FBI to move thousands of agents from immigration to counterterrorism in wake of Iran strikes: reports
The FBI is planning to move thousands of agents working in immigration enforcement to boost counterterrorism efforts in the wake of U.S. strikes on Iran, according to reports.
A memo was reportedly distributed in the past 48 hours to FBI field office directors with instructions to focus resources on terror threats, including those made at home, sources told CBS News, while insiders told ABC News that potentially thousands of agents could be moved.
'The FBI does not comment on specific operational adjustments or personnel decisions,' an FBI official spokesperson said in a statement to The Independent. 'However, we continuously assess and realign our resources to respond to the most pressing threats to our national security and to ensure the safety of the American people.'
FBI Director Kash Patel warned Monday that the bureau's main priority is now stopping any possible retaliation at home.
'Right now the focus, given the nature especially of what just happened, has to be on protecting the homeland and protecting our communities,' Patel said at the National Sheriffs' Association conference in Florida.
Following the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, the FBI assigned agents to support immigration enforcement efforts. But agents had previously expressed concern that as a result, fewer resources were working on counterterrorism threats, according to ABC. Employees complained about being pulled off counterterrorism tasks to work on immigration issues, sources also told CBS.
The move to refocus agents comes swiftly after the National Terrorism Advisory System issued a bulletin Sunday warning Americans that the Iran conflict has created a 'heightened threat environment' in the U.S.
'Low-level cyber attacks against U.S. networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against U.S. networks,' the bulletin said. 'Iran also has a long-standing commitment to target U.S. government officials it views as responsible for the death of an Iranian military commander killed in January 2020.'
'The likelihood of violent extremists in the Homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland,' the warning continued.
President Donald Trump raged at Israel and Iran Tuesday morning after the 'complete and total' ceasefire he announced on Monday evening immediately broke down, with the two sides accusing each other of violations.
The chaos led to Trump telling reporters on the South Lawn of the White House that neither side 'knows what the f*** they're doing.'
'Iran violated it, but Israel violated it too. Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs the likes of which I've never seen before. The biggest load that we've seen,' the president said, visibly angry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
Influencer Liver King arrested after ‘making threats' to Joe Rogan in bizarre Instagram vid
SOCIAL media star Liver King has been arrested - days after sharing a bizarre video where he appeared to be calling out the podcaster Joe Rogan. In the bizarre tirade, the influencer said he was picking a fight with Rogan. Cops in Austin, Texas, have confirmed that Liver King, known as Brian Johnson, faces a terroristic threat charge. 'Joe Rogan, I'm calling you out, my name's Liver King. Man to man, I'm picking a fight with you,' The Liver King said in the video. He said that he didn't have training in jiu-jitsu. "You're a black belt. You should dismantle me," Liver King said. "But I'm picking a fight with you.' 1 .
Times
44 minutes ago
- Times
If Vladimir Putin won't help, Ayatollah Khamenei looks sunk
Iran under siege sent its top diplomat this week to see Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin, supposedly the Tehran regime's one true remaining friend. The meeting was a flop and it was clear to all that the supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was finished. The shrewd emissary, foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, had worked well with the Russians in an earlier stint as Iran's chief nuclear negotiator. More importantly perhaps, he served in Estonia and Finland as ambassador at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union. So everyone around the Kremlin table this week understood the moment, the blink of an eyelid that signifies the sudden approach of a fin de régime. The Russians may have anticipated an Iranian plea to intervene with Donald Trump and persuade the American president not to push for a chaotic handover of power. Or was Iran seeking a safe refuge, if not for the supreme leader then at least for his son Mojtaba? Moscow is already full of Assad clan members, decamped from Damascus to ensure they did not endure the grisly end that befell Libya's Muammar Gaddafi. In fact, the ambassador merely wanted to clarify the terms of a 20-year strategic partnership signed last January, hinting at mutual support in case of outside attack. Were Russia and Iran still allies? Was the Crink axis — which also includes China and North Korea — still a thing? We don't know yet if Araghchi got an answer. A cynic would say that neither Russia nor China is going to cross the Trump administration for a dying regime. And that same cynic will have noted that the Putin photographed with Araghchi in the Kremlin looked much younger than his 72 years, resembling one of his team of younger doubles. Who knows? The real president might have had another pressing engagement. Fresh from seeing his number one Middle East ally fall apart in Syria in a fortnight, Putin has spent the past 12 days watching Iran shift from a clerical autocracy into a form of martial law. Khamenei, hiding in a bombproof (but far from secret) shelter, has delegated authority to a new council, a shura that is dominated by officers from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). But the supreme leader's communications have been reduced to a minimum, and not with IRGC commanders, nor with anyone able to inform him about bomb damage or the reeling economy. Outside the shelter, his world has been collapsing. At least a dozen top generals and nuclear scientists have been assassinated. Commanders are killed and so, within days, are their replacements. Iran has no control over its airspace, the main nuclear installations have been hammered, oil and energy facilities are in flames. The IRGC headquarters in charge of the defence of Tehran has been hit, as has the homeland defence and internal threat department, the information security command, the HQ of the Basij militia, and the nerve-hub of the intelligence and security police. The gates of the notorious Evin high-security prison have been blown open. Trump, having denied that he was seeking regime change, has started to publicly frame the question of why a system that has so profoundly failed to shield its citizens can still claim legitimacy. You can see why he might have changed his pitch: the opening of Evin is an image comparable to the storming of the Bastille. It helps to establish Trump's credentials as a revolutionary leader. But the administration has to have the residual wisdom to reject the choice of killing — martyring, as he would see it — the supreme leader in his monastic hideaway. There is more at stake in Iran than uprooting a nasty regime. It is about dealing with an even more dangerous vacuum. The collapse of the Soviet empire seemed like a glorious day in the West; to Putin it marked the start of a long, sweaty nightmare of cascading national uprisings. The 12-day war of Iran has established that one leadership generation of clerico-politicians — that of 86-year-old Khamenei and the veterans of the long 1980s war against Iraq — has lost its natural successors. Now the political battle may be dominated by a faction of the IRGC, hardline champions of national pride and victimhood, inward-looking, inclined to hunt down traitors and those deemed to be Israeli collaborators. This is a faction closely linked to the military industrial complex, the cash cow of the IRGC; it will try to influence the choice of the next supreme leader. Pragmatists who advocated cautious modernisation, strategic patience and double-dealing diplomatic manoeuvres to win the lifting of western sanctions are likely to lose out. Whatever comes next will be pumped up by anti-Israel and anti-American sentiment. The worst, most reckless outcome of this war would be that in the hidden depths of the Fordow plant, its uranium enrichment potential has survived. That a new Iranian regime suspends all access to international inspectors and that it makes common cause with a nuclear rogue state to start up an even more secretive road to the bomb (North Korea, I'm looking at you). It doesn't have to end quite so apocalyptically and there are ways perhaps that Iran can scramble out of its pariah status. But if Iran is going to enter the modern world then it has to start behaving like a responsible actor. Its false friends in the rogue Crink axis have encouraged the idea that getting hold of the means to blow up the world will somehow make Tehran stronger and more respected in the region. That's just bully-boy thinking and this week, under foreign bombardment, many young Iranians have woken up to the fact they have been led into a geopolitical cul-de-sac by their deluded political class.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Zohran Mamdani declares victory in NYC Democratic mayoral primary race
'Tonight, we made history,' says Zohran Mamdani as the 33-year-old democratic socialist celebrates his apparent victory in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. Andrew Cuomo, who was previously considered the race's frontrunner, conceded early in the night as Mamdani's extended lead became apparent
