logo
We need a police summit on knife crime. Oh, yes, we've already had one

We need a police summit on knife crime. Oh, yes, we've already had one

The Age6 days ago

We need cops who police youth gangs, PSOs at railway stations, police who patrol in divisional vans and station bosses to share their practical experiences, because it is only through knowing the problem that we can deal with it.
Loading
Well, that is precisely what happened in December 2022. The result? Zip-a-dee-doo-dah.
At the summit, police discussed South Australian weapons prohibition orders (WPOs). They are similar to our firearm prohibition orders.
In SA, if a person has been convicted of a weapons-related offence and the police commissioner reasonably believes the person is a danger to life or property, they are hit with a three-year WPO.
Police can 'detain and search a person who the police officer reasonably suspects is a person to whom a weapons prohibition order applies for prohibited weapons ... stop, detain and search a vehicle, vessel or aircraft [connected to the suspect] ... enter and search premises for prohibited weapons'.
Wouldn't it make more sense to target those convicted of using or carrying weapons rather than waiting to try to break up knife fights?
In NSW, they have drug supply prohibition orders to stop and search anyone convicted of selling drugs. Police can search their car or any property associated with them.
Another suggestion at the police knife conference that has disappeared under the waves like Moby Dick was to beef up the force's semi-secret VPMAC (Victoria Police Monitor Assessment Centre). It is used to follow trends to get in front of the game – such as the movements of a home-invading gang.
It can also watch social media as the gangs talk online and often organise their fights on the internet. More funds mean more staff and a greater chance of cutting off the gangs before they cut each other.
But there are no more funds, with the police budget to be cut.
Increasingly, states across Australia are introducing Jack's Law – a powerful weapon for police that came into existence because of a tragedy.
When Brett and Belinda Beasley lost their 17-year-old son Jack to a knife attack in Surfers Paradise in December 2019, they were determined to use his death to reform laws.
After dozens of rounds of lobbying, they persuaded the Queensland government to trial Jack's Law.
In Surfers Paradise, police trialled hand-held wands to randomly search people for edged weapons. The initiative has now been expanded to all public places in Queensland.
Since it began, police have conducted more than 100,000 scans, with more than 2800 people charged and 1058 weapons seized.
Brett Beasley says: 'I have been trying to help Victoria, but your premier won't listen. She won't meet with me.
'We have met with Victoria Police, and they absolutely love Jack's Law. It has been passed with bipartisan support in Queensland, NSW, WA and Tasmania, but for some reason we can't get it over the line in Victoria.
'It is no different to a random breath test. You are not even touched by the wand, and it doesn't even touch you. It has been phenomenally successful.'
In Victoria, MCC members going to the footy are wand-searched in case they have a concealed cheese knife for the charcuterie board, but a gang member on a railway station is not checked for a myki card, let alone a machete.
Loading
Rule No.2 Reform comes in three steps: need, will and action.
In the area of violent crime there is a need, there is even the political will, but too often the action is diluted when the legislation is written.
Take Jack's Law. Victim input, police support plus political will equals an effective law. So why not here?
One reason is the Justice Department is a cordial factory in which the concentrate is diluted to suit the tastebuds of those with a particular agenda.
When cops showed some in the Justice Department CCTV of a fatal knife attack, it resulted in a complaint the images were too graphic. I imagine the victim would agree. If he wasn't already dead.
In the two-year tobacco war there have been 141 arson attacks and seven homicides.
Under laws to be introduced later this year, we will have a tobacco regulatory body (costing $65 million) with about 10 unarmed enforcement officers to police 1300 tobacco shops selling illegal products. It is like sending a platoon of lollipop ladies with stop-go signs to take on the Roman legions.
Gangster Kaz Hamad orders hits from Iraq and is making $1 million a month just from the protection side of his business. Will he be deterred by a stern letter from an enforcement officer?
Illegal cigarettes are about $15 a packet compared with about $40 a packet for the legal ones. Government taxes have created the market, people like Hamad are just exploiting it.
Meanwhile, the government's anti-bikie laws will be toughened later this year with the Criminal Organisations Control Amendment Act 2024.
The laws are designed to stop outlaw bikies wearing and displaying their colours, which are often used to intimidate. A noble idea, but will it work?
Police Minister Anthony Carbines is talking tough: ' Organised crime groups and bikie gangs are on notice – we won't stand for intimidation and neither will Victoria Police, who won't hesitate to use these new laws to keep Victorians safe.'
Police wanted the law to reflect interstate legislation, under which wearing banned bikie colours is an indictable offence. Yet in Victoria it will be a summary offence.
This means as long as the suspect provides his name and address, he will not be arrested but will receive a summons in the post.
Under the law, a police officer may direct a person to stop displaying bikie insignia. Police on the road believe a bikie will simply need to turn their jacket inside out, which means they will be displaying the logos 'Made in Thailand' and 'Dry clean only'.
The law excludes tattoos, but what about temporary tattoos or body art? Will police lick the biceps of bikies to see if tattoos are permanent? Or will it be a case of not giving a rat's about tatts and don't create a stink about ink?
Police are preparing dossiers on outlaw motorcycle gangs to have them declared organised crime groups. In Queensland, there are 26.
In Victoria, the top seven are likely to be the Hells Angels, Mongols, Rebels, Finks, Comancheros, Black Uhlans and Bandidos.
History shows the gangs that are not mentioned feel miffed and often ring police to complain. In that business if you are bad, you want to be bad to the bone.
Rule No.3 Laws alone don't change behaviour.
It is an offence to sell a knife to a person under the age of 18, with proof of age required.
It comes as no surprise that the average blade-wielding offender may be more inclined to steal a knife than provide a name, address, three forms of identification and a Frequent Flyer number at the checkout. Anything above a butter knife should be kept in a locked cabinet so it can't be shoplifted.
What is indefensible is the lack of appetite for a logical, rational and cool-headed review of crime.
Loading
When then-deputy commissioner Ross Guenther told this column last year that the criminal justice system needed to embrace reform, the government lost both its marbles and the bag they came in.
He said: 'The system is not suited for victims or offenders. Why do self-interest groups and self-described experts have so much sway over issues that impact the whole community? Do we adequately respond to the needs of victims?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Delusional': Victorian government ridiculed after revealing plan to have just 14 inspectors enforce new tobacco licensing scheme
‘Delusional': Victorian government ridiculed after revealing plan to have just 14 inspectors enforce new tobacco licensing scheme

Sky News AU

time11 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Delusional': Victorian government ridiculed after revealing plan to have just 14 inspectors enforce new tobacco licensing scheme

Victoria's new tobacco licensing scheme has been ridiculed by opposition and crossbench MPs after the Allan government revealed there would be just 14 inspectors to enforce new laws. Premier Jacinta Allan's government is implementing a licensing scheme as part of its attempts to combat the state's ongoing illicit tobacco wars. There have been at least 125 arson attacks and 130 arrests connected to the conflict since March 2023, which has seen outlaw motorcycle gangs and organised crime groups battle for control of a black market trade estimated to be worth $5 billion. Details of the new tobacco licensing scheme were revealed on Wednesday, with the Allan government claiming it would begin the process to 'break the business model of organised crime'. From July, businesses will be able to apply for licenses to sell cigarettes, cigars, and other tobacco-related products, with enforcement for the new scheme to begin in February next year. Under the scheme, any person found to be selling illicit tobacco will face fines of up to $355,000 or up to 15 years in jail, while businesses will face fines of more than $1.7 million. In announcing the scheme, the Allan government claimed it was 'delivering boots on the ground to crack down on those breaking the law and backing the work of Victoria Police to disrupt the illicit tobacco trade.' But the $46 million scheme is set to be enforced by just 14 licensing inspectors. The government said the inspectors, who will work for Tobacco Licensing Victoria, will 'hit the streets to hold illegal operators to account'. The inspectors will also support Victoria Police's Taskforce Lunar – set up to combat the illicit tobacco trade – by providing them with additional intelligence. But Victorian Opposition Leader Brad Battin said the plan was akin to sending parking inspectors to confront hardened criminals. 'They're saying they're bringing in 14 inspectors to go out for a problem that is involving bikies, bombings and fires here across our state,' Mr Battin said. 'We're going to be effectively sending in parking officers to fix a problem of massive crime and corruption here in Victoria. That is a big problem.' The Liberal leader – who is a former police officer – said the state's tobacco laws could only be combatted by Victoria Police. 'We're not talking about walking into a shop for someone who stole a Mars bar. We're talking about organised crime who have used fire bombings on more than 100 occasions across the state. You can't send in someone who's not qualified and trained to stop that crime,' he said. 'You've got to send Victoria Police to fix this issue. And that means intervention earlier. That means working with Victoria Police to give them the powers that they need to stop these crimes happening. 'We need to make sure Victoria Police have the powers. We need to make sure Victoria Police have the staffing they can to go out and address this issue.' The government's announcement has also come under fire from Victorian Libertarian MP David Limbrick, who compared the plan to hire 14 illicit tobacco inspectors for the entire state of Victoria with the estimated 300 inspectors in Chicago to enforce alcohol prohibition in the 1920 – a city of around 3 million people. 'If the Victorian Government thinks 14 inspectors will suppress a multi-billion dollar industry, they are delusional. They seem to have no idea about the scale of organised crime in this state,' Mr Limbrick told The Libertarian MP backed NSW Premier Chris Minns' recent calls for a federal review of the tobacco excise, which has been cited as a major driver of the illicit tobacco trade. 'Until such time as federal excise is reduced, organised crime will continue to control the tobacco industry in this state,' Mr Limbrick said.

Tasmania AFL team news: Key questions that will decide 19th licence answered
Tasmania AFL team news: Key questions that will decide 19th licence answered

Mercury

time13 hours ago

  • Mercury

Tasmania AFL team news: Key questions that will decide 19th licence answered

WHY IS IT ALL ABOUT THE STADIUM? As AFL CEO Andrew Dillon has said repeatedly, the 19th team licence is contingent on a Macquarie Point stadium with a roof. The 18 club presidents voted for that as part of the case for the new Tasmania team in May, 2023, so without the ground, the team is no longer case hinged on building a brand-spanking new stadium on Macquarie Point, prime real estate near the water's edge in Hobart, with a Devils are not expected to play there from the start, with at least a year spent playing between Hobart's Bellerive Oval and Launceston's UTAS Stadium. But if the stadium wasn't going ahead, that approval from the presidents would vanish, and even if it is pushed back, the case for a team becomes dicey. WHAT DO THE DEVILS THINK? Brendon Gale was appointed CEO almost exactly 12 months after the president's gave a thumbs up in that Zoom meeting. Last week he acknowledged that if the stadium plans fall over, so could the team, as club presidents would have to change their verdict somewhat and approve the team more on goodwill than the financial returns of a new stadium. IF THEY NEED THE STADIUM, WHY ARE PEOPLE AGAINST IT? The Greens have led the anti-stadium push, at least politically, and were against the Macquarie Point from the start. The latest estimates had the build ballooning out to $945m – up from the initial $715m – and those against it reckon that money should be put into health, housing an education. The anti-stadium crew either think they can cut a new deal with the AFL to keep a team – an idea which has no backing at this stage – or they are happy to kill the Devils. BUT DOESN'T TASMANIA WANT A TEAM? Definitely, the overwhelming sentiment on the island and on the mainland is that Tasmania should have a team. But some locals don't think it's necessary for a new stadium to be part of that team. WHY DOES IT NEED TO BE A NEW STADIUM? Basically, because the AFL says so. It has been a key part of the case for the team from the start and the team has not been approved without it. DOES IT HAVE TO HAVE A ROOF? The roof definitely makes things more expensive, but it has been a core part of the case this whole time. Cricket, who would play matches there in summer, has not been happy with the design of the roof, given the shadows it would cast. WHAT DO THOSE IN FAVOUR OF THE STADIUM THINK? The arguments on the pro-stadium side are clear. Firstly, the stadium gets Tasmania an AFL team. And other cities further west have greatly benefitted from expensive builds, with Perth Stadium the envy of many rival cities and the Adelaide Oval a gold-standard success story in revamping a state-owned asset. The Devils suggest that clubs in those towns have benefitted greatly, with Port Adelaide's match day revenue up a whopping 130 per cent since the Power moved out of Football Park, according to Devils modelling. The Adelaide Oval has been such a success that this masthead revealed last month that South Australian premier Peter Malinauskas had pitched to independent Tasmanian parliamentarians about the positives of a new stadium. A world-class venue would open the door to more non-sport events like concerts. BUT AREN'T THERE TWO OTHER STADIUMS IN TASSIE? Yes, there are two grounds on the Apple Isle deemed good enough to stage AFL right now. North Melbourne has hosted games at Bellerive Oval (Hobart) since 2012, with the Roos to soon depart as they chart a new course selling games to Western Australia. Hawthorn has made a powerful second home at UTAS Stadium (Launceston), having first hosted a game in 2001. Those games are bolstered by bank transfer, with the Tasmanian government sending cash to the Roos and Hawks to stage games there, and with a capacity of around 20,000 at each stadium, aren't seen as big enough to support an AFL side full time. WHY DON'T THEY JUST REVAMP BELLERIVE OVAL? That has never been part of the plans for the new team. Bellerive Oval has almost always been built around cricket and the ground is wedged into suburbia, making a genuine upgrade to a world-class stadium just too tough. The ongoing plan is for the Devils to play some home games at UTAS Stadium in Launceston going forward to ease the state's famous north-south divide, but playing home matches at Bellerive Oval long-term is seen as a no-go, given its shoddy infrastructure. The Devils themselves believe the team would be $5.4-5.9m worse off every year if they played home games at Bellerive Stadium instead of Macquarie Point. The Devils reckon sponsorship would be down by $1.2m, corporate hospitality cash down $1.8m, and even merchandise down $100,000 without a brand-spanking new stadium. Tasmania hopes to bring in $55-60m in revenue per year to be a viable team, so losing nearly $6m would make the club too reliant on AFL support. BUT HASN'T THE AFL PROPPED UP OTHER TEAMS? Definitely, recent expansion sides Gold Coast and GWS, have been held up by the league for their whole existence. But the league and the club presidents had little interest in bringing in another problem child on pocket money. Even as football participation has waned down south, Tasmania is not the growth market that western Sydney is for the game. And the Devils themselves have been adamant they want to stand alone, not with the crutch of the league. The AFL put in $15m of its money at the announcement of the stadium, but hasn't promised the same support for the new team as its other recent sides. LET'S TALK POLITICS Yes, we have to. This section is important, don't skip it. The Liberal government reiterated on Wednesday it would only spend $375m on building the stadium. Labor leader Dean Winter again said his party backed the stadium and the team, so both major parties support it. But the Greens don't and crucial independents are on the fence at best. BUT IF LABOR AND LIBERALS SUPPORT IT, WHAT'S THE PROBLEM? Even with both parties behind it, independents are needed to shepherd the bill for the stadium through the upper house of parliament, if they ever get to debating that. The Liberal Party is governing in minority, which means it needs support from the crossbench to stay in power, and that support doesn't all back in the stadium. Labor leader Winter wrote to Dillon amid a busy day in parliament on Wednesday 'to reaffirm our party's strong support' for the Devils and the stadium. SO, WHAT IS THE KERFUFFLE AROUND 'NO CONFIDENCE' AND THE BUDGET? Winter tabled a motion of 'no confidence' in Tasmanian premier Jeremy Rockliff on Tuesday night, which was debated all day and deep into the night on Wednesday. That wasn't specifically about the stadium – officially the budget concerns include a bungled Spirit of Tasmania ferry port. The Greens wanted to insert that the cause of budget disarray was the impending stadium, but that was voted down. If the no-confidence call succeeds Rockliff will step down as premier, and either a new premier can emerge, of the Tasmanians go back to the polls for a snap election. SO TELL ME AGAIN WHY THE POLITICS IS IMPACTING FOOTBALL? No doubt, given the turmoil about the stadium, a new election would be a pseudo-referendum on Macquarie Point, and effectively the football team. Whether the Devils come out well in that potential public vote or not, another election would clearly delay the project further putting more doubt on the team, because remember, the team needs the stadium. SO, WHAT DO THE DEVILS DO NOW? Basically, sit on the edge of their seat. Club GM Kathryn McCann was in tears about the situation on Wednesday morning and said: 'our leaders need to think about the consequences of their actions'. The football club's concern had grown enough for Gale to essentially go on a media tour late last month, speaking to journalists and radio stations to push a case. Clearly, instead of hoping things would go their way, the Devils realised they had to get into the fight more. The football club is still wary of getting too involved in politics, but in this case, football is politics. Richo's fears for Tassie team 'disaster' amid political upheaval Originally published as Key questions that will decide the future of the Tasmania Devils in the AFL answered

Man accused of sexually abusing children over decades
Man accused of sexually abusing children over decades

The Advertiser

time15 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Man accused of sexually abusing children over decades

A man accused of sexually abusing 30 children over three decades had an arrangement with a child protection agency to house and provide schooling for minors. South Australian Trevor James Scroop, 65, is alleged to have travelled multiple times to Northern Territory communities to take back children who he then abused. He was arrested and charged with two child sex offences in 2023. After an ongoing joint SA and NT police investigation, further charges have been laid totalling 44 sex offences against 30 children from 1989 to 2023. The charges include sexual abuse of a child, unlawful sexual intercourse, indecent and aggravated indecent assault, aggravated assault and possessing child exploitation material. Scroop appeared in the SA District Court on Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the charges. The lifting of suppression orders means he can now be named. Scroop, a former ABC cameraman, had access to dozens of mostly Aboriginal boys under an arrangement with SA's Department for Child Protection to house them, the ABC reported. SA Police Acting Assistant Commissioner Catherine Hilliard told reporters in Darwin on Wednesday it was a "complex and incredibly confronting investigation". "The man had been providing accommodation and schooling in South Australia for many young people from the Northern Territory over an extended period of time," she said. "The privacy and safety of the victims remains our number one priority. We have been providing updates, along with support, to everyone effected." Northern Territory Police Force Assistant Commissioner Michael White said the alleged offending was "abhorrent" and its scale disturbing. He assured the NT community the alleged offender was in custody and was believed to have acted alone. The two commissioners urged anyone with further information on the man's alleged offending to contact police as investigations continue. They said ongoing court suppression orders meant police were restricted in what they could say about the victims and their families. SA Premier Peter Malinauskas said anyone who committed those types of crimes should know "we want the full force of the law to be imposed upon them with only the consideration of victims in mind." Scroop is scheduled to reappear in court in August. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) 13YARN 13 92 76 A man accused of sexually abusing 30 children over three decades had an arrangement with a child protection agency to house and provide schooling for minors. South Australian Trevor James Scroop, 65, is alleged to have travelled multiple times to Northern Territory communities to take back children who he then abused. He was arrested and charged with two child sex offences in 2023. After an ongoing joint SA and NT police investigation, further charges have been laid totalling 44 sex offences against 30 children from 1989 to 2023. The charges include sexual abuse of a child, unlawful sexual intercourse, indecent and aggravated indecent assault, aggravated assault and possessing child exploitation material. Scroop appeared in the SA District Court on Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the charges. The lifting of suppression orders means he can now be named. Scroop, a former ABC cameraman, had access to dozens of mostly Aboriginal boys under an arrangement with SA's Department for Child Protection to house them, the ABC reported. SA Police Acting Assistant Commissioner Catherine Hilliard told reporters in Darwin on Wednesday it was a "complex and incredibly confronting investigation". "The man had been providing accommodation and schooling in South Australia for many young people from the Northern Territory over an extended period of time," she said. "The privacy and safety of the victims remains our number one priority. We have been providing updates, along with support, to everyone effected." Northern Territory Police Force Assistant Commissioner Michael White said the alleged offending was "abhorrent" and its scale disturbing. He assured the NT community the alleged offender was in custody and was believed to have acted alone. The two commissioners urged anyone with further information on the man's alleged offending to contact police as investigations continue. They said ongoing court suppression orders meant police were restricted in what they could say about the victims and their families. SA Premier Peter Malinauskas said anyone who committed those types of crimes should know "we want the full force of the law to be imposed upon them with only the consideration of victims in mind." Scroop is scheduled to reappear in court in August. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) 13YARN 13 92 76 A man accused of sexually abusing 30 children over three decades had an arrangement with a child protection agency to house and provide schooling for minors. South Australian Trevor James Scroop, 65, is alleged to have travelled multiple times to Northern Territory communities to take back children who he then abused. He was arrested and charged with two child sex offences in 2023. After an ongoing joint SA and NT police investigation, further charges have been laid totalling 44 sex offences against 30 children from 1989 to 2023. The charges include sexual abuse of a child, unlawful sexual intercourse, indecent and aggravated indecent assault, aggravated assault and possessing child exploitation material. Scroop appeared in the SA District Court on Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the charges. The lifting of suppression orders means he can now be named. Scroop, a former ABC cameraman, had access to dozens of mostly Aboriginal boys under an arrangement with SA's Department for Child Protection to house them, the ABC reported. SA Police Acting Assistant Commissioner Catherine Hilliard told reporters in Darwin on Wednesday it was a "complex and incredibly confronting investigation". "The man had been providing accommodation and schooling in South Australia for many young people from the Northern Territory over an extended period of time," she said. "The privacy and safety of the victims remains our number one priority. We have been providing updates, along with support, to everyone effected." Northern Territory Police Force Assistant Commissioner Michael White said the alleged offending was "abhorrent" and its scale disturbing. He assured the NT community the alleged offender was in custody and was believed to have acted alone. The two commissioners urged anyone with further information on the man's alleged offending to contact police as investigations continue. They said ongoing court suppression orders meant police were restricted in what they could say about the victims and their families. SA Premier Peter Malinauskas said anyone who committed those types of crimes should know "we want the full force of the law to be imposed upon them with only the consideration of victims in mind." Scroop is scheduled to reappear in court in August. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) 13YARN 13 92 76 A man accused of sexually abusing 30 children over three decades had an arrangement with a child protection agency to house and provide schooling for minors. South Australian Trevor James Scroop, 65, is alleged to have travelled multiple times to Northern Territory communities to take back children who he then abused. He was arrested and charged with two child sex offences in 2023. After an ongoing joint SA and NT police investigation, further charges have been laid totalling 44 sex offences against 30 children from 1989 to 2023. The charges include sexual abuse of a child, unlawful sexual intercourse, indecent and aggravated indecent assault, aggravated assault and possessing child exploitation material. Scroop appeared in the SA District Court on Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the charges. The lifting of suppression orders means he can now be named. Scroop, a former ABC cameraman, had access to dozens of mostly Aboriginal boys under an arrangement with SA's Department for Child Protection to house them, the ABC reported. SA Police Acting Assistant Commissioner Catherine Hilliard told reporters in Darwin on Wednesday it was a "complex and incredibly confronting investigation". "The man had been providing accommodation and schooling in South Australia for many young people from the Northern Territory over an extended period of time," she said. "The privacy and safety of the victims remains our number one priority. We have been providing updates, along with support, to everyone effected." Northern Territory Police Force Assistant Commissioner Michael White said the alleged offending was "abhorrent" and its scale disturbing. He assured the NT community the alleged offender was in custody and was believed to have acted alone. The two commissioners urged anyone with further information on the man's alleged offending to contact police as investigations continue. They said ongoing court suppression orders meant police were restricted in what they could say about the victims and their families. SA Premier Peter Malinauskas said anyone who committed those types of crimes should know "we want the full force of the law to be imposed upon them with only the consideration of victims in mind." Scroop is scheduled to reappear in court in August. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) 13YARN 13 92 76

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store