logo
At last, Putin is getting a taste of his own medicine

At last, Putin is getting a taste of his own medicine

Yahoo2 days ago

Sunday, June 1, may go down as one of the most significant days of this war. It may be a sign that the pendulum is at last swinging in Ukraine's favour. The Russian Air Force has apparently just suffered a terrible blow, with up to 40 fighter jets, including long range nuclear bombers, destroyed thousands of miles from Ukraine.
In what could be a sequential attack, the Russian rail network near the Ukraine border has been decimated by several strikes, and even Russian bases in the Arctic have been hit. This would have been considered unthinkable a few months ago, including by Putin no doubt.
It is seemingly now apparent that restrictions of the use of Western weapons by Ukraine are being lifted. This brings into range anything within 500kms of Ukraine – including Moscow. The Ukrainian military has also confirmed they had developed a drone with a range of over 3,000kms. Indeed, we may have seen both these capabilities in action today, and even the great Russian propaganda and disinformation machine will struggle to portray this as anything but a disaster for Putin and the Russian forces.
Where is all the air defence protecting these airfields and trains? Perhaps protecting Putin's palaces, or given away to North Korea in return for ammunition?
The timing of these attacks is significant: discontent is mounting in Russia amongst the rank and file. As Putin drives their economy and way of life into the deck, rumblings of rebellion will be even harder to stifle.
This is not one way traffic and Russia also launched a massive drone attack over the weekend, almost exclusively hitting civilian targets. Putin seems to believe if you kill enough people they will acquiesce and give up, but his instincts and his tactics could soon bite him back hard, very hard.
Now that much of Russia is now in range of Kyiv attacks, be it drones, missiles or the frighteningly efficient assassins of Ukraine's secret service the SBU, how will the Kremlin respond?
This bold action also lays bare the inadequacies of the UK military. Could Britain execute such ingenious and effective attacks, after 20 years of funding cuts and neglect from successive governments, such that the only way we can ensure the security of our Islands in future is through the re-introduction of tactical nuclear weapons? Putin has exploited our lack of conventional deterrence for too long, but he respects strength, and nothing shows strength in this context more than nuclear capability.
The level, range and intensity of these attacks shows that after three years of repelling Russian attacks, Ukraine is now returning the compliment. As the UK Strategic Defence Review is unveiled, let us hope it reveals that we are now learning from the Ukrainian experience and developing capabilities for tomorrow's battlefield and capabilities which will deter tyrants like Putin, rather than just kit that looks good on the parade ground.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We have no plans to attack Britain,' say Russia's London diplomats as defence review lays out Putin threats
‘We have no plans to attack Britain,' say Russia's London diplomats as defence review lays out Putin threats

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘We have no plans to attack Britain,' say Russia's London diplomats as defence review lays out Putin threats

Russia's embassy in London said on Tuesday that Moscow had no intention of attacking Britain after the UK's Strategic Defence Review highlighted a series of threats from Vladimir Putin's regime. The SDR mentions Russia 33 times and tells of the 'immediate and pressing threat' posed by it. In an introduction to the 144-page document, Sir Keir Starmer stressed: 'In this new era for defence and security, when Russia is waging war on our continent and probing our defences at home, we must meet the danger head on.' The SDR emphasised: 'Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine makes unequivocally clear its willingness to use force to achieve its goals, as well as its intent to re-establish spheres of influence in its near-abroad and disrupt the international order to the UK and its allies' disadvantage. 'While the Ukraine conflict has temporarily degraded Russian conventional land forces, the overall modernisation and expansion of its armed forces means it will pose an enduring threat in key areas such as space, cyberspace, information operations, undersea warfare, and chemical and biological weapons.' Defence Secretary John Healey has warned that Britain's military is coming under daily cyber attacks from Russia, as well as other countries. But the Russian Embassy in London rejected the claims against the Putin regime of aggression, criticising what it described as "a fresh salvo of anti-Russian rhetoric". In a statement, it said: 'Russia poses no threat to the United Kingdom and its people. 'We harbour no aggressive intentions and have no plans to attack Britain. We are not interested in doing so, nor do we need to.' However, the statement will be treated with scepticism in Whitehall and at Westminster given the repeated denials that Russia was planning to invade Ukraine, before doing so in February 2022. Mr Healey has told how laser weapons will be installed on Royal Navy ships within two years to protect the UK against a missile attack by Russia, or other aggressor. The Cabinet minister has also warned of the threat of a biological attack on Britain's streets by Russia, following the poisoning of Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia with Novichok in Salisbury in March 2018. They both survived but Dawn Burgess, 44, died after also coming into contact with the nerve agent. British prosecutors identified two Russians who they said were operating under aliases, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, who they believe tried to murder the Skripals with the military-grade nerve agent. Relations between Russia and Britain are at their lowest level since the Cold War. They deteriorated further after Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The UK has led moves to arm Ukraine, first with anti-tank weapons, then Challenger II tanks and Storm Shadow long-range missiles. China's embassy in London also criticised Britain's defence review, saying that the document deliberately misrepresented Beijing's defence policy to justify British military expansion. The SDR had described China as "a sophisticated and persistent challenge", citing its rapid military modernisation, including an expanded nuclear arsenal, and saying Beijing was likely using espionage and cyberattacks, and stealing intellectual property. The review, which included 62 recommendations, proposed sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology including drones, laser weapons to protect the UK, artificial intelligence, as well as more nuclear-powered submarines, but the Government has been accused of not guaranteeing sufficient funding.

Bannon: Graham giving Ukrainians ‘false hope'
Bannon: Graham giving Ukrainians ‘false hope'

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bannon: Graham giving Ukrainians ‘false hope'

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, a key MAGA insider, doubled down late Monday on his criticism of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and the lawmaker's vocal support for Ukraine amid its war with Russia. In an interview on NewsNation's 'Cuomo,' Bannon said Graham was giving Ukrainians 'false hope' by meeting with the country's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, and by suggesting the U.S. support Kyiv's stunning drone attack on Russia's strategic bombing fleet. 'We can't have Lindsey Graham, and particularly Zelensky, leading us into a third world war with a deep strike into Russia,' Bannon told host Chris Cuomo. The comments come after the former Trump adviser called for the South Carolina Republican to be jailed for his pro-Ukraine stance. Cuomo repeatedly challenged Bannon to back up that request. 'I don't understand how you could want to jail a U.S. senator because he's saying something you don't like,' the NewsNation host said, adding, 'That sounds like the worst of the deep state and lawfare.' Bannon responded, 'No, it's absolutely — what he's doing over there right now is stirring it up. He's giving the Ukrainians false hope.' Cuomo cut in, 'But it's not illegal.' The Trump ally continued, 'He's giving Ukrainians false hope that we're there to support them on engaging Russia in a kinetic conflict. And we are not.' The host continued to press Bannon about why he thinks Graham should be detained. 'So maybe he's wrong, but why do you say throw him in jail?' he said. 'Two things ought to happen: Either cancel his passport and don't let him back in the country, or put him in jail if he comes back,' Bannon responded, adding, 'The attack was audacious.' 'It was brilliant. But the problem is it gets us involved in a conflict that no one in the United States wants to be part of,' he added. Cuomo noted that he didn't necessarily disagree with the former strategist's opinion. 'I'm just saying you can't be throwing people in jail because you don't like what they say. That's my only point,' he told Bannon. 'I'm not saying that you're wrong about where this might lead and how dangerous it is.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Kremlin says Putin-Trump-Zelenskyy meeting unlikely in near future
Kremlin says Putin-Trump-Zelenskyy meeting unlikely in near future

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kremlin says Putin-Trump-Zelenskyy meeting unlikely in near future

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has stated that a trilateral meeting involving Russian leader Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is unlikely in the near future. Source: Kremlin-aligned Russian news agency Interfax, as reported by European Pravda Details: Peskov was responding to White House comments about Trump's openness to such a meeting format. Quote: "Frankly, this is unlikely in the near future. President Putin has repeatedly stressed his readiness for high-level contacts, but these must follow agreements developed at technical and expert levels." [N.B. Ukrainska Pravda does not recognise Putin as president – ed.] Background White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed that Trump has not ruled out taking part in a potential meeting between the leaders of Ukraine and Russia to end Moscow's war of aggression. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan expressed hope that Ankara will be able to organise a meeting between Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin in Istanbul or Ankara. Soon after, Zelenskyy stated that he supports Erdoğan's proposal to hold a meeting with Putin, Trump and Erdoğan himself. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store