US vetoes UN resolution demanding immediate Gaza ceasefire
The
United States
vetoed a
United Nations
(UN) Security Council resolution demanding an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the
Gaza Strip
, the release of all hostages and the resumption of
full-scale humanitarian aid
deliveries to the enclave on Wednesday.
Ten non-permanent members of the 15-seat council had put forth the resolution for a vote. It was the first time since president
Donald Trump
took office that the council had considered a ceasefire resolution on the
Israel
-Hamas war in Gaza.
The US was the only member to vote against the measure; the other 14 members of the council, including Russia, voted in favour, highlighting Washington's isolation on the global stage over its policy of unconditional support of Israel.
'We believe this text reflects the consensus shared by all council members that the war in Gaza has to come to an immediate halt, all hostages must be immediately and unconditionally released, and civilians in Gaza must not starve and must have full and unimpeded access to aid,' said a joint statement from the 10 non-permanent members, which was read by Slovenia's ambassador to the UN, Samuel Zbogar, at the council meeting before the vote.
READ MORE
[
Gaza aid group halts distribution due to civilian safety concerns after dozens killed seeking aid
Opens in new window
]
To be adopted, Security Council resolution must receive nine votes in favour and no vetoes from the five permanent members: Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States. Since the war broke out after the October 7th, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel, the US has vetoed four council resolutions calling for a ceasefire and has abstained from one, allowing it to pass, last June.
Dorothy Camille Shea, the interim US representative at the UN, repeated Washington's message that Israel had the right to defend itself. She blamed Hamas for the suffering of Palestinians, saying the war would end if the group surrendered.
'Any product that undermines our close ally Israel's security is a non-starter,' Ms Shea said, explaining the 'no' vote.
Diplomats at the UN have watched in fury and frustration as the humanitarian situation in Gaza has deteriorated to levels where children are starving. Since March, Israel had enforced a ban on all aid delivery into the territory, facing global backlash and accusations that its army was committing war crimes by weaponising food and essential aid.
Israel justified blocking aid deliveries by claiming that Hamas hijacks them and has denied international assessments that Palestinians are on the brink of famine.
[
Liam Cunningham says Government is 'siding with warmongers' as he endorses Irish neutrality campaign
Opens in new window
]
Council members have also been frustrated at the United States for blocking the body from acting in a deadly war that has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, many of them women and children, said Gaza officials, whose numbers do not distinguish between combatants and civilians. Unicef said this week that 50,000 children had been killed or injured in Gaza since the war began.
The council members say, publicly and privately, that the United States is standing in the way of the will of the majority of the member states at the UN
'Today, the elected members of the council have stood with clarity, with conviction, with courage – they are the proud bearer of moral legitimacy,' said Algeria's ambassador to the UN, Amar Bendjama, the only Arab representative in the council. He said the resolution was not 'the voice of the few, but the collective will of the entire world '.
Israel's ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, told reporters before the council meeting Wednesday that the resolution 'doesn't advance humanitarian relief – it undermines it.' He said , 'It ignores a working system in favour of political agendas.'
A new US-Israeli backed effort to control and distribute limited aid in Gaza through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation was suspended Wednesday, after a week of chaos and deadly violence.
Gaza officials said that on June 1st, Israeli soldiers shot and killed more than 20 Palestinians standing in line to receive aid. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots toward 'suspects' who approached them.
On Tuesday, at least 27 people were killed as Palestinians walked toward a new food distribution site in southern Gaza, Gaza health officials said. Israel said its forces had fired near 'a few' people who had strayed from the route to the site and did not respond to warning shots.
The UN has called for an independent investigation into the killings and has denounced this aid-distribution effort, saying that it violates international laws protecting the unhindered flow of aid and access for aid agencies in conflict zones.
'The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat,' the UN's top humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, said on Wednesday. 'We must be allowed to do our jobs. We have the teams, the plan, the supplies and the experience.'
The Trump administration has been trying without success to mediate a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. This week, Hamas – which has said it is willing to free the Israeli and foreign captives in Gaza as part of a broader deal – rejected the American plan, demanding guarantees for a permanent end to the war. – This article originally appeared in
The New York Times
.
2025 The New York Times Company
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘Big, beautiful break-up': Washington insiders' view of falling out between Donald Trump and Elon Musk
Just in time for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's visit to Washington, Democrats enjoyed a healthy helping of schadenfreude as President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's feud went nuclear in real time.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Ireland added to ‘monitoring list' of countries watched closely around US dollar manipulation
No major US trading partner manipulated its currency in 2024, the Treasury Department said on Thursday in the first semi-annual currency report of President Donald Trump's new administration, although its "monitoring list" of countries warranting close attention grew to nine with the addition of Ireland and Switzerland. Countries that meet two of the criteria - a trade surplus with the US of at least $15 billion, a global account surplus above 3pc of GDP and persistent, one-way net foreign exchange purchases - are automatically added to the list. Ireland and Switzerland were added due to their large trade and current account surpluses with the US. The Swiss National Bank on Friday denied being a currency manipulator, but said it would continue to act in Switzerland's interests as the strong Swiss franc helped push inflation into negative terrain last month. "The SNB does not engage in any manipulation of the Swiss franc," it said. "It does not seek to prevent adjustments in the balance of trade or to gain unfair competitive advantages for the Swiss economy." Treasury said China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Vietnam, Germany, Ireland and Switzerland were on its monitoring list for extra foreign exchange scrutiny. While it did not label China a currency manipulator for now despite "depreciation pressure" facing its currency, the yuan, Treasury issued a stern warning to China, saying it "stands out among our major trading partners in its lack of transparency around its exchange rate policies and practices." "This lack of transparency will not preclude Treasury from designating China if available evidence suggests that it is intervening through formal or informal channels to resist (yuan) appreciation in the future," Treasury said in a statement. Trump in his first term labelled China a manipulator in August 2019, a move made then - as now - amid heightened US-China trade tensions. The Treasury Department dropped the designation in January 2020 as Chinese officials arrived in Washington to sign a trade deal with the US. Thursday's report was released hours after Trump spoke with China's leader Xi Jinping for the first time since returning to the White House amid an even more tense trade standoff between the world's two largest economies, and more recently a battle over critical minerals. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. The latest report covers the final full year of the administration of Trump's predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, who over his four-year term never labelled any trading partner a currency manipulator but raised similar concerns over China's behaviour and lack of transparency. Last year was marked generally by broad-based dollar strengthening, with the greenback gaining 7pc in 2024 against a basket of major trading partners' currencies. That dynamic made it less likely that Treasury would find evidence of consistent one-way actions by countries to weaken their currencies for competitive advantage, since most currencies were broadly weakening anyway, Treasury officials said. That could change over the course of this year, with the dollar already down by roughly 9pc since Trump returned to the White House and launched a trade war that has global investors rethinking their commitments to US assets. In the current environment, it might be more tempting for countries to step in to try to prevent or reverse the continued strengthening of their currencies, and Treasury officials said they would be watching closely for such behaviour. In the case of China more specifically, Treasury officials said they were looking at broadening their surveillance to include monitoring of the activities of sovereign wealth and state pension funds for any indication these entities were acting on Beijing's behest in the foreign exchange market. They said there was no current evidence of that but it had been a tactic used by others in the past.
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
US judge blocks Trump's latest ban on foreign students at Harvard
A US JUDGE has put a temporary stay on Donald Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, as the US president's battle with one of the world's most prestigious universities intensified. A proclamation issued by the White House late Wednesday sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. 'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' the order said. Harvard quickly amended an existing complaint filed in federal court, saying: 'This is not the Administration's first attempt to sever Harvard from its international students.' '(It) is part of a concerted and escalating campaign of retaliation by the government in clear retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students.' Advertisement US District Judge Allison Burroughs ruled the government cannot enforce Trump's proclamation. Harvard had showed, she said, that without a temporary restraining order, it risked sustaining 'immediate and irreparable injury before there is an opportunity to hear from all parties.' The same judge had already blocked Trump's earlier effort to bar international students from enrolling at the storied university. 'Government vendetta' The government already cut around $3.2 billion (€2.7 billion) of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.' Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who accounted for 27% of total enrollment in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. In its filing, Harvard acknowledged that Trump had the authority to bar an entire class of aliens if it was deemed to be in the public interest, but stressed that was not the case in this action. Related Reads Harvard University sues Trump administration to stop federal funding freeze Trump threatens to strip Harvard's tax-exempt status after freezing university's funding Harvard University hit with $2.2 billion funding freeze after rejecting Trump's demands 'The President's actions thus are not undertaken to protect the 'interests of the United States' but instead to pursue a government vendetta against Harvard,' it said. Since returning to office Trump has targeted elite US universities which he and his allies accuse of being hotbeds of anti-Semitism, liberal bias and 'woke' ideology. Trump's education secretary also threatened to strip Columbia University of its accreditation. The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt. Unlike Harvard, several top institutions – including Columbia – have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration. © AFP 2025
