Cocaine the main drug in almost 40% of addiction treatment cases last year
COCAINE WAS THE main drug in almost 40% of cases of treatment for problem drug use last year, according to a report by the Health Research Board (HRB).
There was a record figure of 13,295 cases treated for problem drug use in 2024.
The data published in the National Drug Treatment Reporting System (NDTRS) by the HRB shows an upward trend in treatment cases, up 50% since the National Drugs Strategy began in 2017.
The data shows that the demand for drug treatment is across all regions of the country, all age groups, men and women, people with and without children, and those who are unemployed as well those with jobs.
There was an increase of 7.4% in the number of cases where cocaine was the main drug, now accounting for 39.8% of all cases.
There was also an increase of 21% in the number of cases where benzodiazepines were the main drug, up to 13.4% of all cases.
Advertisement
There was an increase of 4.1% in people using more than one drug at the same time, up to 60% of all cases.
There was also a decrease in the number of cases where opioids were the main drug, down to 25% of all cases.
Minister of State at the Department of Health Jennifer Murnane O'Connor said, 'This report provides clear evidence of the importance of a health-led approach to drug use.
'We have to face up to the wide prevalence of problem drug use across society and provide appropriate services to meet the health and social needs of the diverse population groups who use drugs.'
The government's approach to drug use became a contentious political issue in the last general election campaign.
Fine Gael leader Simon Harris criticised Fianna Fáil's proposal to decriminalise personal drug use, despite the findings of a cross-party citizen's assembly on the issue and
Fine Gael's own record on drugs.
With reporting from Press Association
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
18 hours ago
- Irish Times
Commitment to climate action hard to find in Government
The programme for government by this Fianna Fáil - Fine Gael Coalition may have been written this year but, from a climate perspective, it could be a document from a decade ago. A simple comparison with the 2020 document gives a striking contrast. Cycling and bikes were mentioned in that document almost 50 times; this time it's down to 11 and most of them relate to tourist greenways or the bike-to-work scheme, both long-established policies. The references to forestry , woodlands and afforestation have fallen from 50 to 11; there are absolutely no mentions of peatlands, bogs and rewetting, compared to 10 in 2020. The word 'sustainable' is used 46 times in the document, compared to 75 five years ago. READ MORE Professor Diarmuid Torney: 'It is hard to see how these targets are going to be met' 'There is a lot of aspiration but little by way of concrete details of how we are going to meet our targets,' said Professor Diarmuid Torney, director of the DCU Centre for Climate and Society. 'The programme recommits to the big-picture targets, but if you start to drill into the detail of the different areas, it is hard to see how those targets are going to be met. 'And that's against the backdrop of EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] projections that the State is on track to get a little over halfway to the 2030 target,' he said. The EPA report, published last week, made for stark reading. The main conclusion of the report was that, with all existing measures, Ireland is projected to achieve a reduction of up to 23 per cent in total greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, compared to a national target of 51 per cent. [ Ireland has a dismal amount of tree cover but 'wild' is partly between our ears Opens in new window ] Most sectors are on track to reduce emissions, including agriculture, which has reversed years of growing emissions. A reduction in nitrogen fertiliser use, better spreading technologies and liming programmes – to improve the overall health of soil – have contributed. There are some worrying outliers. Total emissions from the land sector are projected to increase by up to 95 per cent, the report found. Ireland's forestry is reaching harvesting age and will move from being a carbon sink to being a carbon source. To counter that there will be a need for increased afforestation, water table management on agricultural organic soils and peatland rehabilitation. But when the programme for government is scanned it is hard to see a tangible commitment to achieve that. To the dismay of environmentalists, Kerry TD Michael Healy-Rae, who wants to allow forestry on peatlands, was appointed Minister of State for Forestry. However, it's too early in his tenure to make any conclusions on what he will, or won't, do. The focus has pivoted to policies that will increase emissions, such as increasing the number of data centres, investing in roads, lifting the passenger cap The programme commits to the overall target of reducing emissions by 51 per cent by 2030 compared to 2018 levels and all the other high-level targets. They include 22 gigawatts (GW) from wind and solar energy: that's enough to power the entire State, accommodate new data centres and generate a surplus. But many of the targets of the 2020 document have disappeared. Unlike the last government, there is no commitment to a two to one ratio for public transport over roads, or a 20 per cent ring-fencing of the total transport capital budget to cycling and walking – some €360 million a year. Rewetting peatlands is gone from the programme for government. Photograph: Getty Images Rewetting peatlands, which stops the decomposition of peat and prevents harmful carbon emissions, is gone. Two pages on forestry in 2020 have been reduced to two paragraphs. However, it's not a total abandonment. The focus has pivoted to policies that will increase emissions, such as increasing the number of data centres, investing in roads, lifting the passenger cap in Dublin Airport, retaining the nitrates directive derogation, and a campaign to remove biogenic methane (emitted from ruminant livestock) from emissions calculations. 'If we were to take our commitments seriously, that would mean a significant ramping up of implementation, but also new policies and measures, and it's hard to find those in the programme for government,' said Torney. 'Reducing transport emissions is probably the most difficult because we have such an ingrained car dominance in our system' Last week, the secretary general of the Department of Environment, Climate and Energy Oonagh Buckley said that given the capacity of the grid, policymakers faced a stark choice between housing and artificial intelligence/data centres. Taoiseach Micheál Martin later took issue with the comments. 'I was at the event where she said that,' said Prof Torney. 'Statistics were shared [at that event] that 50 per cent of electricity generated in the Dublin region is now being consumed by data centres. I'm not sure that the average member of the public knows that.' The base point for the EPA projections is the performance of the last government rather than this one. That government did manage to achieve a 7 per cent reduction in overall emissions in 2023 but it was always known the hard slog would be in the last five years. Former leader of the Green Party Eamon Ryan. Photograph: Alan Betson/The Irish Times For former Green Party leader Eamon Ryan, some of the first gestures of the new Government did not bode well for climate action, such as its decision on a LNG [liquefied natural gas] storage facility, an emphasis on data centres and what he says is the lure of the 'smell of tar'. 'Reducing transport emissions is probably the most difficult because we have such an ingrained car dominance in our system,' said Ryan. 'The Bus Connects project is starting in Dublin but it really needs to accelerate. There's starting with two but we need them to start in groups of four. 'The same in Cork, Galway, Waterford and Limerick. We need them at speed and at scale. I don't see that happening.' Ryan claims the figures show the last government in which he was minister for the environment and climate 'delivered in the last five years'. 'Part of the reason is because the Greens were in government. The difficulty is that political science trumps climate science. 'What we did wasn't [electorally] successful for us ... political science is maybe telling this Government it shouldn't push so hard because of the [electoral] consequences.' Minister for Climate, Environment and Energy, Darragh O'Brien. Photograph: Conor Ó Mearáin/Collins Photo Agency Minister for Environment, Climate and Energy Darragh O'Brien has acknowledged that delivery must be accelerated to meet the 2030 targets. He points to 'significant investment' such as a €2.5 billion grid-upgrade programme, new interconnectors to the UK and France and the expansion of renewables through further support schemes for offshore wind and other renewable energy sources. The 2030 target for electric vehicles (EVs) is 945,000. At present the number is 125,000. O'Brien says after a dip the numbers are back on track with a 23 per cent leap in sales in April. Figures from the Society of the Irish Motor Industry (SIMI) on Tuesday showed this increase was sustained in May with 12,392 new EVs being registered in the first five months of the year. [ EV Q&A: Why doesn't Ireland use roadside furniture for charging electric vehicles? Opens in new window ] 'The first meeting of the new Climate Action Programme Board was held last week, involving senior officials from all the main sectors. Its remit is clear: to focus on accelerated delivery of the actions needed to close the emissions gap,' he said. But objectively, the task facing O'Brien and the Government is daunting and will need radical policy changes if Ireland has any hope of coming close to reaching the targets. Professor Hannah Daly: 'You're talking about an increase in emissions in agriculture and almost a doubling of emissions from land use change by 2030' Hannah Daly, professor in sustainable energy and energy systems modelling at University College Cork, has said that even if all the current measures were implemented the gap could still be much bigger than is commonly spoken about. 'It's really alarming. You're talking about an increase in emissions in agriculture and almost a doubling of emissions from land use change by 2030 with existing, actual implemented policies, rather than the ones that are just spoken about,' she said. The programme for government contains strong language on commitments to phase out fossil fuel use, carbon budgets and the 2030 target, she said. 'But while you have this high-level commitment on paper it does not actually commit to the hard choices that are necessary,' she said. 'There's very little on agriculture as well. What's needed to fill that gap is just far more investment in clean energy transition and a halt in the support for the growth of carbon intensive industries.' This means a focus on dairy farming, flights at Dublin Airport and data centres, she said.
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Over 11,000 people diagnosed with skin cancer in Ireland every year – calls for free sunscreen in all schools and public buildings
Over 11,000 people are diagnosed with skin cancer in Ireland every year and projections from the National Skin Cancer Prevention Plan 2023-2026 has predicted that cases of melanoma will double by 2045 particularly among men. In 2022, research conducted on behalf of the Irish Cancer Society found that just a third of Irish people apply sunscreen regularly, and nearly one in seven of us never wear it in Ireland. The issue was debated at a recent full council meeting after Fine Gael councillor Aileen Browne brought forward a motion urging Cork County Council to install free sunscreen dispensers in all Council offices and libraries. The motion also requested Cork County Council to write to the Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill seeking dedicated national funding to provide sunscreen dispensers in public buildings across Ireland, including schools and third-level institutions. Cllr Browne said the move is both practical and essential in light of the growing skin cancer crisis in Ireland. 'Over 11,000 people are diagnosed with skin cancer in Ireland every year, and tragically, most of those cases are preventable. This motion is about normalising the use of sunscreen, just like we normalised hand sanitiser during Covid. It's a small change that could make a huge difference.' Ms Browne cited alarming projections from the National Skin Cancer Prevention Plan 2023–2026, which forecasts a doubling of melanoma cases by 2045, particularly among men. 'With fair skin being the most common skin type in Ireland, UV protection is more important than ever even on cloudy days. People often assume that sunscreen is only for hot, sunny countries, but in Ireland, UV rays still penetrate through cloud, and they still cause damage. This is not just a seasonal issue, it's a public health issue." The motion also emphasised the cost-effectiveness of prevention, noting that while treating advanced melanoma can cost over €122,000 per case, early prevention costs just a fraction of that. 'We can't afford for more diagnoses or more suffering,' said Cllr Browne. 'This initiative is not only about saving lives, it's also about saving our health service money. Our communities deserve visible, accessible tools to stay safe in the sun. We care about people's health, and we're ready to act. 'This is a simple step we can take right now and I sincerely hope the Minister for Health will join me in making it a national priority,' she added. The motion was seconded by Independent councillor Ben Dalton O'Sullivan who said skin cancer is very prominent and unfortunately cases are on the increase. Fianna Fáil councillor Gearóid Murphy praised the motion for being practical and sensible. 'We live in a country which often has very changeable weather. It would be a good idea to try and roll this out on a national basis.' Fine Gael councillor Kate Lynch emphasised the importance of normalising the use of sunscreen. 'By installing this in schools we are making it part and parcel of a daily routine. We need to normalise kids putting on their own sunscreen. I don't think we realise the seriousness of it until it actually knock on your door and someone is diagnosed with skin cancer. The solution can be fairly simple. Protect ourselves rather than having to deal with the actual cancer itself.' Social Democrats councillor Ann Bambury said: 'Having four young children I know how significant it is to ensure they are fully protected with sunscreen and with our increasing warmer climate all preventative measures should be taken. I would also love to see the removal of VAT from sunscreen as well.' 'I would support the principle of the motion,' said the CEO of Cork County Council Moira Murrell: 'Our first duty of care is to our employees. We do provide sunscreen for staff that work outdoors. Primarily it is a public health initiative. If there is a national scheme and if local authorities are asked to engage in that, we will fully support that public health initiative. We will certainly be in a position to work with any national scheme that is there.'
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, June 4th: On housing, rugby refereeing and bad sportsmanship
Sir, – I note the article by N icholas Mansergh, 'Ireland is overdependent on apartment development,' ( Business, June 2nd), where he states that an apartment of 80sqm costs an €150,000-€190,000 to build compared to a terraced house of same floor area. Here in Turkiye (Turkey) where I live for part of the year, the standard residential provision is a 12-storey apartment block, with two penthouses on top, comprising 50 two-bed apartments in total. It is difficult to find a house anywhere. How is it the case that the Turks can produce these developments cheaply and efficiently while we in Ireland cannot? I might also point out that Turkish modern apartments are of excellent design and quality. There is something wrong. How can, say, an apartment in a 50-unit block in Ireland cost in excess ¤150,000 more than a terrace house in a similar area? READ MORE Such an apartment shares the same site with adjacent apartments. It also shares floors, roofs, structural uprights, water and sewage systems and electrical systems with other adjacent apartments which logically should lead to lower costs for each individual unit. In general, materials for apartments and terraced houses cost the same. In Ireland it seems that there is over-regulation and over-specification regarding apartment construction. Indeed, Tánaiste Simon Harris recently indicated that he is open to seeing if these can be eased. The Irish have a historical bias against apartments and almost every proposed development is met by planning objections. The costs and time delays to apartment developers adds to the overall cost of construction. Large apartment developments require large construction companies and since the demise of the Celtic Tiger, these appear to no more. A solution may be to bring in large foreign companies from outside. Mr Mansergh makes the extraordinary claim that apartments are not suitable for owner occupiers and may not be viable in the future. Really? The rest of the world does not think so. – Yours, etc, TIMOTHY RYAN, Castleknock, Dublin 15. Sir, – I completely agree with Nicholas Mansergh that Ireland is over-dependent on apartment development while unduly focused on private investment funds to satisfy our housing needs. While the rapid expansion of apartment buildings in the 1990s in Dublin, led by major Irish builders, produced much-needed apartment accommodation for workers and students, at that time private buyers were also incentivised to purchase. Since then while apartment blocks were built, few individual units were advertised for sale. Entire blocks were purchased by investment funds and this continues to be the case. There are many unintended consequences: workers are forced to rent at very high rates (as investors seek a return); few apartments are being sold to owner occupiers, few family homes are being built that might be purchased by tenants who want to a home to raise a family. If we continue to focus on investment-led office and apartment blocks, we are left with few contractors and skilled staff to build much needed family homes. In order to explore this issue further, it would be helpful to compare the number of new builds by city and county councils. For instance, have some counties – like Galway – generated more domestic family units in suburbs and village communities than others. If so what are the factors that actively contribute to such developments? A regional 'best practice model' would help the Government to further explore and resolve our housing needs. – Yours, etc, Dr EVELYN MAHON, Fellow Emerita, School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College, Dublin 2 . Sir, – Your columnist Pat Leahy's article ('Housing emergency? It's not even treated as mildly urgent', May 31st) makes for depressing reading. There is zero chance, just several months into a new administration, of the Government meeting its promised 300,000 completed units during its term. The simple truth is that the biggest societal challenge within Ireland today is going to become more serious and more socially alienating over the short- to medium-term future. The likelihood of amplified social unrest is very high, driven by frustration and anger at a continuing failure to address what has been a known problem for over a decade now. The current approach to fixing the problem is clearly suboptimal. It is time for the Taoiseach to show real leadership and steer through the necessary emergency legislation that rapidly removes the identifiable roadblocks, be they infrastructural, planning, financial, tax-based etc. Such legislation was passed in 2020 in the public interest in response to Covid 19. It is past time to recognise our housing crisis as the social challenge that has and will increasingly have an impact on every aspect of our society, in an ever-increasing negative way. More of the same approach to addressing this crisis will commit us to certain failure and a likely dual outcome of increased emigration and domestic social upheaval. – Yours, etc, GERRY PRIZEMAN, Clontarf, Dublin. Leaving Certificate results Sir, – This is the week that the Leaving Cert starts in Ireland. Here in France the equivalent state exam, the Baccalauréat, starts next week. In both countries the exams will end in the third week in June. And then something very odd happens. Here in France, students will get their results within two weeks, and this has been the norm for generations. But in Ireland, students have to wait a staggering two months. This delay has always been the case in Ireland, but it is also very unfair on students. Stress and uncertainty could be avoided, particularly by students being able to plan and prepare for the future during the summer, as opposed to rushing and panicking in the last week in August. Can we not do better ? Make 'beatha an scoláire aoibhinn arís'. Make student life joyful again. – Yours, etc, CIARÁN Mac GUILL, Clichy, France. Sir , – Can I respectfully request The Irish Times and other print and broadcast media outlets to desist from their daily analysis of the Leaving Certificate examinations? This annual exercise of detailed exam postmortems is not only futile, but puts added stress on students and their parents/guardians. – Yours, etc, Dr PADRAIG McGARTY, Mohill, Co Leitrim. Tsar play Sir, – In reference to your editorial 'To tsar or not to tsar ' (May 31st), you quoted the secretary general of the relevant department as saying such a person is not needed and also pointed to the fact that a tsar could in fact be a person appointed by government to resolve a particular issue. First of all, let me say that the reaction of the secretary general is typical. Secretary generals never want to cede power. Secondly, numerous politicians and ministers over the years realise that their departments and civil servants are incapable of resolving particular issues and delivering the required change. As a result, they establish agencies to do so and oft times put in place specific legislation to allow them to resolve issues and effect change. Even so, the departments resist the efforts of agencies to deliver their legislative responsibilities. They do not like the fact that their minister can actually refer to the chair of an agency rather than them. More times than not, the chief executive is caught in the middle, keeping the balance and bearing the responsibility between chair, board and department. In most cases, the department wins such struggles. I had the benefit of managing such tensions for many years as chief executive of the Heritage Council. My experience tells me that with the legislative responsibilities given by government to agencies (tsar or no tsar) at least the agency has a clear idea what it has to do and very often does just that. Certainly, to date as far as housing is concerned no department has come anywhere near. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL STARRETT, Kilkenny. Defence Forces and pay issue Sir, – M artin Wall's article ('Expert group raised Air Corps staffing concerns in 2021, June 2nd) outlines the recommendations made by the joint Department of Defence/Defence Forces Group in 2021 to dissuade military air traffic controllers from leaving the Air Corps for the better paid private sector. His article also states that this 2021 report was not acted on, which now raises the prospect in 2025 of Air Corps management having to restrict its decades long 24/7 air-traffic control services. For clarity, I'm adding here that it is various Civil Service departments who control pay and conditions and not Air Corps management in this instance. So, the obvious question is why has this deteriorating situation been allowed to drag on? Mr Wall's comment that the 2021 report was not acted on provides a partial answer. The full answer needs the question to be asked, which is: which department/person rejected the group's recommendations and what reasons were given at the time? Was it based on technical or financial advice or something else? The Civil Service sometimes acts in an arcane way but this is one simple answer that doesn't need the imprimatur of the Minister of Defence. Of course, the Minister himself has the power to put an end to this needless morale sapping of the Air Corps capabilities. It's a situation crying out for political action and not mere words anymore. – Yours, etc, Comdt FRANK RUSSELL (ret'd) Blanchardstown, Dublin 15. National Anthem Sir, – I noticed that prior to the Dublin v Armagh senior football championship fixture in Croke Park on Sunday, an announcement was made over the public address system to players and spectators to respect in full the national anthem. It reflects positively on all concerned that the message was complied with. Perhaps someone in authority in Croke Park had read Kevin O'Regan's letter of May 30th in the Irish Times letters page: Our international rugby and soccer teams stand proudly to attention at all times during the playing of our anthem, so why not GAA players? – Yours, etc, RICHARD POWER, Ballymacarbry, Co Waterford. Sir, – A correspondent compares the pride and passion displayed by Ireland rugby players in their singing of the national anthem compared to GAA players. My observation, since I depend a lot on lip-reading, is that not all the Ireland rugby players know all the words and their obvious guessing makes me cringe. It must be stressful for them too on a day which is already exacting enough. I think the anthem, sung only for home games, should be dropped. Ireland's Call, whatever its defects, has at least the unifying advantage of representing all the provinces, and is easy to learn. – Yours, etc, PATRICK O'DONOGHUE, Maynooth, Co Kildare. Nuclear energy Sir, – Dr Anne Baily (Letters, June 2nd) suggests nuclear energy as a means to help Ireland meet its climate targets. While the urgency is undeniable, the proposed solution deserves closer scrutiny. Replacing fossil fuels (which we now know have caused profound harm) with nuclear technology (that we already know is deeply hazardous and problematic for a very long time) is hardly an improvement. It risks exchanging one legacy of environmental damage for another. Climate breakdown cannot be solved purely through technological fixes, or by sidestepping the more difficult task of changing the systems and lifestyles that fuel greenhouse gas emissions as well as a host of broader environmental crises. The real challenge is to rethink how we live, consume and use energy. Renewables, energy efficiency and community-based solutions already offer safer, faster and more democratic ways forward. Ireland should invest in those, rather than repeating old mistakes under a new name. – Yours, etc, HANS ZOMER, Chief Executive Officer, Global Action Plan, Dublin. Calling foul on rugby antics Sir, – As usual Owen Doyle ( 'Persistent acceptance of foul play is a dreadful reflection on rugby', June 3rd) is exactly right. What was once a beautiful game has been allowed to degenerate, on and off the field. The forward-dominated assaults on the goal line, with the endless penalty advantages, the ping-pong kicking, the boorish behaviour of some players and the ignorant and abusive antics of sections of supporters are killing the game. I feel sorry for referees attempting to deal with the ever-changing and often inconsistent laws, and players trying to pull the wool over their eyes, but that does not disguise the fact, as Doyle points out, that some are simply not up to the task, and nor, it seems, are many of the administrators, who are guilty of neglect. – Yours, etc, BILL REDMOND, Edinburgh, Scotland. Sir, – As an avid soccer fan I have been admonished, patronised and chastised by rugby-supporting friends about the moral superiority surrounding the conduct of rugby players on the field of play. The antics of Jaden Hendrikse at Kings Park, Durban, on Saturday nailed this myth once and for all. Not alone did Hendrikse enact a fabricated 'cramp' episode to inconvenience an opponent, he added a 'wink' as his coup de grace. Gerry Thornley bemoans the failure to maintain the values of respect shown by this episode ('Sharks shameful antics betrayed moral code that makes rugby special', Tuesday, June 3rd). Perhaps, the moral code attributed to rugby now resides 'with O'Leary in the grave'. – Yours, etc, JOHN NAUGHTON, Leopardstown, Dublin 18. Bigger picture Sir, – We are hearing again about the Calor Gas-sponsored housewife of the year competition that took place annually from 1967 to 1995. When I hear negative comments about this event I think it's important to keep the bigger picture in mind and not get drawn into presentism and to remember that you cannot judge the morning by the rules of the afternoon. – Yours, etc, MARY DALY, Dublin.
