EXCLUSIVE I was left with horrifying burns after I cooked sausages in my air fryer and it EXPLODED
A man who says his air fryer exploded despite being unplugged from its power source has told how he has been left with third-degree burns and permanent nerve damage.
Jonty Benjamin, 52, from Blackpool, had cooked sausages in his Tower Housewares Air Fryer one evening as he prepared what he dubbed a 'roast dinner' on an otherwise normal night.
But after turning the device off and unplugging it from the wall - a ritual he claims to do with all electric appliances - Mr Benjamin sat down to eat his meal before the smell of smoke began to flow into his living room.
No sooner than his attempts to save the kitchen from burning down were finished as the fryer went up in flames, the 52-year-old realised his right arm was covered in burnt plastic which had seeped into his skin.
'It was the adrenaline that initially made it painless,' Mr Benjamin told MailOnline.
'I got such a shock. Within a few minutes of sitting down I could smell something wasn't right and when I went into my kitchen the air fryer was fully alight.
'It was terrifying. It took me about a minute or two to control the flames but by that point my arm was completely burnt.'
Mr Benjamin said he was surprised at how well he initially coped with the pain - but was later told that he had suffered extreme nerve damage which had drastically reduced his sensory abilities.
He even waited five days after the horror unfolded on March 25 before getting the burns checked at Preston Royal Hospital's skin trauma clinic after the severity of the pain had gotten too strong.
Doctors told Mr Benjamin he had suffered third degree burns, deep cut burns, and severe nerve damage throughout his right arm and parts of his hand.
Now, he is facing rounds of plastic surgery after receiving a skin graft last week where a chunk of skin from his leg was removed to cover the deepest burns on his arm.
Despite suffering the 'lifelong injuries', Mr Benjamin says he does not have high hopes for compensation.
However, he has sent the remnants of the air fryer to Tower Manufacturers who have responded directly to him to say they are investigating.
MailOnline reported how Tower issued a product recall on April 10 over concerns that their products will overheat and ignite during use, but the warning was supplied more than two weeks after the 52-year-old suffered the injuries.
The appliance company, founded in Wolverhampton, claimed that the affected products were manufactured between January 2022 and April 2023 and said said the fault was deemed 'low risk'.
Though it advised those who have purchased the air fryers to 'stop using them immediately' and unplug them from power supplies, Mr Benjamin claims his explosion occurred after it had been unplugged.
The air fryer, which the 52-year-old says he only used 'once or twice a week' was given to him as a gift from his friend last year, who has been left 'mortified and angry' by the incident.
And it has left Mr Benjamin so traumatised that he no longer feels he can use an electric cooking device.
'I have an oven, microwave and grill all-in-one at home but I don't even want to use that now,' Mr Benjamin said.
'For the past three weeks I've been living on sandwiches and instant noodles. I haven't been able to cook since it happened.
'I was out a walk with my dog the other day and I heard a fire alarm in the distance, and even that was still triggering. I don't know when I'll be ready again.'
A spokesperson for Tower Housewares told MailOnline: 'At Tower, the safety and well-being of our customers is of paramount importance.
'All of our products are subject to rigorous safety and testing procedures, which our dedicated quality assurance team constantly monitor to ensure they meet the highest standards.
'The customer has made contact with our team and we are working with him directly to understand the cause of this incident.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Politicians don't want to admit the truth about the Northern Ireland riots
The scenes of violence that have gripped Northern Ireland this week have evoked unwelcome memories of the province's turbulent recent history. But the working-class communities there have found a very different 'grievance' from the one that wreaked devastation on their towns and cities during the Troubles. In the past, the 'enemy' was defined by Northern Ireland's complex divisions over civil rights, religion and the prospect of a united Ireland. In the last few nights, the target has been the local immigrant population. Police have come under attack from violent mobs throwing firebombs, bottles and rocks after demonstrations against Roma residents escalated. Cultural tensions were already high, with locals voicing their objections to the influx of Roma into their communities, even before it was reported that a teenage girl from Ballymena had allegedly suffered a sexual assault at the hands of two teenage Roma boys. The list of complaints is a familiar one: they claim few of the new arrivals speak English and require the support of translators in order to be able to access local services. There are concerns that the Roma people are more likely to be on benefits compared to other ethnic groups. Local women have complained about harassment from groups of Roma men (and women) as they walk to and from their homes. And to complicate matters, no one seems quite sure whether the new arrivals have crossed the border from the Republic of Ireland or are in the UK legally, having arrived in the UK before EU Freedom of Movement was scrapped on December 31, 2020. Similar tensions over the Roma emerged in areas of Britain during the UK's EU membership, when local, usually poorer, areas of some large cities attracted large numbers of those originating in parts of eastern Europe where the Roma have historically suffered persecution and discrimination. In Glasgow, the Govanhill area in the city's south side gained a reputation as the centre of a new Roma community without much civil upset. But unlike Glasgow, Northern Ireland has a recent history of civil unrest, not to mention a folk memory of burning resentment against the establishment, that has proved all too easily exploited by racist elements. Roma families, many with young children, have been forced to flee the mobs who have targeted, and on some occasions, destroyed their homes. Uncomplimentary comparisons have already been made with last year's summer riots that followed the murder of three young girls at a local dance class in Southport. It is tempting now, as it was then, to conclude that this is nothing more than attempts by the 'far-Right' to foment civil disturbance for their own ends. It is more complicated than that. Do local communities have any right to object to the imposition of alien, or at least unfamiliar, cultures upon them? Is it always irrational and xenophobic to resent someone because of their apparent refusal to learn the language of the country in which they have chosen to live? Is it similarly unreasonable to object to the amount of local authority resources devoted towards easing that problem? And while it is both dangerous and unjust to make blanket assumptions about any nationality's attitudes to women and sex, it is undeniable that certain cultures have, by western standards, an outdated view of women's roles in society. Until relatively recently, it was decreed by our political masters that we should never cast aspersions on such attitudes and cultures, but such restrictions are no longer taken seriously, not after the grooming gangs scandal, or Kemi Badenoch's warning that not all cultures are equally valid. An entire community cannot and should not be held accountable for the alleged sexual assault on a teenage girl. But to dismiss local anger as racism, to order people to accept whatever changes are imposed on their communities by their political betters without demur, is simply storing up greater trouble for the future.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Self-styled Lord allegedly pelted former lover's home with eggs, paint and bricks after she jilted him, court hears
A self-styled 'lord' waged a campaign of intimidation against a former partner after she ended the relationship, a court has heard. Peter Sorrell, 65, allegedly threw items including rocks and eggs at the woman's home when their four-year affair ended. He is also said to have daubed words such as 'slapper', and 'sex for sale' on her house during late night raids. Jurors were told 'bizarre' letters and messages were sent to the woman, under the names of other people including the defendant's ex-wife, describing how she was causing 'suffering' to a 'good man'. Others threatened her, the prosecution says, with comments including 'bitch is going to burn'. Details of the alleged stalking have been heard at Norwich Crown Court in Norfolk, where the defendant has been turning up clutching a copy of the Magna Carta and insisted on being referred to as Lord Peter Sorrelll (sic). Father-of-three Sorrell, a retired lorry driver who lives in a modest two-bedroom newbuild house in Bradwell, and the woman went out between 2014 and 2018, the prosecution say. But when she told him the relationship was over he couldn't 'accept' the break-up and 'begged her to take him back'. When this failed, he started on the course of action that led to his alleged victim to 'fear violence would be used against her'. Sorrell denies putting a person in fear of violence by stalking between December 22, 2019 and November 19, 2020. He has also pleaded not guilty to four breaches of a non-molestation order made by the Family Court in November 2019. The breaches occurred between March and November 2020, jurors heard. Prosecutor John Fairhead said that other items thrown at the victim's house in Great Yarmouth included bricks and paint. Paint was also used to write the graffiti on the front and back of her home including 'whore' and 'RIP, RIP'. Mr Fairhead added the defendant 'sent her a number of letters', some handwritten and others on Facebook, claiming to be from his ex-wife, friends and well-wishers. These were 'lengthy, rambling and, the Crown would say, frankly bizarre' as they outlined how he was a 'good man'. 'But apart from this frankly blatant emotional blackmail, the letters became increasingly abusive and menacing,' the prosecutor said. They included a Valentine's card with the message: 'Happy Valentine's Day you black widow… when I play games, I play to the end.' Messages from the Facebook accounts of several women were also actually composed by the defendant, the court heard. These had comments such as 'you stupid bitch', 'you killed him, you're responsible' and 'bitch is going to burn'. One warned that Sorrell would 'not see this year out if he doesn't stop hurting himself'. The Crown claims the defendant was also seen 'wearing a wig to disguise himself' during late night visits to his victim's home. Giving evidence from behind a screen, the woman said the messages had become 'more and more threatening and aggressive'. 'I began to worry for my life. It made me feel scared to be in my own home,' she told the jury. 'My home was my safe place. It was my daughter's safe place. But it made me realise it was no longer a place I could feel safe.' She also claimed Sorrell had been sending gifts and 'turning up at my neighbour's door asking to send me gifts' because he 'refused to accept' they were no longer together. Referring to the letters, she said she recognised the handwriting and said of the comments they contained: 'It's a pattern he had been following for about a year-and-a-half. 'He's been trying to portray himself as a good guy and a victim in this.' Finding the words 'RIP, RIP' scrawled on her house had 'made me fear eventually he would kill me'. She added: 'It came to the point [where] I didn't want to leave the house because I didn't know what was going to happen.' Sorrell, who is representing himself in court, tried to 'paint himself as the victim' when he was arrested and allegedly blamed his former wife for the graffiti, it is said. He was initially released without charge but was later arrested for breaching the non-molestation order by being within 50m of his victim's home, the court heard. He had gone to a launderette that was 36m from the house, claiming it was the only one open in the area at the time. Mr Fairhead said the defendant had 'pursued a course of conduct' that caused his victim to 'fear violence would be used against her'. He added: 'The Crown say all the evidence points to one person – the defendant, 'Lord Peter Sorrell'.' The Magna Carta, signed by King John in 1215, was a landmark document in English democracy that established that no one is above the law. The trial continues.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Three e-bikes worth £20k stolen from rural garage in Devon
Three electric bikes collectively worth nearly £20,000 have been stolen from a garage in west Devon, police have burglary took place place at a rural property in Venton near Drewsteignton between 01:00 and 02:00 BST on Wednesday, Devon and Cornwall Police said thieves had taken a midnight green Santa Cruz Vala e-bike, an avocado green Santa Cruz Heckler bike and a mint green Specialized Levo said they suspected a van had been used to transport the e-bikes and asked anyone with information or relevant CCTV or doorbell camera footage to contact them. Sgt Tom Ottley added: "We would also like to hear from anyone who has been offered any of these high-value e-bikes for sale."
