Helen Godwin takes office as new Weca metro mayor
New Weca mayor takes office after election win
7 minutes ago
Share
Save
Joe Skirkowski
BBC West
Share
Save
PA Media
Helen Godwin won the election on May 1st with 25% of the vote
The new mayor for the West of England Combined Authority (Weca) has been sworn in.
Labour's Helen Godwin retained the seat for the party with 25% of the vote - Reform's Arron Banks came second with 22% and Mary Page of the Green Party came in third with approximately 20%.
Ms Godwin has now been sworn in alongside the leaders of the councils that make up the authority - Bristol, Bathe and North East Somerset and South Gloucestershire.
"It's quite surreal but we worked really hard to be here and I think we're going to get a lot done," she said.
"I really want to deliver for people and we've campaigned really hard over the last six months and I've learned a lot about the region that I didn't know and I want to bring all that knowledge into the role," she added.
Ms Godwin has announced that the position of deputy mayor will be a rotating one during her tenure.
The Weca mayor is responsible for allocating funding to areas such as transport, housing and job opportunities.
Transport in particular will be a key issue for the new mayor - with much of the region relying on buses to get around.
Ongoing transport issues
"All the way through the campaign we talked about buses and people spoke to me about buses," said Ms Godwin.
"Whether they're in the centre of Bristol, the centre of Bath or the surrounding towns and villages - people are dissatisfied with the reliability and accessibility of the service.
"My priority is to unpick all of that and figure out what we can deliver quickly and over the medium term so people feel the difference," she added.
The new mayor will have to work with three councils to organise new transport routes - including Bristol where discussions around a mass transit system have been ongoing for years.
"Transport and connectivity is a key challenge," said Green councillor Tony Dyer, leader of Bristol City Council.
"It's kind of a chicken-and-egg situation that in order to get a better transport system we need to improve public transport, and at the same time we need to remove some of the space currently available for cars," he added.
Ms Godwin takes over the position of Weca mayor from Dan Norris, who was arrested on suspicion of rape and child sex offences in April.
Follow BBC Bristol on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Ed Miliband accused of ‘rewriting history' after claiming winter fuel axe was to stop millionaires cashing in
ED Miliband was accused of 'rewriting history' yesterday after he claimed scrapping winter fuel was about stopping millionaires getting payments. The bungling Net Zero Secretary tried to justify Labour's original decision to strip the handout by suggesting the pensioners who would've missed out were all rich. 2 2 But some of them earned as little as £12,000 per year. Mr Miliband said: 'The principal question was, the richest in our society, should they get the winter fuel payment, should millionaires, should the richest get the winter fuel payment? 'I think the answer for most people to that is no.' The Net Zero Secretary's desperate bid to explain scrapping winter fuel payments – before the decision was partially reversed – was blasted by senior Tories, who accused him of spouting a 'pack of lies'. Shadow Energy Secretary Andrew Bowie told The Sun: 'Red Ed is even more out of touch than we thought if he thinks people will believe this pack of lies. 'The economy is worse off than when they found it - taxes higher, unemployment higher and living standards lower. 'He is just trying to rewrite history to try and cover up Labour's embarrassing U-turn.' Meanwhile, a flagship Net Zero plan has been spared ahead of next week's spending review — to opponents' dismay. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has ensured his £13billion warm homes scheme will not be downgraded after negotiations with the Treasury. Chancellor Rachel Reeves decided not to cut the cash which allows heating upgrades through better insulation, solar panels and heat pumps.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Fact check: Labour claims the economy is ‘in a better place'
Labour has justified its U-turn on winter fuel payments by claiming the economy 'is in a better place' and the public finances are on a 'stronger footing', according to James Murray, a Treasury minister. Is he correct? The main statistic backing the government's claim that the economy has turned a corner is the most recent set of official growth figures. Gross domestic product — a broad measure of the size of the economy — expanded by 0.7 per cent in the first three months of the year, exceeding forecasts of about 0.4 per cent and the fastest acceleration in 12 months. It also meant the UK was the fastest-growing economy in the G7 at the start of 2025. Although the growth momentum is expected to peter out over the course of the year, the strong first quarter has led City forecasters and the International Monetary Fund to modestly upgrade their annual growth forecast from 1 per cent to about 1.1-1.2 per cent. The economy expanded by 1.1 per cent last year, so growth is likely to at least match, rather than far outstrip last year's performance. Labour will also take comfort in an improvement in the UK's GDP per capita figures, which is a more accurate measure of living standards. Growth divided by the population rose by 0.5 per cent in the first quarter, after contracting for two consecutive quarters prior. One of the most important economic indicators for living standards and the sustainability of the public finances is productivity growth. This is a broad measure that combines the efficiency of worker output and investment across the economy. The UK's dismal productivity performance since the global financial crisis hasn't turned around since Labour won the election. Productivity was 0.2 per cent lower in the first quarter of the year compared with the same period in 2024. Productivity in the private sector also contracted by a surprising 0.7 per cent last year, pushing it to below pre-pandemic levels and nearly 2 per cent lower than before the financial crisis in 2008. In the public sector, productivity has contracted for the past two years. Along with productivity growth, lifting business investment will be decisive in defining the government's economic record in this parliament. Private sector investment enjoyed a strong start to the year, expanding by 5.9 per cent in the first quarter compared with the end of 2024, and is 8.1 per cent stronger compared with a year ago. However, the figures are likely to have been distorted by a sharp rise in manufacturing investment, as companies rushed to stockpile materials before President Trump's tariffs announcement on April 2. Public and private sector investment is vital to raise innovation, create jobs and ultimately boost productivity. The UK's total rate of investment has been the worst in the G7 for 24 out of the past 30 years, according to the Institute for Public Policy Research. After more than a year of steadily falling inflation, the pace of price rises has started accelerating again this spring. Annual consumer price inflation rose to 3.4 per cent in April, dragged higher by energy and utility costs. The Bank of England does not expect inflation to fall back to its 2 per cent target until the end of next year. Figures released on Tuesday showed that the labour market is in the grip of a pronounced slowdown. Unemployment has hit a four-year high of 4.6 per cent, and the number of payrolled employees contracted by 55,000 in the three months to April. A first estimate for May showed a 109,000 decline in jobs, which if confirmed would be the worst month since the height of the pandemic in April 2022. Labour has been handed some mixed news on the state of the public finances. The Office for National Statistics lowered its borrowing estimate for the last fiscal year by £3.7 billion to £148.3 billion ending in March 2025, but this figure still overshot the £137.3 billion forecast made by the government's independent fiscal watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility. Monthly borrowing data has also consistently come in above forecasts as the government's coffers have suffered from lower-than-expected tax revenues. On the expenditure side, spending on public sector pay deals and welfare has been growing too fast for comfort for the chancellor. Financial market conditions have also turned against the government this year. Investors have driven up the UK's borrowing costs, as reflected by yields on sovereign debt. Since Rachel Reeves's spring statement in late March, higher gilt yields have blown a £5 billion hole in the chancellor's £9.9 billion buffer to meet her main fiscal rule. Labour's difficulty in balancing the books over the course of the parliament has stoked speculation that Reeves will be forced into more tax rises or spending cuts at her autumn budget.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EUAN McCOLM: Farage has tickled the tummies of Nationalist voters. He won't win the next election...but he may end SNP's reign
Reform leader Nigel Farage was supposed to be the perfect bogeyman. As last week's Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse by-election drew closer, First Minister John Swinney implored voters to back the SNP if they wished to keep Mr Farage's brand of politics out of Holyrood. A vote for Labour, said Mr Swinney, would hand the constituency to Reform. In the end, it was Labour's Davy Russell who took the seat, made vacant by the untimely death of sitting nationalist MSP Christina McKelvie, nudging the SNP's Katy Loudon into second. Reform's Ross Lambie came a very close third. Mr Swinney's claim that the by-election was a two horse race between his and Mr Farage's parties could not have been more wrong. Within minutes of last week's result being declared, the briefing against the First Minister was in full swing. SNP insiders muttered darkly about strategic errors and poor campaigning. Former SNP health secretary Alex Neil was among senior nationalists calling for Mr Swinney to go. The result, said Mr Neil, showed the current SNP leadership needed to be replaced, urgently. Political leadership requires the ability to be bullish in the face of disaster, something which Mr Swinney attempted during a SKY News interview. Speaking on Sunday Morning With Trevor Philips, the First Minister said, if current polls were to be believed, the SNP was on course to win its fifth consecutive Holyrood election next year and to remain - 'by a country mile' - the largest party at Holyrood. Snarkier sorts than me might be tempted to point out that, before voting opened last Thursday morning, Mr Swinney reckoned current polls showed Labour hadn't a hope of winning in Lanarkshire. It is routine for politicians, when confronted with polling that looks bad for them, to declare that the only poll that counts takes place on election day. Surveys, they say, are nothing more than a snapshot of a moment in time. With this in mind, perhaps the First Minister should spend less time focusing on opinion polls and more examining last Thursday's result. The numbers make for fascinating - and surprising - reading. Mr Swinney has expended considerable effort over recent months attempting to build the case that Nigel Farage's politics is anathema to Scots. His disruptive approach is cruel and unfeeling while we prefer something more compassionate, more progressive, more downright baby-boxy. Even a cursory glance at last week's result shows many take a different view. In fact, the numbers show a substantial number of Scots are more than happy to vote for Mr Farage's party. Reform won 26.1 per cent of the vote in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse last week. Not bad for a party contesting a seat for the first time. Unsurprisingly, much of Reform's support came from people who had previously backed the Tories. But a drop of 11.5 per cent in the Conservative vote, compared with the result of the 2021 election, doesn't account for the level of support achieved by Mr Farage's party. It must, then, have been disillusioned former Labour voters who got behind Reform, mustn't it? It would certainly suit Mr Swinney for that to be so but a drop of just two per cent in Labour's support doesn't make up the shortfall. What does balance the books is the fall in support for the SNP. Last week, the nationalists' vote share plummeted by 16.8 per cent. Add that to the Tory and Labour losses and the Reform result is explained. It would appear that Nigel Farage is able to tickle the tummies of voters who previously sought to express their disillusionment with 'the establishment' by voting SNP. If this is so - and some Scottish nationalist politicians believe it to be - then the chances of another Scottish Parliamentary election victory have slimmed down. As the 2014 referendum campaign kicked off, support among Scots for the break-up of the United Kingdom sat at below 30 per cent. These voters - die hard nationalists - were of the 'independence at any cost' variety. Nothing could have shaken the belief of those voters that Scotland should stand alone. During the referendum campaign, support for independence rocketed. No, the Yes campaign didn't prevail but it took 45 per cent of the vote, a result which emboldened the SNP to believe it was just a matter of time until its separatist dream came true. But were the new converts to the independence cause true believers whose loyalty would remain unshakeable? Doesn't look like it, does it? Eleven years ago, then SNP leader Alex Salmond enthusiastically fomented great anger among a section of the electorate. He encouraged the belief that a distant political elite had abandoned ordinary voters and - to an extent - he did so very successfully, indeed. For some, a Yes vote was less about self-determination than it was about furious rejection of the status quo. And, so long as 'Indyref2' was being denied by big bad Westminster, those supporters looked like they'd stick by the SNP. These days, even John Swinney accepts there will be no second referendum any time soon. That reality makes the SNP offer less appealing to the hacked-off voter who wishes to 'shake things up'. The more self-aware among the upper echelons of the SNP know that the same dissatisfaction which boosted the independence cause in 2014 also drives support for Reform. Understandably, senior SNP figures take succour from a recent poll by Norstat which revealed that - once undecideds are removed - support for Scottish independence sits at 54 per cent, with just 46 per cent in favour of maintenance of the United Kingdom. Surely such a result shows the independence dream is very much alive? Well, up to a point, Lord Copper. One SNP source cautions colleagues against agitating for a second referendum, now, on the grounds both that the party - and wider independence movement - is unprepared and that support for breaking up the UK is not concrete. 'In the last few years,' said the party insider, 'we've seen polls which say people are in flavour of a second referendum and lots of our people get very excited. The thing is, though, that when you get down into the detail, it's usually been the case that people would be happy to see a second referendum at some vague point in the future which means we're just stuck in a time-loop where a referendum is always in sight but always out of reach.' The SNP moved from the fringes of Scottish politics to become the dominant party by persuading a substantial number of voters that it was an insurgent, anti-establishment force. After almost 20 years in government, the SNP is very much part of the establishment and that makes it vulnerable to the sort of attacks it once launched on Scottish Labour. Nigel Farage's Reform won't win next year's Holyrood election but the result in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse suggests it could help end the SNP's reign.
