logo
Young people are skeptical of the American Dream

Young people are skeptical of the American Dream

Yahoo2 days ago

A version of this story appeared in CNN's What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here.
There are some striking divides in a new CNN poll, but they aren't necessarily the partisan kind Americans have come to expect: The divides are more gray than red versus blue.
The first has to do with the American Dream, which a growing number of Americans feel is out of reach. Most, 54%, still agreed with the idea that 'people who want to get ahead can make it if they're willing to work hard,' in the new poll, conducted by SSRS.
What's noteworthy is that when CNN asked the same question back in 2016, more than two-thirds of respondents, 67%, agreed with that optimistic idea.
Looking at the new poll's results by age, younger Americans are less bullish that they can 'make it.'
About half, 51%, of those under 45, felt that 'Hard work and determination are no guarantee of success for most people,' compared with 41% of those 45 and older.
There's likely some partisanship behind those numbers, since younger Americans tend to be more liberal, despite the inroads that President Donald Trump and Republicans have made with young people.
But the age divide exists, to a more modest extent, even within the Democratic Party. More than two-thirds of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents under 45 say that hard work and determination are no guarantee of success. A smaller portion, 62% of older Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents feel that way.
Read the full report by CNN's Ariel Edwards-Levy.
A second question in the poll asks whether the government should do more or whether it is trying to do too many things already.
A majority, 58%, say the government should do more to solve the country's problems, up from just 51% when CNN asked the question nearly two years ago.
More young people, 63% of those under 45, said they want more from the government, compared with 54% of those 45 and older.
The government arguably does more for older people: It helps to provide health care in the form of Medicare and retirement benefits in the form of Social Security for a large portion of older Americans. At the same time, the ballooning national debt means those programs' future is on an unsustainable path for younger Americans.
Asked about which party they feel represents their views on the economy, three-quarters of people over 45 picked either Democrats (32%) or Republicans (42%), leaving just about a quarter of older Americans who said neither party represented them on the economy.
A larger portion of people under 45, 38%, said they did not feel represented by either party on the economy.
Another CNN story published Monday might help explain some of the malaise felt by younger Americans.
This is from CNN's report on the 'No hire, no fire' economy by Matt Egan:
… Even as the overall labor market looks relatively healthy, economists say this is the worst market for new college graduates since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Recent grads are finding that it takes considerable time to get hired, leaving them unemployed and saddled with student debt for a frustratingly long time.
For the first time since record-keeping on the topic began in 1980, the unemployment rate for recent graduates (those 22 to 27 years old with a bachelor's degree or higher) is consistently higher than the national unemployment rate, according to Oxford Economics.
The unemployment rate for people between 20 and 24 is twice the national average, and there is evidence that companies are adjusting how they make entry-level hires as they adopt AI advancements.
All of that could point to a distinct lack of optimism among younger Americans.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Treasury Yields Slide as ADP Data Flash Signs of Softening Jobs
Treasury Yields Slide as ADP Data Flash Signs of Softening Jobs

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Treasury Yields Slide as ADP Data Flash Signs of Softening Jobs

(Bloomberg) -- Treasury yields slid on Wednesday as a fresh dose of data on the health of the US labor market signaled more softening, emboldening traders' view that the Federal Reserve will resume cutting interest rates later this year. The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars At London's New Design Museum, Visitors Get Hands-On Access LA City Council Passes Budget That Trims Police, Fire Spending ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract NYC Residents Want Safer Streets, Cheaper Housing, Survey Says ADP Research data showed hiring decelerated to the slowest pace in two years in May, putting traders on alert that Friday's key non-farm payrolls figures could also show labor conditions weakening. The data drew a swift response from US President Donald Trump, stating in a social media post that the Fed needs to cut interest rates, a demand he's made before. The two-year Treasury yield — most sensitive to changes in Fed policy — fell as much as four basis points to a low of 3.91%. Rates on long-maturity US government debt saw the biggest declines, with the 30-year bond rate down six basis points at 4.92%. Swaps traders are pricing in two quarter-point interest rate reductions before the end of 2025, with the first move seen most likely coming in October. 'This is a leading indicator into what we think is going to happen in Friday payrolls,' Jim Caron, a chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, said on Bloomberg Television. 'It does make the Fed probably have to step up and look. The thing they are worried about the most is a softening in the jobs market.' Ahead of the Wednesday data, traders were ramping up bets that hedged against dramatic shifts in the Fed's rate path as questions about the economic impact of the Trump administration's evolving policies persist. Friday's figures are forecast to show employers added 130,000 new workers in May, a stepdown from the prior-month increase of 177,000. The unemployment rate is predicted to remain steady at 4.2%, according to a Bloomberg survey of economists. 'We are looking at the unemployment rate given it's more of a clear signal,' Molly Brooks McGown, US rates strategist TD Securities, said on Bloomberg Television. An upward move in the unemployment rate to 4.5% — from the current 4.2% — would see the 'Fed get more concerned,' Brooks McGown said. That would 'probably' make most investors more comfortable with the Fed stepping in, she said. --With assistance from Edward Bolingbroke and Michael Mackenzie. YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Federal judge halts Florida's social media ban for kids
Federal judge halts Florida's social media ban for kids

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal judge halts Florida's social media ban for kids

A federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction against Florida's HB 3, a law regarding youth and social media accounts. Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker in Tallahassee says in court documents obtained by FOX Business that the law is a violation of the First Amendment's protections on free speech. Walker's ruling on Tuesday sides with trade groups NetChoice and Computer and Communications Industry Association, putting HB 3 on hold until the litigation is resolved. "Today's ruling is yet another affirmation that the government cannot control or censor online speech. Like all Americans, Floridians have the right to access lawful speech without the government controlling what they say, share or see online," Chris Marchese, NetChoice Director of Litigation, said in a statement. Texas Bill Pushes Strictest Social Media Ban For Minors In The Nation "Lawmakers should focus on real, constitutional alternatives that respect both family autonomy and free speech," he continued. Read On The Fox Business App Jeremy Redfern, a spokesman for Republican Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, whose office is defending the law, said in a statement obtained by Reuters that the "platforms do not have a constitutional right to addict kids to their products." Uthmeier's office plans to appeal it to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, he said. Snapchat 'Openly Defying' Law, Allowing Kids Access To Harmful, Addictive Content: Florida Ag HB 3 requires social media platforms to bar users under the age of 14 and requires users under 16 to get parental consent before opening an account. It was supposed to go into effect Jan. 1, but was put on hold due to litigation. NetChoice, which represents social media platforms, has won injunctions in recent months against similar laws in Utah and California that restricted the use of social media platforms by youths. Click Here To Read More On Fox Business In Tuesday's ruling, Walker said he appreciated that parents are concerned about their children's social media use, but that other, unchallenged provisions of the law offered them recourse. The industry groups did not address some parts of the law that directed social media companies to delete youth accounts at parental request. Reuters contributed to this report. Original article source: Federal judge halts Florida's social media ban for kids

Trump defeats Democrats' lawsuit over election commission independence
Trump defeats Democrats' lawsuit over election commission independence

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump defeats Democrats' lawsuit over election commission independence

By Jonathan Stempel (Reuters) -A Washington, D.C. judge has dismissed the Democratic Party's lawsuit accusing U.S. President Donald Trump of violating federal election law by trying to assert control over the independent Federal Election Commission. U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ruled on Tuesday night that three national Democratic committees lacked a "concrete and imminent injury" to justify suing now, because they did not show Trump would violate election law. The lawsuit filed on February 28 was the Democratic Party's first against Trump during the Republican's second White House term. Hundreds of lawsuits challenging the administration's actions have been filed. Neither the Democratic party nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment on Wednesday. The White House did not immediately respond to a similar request. Democrats challenged Trump's February 18 executive order giving the White House more control over traditionally independent agencies including the election commission, National Labor Relations Board and Securities and Exchange Commission. They objected to language making Trump's and Attorney General Pam Bondi's views on questions of law "controlling" for federal employees performing their official duties, and bans executive branch employees from advancing contrary views. The plaintiffs included the Democratic National Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. In a 14-page decision, Ali said White House lawyers assured that the administration would not invoke Trump's order to dictate election commission activity, and commissioners would not interpret the order as a command to vote a particular way. Ali, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, also found no imminent injury based on Democrats' claim they were "chilled" from pursuing campaign strategies because a Trump-controlled election commission might reject them. "The court does not doubt that the committees would have cause for profound concern were the FEC's independence to be compromised," the judge wrote. But he said Supreme Court precedent required the committees to show that their relationship with the bipartisan commission has changed or will change. "They have not done so," he said. The election commission oversees elections and enforces campaign finance laws. Congress created it in 1974 in the wake of the Watergate scandal. The case is Democratic National Committee et al v Trump et al, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 25-00587.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store