logo
A nation of shoplifters

A nation of shoplifters

New European28-01-2025

'Or maybe the thieves need padlocks to secure all the stuff they've stolen?', quips one of his workers from the other side of the shop.
Padlocking the padlocks is just one of many measures Mackay has had to take in the wake of fairly relentless attacks by criminals in the last couple of years. He refuses to call them shoplifters. 'It's a word that makes it sound as though it's a lesser crime,' he says firmly. He prefers 'shop theft'.
At first sight, this may look like a genteel ironmonger of the type immortalised by The Two Ronnies ' 'Four Candles' sketch of the 1970s – indeed Ronnie Barker was a customer of Mackay's – selling balls of twine, dustpan and brushes and 3p nuts. But it also sells serious and expensive kit, including £450 drilling machines and £541 ladders.
Power tools were stolen in the most costly recent raid, with £4,000 worth of kit taken from near the front of the shop by a team of three men, who used pliers to cut through the security wiring attaching them to a display stand. 'They probably stole the cutters from us,' Mackay says wryly.
His humour fails him, however, when he explains the financial and wider impact the crimes have on his business.
'They are professional thieves, who are organised and determined. And on average you have to sell another 12 of those items just to make your money back.' That's because profit margins are low in hardware, as in most retail. 'It's just a massive additional cost to business and a huge disincentive to trade in the way we do.'
A lot of stock, even basic screwdrivers, are now security locked to the shelves, other products are stored in closed cabinets, and some of the most expensive items, such as power tools, have been moved to behind a counter. All of this means the traditional experience of wandering around a shop and discovering a great little tool or gadget is fading.
'The whole atmosphere and ambience of what we are offering is diminished. It's very sad,' he says.
Mackay's despair is shared by many shopkeepers up and down Britain – from those running their own corner shops to those in charge of large chains.
A House of Lords inquiry in November found that shoplifting is at 'unacceptable' levels nationally. The crime is vastly under-reported and the problem is so urgent that police forces need to take 'immediate action', the House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee concluded.
How bad is it? The British Retail Consortium is due to release its annual retail crime report on January 30, and the figures are likely to show 'a dramatic worsening on last year', according to a source.
A year ago, it reported the overall cost of retail crime had almost doubled to £3.3bn. This included £1.8bn of goods stolen and £1.2bn spent on crime prevention measures, such as increased security guards, body-worn cameras for staff or reinforced glass around the tills.
Shopkeepers have always had to contend with a bit of stealing – what the trade euphemistically calls 'shrinkage'. But nearly all retail bosses say it has become significantly worse in the last couple of years.
'When we first came here, we had four or five incidents a week, now we're finding it can be as many as four or five incidents a day,' says Benedict Selvaratnam, 40, who has been a shopkeeper for 20 years and has run his family business, Freshfields Market in Croydon, for eight years. It is a classic convenience store selling fresh food, toiletries, household cleaning items and the like. 'What I am facing in Croydon town centre is the worst it's ever been.'
He says violence towards staff is becoming an issue too. 'It's really disheartening – not knowing how bad each day is going to be, not being able to leave staff members running the shop alone.'
He used to employ three staff each shift, but this has now increased to four or five, to increase security. 'We're losing hundreds of pounds a week and thousands of pounds a month, and that's not including the money we've spent on various security measures. We spent £10,000 on security glass around the till area, because we were being jumped.'
That has proved only a partial success. 'About three weeks ago a group of about 10 school kids managed to get their hands behind the security glass and nick a few hundred pounds worth of buzz vapes [disposable ones].'
Another retail euphemism is 'defensive merchandising' – the tactics retail bosses use to deter criminals. At Morrisons there is a 'buzz for booze' button, which customers have to press to unlock high-value spirits; Aldi resorted to putting up signs at some of its stores: 'steaks available by request'.
Similarly, at some outlets the Co-op has taken the £4.50 jars of instant coffee and £2.75 packs of Lurpak spreadable butter off the shelves, replacing them with signs saying: 'If you require any of these products, please ask a member of staff. Sorry for any inconvenience.'
Even more drastic is when you stop selling an item. That's what Selvaratnam has had to do with baby formula. 'Baby formula kept being nicked, so it was just easier for us to de-list it,' he says, using the term for no longer stocking an item. 'It's really sad – if you're a young mum and it's nine o'clock at night and you need baby formula, we have to let her down, unfortunately, because we can't afford to keep it because of the shoplifters.'
What's driving such high levels of shoplifting? The fact that necessities such as butter, coffee and baby formula are being stolen suggests that the cost of living crisis has caused a lot of desperate consumers to resort to crime.
Donald Nairn, 50, the owner of Toys Galore in Edinburgh, say:, 'Saying it's [because of] the cost of living crisis is just a cop-out. It's criminals taking advantage of the police not making it a priority. They've worked out that it's an easy way to make money. Toys Galore is an old-school toy shop in Morningside that has been targeted a couple of times in recent months, with one incident just before Christmas involving the manager being attacked, leaving her with bruises.
'It's definitely got worse in the last six months or so; it used to be quite trivial – junkies stealing to get their next fix, but now it's far more organised.'
His view that organised gangs are behind a lot of the crime is backed up by experts. Prof Emmeline Taylor, professor of criminology at City St George's, says: 'We now have completely brazen thieves. They're not trying to hide things in their pockets. They're walking out with a trolley full of goods.'
Taylor spent time with offenders to find out more about their methods and motives. 'The criminals run it like a business. At the moment it is a low-risk, high-reward enterprise. Once it goes back to being high-risk, low-reward, they'll go back to stealing freight, counterfeit tobacco and the like.'
The reason it is low-risk is that the police are just not interested, according to shopkeepers. 'They don't attend 70%, 75% of the incidents when you call them,' says Selvaratnam.
Back in 2023, the Co-op submitted Freedom of Information requests to all police forces. Two-thirds of forces replied, and the information revealed that in 71% of cases where police were called to a store, they did not respond.
'And, when you are being confronted by someone possibly violent, you can't necessarily get on the phone to the police, who may or may not come. It's just not practical. It's just not worth the time and the effort,' Selvaratnam continues.
And the reason it is high reward is because criminals can offload their stolen goods more easily than ever. 'It used to be the case that they would go down the local pub with a bin bag, or sell it at a car boot or market stall. But there are now far more digital avenues,' explains Taylor. 'If someone is selling five packets of Persil washing powder on Facebook Marketplace or eBay, I think you can be fairly certain that's stolen goods.'
When it comes to fresh food, such as cheese and steaks, these are often sold to unscrupulous retailers or restaurants prepared to turn a blind eye in order to source cheap stock. She adds that most thieves can receive one-third to a half of the retail price for any item, depending on the quantity they have.
Taylor says that though the bulk of crime is being committed by gangs, there is a lot by individuals stealing to fund their drug habits.
'One offender I spoke to needs £500 every day just to fund his habit,' says Taylor. 'If he's getting just one-third of the retail price, that means he needs to steal £1,500 of goods. If you think about this happening up and down the country, that's an eye-watering sum of money.'
Those with substance abuse addictions tend not to use a 'fence' to sell their goods. 'There's a woman I have come across who takes in stock at the back door of her flat and sells it out the front door. In some cases, the thieves stay with her and the rent she charges is stolen goods,' she adds.
The rise of middle-class thieves plays a role too, thanks to the prevalence of self-scan tills in shops. 'People use ideological justifications – 'I'm not paid to work in Sainsbury's, so why am I doing this checkout that somebody used to get paid for?'' Taylor explains.
'What's really interesting is that there's been a shift: it used to be shameful if you'd stolen a bottle of olive oil from Sainsbury's. That's certainly not something you would ever tell your friends or family about. But it's almost become a bit of a sport – 'you won't believe how I put some salmon through as bananas!' There's a certain pleasure that's derived from it. As criminologists, we know that a lot of crime is done through that sort of pleasure-seeking, voluntary risk-taking.'
One in eight adults (13%) said they had selected a cheaper item on a self-service till than the one they were buying, according to a recent poll conducted by Ipsos.
Regardless of the type of thief, all retailers point to a failure by police to take the crime seriously enough. Part of the problem is that following the 2014 Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, shoplifting was, in effect, downgraded. Any offence where the items were valued at less than £200 would be tried in a magistrates court with the punishment liable to be, at most, a fine.
Andrew Goodacre is the chief executive of the British Independent Retailers Association (Bira). 'Why have we got this industrial scale of stuff going on? The mixture of the lack of police and then the lack of prosecution. It has made it look like an easy crime,' he says.
Stuart Rose, the chairman of Asda and former chief executive of Marks & Spencer, said in an interview last year that shoplifting had become virtually decriminalised.
'The authorities just do not take shoplifting seriously. Forty years ago when I was a manager at Marks & Spencer Marble Arch, the police would turn up. Now they don't even answer the telephone.'
The new government announced that it intended to reverse this £200 rule in the King's Speech last year. In November, the policing minister, Diana Johnson, confirmed the move: 'It is simply not right to leave business and retail workers at the mercy of criminals. We will therefore remove the £200 threshold and treat shoplifting with the seriousness that it deserves.'
At his shop in Cambridge, Neil Mackay is dubious this will help. 'The last three home secretaries have all said the same thing. It doesn't change the fact that the local priorities are set by the local police and crime commissioner.'
Some police forces have started to invest time and resources in tackling shoplifting, notably in Sussex, where the police and crime commissioner, Katy Bourne, has insisted retail crime is worth taking seriously. 'My view is that shoplifting is a gateway crime. Pretty much every criminal starts somewhere, and they usually start shoplifting,' she says. 'If you don't tackle it at source, when it starts to happen, it will increase.'
Even an 85p Mars Bar? Yes, she insists. 'It comes with fear for the shopkeeper, for the shop worker, for the members of the public who have witnessed it. On the other side of the coin, for the person who has stolen, if they don't get challenged, if they don't get reported, they get more emboldened, and that forces them on to more criminality.'
One of her solutions has been to make it far easier for shopkeepers to report shoplifting, by using a secure messaging system, similar to WhatsApp, which allows retailers to upload CCTV pictures. 'We've taken it down from being half an hour to literally taking them two minutes to do. It's almost at the touch of a button. It goes straight into police systems. There's the report done, then get back to work.'
The downside of making it easier to report, she acknowledges, is that crime figures will go up. But she says she's relaxed about that as long as the police can then focus their efforts on catching the serious and repeat offenders.
She was also instrumental in setting up Operation Pegasus, a scheme initially funded by a group of big retailers including Tesco, Primark, Aldi, B&Q and Co-op, which has tried to crack down on the worst of organised criminal gangs – defined as those working across different police forces.
It started operating in the summer of 2024 and involved retailers and police liaising more closely, sharing CCTV footage and analysing data. It has had some early successes, with 93 offenders arrested. So far, 32 of the 93 arrested offenders have appeared in court, and five have been deported.
'I'm delighted,' says Bourne. 'It's absolutely making a difference. We've seen that with the number of arrests coming through.'
It is also proof that with a concerted effort some criminals, at least, can be stopped. But without further serious improvements many retailers say the depressed state of the high street is only going to get worse.
'I really worry for the next generation of entrepreneurs and businessmen and women who want to open a shop,' says Selvaratnam. 'Why would they take on a business on the high street, with all the costs of business rates, rents, when they have to physically protect their stock and man their doors because the police may not come when people brazenly come in to steal their stock. Why would you take on that aggro?'
Indeed, Donald Nairn who runs the toy shop in Edinburgh is questioning whether he will renew his lease when it comes up for renewal. 'It does suck the fun out of it. It means you have to treat everyone who comes into your shop as a potential criminal. And that's horrible.'
Harry Wallop is a journalist, broadcaster and author

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain's debt is a threat to national security
Britain's debt is a threat to national security

Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Telegraph

Britain's debt is a threat to national security

Our sky high debt is a threat to our national security. This year, the cost of servicing our debt will be almost double what we are spending on defence. And in today's turbulent world, the fiscal buffer to cushion us from shocks is paper thin. The smallest tap could shatter our economic credibility. The Prime Minister has made defence and security the organising principle of his government. Given that, putting our debt on a downward path should be his government's priority. It isn't. Debt will be higher at the end of the Parliament than today. And with global government debt already around $100 trillion, and Donald Trump about to increase that by a further $2.4 trillion, who will buy our debt – and at what price? Last year, the cross-party House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee raised a red flag that UK debt risks becoming unsustainable unless tough decisions are taken in this Parliament. We set out a choice: taxes would have to rise, or the state would have to do less. Being cross-party, we did not opine on which option was best. The Government has taken tough decisions – but in my mind the wrong ones. Taxes are rising to record highs. The Chancellor said last year that her strategy would deliver growth, and that she would not come back for more tax. But the growth forecast has been halved, and further tax hikes are on the cards. Meanwhile, pressure to spend more on defence is going to increase. At the upcoming Nato summit, nations are likely to be asked to commit to spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence – double Labour's current commitment. So what is to be done? We need to confront the other option: the state should do less. The Government rightly says that the relentless rise in welfare spending is 'unsustainable'. Spending on disability and incapacity benefits alone is more than on defence. But having announced that action would be taken to curb the growth in the welfare budget, the Prime Minister is now blinking in the face of opposition. The Government – and the nation – cannot afford ministers losing their nerve to keep a lid on spending. The bond vigilantes have saddled up and are on the prowl. Nor can the Chancellor tax her way out of the debt quagmire: to do so would risk us entering into a doom loop of ever lower growth and ever higher debt. If defence and security is the organising principle of government, the Chancellor must set out a credible plan to stop debt's relentless rise and bring it down from today's giddying heights. Not doing so risks economic catastrophe – and our national security.

UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI
UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI

The Guardian

time2 days ago

  • The Guardian

UK government signals it will not force tech firms to disclose how they train AI

Campaigners have accused ministers of lying to parliament and the creative industries after the government signalled it would not force AI companies to disclose how they train their models. Ministers are holding firm in a standoff with the House of Lords, which has called for artists to be offered immediate copyright protection against artificial intelligence companies. Peers voted by 221 to 116 on Wednesday to insist on an amendment to the data bill that would force AI firms to be transparent about what copyrighted material they use to train their models. In an amendment tabled on Friday, the government dismissed the Lords' request and reiterated its promise to publish an economic impact assessment and technical reports on the future of AI and copyright regulation. Beeban Kidron, the cross-bench peer and film director who has campaigned on behalf of the industry, said during Wednesday's debate that she would 'accept anything that the Commons does' after this week. 'I will not stand in front of your Lordships again and press our case,' she said. But the News Media Association (NMA), which represents publishers including the Guardian, said peers could table further amendments to the data bill when it returns to the Lords next Wednesday. Industry figures said the government was acting in bad faith by not addressing the Lords' concerns and called for it to make further amendments of its own before MPs vote on it on Tuesday. Kidron said: 'The government has repeatedly taken all protections for UK copyrights holders out of the data bill. In doing so they have shafted the creative industries, and they have proved willing to decimate the UK's second biggest industrial sector. They have lied to parliament, and they are lying to the sector.' She said the government's action 'adds another sector to the growing number that have an unbridgeable gap of trust with the government'. Owen Meredith, chief executive of the NMA, said: 'the government's refusal to listen to the strong view of the Lords … risks undermining the legislative process. 'There is still time for the government to do the right thing, and take transparency powers in this bill. This would be a key step towards rebuilding trust with a £126bn industry.' Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The government's approach to copyright has drawn the ire of major creative artists and organisations including Paul McCartney, Kate Bush and the National Theatre, with Elton John describing the situation as an 'existential issue' this week. Opponents of the plans have warned that even if the attempts to insert clauses into the data bill fail, the government could be challenged in the courts over the proposed changes. The consultation on copyright changes, which is due to produce its findings before the end of the year, contains four options: to let AI companies use copyrighted work without permission, alongside an option for artists to 'opt out' of the process; to leave the situation unchanged; to require AI companies to seek licences for using copyrighted work; and to allow AI firms to use copyrighted work with no opt-out for creative companies and individuals. Kyle has said the copyright-waiver-plus-opt-out scenario is no longer the government's preferred option, but Kidron's amendments have attempted to head off that option by effectively requiring tech companies to seek licensing deals for any content that they use to train their AI models.

Prison sentences with no release date branded 'inhumane' 20 years after being introduced
Prison sentences with no release date branded 'inhumane' 20 years after being introduced

ITV News

time2 days ago

  • ITV News

Prison sentences with no release date branded 'inhumane' 20 years after being introduced

A prison sentence which allows offenders to be incarcerated indefinitely has been branded "inhumane". Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences were introduced in 2005 before being scrapped in 2012. However, the orders were not revoked retrospectively, meaning that two decades since being brought in, thousands of people across the UK are still subject to their conditions. The sentences were initially intended to be handed to the most serious offenders whose crimes did not warrant a life sentence, with the view that they would only be released once re-habilitated. But once released from custody, offenders remain on licence for an indefinite period meaning they can be recalled at any time, often for behaviour which is not deemed criminal. Now, as a bill to allow re-sentencing of all IPP offenders progresses through the House of Lords, people who are living with IPP conditions have said they are the equivalent to a life sentence. Shaun Lloyd was originally sentenced to two and a half years in prison in 2005 after stealing a mobile phone, but spent nine consecutive years behind bars. He is now currently back in prison after being recalled on his IPP in March 2024. Shirley Debon, Shaun's mother, says behaviour linked to his drug addiction - which he developed in prison - has seen him recalled four times. She says he has now spent 14 years behind bars, Shirley is now campaigning for all prisoners still serving an IPP to be re-sentenced. "I don't condone what these people have done, they deserved prison," she said. "But this IPP sentence it's indeterminate, it's got no date of release. Murderers don't get that long. "It's not fair, it is inhumane, and it is killing people. It's killing prisoners, some family members are dying because of the stress of it." She says Shaun has missed out on large parts of his life due to multiple re-calls. "He would have been out in two and a half years, he would have been working, settled down, everything would have been so different," Shirley added. Meanwhile, Michael Roberts, from Barry, was convicted of armed robbery in 2006 and sentenced to more than three years in prison and given an IPP sentence. He served five years before he was released, and has been recalled several times since for minor offences - some of which he says he was later found not guilty of. "I'm scared to walk around my town because it only takes one phone call, and whether I've done anything wrong or not, the moment that allegation is raised I'm back in prison waiting for them to do their homework to work out if I actually did anything wrong or not," he said. While he acknowledges the seriousness of his initial crime, he says his IPP sentence has made it impossible for him to move on and be fully rehabilitated. "I've done my time for the offence I committed, I've done the punitive part, I had my punishment," he said. "I'm trying to make up for the things I've done wrong, I'm trying to rebuild with everybody I've done wrong to, I'm trying to be a better person, at what point do I stop getting flogged?" What are IPP sentences? Following criticism of over and incorrect use - including a European Court of Human Rights ruling that the sentences were unlawful - IPPs were abolished in 2012. In total, between 2005 and 2012, courts in Wales and England imposed a total of 8,711 IPP sentences. At the beginning of 2024, more than 150 Welsh prisoners were still subject to IPPs. As of March 31, 2025, Ministry of Justice figures show the number of 'unreleased' IPP prisoners fell by 14% to 1,012 across Wales and England compared to the previous year. More than two thirds of the 'unreleased' IPP prisoners who have served their minimum tariff period have been held for at least 10 years beyond the end of their tariff. In the year to March 31, 2024, the number of 'recalled' IPP prisoners had decreased by 5% to 1,532. Changes were introduced by the UK Government in November 2024 which meant that prisoners who have served their custodial sentence can now apply to have their licence terminated after three years in the community without re-call. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'It is right that IPP sentences were abolished. We are determined to make progress towards safe and sustainable releases for those in prison, but not in a way that undermines public protection.' Lord David Blunkett who was Home Secretary when IPP sentences were introduced, has been calling for a reform of the sentences. He has previously said it was one of the biggest regrets of his time in government. Lord Blunkett said: 'Whilst parliament agreed to the imprisonment for public protection sentence all those years ago without dissent, no one – including me - envisaged that prisoners would be held for so long, and have such difficulty in gaining agreement to the Parole Board releasing them back into the community. That is why a group of peers have been working with a range of charities and organisations to make real progress including legislation, this time last year, which has seen 1,800 former prisoners have their license conditions lifted. 'In just over two weeks' time, a report sponsored by the Howard League for Penal Reform, and led by a former Supreme Court Judge, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, will make further recommendations on progress for those who have never been released, and I look forward to working with all those of goodwill to finding a way which will both rehabilitate those offenders, and protect the community.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store