logo
‘I don't trust America.' Trump's tariffs, detentions take a toll on local tourism

‘I don't trust America.' Trump's tariffs, detentions take a toll on local tourism

On Tuesday, a trickle of visitors traversed the sidewalks of star-studded Hollywood Boulevard, which is usually bustling this time of year with families and students on spring break trips. Parked open-air tour buses and vans were largely empty.
But Jose Ayon, manager at La La Land, a souvenir and gift shop, was not surprised. Foot traffic has struggled to rebound after the pandemic shutdowns and now global tariffs imposed by the Trump administration could make matters worse.
That morning, Ayon said, several vendors that supply mugs, chocolates, plates, magnets and other knickknacks to the store told him that they would hike prices as much as 30%.
'It's pretty concerning,' said Ayon, who has worked at the store for 10 years. 'Everyone in the back is panicking.'
In the face of market turmoil, Trump on Wednesday paused some of the tariffs he had imposed on most countries, while escalating duties on China.
But the twists and turns in the trade war have shaken Wall Street and deepened anxieties among business owners in Los Angeles and nationwide who fear a rise in prices and a disruption in their supply chains.
Among the casualties in the ongoing trade hostilities is tourism. Amid news of visa cancellations and deportations, state and local tourism officials are increasingly worried about the potential adverse effects on travel to Los Angeles and California.
'California's message to all visitors remains the same: You're welcomed and respected,' Caroline Beteta, president of Visit California, the state's marketing agency, said in a statement.
Jackie Filla, president of the Hotel Assn. of Los Angeles, said local hoteliers are scrambling to keep foreign visitors coming.
'The way we are perceived globally, is we are blowing up not just our economy but everyone else's economy,' Filla said. 'People don't think it's good, they don't think it's fair, so why would they go to America?'
The worries are rippling across the local tourism and hospitality industry that employs about 510,000 Angelenos and supports more than 1,000 local businesses, according to the Los Angeles Tourism and Convention Board.
International visitors are crucial to the regional industry because they tend to stay longer and spend more, tourism officials say. Canada and Mexico, which send the most visitors, were hit early on with steep tariffs — some of which remain in place, even after Trump announced Wednesday that he would pause some global tariffs for 90 days.
Canadians, furious over Trump threats to annex their country, are boycotting American products and canceling travel plans south of the border, including scrapping visits to popular winter destinations such as Palm Springs.
That's especially concerning because Canadians account for a large share of bookings — 770,000 guest nights annually in Los Angeles, Filla said.
The recent two-week detention of a Canadian on a work visa by immigration authorities did not help matters, Filla said. At least one major hotel brand has paused marketing for all of its U.S. properties in reaction to angry comments on its social media accounts, she said.
'How do we attract people from other countries when the tide of media they're getting is, 'You may be snatched off the street?'' Filla said. 'But we need them to come here, it's very vital to our economy.'
Aside from fewer visitors, local hotels are bracing for price increases on cleaning products, technical equipment for elevators, golf simulators, spas and other amenities, food imports and a host of other goods because of tariffs, she said.
They are also worried about businesses canceling conferences and cutting travel expenses, and families forgoing vacations because of heightening economic pressures. Hotels that employ unauthorized immigrants also have been rattled by deportation threats.
Adam Burke, president and chief executive of the Los Angeles Tourism and Convention Board, said his organization is 'concerned about any factors that could negatively impact perceptions of the U.S. as a preferred travel destination.'
California is the No. 1 travel destination in the U.S., with international visitors spending $26.5 billion last year, a 17.5% increase over 2023, according to Visit California.
That growth is slowing, however. In March, the organization revised its projections for 2025 visitor spending in California to $160 billion, down from $166 billion it had originally. That represents 2.3% annual growth, down from an earlier projection of 6.2%.
The U.S. as a whole is expected to be even more hard hit. Tourism Economics, a Philadelphia-based travel data company, expects international travel to the U.S. to decrease 5% this year, with a 15% decline in travel from Canada.
One bright spot: California is seeing less negative sentiment and a proportionally smaller decline in consideration for travel, according to Visit California, citing data from market research firm YouGov.
Along Hollywood Boulevard on Tuesday afternoon, Canadian tourist Harpreet Kaur, 24, perused shops with her cousins and uncle in tow. Kaur, who lives in Nova Scotia, said Trump's threats to turn the nation's northern neighbor into the '51st state' have made people angry.
Kaur was on a two-week trip to see L.A. and visit cousins in Bakersfield.
'I'm not sure what's going to happen in the future,' she said. 'I wanted to see them before anything drastic happens. I don't trust America, as a tourist.'
Business has been slow all year at Hollywood City Tours, owner Moses Marjanian said. First it was the fires, which caused tourists to cancel their trips because they thought the inferno had reached the Hollywood sign and other major attractions.
'We had a very slow January and February,' he said. 'But it's been carrying on all the way until now. I'm guessing it's because of the tariffs. Our business is probably down over 30%.'
Marjanian started his company 11 years ago, weathering the pandemic, Hollywood strikes, inflation and other business challenges.
But this is 'the worst it's been,' he said.'We're giving our tour guides a lot more days off because we're running less tour buses and they're not going out full,' he said.
Marjanian believes the decline in bookings is also a result of deportation threats.
'There's a lot of Hispanic customer base that we have that aren't out and visiting as much as before,' he said. 'Because of the uncertainties they're facing, they're probably not spending as much money anymore as they figure out what the future brings.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Individual investors invested in International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (LON:IAG) copped the brunt of last week's UK£724m market cap decline
Individual investors invested in International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (LON:IAG) copped the brunt of last week's UK£724m market cap decline

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Individual investors invested in International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (LON:IAG) copped the brunt of last week's UK£724m market cap decline

The considerable ownership by individual investors in International Consolidated Airlines Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders 15% of International Consolidated Airlines Group is held by Institutions Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (LON:IAG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 59% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). And following last week's 4.5% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of International Consolidated Airlines Group, beginning with the chart below. Check out our latest analysis for International Consolidated Airlines Group Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. International Consolidated Airlines Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at International Consolidated Airlines Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in International Consolidated Airlines Group. Qatar Airways Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 27% of shares outstanding. With 3.6% and 3.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders. On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own UK£4.3m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of International Consolidated Airlines Group shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability. We can see that Private Companies own 27%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand International Consolidated Airlines Group better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for International Consolidated Airlines Group that you should be aware of. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Read This Before Considering Mitie Group plc (LON:MTO) For Its Upcoming UK£0.03 Dividend
Read This Before Considering Mitie Group plc (LON:MTO) For Its Upcoming UK£0.03 Dividend

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Read This Before Considering Mitie Group plc (LON:MTO) For Its Upcoming UK£0.03 Dividend

It looks like Mitie Group plc (LON:MTO) is about to go ex-dividend in the next three days. The ex-dividend date is usually set to be two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date on which you must be present on the company's books as a shareholder in order to receive the dividend. The ex-dividend date is of consequence because whenever a stock is bought or sold, the trade can take two business days or more to settle. Accordingly, Mitie Group investors that purchase the stock on or after the 19th of June will not receive the dividend, which will be paid on the 4th of August. The company's next dividend payment will be UK£0.03 per share, on the back of last year when the company paid a total of UK£0.043 to shareholders. Based on the last year's worth of payments, Mitie Group stock has a trailing yield of around 3.0% on the current share price of UK£1.44. Dividends are a major contributor to investment returns for long term holders, but only if the dividend continues to be paid. That's why we should always check whether the dividend payments appear sustainable, and if the company is growing. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If a company pays out more in dividends than it earned, then the dividend might become unsustainable - hardly an ideal situation. Mitie Group is paying out an acceptable 52% of its profit, a common payout level among most companies. Yet cash flow is typically more important than profit for assessing dividend sustainability, so we should always check if the company generated enough cash to afford its dividend. It distributed 29% of its free cash flow as dividends, a comfortable payout level for most companies. It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously. View our latest analysis for Mitie Group Click here to see the company's payout ratio, plus analyst estimates of its future dividends. Businesses with shrinking earnings are tricky from a dividend perspective. If business enters a downturn and the dividend is cut, the company could see its value fall precipitously. Readers will understand then, why we're concerned to see Mitie Group's earnings per share have dropped 5.7% a year over the past five years. Such a sharp decline casts doubt on the future sustainability of the dividend. Another key way to measure a company's dividend prospects is by measuring its historical rate of dividend growth. Mitie Group's dividend payments per share have declined at 9.5% per year on average over the past 10 years, which is uninspiring. While it's not great that earnings and dividends per share have fallen in recent years, we're encouraged by the fact that management has trimmed the dividend rather than risk over-committing the company in a risky attempt to maintain yields to shareholders. Is Mitie Group an attractive dividend stock, or better left on the shelf? We're not enthused by the declining earnings per share, although at least the company's payout ratio is within a reasonable range, meaning it may not be at imminent risk of a dividend cut. To summarise, Mitie Group looks okay on this analysis, although it doesn't appear a stand-out opportunity. So if you want to do more digging on Mitie Group, you'll find it worthwhile knowing the risks that this stock faces. For example, we've found 1 warning sign for Mitie Group that we recommend you consider before investing in the business. Generally, we wouldn't recommend just buying the first dividend stock you see. Here's a curated list of interesting stocks that are strong dividend payers. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Trump voters with student loans are having 'buyer's remorse' over his latest debt collection moves
Trump voters with student loans are having 'buyer's remorse' over his latest debt collection moves

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Trump voters with student loans are having 'buyer's remorse' over his latest debt collection moves

Tracy Davis, 42, still thinks that voting for President Donald Trump was a good choice. But she wishes the president would think more carefully about how his actions are affecting student-loan borrowers like herself. "I did vote for Trump," Davis told Business Insider. "This was a very big surprise for me. I mean, I was thinking he was going to fix some things, and it didn't go the way I was seeing it going with student loans." Davis is referring to the Trump administration's move to restart collections on defaulted student loans in early May after a five-year pause. Negative credit reporting for defaulted student loans resumed in October 2024, and Trump's Education Department announced that collections would resume in an effort to restore accountability to the student-loan system. "Borrowing money and failing to pay it back isn't a victimless offense," Linda McMahon, Trump's education secretary, wrote in an opinion piece. "Debt doesn't go away; it gets transferred to others. If borrowers don't pay their debts to the government, taxpayers do." Prior to the pandemic pause, Davis said she was able to make her $150 student-loan payments. However, once the pause lifted, she was billed nearly $400, which she said she could not afford. It caused her to fall behind on payments, and her credit score took a hit after negative credit reporting resumed. "I think they pulled the trigger a little too fast, especially with hitting the credit report, because we're not all in the same situation," Davis said. "I just wish there was more thought put into it." Business Insider has heard from dozens of student-loan borrowers who are delinquent or in default on their debt, including some who voted for Trump. Borrowers tend to go into default after 270 days of missed payments. While many borrowers expressed frustration with the abrupt collections restart and the consequences for defaulting, like negative credit reporting and wage garnishment, some said they recognize the importance of restarting the system and ensuring borrowers pay back their loans. Ellen Keast, a spokesperson for the Department of Education, previously confirmed to BI that Social Security garnishment for defaulted borrowers is paused: "The Trump Administration is committed to protecting social security recipients who oftentimes rely on a fixed income." However, the department still plans to garnish wages for defaulted borrowers later this summer. Davis is concerned that she might be on the receiving end of that policy. "If you were way behind and you had no intention of paying them back, yes, go after them, garnish wages," Davis said. "But when you're trying to make it and you're trying to honestly make an effort to pay them off, I don't think that's right that we're getting wages garnished or credit hits." 'Buyer's remorse' Miranda Metheny, 37, is in default on her student loans — and she's rethinking the vote she cast for Trump. "I'm having a bit of buyer's remorse," Metheny said. "Now, seeing what all is taking place, I'm like, maybe I just shouldn't have voted." Metheny is unable to work due to a disability, and she can't afford to dig into the $600 monthly disability insurance to pay off her student loans while also helping support her two children. "We already don't make enough to really even survive at this point," Metheny said. "We're all robbing Peter to pay Paul, and now you're going to cut into that? I worry about people that are already hurting." The Department of Education estimated that 5 million borrowers are currently in default. Recent data from the New York Federal Reserve showed that millions more could enter default this summer; since negative credit reporting resumed in the fall, 8.04% of balances moved into serious delinquency in the first quarter of 2025. While some higher education analysts previously told BI that the surge in delinquency was expected, many borrowers are at risk of defaulting because they might not be aware of their payment status and are unprepared to afford an extra monthly bill. Some student-loan borrowers at risk of default said they still support Trump's move to collect on defaulted student loans. Cheri, 67, said that she voted for Trump and supports his stance that loans should be paid back. She hasn't made any payments on her loans since the pandemic pause, though, and she said she's not financially prepared to shoulder another monthly bill. "I'm not going to bash the Trump administration. But that being said, I think that turning people over to collections is a very drastic move after what we just went through over the past four years," Cheri said. "I'm opposed to that." Aside from collections on defaulted student loans, the Trump administration is urging Congress to pass the president's big spending bill. The version of the bill that passed the House would condense existing income-driven repayment plans into two plans that have longer repayment periods. McMahon wrote in a June 11 post on X that the bill "will prevent future Democrat administrations from illegally transferring student loan debt to American taxpayers." Former President Joe Biden's SAVE plan — an income-driven repayment plan that would have allowed for cheaper monthly payments — is also blocked in court, leaving borrowers with fewer repayment options. As far as default consequences go, Sen. Elizabeth Warren said that McMahon confirmed in a private meeting on June 10 that Social Security garnishments will remain paused. "The Education Secretary has assured me that the pause that is currently in place will stay in place and if there is to be any change in that, she would get in touch with me directly before we go there," Warren said. Metheny said she hopes that the administration will consider more relief for borrowers. "We're not all billionaires," she said. "We can't just come up with that amount of money that quickly." Are you in default, or concerned about defaulting, on your student loans? Share your story with this reporter at asheffey@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store