Revamp aims to make city's market 'magical'
A central court could be added to a city's renowned marketplace as part of plans for a major revamp.
Smaller squares and a covered pathway through the middle are also options being put forward by Norwich City Council.
Carli Harper, the Labour councillor responsible for major projects, said the authority wanted to make it "one of the most magical places you can visit in Norwich or the region".
The council has now launched a survey asking for the public's views on its proposals and said it hoped to have final plans drawn up by this autumn.
Earlier this year, the cabinet of the Labour-run authority agreed to spend £740,000 to commission proposals for potential new designs.
Should changes go ahead, it would be the first major redevelopment of the market since 2006 – when ageing, wooden stalls were replaced with metal structures with roofs.
The council said a central court or smaller squares could be used for "special events" and pop-up stalls, whilst a covered pathway would provide "a clear entrance point".
Dominic Burke, co-owner of the Sir Toby's Beers stall, said some "exciting ideas" had been proposed.
He added that traders had been meeting with the council to discuss plans and it was important for the wider public to comment.
"The market belongs to everyone," he said.
Harper said the aim was to "maximise footfall" and make the site "a destination market in Europe" and that construction work could begin later this year.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Traders 'at the heart' of city market revamp plans
One of Britain's oldest markets set for revamp
Norwich City Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Deputy mayor says police funding needs to increase
West Yorkshire's deputy mayor for policing says the chancellor needs to give forces across the country more money if they are to halve violence against women and girls. Labour's Alison Lowe has been answering questions on Message the Mayor on BBC Radio Leeds. She has also been talking about crossbow laws, tackling anti-social behaviour, and "unacceptable" delays into domestic abuse-related deaths. Read our takeaways from the interview below or listen to the full interview here. "Over the next three years, that is the national deficit for policing - irrespective of the money the government are giving us. And that's because of the cuts that have happened, and the underfunding." Last week, the West Yorkshire's Chief Constable John Robbins signed a letter to The Times, saying years of cuts had left forces overstretched and working in "broken" buildings with "outdated" technology. "I just don't think six months is enough. We should be saying it is a minimum of 12 months, just to manage some of those expectations of the families." The deputy mayor was asked about today's BBC News story, which suggests just 1% of reviews into domestic abuse-related deaths are being completed within six months - the target set by the government. Lowe says the government is creating a new "oversight board", to help speed up the process of reviewing these reports. "I'm hoping they (the government) equate crossbows with guns. So you can't get a crossbow unless you go through a process, you're registered, you're licensed, all the rest of it." Lowe says she doesn't know why anyone would want a crossbow and personally thinks they should be banned altogether - but recognises a "tiny number" of people use them for sport. In April, two people were injured in a crossbow attack along the route of the popular Otley Run pub crawl in Leeds. "West Yorkshire Police have got 60 courses, all age appropriate, from [school] years one to 13. "They teach children about how to stay safe, about how anti-social behaviour can impact them and about how they can become perpetrators or victims." But the deputy mayor says investing in lessons in schools today is a "long-term culture choice", and it could be 10 years before people see big benefits. "It's a huge issue and it does lead to crime in communities, because where you've got a bit of green space that's been desecrated by fly tipping it means more people dump stuff, crime happens, kids start congregating and fires get lit." Concerns have been raised recently that the closure of rubbish tips, in places such as Birstall and Bradford, will lead to more waste being dumped at the side of the road. PM warned more funding needed to halve crime against women Met chief warns anti-crime pledges need funding 'Delayed review into my daughter's killing has left me broken' Pub crawl crossbow attack raises route safety fear Tip closure blamed for rubbish-dumping spike
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What we know about killings near US-Israeli backed Gaza aid site
Over the past three days, there have been a series of deadly incidents on the route to an aid distribution site in Gaza run by a controversial group backed by the US and Israel. The three incidents took place on roads approaching one of the new sites in the extreme south-west of Gaza, which is under full Israeli military control. The facility is being operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The first incident took place early on Sunday morning when 31 Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire, according to the Hamas-run Civil Defence agency. Another three people were killed by gunfire on Monday morning, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Meanwhile, a further 27 people were killed by Israeli fire near the site on Tuesday morning, according to health officials. Israel has denounced what it called "false reports" that its troops fired on civilians at or near the sites. It said that some soldiers fired warning shots on Sunday 1km away, and that they also opened fire after identifying "several suspects" on Monday and Tuesday. Very few videos have emerged from Gaza that show the incidents themselves, but BBC Verify has examined available footage and attempted to map how they unfolded. All three are reported to have taken place near an aid distribution centre in the south-west of Gaza, in the Tal al-Sultan area. The site, named Safe Distribution Site 1 (SDS 1) by the GHF, opened on the 26 May. It is one of four such facilities, three of which are based in southern Gaza. The facilities are part of a new aid system - widely condemned by humanitarian groups - aiming to bypass the UN, which Israel has accused of failing to prevent Hamas diverting aid to its fighters. The UN says that has not been a big problem and that the GHF's system is unworkable and unethical. However, only SDS 1 has been open and operational since Friday, according to official GHF posts online. It follows a chaotic opening week which saw the site overrun by desperate civilians, and projectiles being thrown towards Gazans at another facility at the GHF's northern site near Nuseirat on Thursday. A spokesperson for the foundation did not respond to messages asking why the other facilities have been closed for several days. The GHF has also encouraged civilians to follow a set route when approaching SDS 1, directing them along a coastal road called al-Rashid Street. The instructions have been issued on the foundation's official Facebook page. Chris Newton, a senior analyst at the Brussels-based think tank Crisis Group, said the route was neither "safe nor effective". He added that directing civilians down a single route towards the site was "a very far cry from what was possible" under the UN-based system, which saw 400 distribution points scattered across the strip. "This all looks designed to fail," he said of the new aid system. According to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry, some 31 people were killed by gunfire on Sunday. The GHF posted on its official Facebook page early on Sunday, telling civilians that SDS 1 would be open from 05:00 local time. However, just an hour later it posted again saying that the site was closed. By this time many Gazans had gathered at the Al-Alam roundabout as they waited to be granted access to the site, Mohammed Ghareeb, a journalist based in Rafah, told the BBC. We have seen a limited amount of video that is claimed to relate to the shootings. In one video filmed on the route to the aid site, purportedly on Sunday, people lie on the ground and an explosion is heard. There is a "realistic possibility" this blast sound was a battle tank firing its main armament, says David Heathcote, an intelligence manager with security analysts McKenzie Intelligence, but he adds that "there could be other explanations". Another expert we spoke to said the source of the sound was unclear. An audio recording provided to the BBC by international staff at the UK-Med field hospital about 3km away from the site captured two apparent explosions and protracted gunfire for over five minutes. Video footage posted at 06:08 showed dozens of people lying prone on sand, with automatic gunfire audible. BBC Verify could not definitively geolocate the footage. Another clip reviewed by BBC Verify, which claimed to be from the aftermath of the incident, showed a number of bodies lying on a beach on Gaza's coast. As the video progresses, several of the bodies were covered by white bags. One of those lying on the beach appeared to be a young woman. We cannot definitively geolocate the footage. However, lights seen in the distance suggest that the footage may have been filmed in an area about 1km from SDS 1. Images - provided to the BBC by doctors - of bullets recovered from those killed and wounded in the incidents showed that both 5.56mm and 7.62mm rounds were used. But Benedict Manzin - an analyst with the risk consultancy Sibylline - said that the source of the rounds was unclear, noting that both the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Palestinian armed groups "will have access to weapons that fire 5.56mm and 7.62mm rounds". The IDF denied its troops fired at civilians "near or within" the site and said reports to this effect were false. But an Israeli military source later said warning shots were fired approximately 1km (0.6 miles) away from the site "to prevent suspects from approaching the troops". The GHF said in a statement: "There were no injuries, fatalities or incidents during our operations yesterday. Period. We have yet to see any evidence that there was an attack at or near our facility." On Monday, three people were killed while waiting for food near SDS 1, according to the ICRC. The Israeli military said "warning shots were fired toward several suspects who advanced toward" troops approximately 1km from the site. The Gaza health ministry said at least 27 people were then killed when Israeli forces opened fire near SDS 1 early on Tuesday. Very little footage has emerged purporting to show the moment of the shooting. But one clip posted online showed people running with gunfire audible. BBC Verify geolocated the footage to a road near SDS 1 and established it was newly published on Tuesday although we cannot say for certain it relates to Tuesday's incident. Killings near Gaza aid centre will deepen criticism of Israel's new distribution system How controversial US-Israeli backed Gaza aid plan turned to chaos Gaza aid trucks rushed by desperate and hungry crowds, WFP says Mahmoud Basal, a spokesperson for the Palestinian Civil Defence agency, told the BBC that the incident again occurred a few hundred metres away from the Al-Alam roundabout. He said most of those killed or injured "were hit by gunfire from tanks, helicopters and quadcopter drones". Yasser Abu Lubda, a 50-year-old who has been displaced from Rafah, told the Associated Press (AP) news agency that the shooting began shortly before 04:00 local time. Rasha al-Nahal, another witness, told AP "there was gunfire from all directions". And the ICRC said in a statement that its field hospital in Rafah received "a mass casualty influx of 184 patients". "This includes nineteen cases who were declared dead upon arrival and eight more who died due to their wounds shortly after. The majority of cases suffered gunshot wounds." In a statement, the IDF said approximately 0.5km from the aid distribution site "several suspects" moved towards them. It said troops shot warning fire and when "suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects". It said it was looking into reports of casualties. Responding to Tuesday's incident, the GHF said: "While the aid distribution was conducted safely and without incident at our site today, we understand that IDF is investigating whether a number of civilians were injured after moving beyond the designated safe corridor and into a closed military zone. This was an area well beyond our secure distribution site and operations area." BBC Verify will continue to investigate footage surrounding each of the three incidents. Reporting and verification by Matt Murphy, Mohamed Shalaby, Emma Pengelly, Kay Devlin, Benedict Garman, Joshua Cheetham and Alex Murray. Update: This piece was amended to reflect expert analysis of a blast sound heard in a video. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate? How controversial US-Israeli backed Gaza aid plan turned to chaos At least 27 Palestinians killed by Israeli fire near aid centre, Gaza authorities say UN calls for investigation into killings near Gaza aid distribution site
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘These are not numbers – they are people': what ex-communist Slovenia can teach the world about child poverty
Much of the world doesn't have a clue what to do about child poverty, or even when to do it. In the UK the Labour government recently delayed its flagship policy on tackling the issue until the autumn. But if you're looking for inspiration, it might be worth asking what Slovenia has been getting right. The country has the lowest rates of child poverty in Europe. Why? The glaringly obvious reason is that Slovenia is a very economically equal country. 'The heritage of the social state, from communist times, is still here,' says Marta Gregorčič, a professor at the Institute of Macroeconomic Analysis and Development, which addresses household distress and poverty. However, this is more than a broad-spectrum equality story. There is a deep, stated commitment to eradicating child poverty in Slovenia, and you can read that in various and sometimes counterintuitive ways. There is a national action plan for children across all kinds of metrics: affordable early years care; educational inclusivity, particularly for Roma children; protective measures on mental health; access to housing – which is transparent and prioritised. The country has 'very strong humanitarian and civil organisations,' says Gregorčič, but Slovenians also take as given that it is everyone's job to make sure kids don't get siloed by social class. And then, seeing one of those organisations up close, one driver of the country's success surfaces constantly: they are never satisfied; one child in poverty is too many. The numbers speak for themselves – the amount of children at risk of deprivation in Slovenia is 10.3%, just under half the EU average of 24.4%, according to Eurostat. The UK is no longer included in these figures, but for comparison, a separate Unicef study found that the UK was third from bottom of the OECD in 2021, and that only Turkish and Colombian children were more likely to be living below the poverty line. Slovenia, in that study? Still first. I'm here to visit Zveza Anita Ogulin & ZPM (ZPM for short), a children's charity in the east of Ljubljana, in a set of low-rise municipal buildings on a tidy, grass-banked street whose name translates as Proletarian Road. Doris Rojo, its head of communications, is annoyed that it gets these buildings rent-free from the state, but has to pay rent on the larger site opposite, which houses a community centre and food bank. Rojo refers frequently to the 'socialism that is left from the past', to explain many features of a Slovenian childhood: the custom of cooked meals at school that lots of children don't pay for, for instance, or the idea that kids have a right to a holiday, by the sea or in the mountains, and no one would think of organising a group trip that didn't include a cross-section of social classes. 'This was considered part of life,' Rojo says. 'Everyone went on holiday, at least once a year. The state even owned apartments by the sea, available for workers on reduced terms.' Somehow, capitalism never attained the status of inevitability or modernity in Slovenian policy discourse – just a different way of doing things, that is only sometimes better. When they call a street after the proletariat, they don't mean that in a bad way. 'Social protection policy in Slovenia has always quite strongly supported families and children,' Gregorčič says, noting that female workforce participation has a long history, going back to the second world war. 'All these policies for women in the labour market, all the subsidies for parental leave, I believe contribute to a lower risk of poverty.' She goes on to list these assistances and allowances: 'maternity and paternity leave at 100% pay; the right to reduced working hours; a childbirth grant; breastfeeding breaks; allowances for large families; allowances for childcare if you have children with disabilities; quite a significant child allowance – €115 a month for the first child in low income households'. Policy, history and social cohesion interact in subtle ways. Female workforce participation has also created a tradition of grandparental childcare, but family help is only part of the picture. Peter Wostner, a policy expert at the Institute of Macroeconomic Analysis and Development, describes this geographically. 'We're a very small country, which internally is very diverse. To give you a flavour – there are 33 or 34 regions within Slovenia by which people principally identify themselves – a similar number of different dialects, different cuisines, different everything. Why am I mentioning that? Because of that element of community, the networks within these areas are strong.' Perhaps more generous attitudes created the conditions for a solid social safety net, or perhaps the security creates more generosity, or more likely they're in a feedback loop. Covid triggered a scramble for emergency support common to many European nations, but its aftermath brought on a deeper consideration of the struggles many working families faced here. In 2021, a new child welfare advisory group was formed made up of NGOs, the local Unicef branch and the government-funded Social Protection Institute. Among other things, it consulted 37 children aged 12 to 15 from all over Slovenia, who made proposals on a draft child guarantee action plan. It had fast, concrete results – 13,000 of the most deprived children were guaranteed computer access by 2024 – and the overall finding was that they needed a 'social protection system for the entire family, not only for the child in need within the family. After all, a child is part of a family and shares the same fate as its other members.' Maybe that sounds obvious, that you can't get serious about children's dignity and life chances if you're not also serious about their parents' wages and rents. Economists like Gregorčič will acknowledge the 'strong social protections for families', but she immediately moves on to stubborn pockets of deprivation: 'the migrants, Roma, the homeless, the erased'. (When Slovenia declared independence in 1991, 25,000 people were removed from the registry of permanent residents, thereby losing social and civil rights, and disappearing from the statistics). 'There were 5,000 children among them, and now they are grown up,' Gregorčič continues, 'but it is still a huge problem, the marginalised groups who are missing from the statistics.' The assembled team at ZPM – Rojo, plus Tea Dorić, a social worker, Julija Mišič, the communications lead, and Živa Logar, programme coordinator – also give short shrift to the child-poverty rankings, because the numbers are going in the wrong direction. 'We still have 41,000 children living under the poverty line,' Rojo says, 'and these are not just numbers, they are people.' Slovenia's population is small – two million; if that were scaled up to a UK-sized population, it would equate to 1.5 million kids. In fact, in the UK there are 4.5 million children living in poverty, almost a third. It's almost as if our runaway numbers have washed away our seriousness of purpose. Dorić is technically not a social worker but a social pedagogue – a more holistic form of careworker, concerned with equality and relationships as much as material needs. A lot of European countries practise social pedagogy (Poland, Hungary, Spain, Germany), which if you describe it conceptually sounds kind of: 'Meh, don't we all do that?' You need examples to really get it. Yvalia Febrer, an associate professor of social work at Kingston University, offered this: 'In the UK, you'll get a social worker who will say, 'I'm little Jonny's social worker, I'm not your social worker, even though you're his mum. I'm not interested in your housing issues … I'm just looking at his needs, and whether they're being met. If you're not able to meet them, then that's neglect.' A social pedagogue will say: 'If the problem is housing, let's fix the housing.'' Dorić is the first social pedagogue I've met in real life, and she is everything about that model you would dream of: fierce, imaginative, indefatigable, humane. 'We are trying to say to the wider public, children are not inherently bad. They're amazing, they're so loving and smart, they are doing regular things.' Mišič chimes in: 'Society is bad, not the children. Our parents can't pay the bills, they can't buy food, they can't go on holiday, they are alone.' ZPM started as a charity providing holidays, nearly 70 years ago, but it has expanded its mission to provide a range of services – extra tuition, financial support, therapy, youth groups, food parcels (particularly during Covid) and financial advice. 'It's hard to tell someone how to better manage their finances if you know that they don't have enough. Families will spend a long time walking the line of just about meeting their family's needs, and then one crisis, and the debt keeps on growing. It snowballs,' Mišič says. That collective memory of a socialist past cuts two ways. 'There is a perception that people who are employed cannot be poor. People find it hard to imagine even when it's happening to them,' Mišič continues. Rojo says the stats are lagging the reality: 'But what we are facing really, is that the children we're working with, who are now in poor families, are mainly those where one or both parents work.' Across the road from ZPM, at the youth and community centre, Nuša Lesar, a well-known TV presenter, is running a workshop for teenagers; behind that, there's a food bank, crates of identical flour and supplies, plainly corporately donated; in a third room, I met Vedran Jovanovski, 14, and Tamara Grozden Mirosavlejevič, 11. Vedran is a migrant from North Macedonia; his father is a barber, his mother was a social worker but has to retrain to work in Slovenia. They moved two and a half years ago. His English is excellent, as is his Slovenian. 'For older people, like my mum, it's more difficult. But it's not that hard.' He wants to be an engineer or an architect, and already dresses like one – natty skinny trousers and a blazer. 'We had our own house in Macedonia; my dad had his own barber shop. We had everything, but the situation there is not good,' he says. (The country is politically turbulent and riven with corruption.) 'We didn't come here with friends – we just decided on our own to move and got here, didn't know anything. But we kind of fitted in with people, and with society.' Tamara is quieter. Her mother is a doctor, her father died a few years ago. She loves to dance and teaches younger children traditional Slovenian moves, but both of them come to the children's centre for extra tutoring. She doesn't want to be a doctor because she can't stand the sight of blood, but that's as far as she's got on the career planning, which is fair enough. She's only 11. A core principle of the children's centre, the holidays, the third sector overall, is that kids shouldn't be excluded from anything because of their income or class, whether that's TV workshops or computers or holidays by the sea. In so many ways, the Slovenian story traces that of western democracies everywhere: welfare states have been contracting since the financial crisis. That might show up immediately as a direct impact – Gregorčič describes 'restrictive measures straight after the financial crash, which stopped child allowances being a human right; they became a social right. At that time, childhood poverty rose a lot.' Or it might show up over time as wage erosion and underfunded public services, and that arc would be familiar across a large number of countries. But where Slovenia differs is in the amount of child deprivation it will tolerate. 'We know they are not hungry at school,' Gregorčič says. 'We have free meals in school. We know they are surviving, to say it really harshly. But I, for example, am not proud.' Child poverty isn't the only area where Slovenia ranks high; it's one of the safest countries in the world; it has the third largest share of forests in Europe. 'Five years ago, we started not even comparing ourselves to the EU average [for social health indicators],' Wostner says. 'We benchmark ourselves against the innovators. We're not interested in the US model, we're not interested in the Asian model – we're going in the direction of the social innovation leaders, which is the Nordic model.' I met no one who celebrated having the fewest deprived children in Europe; it seems you can't get this right unless your target figure is zero.
