The human suffering of Sudan's brutal civil war
Christiane Amanpour speaks with photojournalist Giles Clarke about his recent visits to Sudan and his photographs documenting the devastation wrought by an ongoing civil war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats must seize the mantle of law and order
There's a photo pinging around the blogosphere of a pallet of bricks, supposedly placed near Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities for use by 'Democratic militants' during the recent unrest in Los Angeles. The accompanying post says that the bricks were paid for by organizations linked to Democratic financier George Soros, a frequent whipping boy of the American right. 'It's a Civil War!!' the post exclaims. Actually, it's a hoax. The bricks photo comes from the website of a building supply company in Malaysia. And there is no war — civil or otherwise — in Los Angeles, where President Trump has sent 5,000 National Guard troops and Marines to quell an imaginary scourge of violence. But the protests aren't entirely peaceful, either. Across the country, we've seen incidents of looting, vandalism and assault. And unless Democrats admit and condemn the violence — forcefully and unequivocally — the voters will come down on us like a ton of bricks. That's been the historic pattern: the party of 'law and order' wins, and the party of crime and chaos goes down to defeat. Too often, my own team has found itself on the losing side. In 1968, when riots engulfed American cities, Republican presidential candidate Richard Nixon flooded the airwaves with advertisements showing street crime, switchblades and hypodermic needles. The message was clear: If you want to clamp down on crime, vote Republican. Nixon went on to victory, and law and order has remained a staple of GOP appeals ever since. In 1988, George H. W. Bush infamously used a photo of Willie Horton — a convicted African American murderer who had raped a woman while on furlough from his life sentence in Massachusetts — to defeat Democratic nominee Michael Dukakis, that state's governor. But no modern politician has played the crime card more vociferously than Trump, who began his first term with a warning about 'American carnage' overtaking our cities. Three years later, in 2020, the riots following the George Floyd police murder seemed to confirm Trump's dark vision. That's also when some Democrats made a huge tactical error, by indicting all police officers for the sins of a few. Police weren't the solution to the problem, we said; they were the problem, bringing fear and violence to minority communities. Never mind that most non-white Americans want more police, not fewer. That helps explain why Trump's share of minority voters rose in 2020, and again in 2024. The insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, should have allowed Democrats to seize the mantle of law and order. Falsely claiming that the 2020 election was stolen, Trump stood by as mobs defaced the Capitol and assaulted police officers. One police officer serving at the Capitol Jan. 6 died the following day, and four other officers committed suicide in the days and months following the riot. Those officers should be pictured on every Democratic campaign advertisement for the next three years. And we should have invoked their memory again when Trump pardoned the Jan. 6 protesters earlier this year. But we just can't seem to pull it off. Democrats condemned the pardons, of course, but rarely in the language of law and order. So it's time to switch things up, once and for all. In the same breath, we need to acknowledge the violence of the past week and condemn Donald Trump for disparaging the police. That will mark us as the lawful party, and the GOP as the lawless one. The violence is real, and we shouldn't pretend otherwise. In Los Angeles, looters burglarized dozens of stores, several cars were burned, and seven police officers were injured. In Texas, where Republican Gov. Greg Abbott deployed the state's National Guard, demonstrators hurled bottles and rocks at law enforcement officers. To their credit, Democratic leaders around the nation condemned these actions. 'The violence and damage is unacceptable, it is not going to be tolerated, and individuals will be arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law,' warned Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who announced an evening curfew in the city's downtown section on Tuesday night. That's a good start. But we should also blast the Trump administration for stepping on the toes of Los Angeles police, who insisted that they had the situation under control. Trump said otherwise, of course. 'If we didn't do it, there wouldn't be a Los Angeles,' he said, defending his decision to send in troops. 'It would be burning.' Remember when Republicans told us to 'support your local police'? Not anymore. The Trump administration says it knows best, and the local police don't matter. It's not enough to claim that the deployment of federal troops in Los Angeles was illegal, as the state of California argued in a court filing early this week. We also need to depict Trump as anti-police, and declare that we 'back the Blue' — and the GOP doesn't. In America, that's the only way to come out on top. Jonathan Zimmerman teaches history and education at the University of Pennsylvania and serves on the advisory board of the Albert Lepage Center for History in the Public Interest.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump administration considers adding 36 countries to travel ban list
The United States is considering restricting entry to citizens of an additional 36 countries, in what would be a significant expansion of the travel ban announced by the Trump administration early this month, according to a State Department memo reviewed by The Washington Post. Among the new list of countries that could face visa bans or other restrictions are 25 African nations, including significant U.S. partners such as Egypt and Djibouti, plus countries in the Caribbean, Central Asia and several Pacific Island nations. A State Department spokesperson said the agency would not comment on internal deliberations or communications. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Such a move would mark another escalation in the Trump administration's aggressive crackdown on immigration. The memo, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and sent to U.S. diplomats who work with the countries on Saturday, said the governments of listed nations were being given 60 days to meet new benchmarks and requirements established by the State Department. It set a deadline of 8 a.m. Wednesday for them to provide an initial action plan for meeting the requirements. The memo identified varied benchmarks that, in the administration's estimation, these countries were failing to meet. Some countries had 'no competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents,' or they suffered from 'widespread government fraud.' Others had large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the United States, the memo said. Other reasons included the availability of citizenship by monetary investment without a requirement of residency and claims of 'antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States' by people from those countries. The memo also stated that if a country was willing to accept third-country nationals who were removed from the United States or enter a 'safe third country' agreement it could mitigate other concerns. It was not immediately clear when the proposed travel restrictions would go into enforcement if the demands were not met. The countries facing scrutiny in the memo are listed as: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. The list represents a significant expansion of a presidential proclamation issued June 4, when the United States fully restricted the entry of individuals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The United States had also partially restricted the entry of travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela under that order. Democrats and other critics of the Trump administration have described its efforts to issue blanket travel bans on selected nations as xenophobic and bigoted, pointing to President Donald Trump's efforts to block travel from Muslim-majority nations in his first term and the high number of African and Caribbean nations targeted during this term. Early in his first term, Trump attempted to restrict travel from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and Libya. The initial version of the ban caused confusion and chaos at airports. It faced numerous legal challenges until the Supreme Court upheld the third version of it in June 2018. While the travel ban was rescinded under the Biden administration, Trump repeatedly pledged to reinstall it on the campaign trail, stating it would be 'bigger than before.' On Inauguration Day, the White House issued an executive order calling on U.S. agencies, including the State Department, to look for 'countries throughout the world for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.' Hannah Natanson contributed to this report.
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
Nicaragua's former President Violeta Chamorro dies at 95, family says
SAN JOSE, Costa Rica — Violeta Chamorro, an unassuming homemaker who was thrust into politics by her husband's assassination and stunned the world by ousting the ruling Sandinista party in presidential elections and ending Nicaragua's civil war, has died, her family said in a statement on Saturday. She was 95. The country's first female president, known as Doña Violeta to both supporters and detractors, she presided over the Central American nation's uneasy transition to peace after nearly a decade of conflict between the Sandinista government of Daniel Ortega and U.S.-backed Contra rebels. At nearly seven years, Chamorro's was the longest single term ever served by a democratically elected Nicaraguan leader, and when it was over she handed over the presidential sash to an elected civilian successor — a relative rarity for a country with a long history of strongman rule, revolution and deep political polarization. Chamorro died in San Jose, Costa Rica, according to the family's statement shared by her son, Carlos Chamorro, on X.
