to the office of the president" and that he was "too busy doing other things" to dwell on the matter, adding: "I have no intention of speaking to him." "I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could [sic] not disrespect the office of the president," Trump said. What People Are Saying White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Newsweek on Thursday: "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." President Donald Trump posted to Truth Social on Thursday: "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" He added: "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV [electric vehicle] Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" What Happens Next Trump has set a deadline for Senate Republicans to pass the "big beautiful bill" and get it to his desk to sign by July 4. The impact of his fight with Elon Musk remains to be seen.