CDC says parents can decide with doctors if healthy kids get Covid shots
The nation's top public health agency posted new recommendations that say healthy children and pregnant women may get Covid vaccinations, removing stronger language that those groups should get the shots.
The change comes days after U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that Covid vaccines will no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women.
But the updated guidance on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's website sends a more nuanced message, saying shots 'may' be given to those groups.
'The announcement from earlier this week sounded like CDC was going to fully withdraw any statement that could be construed as a recommendation for these vaccines in these populations,' said Jason Schwartz, a Yale University health policy researcher. 'It's not as bad as it could have been.'
Kennedy announced the coming changes in a 58-second video posted on the social media site X on Tuesday. No one from the CDC was in the video, and CDC officials have referred questions about the announcement to Kennedy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
On Thursday, the CDC updated its website. The agency said that shots may be given to children ages 6 months to 17 years who do not have moderate or severe problems with their immune systems. Instead of recommending the shots, the CDC now says parents may decide to get their children vaccinated in consultation with a doctor.
A subtle update to a CDC page on the adult immunization schedule indicated a similar change for the recommendation for pregnant women, excluding them from the routine recommendation made for other adults.
'The old COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children under 18 and for pregnant women have been removed from the CDC vaccine schedule,' a HHS spokesperson said in a statement. 'The CDC and HHS encourage individuals to talk with their healthcare provider about any personal medical decision.'
That kind of recommendation, known as shared decision-making, still means health insurers must pay for the vaccinations, according to the CDC. However, experts say vaccination rates tend to be lower when health authorities use that language and doctors are less emphatic with patients about getting shots.
Childhood vaccination rates for Covid are already low — just 13% of children and 23% of adults have received the 2024-25 Covid vaccine, according to CDC data.
Talk of changing the recommendations has been brewing. As the Covid pandemic has waned, experts have discussed the possibility of focusing vaccination efforts on people 65 and older — who are among those most as risk for death and hospitalization.
A CDC advisory panel is set to meet in June to make recommendations about the fall shots. Among its options are suggesting shots for high-risk groups but still giving lower-risk people the choice to get vaccinated. A committee work group has endorsed the idea.
But Kennedy, a leading anti-vaccine advocate before becoming health secretary, decided not to wait for the scientific panel's review.
The new vaccine recommendation changes, their timing and the way there were announced have created confusion that can be 'incredibly harmful to the success of vaccination programs,' Schwartz said.
'It would be understandable if the public is completely baffled in terms of what the federal government thinks and what the science suggests ... about the evidence for the safety and value of these vaccines,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK is no better prepared: key takeaways from Covid inquiry's test, trace and isolation module
The Covid inquiry has spent the past three weeks on the UK's attempts to control the pandemic through test, trace and isolation. Here we look at the key findings from the module and experts' recommendations for future pandemic preparedness. Testing people for infection, tracing their contacts, and isolating those at risk of passing on bugs is a mainstay of outbreak control. The UK could handle local outbreaks such as norovirus, salmonella, mpox and meningitis, but the pandemic called for radical scaling up. At its peak, NHS test and trace was able to process 800,000 virus tests a day. Lateral flow devices bolstered the capacity. Nearly 16 million people who tested positive were contacted, with more than 31 million contacts. Public Health England developed a Covid test within two weeks of Chinese scientists publishing its genetic sequence. The first case in England was diagnosed on 31 January. Scientists knew the outlook was bleak. 'It was very clear at that stage that we were heading towards a major event, a pandemic that would have a big, big impact,' Prof Christophe Fraser, who worked on Covid apps in the pandemic, told the inquiry. The UK needed to expand testing fast, but on 12 March nearly all community testing and contact tracing was abandoned. Instead, people with symptoms were asked to self-isolate. Prof Alan McNally, an infectious disease expert at the University of Birmingham, was 'flabbergasted'. Days later, the director general of the World Health Organization, Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus, reiterated the call for all countries to 'test, test, test', isolate the infected and test their contacts. There was no plan for nationwide testing. Ministers and many scientific advisers had focused on a flu pandemic, which might tear through the population too fast for testing to help. 'What a catastrophic error that was,' Pete Weatherby KC, for Covid Bereaved Families for Justice, told the inquiry. 'It started with no planning, no capacity, no contact tracing, lab analysis or isolation infrastructure for anything other than the occurrence of a limited high-consequence disease outbreak, and perhaps most significantly, too little support for those most likely to spread the virus if they did not test and isolate.' Rather than building on the expertise and equipment in NHS labs, universities and research institutions, the UK pursued a private, centralised testing programme. It was built 'virtually from scratch', Dominic Cook at Deloitte told the inquiry. The decision had its critics. The Francis Crick Institute in London reconfigured to test its employees, local hospital staff and eventually care home residents. Soon, they were turning up to 4,000 tests a day in 24 hours. 'That sort of speed is absolutely critical to protect vulnerable people,' said Sir Paul Nurse, the Nobel laureate director of the Crick. 'We could have scaled up to about 10,000 [tests a day] in a month if we'd had the money.' Nurse and others pushed for a Dunkirk-inspired big ships and small boats approach, where the UK's existing labs provided local testing until the Lighthouse labs were ready. Nurse estimated the UK's smaller labs could process up to 200,000 tests a day. But ministers had other plans. They sent the army to collect PCR machines for use in the centralised Lighthouse labs. In an email to colleagues shared at the inquiry, McNally wrote: 'That's a massive 'fuck you' to the whole of UK academia.' Early in the pandemic, the NHS listed Covid symptoms as a new continuous cough and high fever. Other symptoms were only added later. It meant many people who had Covid didn't realise. Prof Tim Spector, who pioneered the Zoe Covid app, flagged loss of smell or taste as a symptom in March 2020. It wasn't recognised by the NHS until May. Some people with Covid had no symptoms. Fearing that asymptomatic healthcare workers could spread the virus to patients, Nurse and Sir Peter Ratcliffe, another Nobel laureate at the Crick, wrote to the then health secretary, Matt Hancock, to call for testing of all healthcare workers. A response arrived three months later. Weekly Covid tests were not offered to asymptomatic care home staff and NHS workers until July and November 2020 respectively. Local testing centres popped up from spring 2020 but many failed to consider the most vulnerable. Disabled people found some sites inaccessible. Many centres favoured people with cars. 'If you were doing this again, you'd set up your first set of testing sites in local community halls in Tower Hamlets, not in Chessington World of Adventures,' Dido Harding, who led NHS test and trace, told the inquiry. Online booking systems excluded people without computers or mobile phones. People were sent to the nearest available test site, regardless of practicalities. Robin Swann, the former health minister in Northern Ireland, said some residents were directed to Scotland. 'The Irish Sea hadn't been taken into consideration,' he said. The Lighthouse labs were the powerhouses of the UK's testing capability. Setting them up was hectic. Beyond the machines needed to test samples, labs needed safety cabinets, trained staff, workflows and operating procedures. Post-doctorate and research fellows volunteered to move, while other scientists were seconded to staff them. McNally helped set up the first lab in Milton Keynes, which ran 28,000 tests a day at the end of its first month. A major frustration was the enormous team of Deloitte consultants, he said, which had 'no expertise' in lab work, infectious disease or diagnostics. The need for high standards at testing labs was made clear by failures at the private Immensa lab in Wolverhampton. In 2021, it issued tens of thousands of incorrect test results. 'In the long list of Covid disasters and scandals, this is pretty near the top,' McNally said. England alone had to recruit and train 15,000 contact tracers. To be effective, 80% of contacts of infected people had to be traced. In 2020 the figure was far lower. Scores of people avoided tests because they couldn't afford to self-isolate. Lady Harding pressed for better support but Rishi Sunak, then chancellor, refused 'at every opportunity'. Had we done more, fewer would have died, she believed. Diary entries from Patrick Vallance, the former chief scientist, echoed her concerns, saying ministers 'always want to go for stick, not carrot'. One note had Boris Johnson, the prime minister, saying: 'We must have known that this wasn't working. We have been pretending it has been whereas secretly we know it hasn't been.' In a later note, he said: 'We haven't been ruthless enough. We need to force more isolation. I favour a more authoritarian approach.' The Lighthouse laboratories were dismantled, the equipment sold off and staff returned to their previous jobs. If another pandemic strikes in December, McNally told the inquiry: 'We will be exactly where we were in January, February of 2020.' He and others urged the UK to mirror Germany's federated lab system where a mix of university, commercial and animal health labs perform routine testing but can switch to pandemic testing when needed. Harding stressed the need for a mass test-and-trace system that considered the most vulnerable from the start. 'They're the most exposed to every infectious disease and that means you have to put isolation support at the forefront of your testing and tracing system,' she said.
Daily Mail
19 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Jodi Picoult fumes as Hollywood drops her film over 'radioactive' theme
Beloved author Jodi Picoult launched a scorched earth tirade against Hollywood elites for 'bending the knee' and refusing to create movies that could upset President Trump. The bestselling author of My Sister's Keeper slapped down an 'unnamed streaming service' in a video shared to TikTok after plans to create a movie from her 2021 novel were suddenly abandoned. 'Today I found out after four years they have decided to cancel the project because "with the new regime they don't want to do a storyline around Covid,"' she said on Friday. While Picoult did not explicitly name the streaming service, it is widely known that Netflix acquired the rights to her Covid-era tome Wish You Were Here back. The book centers around a NYC woman in her late-20s woman whose life is upended by the arrival of the pandemic and the subsequent lockdowns. Picoult was responding to a question on TikTok about why more of her books haven't been turned into movies. 'This is what I mean when I say even places that are considered to be very liberal, like Hollywood, are terrified of the Trump administration,' she said. 'They think there is going to be backlash if they don't bend the knee.' Trump has used hardball negotiating tactics during his second term to force CEOs and industries into making dramatic concessions. He even slapped extraordinary tariffs on some of America's closest allies. But in a display of fondness for his favorite films, Trump has tried to remake Hollywood in his own image while railing against the cinema hub for its 'wokeness.' He threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff on foreign-made films in an effort to bring productions back to Hollywood, warning: 'The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death.' Trump also appointed several Ambassadors to Hollywood - right-leaning celebrities who endorsed him during his campaign, including Mel Gibson and Sylvester Stallone. But Picoult argues Trump's involvement has softened the industry, which once proudly opposed to the former reality TV star, and made executives and bigwigs more risk-averse. To make matters worse for Picoult, members of the Trump administration have been openly critical of the handling of the Covid pandemic in the United States. Trump himself has promoted a popular theory that the virus began in a lab in Wuhan, China. The book centers around a late-20s woman living in New York City whose life is upended by the arrival of the Covid pandemic and the subsequent lockdowns Most recently, his administration limited approval for annual Covid booster shots to only seniors and others at high risk of falling ill with the virus. 'I guess that means I better go out and write a book about an anti-vaxxer who is married to someone who thinks Ukraine started the war against itself, and they have a baby who drinks raw milk,' Picoult said. 'You'll want to make that, right Hollywood?' Picoult's criticism marks the latest in a string of accusations that Hollywood has been tip-toeing on egg shells around angering Trump during this administration. Oscar-nominated film The Apprentice, based on Trump's early years as an up-and-coming businessman, struggled to secure a streaming deal after Trump criticized the film. 'It's hard to be creative when you're afraid,' Tom Nunan, from the UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television, told the Los Angeles Times. 'I don't think that people have really figured out what to do yet, how to express themselves or what's going to be the most effective.' Picoult was inundated with support from fans who were concerned Netflix would have butchered the adaption and were upset with how Hollywood changed the ending of her last work for the screen. 'After they ruined My Sister's Keeper, I'll stick to just reading them,' one supportive fan wrote. In the comments section of her post, Picoult was asked about another book she wrote, Sing You Home, which followed the story of a woman who wanted to use frozen embryos she created with her ex-husband with her new wife. The rights to the movie were acquired by Ellen DeGeneres back in 2011. A fan asked: 'What ever happened to that?' Picoult responded with a shocking take against Ellen, writing: 'There is not enough alcohol in the world to tell that story.'
North Wales Chronicle
a day ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Staff 'caught COVID-19' while working at factory on Anglesey
Mark Edwards, Glynne Roberts, Nia Williams and Brian Perry, who worked as food processing operatives for 2 Sisters Food Group, are bringing claims against the company for damages for injuries and losses following development of symptoms of the virus in mid-2020. 2 Sisters Food Group shut its Llangefni factory in 2023. A previous court hearing found in 2 Sisters' favour, but at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre in April, Judge Sir Peter Lane allowed an appeal of this ruling from all four ex-employees. In July 2024, Judge Wendy Owen concluded that the ex-employees would face a 'nigh-on impossible task' in establishing a causal link between a breach of duty from 2 Sisters and their contracting of COVID-19. They say they were working 'shoulder to shoulder' when, in June 2020, there was an outbreak of COVID-19 at the Llangefni factory, and that the site was then closed at the direction of Public Health Wales. As far as they are aware, 217 of the 560 staff at the factory contracted COVID-19 during the course of the outbreak, including all four of them. 2 Sisters admits they worked in close proximity with each other but contests the 'shoulder to shoulder' claim, and refutes the suggestion that the factory's closure was directed by Public Health Wales. In his written reasons, published on Wednesday (May 28), Judge Lane wrote: 'The causation issue stands front and centre of this case. The scenario posited by the appellants was not a fanciful one. 'What is potentially relevant to the present claims is, however, the prevalence of COVID-19, certainly in the area containing the factory and perhaps further afield, depending on the places of residence of the appellants.' Judge Lane added that if evidence were to show, for example, relatively low levels of COVID-19 on Anglesey in June 2020, then 'it is plainly not fanciful for the appellants to be able to show, on the balance of probabilities, that their illness would not have been sustained but for the respondent's breach of duty'. Though he allowed their appeals, he said they 'face an uphill task' in proving their cases.
