Water investment aims to end sewage waste flooding
Thames Water has said it will spend £37m upgrading its Mole Valley network - raising hopes it could spell the end of homes, gardens and rivers being flooded with sewage waste.
The company came in for heavy criticism for the "damage it has inflicted" despite huge profits and shareholder payouts during the latest scrutiny committee meeting at Mole Valley District Council.
However, it hopes investment projects in parts of Surrey will increase its ability to manage storm flows and treat more wastewater, said the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Thames Water's Alice Keeping described the £37m as "a substantial amount of money that we are going to invest going forward".
Last year, Thames Water spent 13,101 hours pumping sewage into the River Mole according to government data seen by the Dorking and Horley MP, Chris Coghlan.
Speaking after the meeting, he described the record as "simply unacceptable" but has since had assurances from Thames Water and environmental regulators that "long overdue" upgrades were on the way.
"The Government and Ofwat have a duty to hold the water companies to account," he said.
A Thames Water spokesperson said: "In 2024 parts of our region experienced some of the wettest months in 250 years.
"This overwhelmed our sewer network which resulted in diluted wastewater being released into rivers.
"While all storm discharges are unacceptable, the sewage systems were designed in this way to prevent sewage backing up into people's homes."
Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, and on X. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Thames Water criticised for sewage spill response
Fix 'unacceptable' sewage problem, MP urges
'Contaminated water floods my garage'
Local Democracy Reporting Service
Thames Water
Mole Valley District Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Another ‘summer of stink?' Resident odour complaints spike around Stoney Creek landfill
Not everyone living within sniffing distance of the GFL-run landfill in Stoney Creek describes the recent olfactory onslaught in the same way. Some describe an intense odour of cat pee or dead fish. Another associates it strongly with the rotting stench that wafts out of a wet garbage can. A sulphurous 'rotten egg smell' is cited repeatedly. The descriptions differ, but the conclusion remains the same for frustrated residents who have filed more than 400 landfill odour complaints to the province this year — even before summer begins. 'They have not fixed the problem and I'm afraid we're heading for another summer of stink,' said Louise Thompson, who lives more than two kilometres away — 'but apparently not far enough' — from the Green Mountain Road landfill. The retired teacher is also worried about a proposal to build a new elementary school within view of the former Taro dump . 'I just want it to shut down. The odours are persisting, summer is coming and no one can be in their backyard … We can't continue like this.' The landfill, which has switched owners and names periodically since the late 1990s, suffered an infamous stinky stretch in 2023 — dubbed by residents the ' Summer of Stink. ' Current operator GFL was charged last month with 10 provincial offences linked primarily to that time frame and separately fined $15,000 — although the company has since appealed those penalties. GFL, which did not respond to Spectator requests for comment for this story, has previously said it made changes to help lessen the odour issues that dominated 2023. Independent air monitoring done the next year by the city showed no exceedances for sulphurous gases commonly associated with the rotten egg smell. But residents in residential neighbourhoods around the landfill — and some of those housing developments are a literal stone's throw away from the operation — say odour problems never went away entirely and have worsened again this spring. As of the first week of June, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks said it had logged 440 odour complaints linked to the landfill in 2025. That was before last weekend, when an apparent spate of intense odours spurred a furious reporting spree by outraged residents who have started posting screenshots of their submitted complaints to a Facebook group devoted to shuttering the former Taro dump. The Spectator counted at least 20 photos of posted complaint reports between June 6 and 10. 'It seems to be getting worse and worse and everyone is nervous about what that means for the summer,' said Kathie Farraway, who helped organize protests against the landfill operations at the height of the 2023 odour woes. She described the odour issue in recent weeks as 'intermittent,' with a low-level 'musty smell' often noticeable — but with occasional bouts of 'cat box mixed with rotten eggs.' 'I won't go out on my bike when it's like that because I don't want to be gulping in big breaths of whatever is in that air,' she said. 'It may not be unhealthy, but it feels like it's unhealthy.' Nelson Faria, who has lived in a suburb off Green Mountain Road for eight years, has filed multiple complaints in the past two weeks. It only gets worse when the weather gets hotter,' he said in a recent interview. 'I think the only solution is to shut it down … That was what we were told was supposed to happen when we bought here in the first place.' Ironically, the latest round of odour woes may be due in part to the province's own order to GFL to reduce the height of its piled waste, which is beyond the allowed limit. Ministry spokesperson Gary Wheeler said via email the occasional odours are 'likely linked' to the waste relocation ordered last year. That worries residents, who say they've been told by GFL that relocation could continue throughout the summer and fall. Wheeler said the ministry is conducting 'regular site visits' to do odour surveys and will 'take any necessary measures to address issues of noncompliance.' He added the province is also requiring GFL to put into place a 'supplemental odour control plan' and extra air monitoring during trash relocation. GFL did not respond to requests for comment on that work, recent odour complaints or its plan to build a treatment plant for leachate, the garbage juice created by rainfall filtering through trash. But the company held a virtual community liaison committee meeting last week that provided some updates on the work, including 'daily' waste relocation activities at the landfill, which is bordered by Green Mountain Road, Mud Street, First Road West and Centennial Parkway. The minutes of that meeting reflect 128 complaints to the company between March and May, with the largest monthly number — 66 — in April. That month, a 'hose-fitting failure' resulted in a spill of leachate that prompted odour complaints and sulphurous gas 'exceedances' on that date, reads the minutes report. The minutes also include an update from GFL site general manager Lorenzo Alfano, who said the company is 'close to finalizing' site approval from the city for a new leachate treatment facility. A discussion on a potential 'health study' for the area surrounding the landfill was put off until the next CLC meeting in September. But residents are hopeful they'll get more news, sooner, as a result of motions from ward councillor Brad Clark passed by city council early in 2025. Those motions asked city staff to examine the prospect of tax relief for odour-affected residents — and whether the city could apply through the courts for a temporary shutdown of the landfill if the chronic stink cannot be resolved. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
New school approved after cost-cutting changes
A new secondary school will be built after cost-cutting changes were made to its designs. The school will be built at the Alconbury Weald Education Campus, near Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, with space for 600 pupils. Instead of being built in the originally proposed "H" shape, the main teaching block will be a "T" shape. The school is being built to serve the new development in Alconbury which will turn a former airfield into about 6,500 new homes. In planning documents, Cambridgeshire County Council and developer Morgan Sindall said the changes "introduced improvements to the design of the scheme". The plans, which have been approved by the council's planning committee, said it was a "more efficient use of area and improves pupil and staff circulation between the school facilities". It could also allow for an expansion to create an enclosed external courtyard space. If expanded, the school could double its pupil capacity to 1,200, said the Local Democracy Reporting Service. Last year, the council proposed not installing a sprinkler system in the new school as construction costs had "significantly" exceeded the £37m project budget. It was thought a sprinkler system could cost between £850,000 and £900,000, although it was later suggested this figure may have been "on the high side". The report said a risk assessment found it was acceptable not to include sprinklers, with other fire protection features proposed. At the time, some councillors disputed the proposals not top have sprinklers. The final plans for the school include a sprinkler tank – a tank that typically provides the water for a sprinkler system. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Councillors say school must have £900k sprinklers New housing development includes Cold War bunker Cambridgeshire County Council Local Democracy Reporting Service
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Five-star loos lead to 'toilet envy'
Eight public toilets in the Chichester district will be refurbished after getting council approval. The plans follow the demolition and rebuilding of the old toilet block in Tower Street. The new Tower Street toilet, which opened earlier this month, cost more than £200,000 and has been said to be inspiring "envy" in other areas after receiving positive Google reviews. The cost of the latest scheme has not yet been revealed but will be made up of money from the Asset Replacement Fund and from reserves. Chichester District Council does not legally have to provide public toilets, but leader Adrian Moss said they were important to residents, adding that the Tower Street project had been "a triumph". Councillor John Cross added: "There is a bit of toilet envy going on with other district councils because our Tower Street toilets have been given a five-star rating on Google and other district councils want the same!" The toilets set for improvement are in Bracklesham Bay in Bracklesham, Pound Road car park in Petworth, Lifeboat Way in Selsey, Northgate car park in Chichester, Avenue de Chartres car park in Chichester, Hillfield Road in Selsey, Kingfisher Parade in East Wittering and Marine Drive in West Wittering. The council will now look for a contractor to carry out the work, which will be a phased approach over the next two years, said the Local Democracy Reporting Service. Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Coastal public toilets reopened for summer season South East councils close dozens of public toilets Chichester District Council Local Democracy Reporting Service
