logo
Mexico's promotion, relegation battle: Clubs in suit allege federation retaliation

Mexico's promotion, relegation battle: Clubs in suit allege federation retaliation

New York Times28-05-2025

The attorneys for the second-division Mexican clubs that filed a claim in the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) last week against the Mexican Football Federation (FMF) and Liga MX remain committed to their fight to re-incorporate promotion and relegation next season, despite one Liga Expansión club dropping out of the battle.
Advertisement
Club Atlante, perhaps the most recognized Liga Expansión team along with Club Morelia, removed itself from the appeal process on Monday. That same day, Liga MX held its annual owners meeting in which the CAS claim was expected to be discussed. Several theories about Atlante's sudden retreat have added a new twist to what is expected to be a contentious litigation process.
Complicating matters, despite the Liga Expansión clubs demanding that pro/rel be reinstated next season, FMF has since insisted the mechanism has remained attainable – via a series of criteria – ever since the federation technically halted the process during the COVID-19 pandemic. Attorney Eduardo Carlezzo, whose firm is representing the nine Liga Expansión clubs, also claims that FMF has responded to the suit by retaliating against those involved.
'The clubs are exhausted; they have reached the end of the tunnel,' Carlezzo told The Athletic in a statement on Wednesday. 'Mexican football urgently needs renovation to restore credibility, and last week's actions by the federation show exactly how they have behaved over the years. As soon as we submitted an appeal to CAS, the FMF withheld a monthly payment due to the clubs since 2020 as compensation for being unable to be promoted. This is pure revenge! These are significant sums that will impact some clubs' finances. We are now analyzing all legal actions available to us to fight against these threats.'
On Wednesday, a separate statement reviewed by The Athletic cited conflicts of interest and a 'legal simulation' by the FMF and Liga MX officials, in addition to several chief concerns about the future of promotion and relegation in Mexico.
Those concerns include the influence of multi-club ownership in Mexico and a tendency among Liga MX officials to favor a permanently closed system, similar to MLS. When pro/rel was paused in Mexico due to the pandemic, the FMF created a fund that would help Liga Expansión clubs financially.
Advertisement
'The FMF General Assembly approved this temporary suspension to protect the economic stability of the clubs,' FMF's secretary general Íñigo Riestra said in response to the CAS claim.
On May 21, the FMF said on its official X account that, 'Promotion remains active through certification. A club will be promoted once at least four clubs are certified at the start of the season and one of them wins the (Liga Expansión) Campeón de Campeones' match.
The requirements that second-division clubs were expected to meet include sporting, infrastructure and administrative improvements that FMF would then review before granting promotion to Liga MX. That certification process is ambiguous, though, per the attorneys representing the nine Liga Expansión clubs.
Coincidentally, Atlante's Estadio Ciudad de Deportes, which does not currently meet the federation's first-division requirements, was used as the home field for Club América during last week's Liga MX final vs. Toluca. América's home stadium, Estadio Azteca, is currently under renovation.
'The 'certification for promotion' argued by the FMF is nothing more than a legal simulation to disguise the fact that there is no real commitment to return promotion and relegation,' the statement reads in part. 'And it scares us that the FMF's Secretary General (Iñigo Riestra) comes out to defend a phantom procedure that has not even been applied this year.'
Riestra countered last week by saying that 'half-truths' had been told and that it was important for the federation to tell its side of the story.
'The competition was suspended during the 2019-2020 season but it wasn't because of this agreement (with Liga Expansión), but rather because of the effects of the pandemic,' Riestra said in a video statement. 'It was the Liga Expansión clubs who requested financial support in order to avoid bankruptcy. … That's why on April 20 of 2020 the federation's general assembly authorized the temporary suspension of promotion and relegation for six seasons.'
Advertisement
The attorneys for the second-division clubs cite 'a concentration of power' within the hierarchy of the FMF and Liga MX that prevents those clubs from having any real influence over their futures. Liga MX president Mikel Arriola is also a presiding commissioner and executive president of the FMF. Arriola is also the current president of Liga Expansión.
Riestra's brother José, is the former president of Club Atlas, which is owned by Grupo Orlegi, an organization that also owns Liga MX side Santos Laguna. José Riestra is now the head of football of Orlegi Sports, a division of Grupo Orlegi, and one of four multi-club ownership groups in Mexico. That, the nine clubs argue, is 'a conflict of interest that no one seems to question.'
'Multi-ownership is allowed despite being expressly prohibited by Article 5 of its bylaws,' Wednesday's statement reads. 'The FMF statute grants Liga MX the power to define the president of Liga Expansión. Additionally, we do not have the capacity to influence decisions in Mexican Football (when we have) barely 5 percent of votes in the General Assembly.'
The original CAS claim that was filed on May 19 also cited the ongoing debate in Mexico regarding multi-club ownership and its impact on Mexican football.
'The concentration of eight first-division clubs in the hands of four ownership groups represents a significant distortion to the Mexican football ecosystem,' reads the claim. It goes on to allege that multi-owned clubs can be 'incentivized to act in a coordinated manner' to benefit the groups that they represent. This, the claim says, is 'a detriment to fair competition.'
Carlezzo said that the Liga Expansión teams have until Thursday to present their arguments to CAS with the required substantiation. FMF will then be notified by CAS and an official hearing could be scheduled within two to three months.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AT&T just launched a new plan that may be perfect for your parents
AT&T just launched a new plan that may be perfect for your parents

Android Authority

timean hour ago

  • Android Authority

AT&T just launched a new plan that may be perfect for your parents

AT&T is introducing a new affordable wireless plan to its list of offerings. This particular plan may be just what you're looking for if you're 55 or older. In a new blog post , AT&T announced the launch of a wireless plan called AT&T 55 Plus. For the price of $40 per month, customers who are 55 or older and are on this plan will get unlimited talk, text, and data in and between the US, Canada, and Mexico. This price drops down to $35 per month each if you add a second line. Additionally, you'll have access to 10GB of hotspot data and the carrier's cybersecurity suite (ActiveArmor) to stop spam and scams. This plan is also backed by the company's guarantee, which will give you a bill credit if you experience a 60-minute or longer wireless outage. On top of this offer, the company will also soon let you bundle your home internet into the deal. Jenifer Robertson, executive VP and GM of AT&T Mass Markets, states: This summer, new and existing AT&T wireless customers 55 and over will have the opportunity to bundle two wireless lines with our lightning-fast AT&T Fiber or our flexible AT&T Internet Air—all for under $100 According to the blog, bundling two lines with Internet 300 or Internet Air will cost you $99 per month. However, that's without taxes and fees included. Regardless, it sounds like a pretty decent deal that you or your parents may want to consider.

Trump's 50% tariffs on imported steel, aluminum go into effect
Trump's 50% tariffs on imported steel, aluminum go into effect

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's 50% tariffs on imported steel, aluminum go into effect

Tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum to the U.S. doubled to 50% starting at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday, after President Donald Trump followed through on his plan to increase the duties. Trump said on Friday during a visit to a Pittsburgh-area steel mill that he would increase the tariff to 50%, upping the levy to protect steelworker jobs in the U.S. He signed an executive order formalizing the tax increase on Tuesday. 'We don't want America's future to be built with shoddy steel from Shanghai, we want it built with the strength and the pride of Pittsburgh,' Trump said from the U.S. Steel facility in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania The 50% tariffs 'will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminum in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminum industries,' the executive order said. In addition to raising steel and aluminum import tariffs to 50%, Trump said he would sign off on a deal in which Japan's Nippon Steel will acquire U.S. Steel for $14 billion. The U.S. is the world's largest steel importer, with imports accounting for about 25% of the steel used in the country annually, according to the International Trade Administration. CNN reported that in 2024, the U.S. imported $31.3 billion worth of iron and steel and $27.4 billion of aluminum, according to the Commerce Department. Canada is the largest supplier of steel to the U.S., followed by Brazil, Mexico and South Korea. Canadian authorities said they are working to have the tariffs on steel and aluminum removed. 'Canada's new government is engaged in intensive and live negotiations to have these and other tariffs removed as part of a new economic and security partnership with the United States,' the office of Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a statement to CTV News on Tuesday. Unifor, Canada's largest labor union, called for retaliatory tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminium to match the 50% tariff imposed by Trump. 'These tariffs are killing investment in our steel, aluminum, and auto sectors, and we are already seeing the consequences in lost jobs and economic instability,' Unifor National President Lana Payne said Wednesday in a news release. 'We need immediate and forceful action to defend good jobs and safeguard our national economic security.' The 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum apply to all countries, except the United Kingdom, which announced a preliminary trade deal with the Trump administration in May. The rate for steel and aluminum imports from the U.K. remains at 25% until at least July 9. The tariff hike arrives about three months after Trump implemented 25% duties on all imported steel and aluminum, including Mexico and Canada, its partners in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said the 50% tariffs on imported steel and aluminum are in violation of the USMCA. 'It's an unfair measure,' Sheinbaum said Wednesday during her daily morning news conference. 'In Mexico's case, it's unfair because Mexico imports more steel and aluminum than it exports. Formally, a tariff is imposed when there's a deficit for the United States, in other words, as if Mexico were exporting more than it was importing. It has no legal basis because there's a national treaty. It's being considered for U.S. security reasons. It's unsustainable.' The post Trump's 50% tariffs on imported steel, aluminum go into effect appeared first on FreightWaves.

Mexico's Sheinbaum to Defend Steel Industry If US Tariff Deal Fails
Mexico's Sheinbaum to Defend Steel Industry If US Tariff Deal Fails

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Mexico's Sheinbaum to Defend Steel Industry If US Tariff Deal Fails

President Claudia Sheinbaum said she will take steps to protect the local steel industry if the government is unable to reach a deal with Donald Trump's administration to exempt Mexico from heightened steel tariffs. Mexico has sought to strike a deal with the US on the basis that the worldwide 50% tariff is unfair given its regional free trade agreement and because Mexico runs a steel trade deficit with the US. Mexico is among the US's biggest steel suppliers along with Canada and Brazil.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store