Gymgoer died in ‘tragic accident' as 65kg weight fell on head
A University of East Anglia student died in a 'tragic accident' involving gym equipment, an inquest has heard.
Mohammed Farraj, a 21-year-old medical student, was using a Smith machine – a weightlifting apparatus with a bar that moves vertically on rails – at the university's Sportspark gym on the evening of October 16, 2024.
Mr Farraj had placed a plastic aerobic step beneath his feet to perform calf raises.
CCTV footage of the incident, described by Detective Sergeant Robert Waring as a "tragic accident", showed Mr Farraj using the step while working with the Smith machine.
The plastic step tipped, causing him to slip and the weighted bar to drop, striking his head. The force of the bar forced his neck to the ground.
The aerobic step was not part of the Smith machine apparatus.
Mr Waring said a safety feature on the machine was a set of adjustable stops which 'should be set to the highest position possible' to stop the weight bar.
He said they had been 'left in the very lowest position'.
He also described the use of the plastic step as 'incorrect' and said it was 'intended for a different purpose', and that a weight disk could have been used instead.
Norfolk assistant coroner Johanna Thompson, concluding that Mr Farraj's death was an accident, said that 'safety stops on the equipment hadn't been appropriately adjusted prior to' Mr Farraj performing his calf raise exercises.
'He used a step aerobic block to stand on,' she said.
'In doing so he slipped, causing the weight he had been lifting to fall onto him. This resulted in him sustaining a fatal head injury.'
Gym user Dr Trey Koev said he had been 'less than two metres away' from Mr Farraj, using another piece of gym equipment – the incline bench press – interchangeably with his gym partner.
He said Mr Farraj had been using the Smith machine 'with a stepping platform to perform calf raises'.
'All of a sudden whilst my gym partner was finishing his set I saw him slip onto the platform,' said Dr Koev, who is a research scientist at UEA.
'The bar carrying the weight came down.'
He said Mr Farraj 'struggled to his feet very rapidly then tumbled, then both my gym partner and I rushed to him as we were the closest to him'.
Dr Koev said there had been red-coloured weights on either end of the bar – indicating 25kg each – and the bar weighed approximately 15kg, with the total weight as 65kg.
He said he 'heard a loud bang of the bar landing down'.
Dr Koev's gym partner, Dr Damian Laba, said he was using the bench press when he heard a bang, 'stood up and turned round and saw Mohammed collapsing on the floor'.
Dr Laba, who is a consultant anaesthetist at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, said he 'saw blood coming out of (Mr Farraj's) nose and mouth'.
'I realised this is potentially a life-threatening injury and I shouted for help to the Sportspark staff, to the reception,' he said, adding that he attempted CPR before Mr Farraj died at the scene.
Benjamin Price, head of sports operations at UEA Sportspark, said: 'It appears Mohammed followed another person who had been using that equipment.
'It appears they had put the stops at the lowest level to perform the exercise they had chosen to perform – a hip thrust exercise.'
He said that it appeared a warning about the stops had not been on the Smith machine at the time, but was now in place.
The inquest was told Mr Farraj had a fast-track induction to the gym in October 2022.
His father, Hashim Farraj, said in a statement read by the coroner's officer that his son was a devout Muslim and 'loved life'.
He said his son grew up at the family home in Stoke-on-Trent, was part of a boxing club and 'took his fitness and his health very seriously'.
'He liked to go to the gym and would run 10k in the morning on a regular basis,' he said.
He added that he had been training for an Ironman triathlon event.
The coroner extended her condolences to the family and friends of Mr Farraj.
The UEA Sportspark said in a statement after the conclusion of the inquest in Norwich that it was 'deeply saddened' by the death of Mr Farraj.
'The safety of our gym's users is, and always will be, our priority,' the statement continued.
'Following this incident, a full investigation took place, by the police and the HSE, who were both satisfied with the arrangements in place.
'UEA Sportspark has co-operated with fully the coroner's inquiry and acknowledges the conclusion of the inquest.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
3 days ago
- NBC News
Former federal inmate pardoned by Trump tapped as Bureau of Prisons deputy director
A former federal inmate who was pardoned by President Donald Trump in his first term for drug trafficking crimes more than two decades ago has been tapped as deputy director of the federal Bureau of Prisons, according to bureau spokesperson Kristie Breshears. Joshua J. Smith, a Tennessee businessman who founded an inmate advocacy and rehabilitation nonprofit foundation, the Fourth Purpose, will be second in command in the bureau. The BOP has never had a formerly incarcerated inmate work as an employee at any level, according to a senior bureau official. 'Josh brings to this role something our agency has never had before at this level, a perspective shaped by lived experience, proven innovation and national impact,' Director William K. Marshall III said in a memo to staff Thursday. 'His firsthand understanding of our facilities — of the tension, the risk and the importance of trust — makes him uniquely positioned to advocate for the resources and reforms front-line staff need to do their jobs safely and effectively,' added Marshall, a former prison commissioner in West Virginia whom Trump selected as BOP director in April. Smith declined to comment when reached by phone Thursday. Trump granted a full pardon to Smith, who had been convicted of conspiracy to possess drugs with intent to distribute. Indictments were filed in 1997 for marijuana- and cocaine-related charges, and the court docket shows he pleaded guilty. The court recommended he go to the Federal Correctional Institution Manchester in Kentucky and boot camp for a 60-month sentence. He was also set to have five years supervised release, substance abuse treatment and a $12,500 fine. The bureau, in recent years, has been roiled by accusations of cronyism and corruption, widespread staffing shortages, and violence and misconduc t in prisons. Its leadership must manage a massive $8 billion-plus budget, more than 143,000 federal inmates across 122 prisons, and a workforce of more than 35,000 as the Justice Department's largest employer. In deciding to pardon Smith, the White House said in 2021 that, after his release from prison in 2003, he 'dedicated his life to his faith and to his community,' founded Fourth Purpose and 'mentored incarcerated individuals and taught business classes to those in prison — including at the prison where he was incarcerated.' Smith's pardon request was supported by Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, a Republican. According to his online biography, Smith said he was raised by a single mother in government housing, was convicted of 10 felonies by the time he was 16 and entered prison at 21. While in prison, he said, he learned about Christianity and God and was mentored by white-collar criminals. He said he started a multimillion-dollar company that hired ex-offenders before becoming more active in prison reform. 'Today is a day of redemption that I attribute to God's grace,' Smith said after he was pardoned, adding that 'there are a lot of Josh Smiths in prisons across our country, and I am going to help as many as possible find a new purpose.' Smith's pardon was one of 74 that Trump granted on his last day in office during his first term, when he also pardoned former chief strategist and longtime ally Steve Bannon, who was indicted on wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy charges, and hip-hop star Lil Wayne, who pleaded guilty to weapons charges.
The Herald Scotland
4 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court rules Mexico can't sue US gunmakers over cartel violence
"An action cannot be brought against a manufacturer if, like Mexico's, it is founded on a third-party's criminal use of the company's product," Justice Elena Kagan wrote. The decision landed against a backdrop of strained diplomatic relations between the United States and Mexico. President Donald Trump wants Mexico to do more to stop illegal drugs from flowing into the United States and Mexico wants to stop illegal arms from flowing south. Mexico has maintained tighter regulations on firearms than its neighbor to the north. The case was also the first time the Supreme Court ruled on a 2005 law that shields gunmakers from liability for crimes committed by third parties. An exception in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act allows suits if a gunmaker is accused of knowingly violating a state or federal law. Attorneys representing Mexico argued that gun companies are "aiding and abetting" the trafficking of hundreds of thousands of high-powered firearms into Mexico through deliberate design, marketing and distribution choices. That includes doing business with dealers who repeatedly sell large quantities of guns to cartel traffickers, Mexico's counsel alleged. Firearms makers, led by Smith & Wesson Brands, said the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes after being sold, transported, and used to commit crime in Mexico involves too many steps to blame the industry. Guns made in the United States are sold to federally licensed distributors who sell them to federally licensed dealers - some of whom knowingly or negligently sell them to criminals who smuggle them into Mexico, where they end up in the hands of cartel members. Mexico's attorneys stressed that the suit was in its early stages and said Mexico should be allowed a chance to prove its allegations in court. A federal judge in Massachusetts dismissed the suit, ruling it was barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms. But the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the challenge met an exception in the law and could move forward. Mexico, it said, had adequately alleged the gunmakers "aided and abetted the knowingly unlawful downstream trafficking of their guns into Mexico." Mexico was seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages, estimated in the range of $10 billion, and a court order requiring gun companies to change their practices. Lawyers for gun rights groups told the Supreme Court that Mexico's suit is an attempt to bankrupt the American firearms industry and undermine the Second Amendment. Gun violence prevention groups worried the case could make it harder to bring domestic lawsuits against the gun industry. The case is Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
Daily Mail
4 days ago
- Daily Mail
Supreme Court blocks Mexico's lawsuit against US gunmakers
The United States Supreme Court has blocked a $10 billion lawsuit filed by the Mexican government claiming U.S. firearm manufacturers are responsible for the out-of-control cartel violence and bloodshed that has ravaged the country. The lawsuit was filed in 2021 against 11 companies with Smith & Wesson appealing a lower court decision that had allowed the case to proceed. The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely protect gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime. The court found that Mexico had not shown that the companies had knowingly allowed weapons to be trafficked across the US's southern border. 'It does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the court's opinion. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has yet to comment on the landmark decision about the case, which her government had wanted to proceed under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law. Mexico had said the case was still in its early stages and wanted the lawsuit to continue against some of the US's biggest gun companies, including Beretta USA, Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Colt's Manufacturing Co. and Glock Inc. Mexico has strict gun laws and just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country's powerful drug cartels every year. The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States and claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market. It has alleged that more than 500,000 guns are smuggled annually from the United States into Mexico and that more than 68 percent are produced by the gun manufacturing companies it sued. Weapons manufactured by the 11 Massachusetts-based gun makers were allegedly used in at least 17,000 homicides in 2019. 'They know how criminals are getting their guns,' Jonathan Lowy, a lawyer for Mexico, argued during virtual hearing in April 2022. 'They could stop and they choose to be willfully blind to the facts. Mexican security forces confiscated a semi-automatic Barrett M82A1 .50 caliber rifle during a raid in July 2022 in Mexico City that led to the arrest of 14 alleged members of Los Chapitos, the Sinaloa Cartel faction that is operated by the sons of notorious drug lord Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán. The same rifle abandoned by Jalisco New Generation Cartel members in the failed assassination of Mexico City police chief Omar García Harfuch on June 26, 2020. The companies have rejected Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence. A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices. That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings.
