Over 370 detained participants of May 1 rallies in Istanbul released
Istanbul, May 3 (UNI) A court ordered the release of 374 people out of 418 detained participants of unauthorized rallies on May 1 in Istanbul, the city's police department said in a statement.
Roads and key highways were blocked in central Istanbul on Thursday due to unauthorized rallies, and more than 15 subway stations and other public transport were closed.
"A total of 374 out of 418 people detained in Istanbul have been released after giving testimony," the ANKA news agency quoted the department as saying.
Trade unions held government-authorized demonstrations in the Kadikoy and Kartal districts in Istanbul on May 1, but opposition minded groups tried to break through to the city center. Around 65,000 citizens took part in the rallies in the Kadikoy and Kartal districts and dispersed peacefully, while more than 52,000 police officers were responsible for ensuring security in the city, the authorities said.
Demonstrations in Taksim Square in downtown Istanbul have been banned for several years. In 2024, Turkish Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said calls to hold rallies in Taksim were coming from "terrorists."
Lawyers for the suspended mayor of Istanbul Ekrem Imamoglu filed an appeal against his arrest on April 7, but the court rejected it. A member of Turkey's main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP), Imamoglu headed the mayor's office since 2019; in 2024, he was re-elected to this post with a margin of almost 12% over his competitor from the ruling party. Since March 23, the arrested mayor has been in a prison in the Istanbul suburb of Silivri on charges of corruption; the prosecutor's request for his arrest as part of the investigation into a second case on terrorism was rejected.
UNI SPUTNIK GNK
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Maha: Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut criticises CM Fadnavis
Mumbai, June 15 (UNI) Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut on Sunday lashed out at Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, accusing him of having started preparations to win upcoming municipal elections with corrupt means just as he won the state assembly elections by cheating. Comparing Fadnavis to a 'madari' (street performers who used to perform tricks with trained animals like monkeys or bears), the Sena-UBT leader alleged that he has power, money, builder lobby with him and hence, he can commit corruption and can make everyone dance. But Thackeray brand is the brand of Mumbai and Maharashtra, and no one be it (Narendra) Modi-(Amit) Shah or even Fadnavis, can finish this brand, he said and asserted that Thackeray brand is invincible. "No matter how Modi, Shah and Fadnavis have brought and raised money from a big builder lobby, they cannot compete with this brand," he said. If one leaves politics aside, then people still have immense respect for party founder Bal Thackeray and his family because the Thackeray family has sacrificed and fought for Maharashtra and the Marathi people, he argued. "The assembly elections were won by cheating. Similar preparations are underway for the municipal elections, but people are wise," added Raut. UNI SP SS
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Woman killed in cracker unit blast, Stalin announces solatium
Chennai, June 15 (UNI) A 37-year-old woman worker was killed in a blast at a private cracker manufacturing unit at Periyakumatty village in Bhuvanagiri Taluk in Cuddalore district of Tamil Nadu on Sunday. Police sources said the deceased woman was identified as Lathakumari. Police and fire service personnel, rushed to the spot, removed her body from the debris and shifted to government hospital for post mortem. Meanwhile, in a statement, Chief Minister M K Stalin expressed deep anguish and grief over the death of the woman worker and announced an assistance of Rs four lakh from the Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund. He also offered his deepest condolences to the bereaved family members. UNI GV
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Anbumani tenders apology, Father-son stand off in PMK seems to be heading for smooth ending
Chennai, June 15 (UNI) The stand off between father son in the PMK's first family appears to be heading for a smooth ending after PMK President Dr Anbumani tendering an apology to his father and Party Founder on Sunday. A day after the senior Ramadoss came down heavily and sharpened his attack on his son and declared that he would remain as PMK Founder and Chief till his last breadth, Dr Anbumani sought to bury the hatchet and tendered an apology. The apology tendered by Anbumani was expected to strengthen the reconciliatory efforts being made by party seniors, including PMK Patron G K Mani, stressing on the need for the party to remain united especially with the key Assembly elections about 10 months away. "Ayya (as Dr Ramadoss is affectionately called), should live for more than 100 years with good health, satisfactions and happiness. As a son, It is my duty to ensure that", he said. "If you have any angst against me, please forgive is nothing wrong in a son apologising to his father", Dr Anbumani said, in what could be seen as an attempt to bring an end to the brewing stand off with his father, which at one stage seemed to have reached a dead end. "Tell me what should I a son and as Party President, I will do it", he said, adding, "PMK was founded and nurtured by you, we will work towards realising your dreams", he added. Dr Ramadoss the attitude and activities of his son and party 'working president' Anbumani had worsened after the recent youth conference at Mammallapuram and firmly declared he would continue to remain the founder and party chief till his last breath. Dr Ramadoss also alleged that Dr Arbumani's actions were akin to backstabbing and said he was spending sleepless nights due to the present crisis created by his son in the party. Recently, the simmering differences in the Vanniyar-dominated Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK's), first family, deepened further as tensions escalated between the father and son. The differences between had widened to such an extent with Dr Ramadoss openly admitting that he had made a grave mistake by making Anbumani as the UnionMinister at the age of 35 and also accused his son of lacking leadership qualities. PMK is a key political player in Tamil Nadu wielding considerable clout among the Vanniyars in Northern districts like Villupuram, Cuddalore, Dharmapuri, Krishnagiri and neighbouring districts. The fresh internal political crisis in the family culminated in the resignation of PMK Founder's grandson Mukundan Parasuraman from the post of PMK Youth Wing Secretary, whose appointment to the post turned out to be the starting point of the rift between the top two leaders in the party. In his resignation letter addressed to Anbumani, Mukundan said he was quitting due to personal reasons, while terming senior Ramadoss as his (Kula Deivam) 'Family (Ancestral) deity' and Anbumani as the 'future'. Sources close to the party indicated that Mukundan's move was aimed at easing tensions between his grandfather Dr. Ramadoss and his uncle, Dr. Anbumani. The resignation is seen as a gesture to reduce friction and support a more united party structure going forward. Incidentally Dr Ramadoss' decision to elevate him to the post and stripping Dr Anbumani, a former Union Minister, from the post of Party President and making him as Working President, triggered a public spat between the father-son duo a couple of months back. After the spat, Dr Anbumani walked out of the meeting in a huff, prompting the party Founder to announce that PMK was founded and nurtured by him and those who did not like, are free to leave. Dr Ramadoss said his orders should be obeyed and that those not following it have no place in the party, signalling that all is not well between the father and son. The fresh bout of confrontation between them stemmed from the fact over the issue of alliance for the 2026 Assembly elections with Dr Ramadoss coming down hard at his son and said that Dr Anbumani was insisting for an alliance with the BJP. What began as a disagreement over electoral alliances has snowballed into a bitter public rift, with strong emotional and political overtones. Turning emotional, Dr. Ramadoss declared that it was not Anbumani who erred, but he himself. 'The mistake was not made by Anbumani. I am the one who made a mistake by making him a Union Minister at the age of 35, even going against my own oath and principles,' he had said. This confession highlights the deep regret and disillusionment Ramadoss feels about his decision to elevate his son in national politics, suggesting that his trust had been betrayed. UNI GV 1830
