
Putin made Trump wait, then strung him along
US President Donald Trump's phone call with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, didn't take a tangible step towards ending the hostilities in Ukraine, let alone finding an enduring peace. Rather, it provided further evidence of Putin's ability to string along and outsmart Trump.
For starters, Putin sent a signal by making Trump wait for more than an hour to talk. Putin was speaking at a televised conference with Russian businesspeople and even made a joke about the delay when told the time for his call was approaching.
This was clearly designed to show his alpha status, both to Trump and to the Russian public. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy, reportedly was made to wait eight hours by Putin when he arrived in Moscow last week for talks.
And after Tuesday's call, Putin only agreed to pause attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure for 30 days, rather than the total ceasefire that had been proposed by Trump and agreed to by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
And even this agreement lacked clarity. The lengthy Kremlin statement on the call said the pause would only apply to attacks on energy infrastructure, while the vaguer White House read-out said it included a much broader 'energy and infrastructure' agreement. The Kremlin will doubtless stick to the narrow concept.
The Kremlin's statement also said Trump proposed this idea and Putin reacted positively. This seems implausible given that pausing attacks on energy infrastructure would be the least costly partial ceasefire for Russia to agree to.
It seems more likely this proposal came from Putin as a 'compromise,' even though Trump was earlier threatening fire and brimstone if Russia did not agree to a proper ceasefire.
Russia will still be able to continue its ground offensive in Ukraine, where it has the upper hand thanks to Ukrainian manpower shortages (despite its own horrendous losses). It will also be able to maintain its bombardment of Ukrainian civilian targets that has already cost possibly as many as 100,000 civilian lives and half a trillion US dollars in mooted reconstruction costs.
Ukraine, meanwhile, has only rarely hit residential areas in Russia. However, it has achieved considerable success with long-distance drone attacks on Russian oil refineries and energy infrastructure, threatening one of the main funding sources of Moscow's war effort. Damage at the AES Group private oil refinery the day after a Russian shock drone attack in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine this week. Sergey Kozlov / EPA
The Kremlin's read-out of the call also noted that various sticking points remain to achieve a full ceasefire in Ukraine.
These included the Kyiv regime's 'inability to negotiate in good faith,' which has 'repeatedly sabotaged and violated the agreements reached.' The Kremlin also accused Ukrainian militants of 'barbaric terrorist crimes' in the Kursk region of Russia that Ukraine briefly occupied.
This is not new language, but shows breathtaking chutzpah. It's Russia, in fact, that has broken several agreements vowing to respect Ukraine's borders, as well as numerous provisions of the Geneva Conventions on treatment of civilian populations and prisoners of war. It has even violated the Genocide Convention in the eyes of some scholars.
That a US president could let this kind of statement go unchallenged underscores the extent of the White House's volte-face on Ukraine.
The Kremlin also asserted that a 'key principle' for further negotiations must be the cessation of foreign military aid and intelligence to Ukraine.
Given Trump has already frozen arms and intelligence support to Ukraine to make Zelensky more compliant, Putin no doubt thinks he might do so again. This, in turn, would strengthen Russia's leverage in negotiations.
Trump has already given away huge bargaining chips that could have been used to pressure Russia towards a just and enduring outcome. These include: holding talks with Russia without Ukraine present,
ruling out security guarantees for Ukraine and NATO membership in the longer term and
foreshadowing that Ukraine should cede its sovereign territory in defiance of international law.
Putin may be content to string out the ceasefire talks as long as he can in the hopes Russian troops can consolidate their hold on Ukrainian territory and completely expel Ukrainian forces from the Kursk region inside Russia.
He shows no sign of resiling from his key aims since the beginning of the war – to reimpose Russian dominance over Ukraine and its foreign and domestic policies, and to retain the territories it has illegally annexed.
The fact Moscow has signed treaties to formally incorporate and assimilate these Ukrainian regions fully into Russia – rather than merely occupying them – underlines how this has always been a war of imperial reconquest rather than a response to perceived military threat. Putin poses with the heads of four Ukrainian regions at a ceremony to sign treaties to annex the territories at the Kremlin in 2022. Photo: Grigory Sysoyev / Kremlin Pool / Sputnik
At the same time, if he can get much of what he wants, Putin may just be tempted to end the war to further a more business-as-usual relationship with the US. Trump has dangled various carrots to encourage Putin to do this, from renewed US investment in Russia to easing sanctions to ice hockey games.
Ukraine's immediate reaction to the Trump-Putin call appears to be cautiously accepting of a limited ceasefire on energy infrastructure. This is no doubt to avoid incurring Trump's wrath.
At the same time, Ukraine's bottom line remains firm: Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty are non-negotiable
it must be able to choose its own foreign alliances and partnerships, and
it must be able to defend itself, without limits on the size of its army or its weaponry.
The only way to square the circle would be to freeze the conflict at the current front lines in Ukraine and leave the status of the annexed Ukrainian regions to be resolved in future negotiations.
But even this would have little credibility unless Russia revoked its annexations and allowed international organisations and observers to enter the region to encourage a modicum of compliance with international law.
Jon Richardson is avisiting fellow at the Center for European Studies, Australian National University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
24 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's crackdown on international students affects far more US schools than Harvard
US President Donald Trump's proclamation last week that he would bar Harvard University from enrolling new international students put the spotlight back on an unprecedented stand-off between the White House and America's pre-eminent university. Advertisement Trump's move came less than a week after a federal court injunction blocked the US Department of Homeland Security's termination of Harvard's ability to host international students. It was also just hours after the administration threatened Columbia University's accreditation standing , contending that the New York school – like Harvard, an Ivy League university whose founding predated the creation of the United States – had permitted antisemitism on campus. The hardline measures underscored Trump's determination to keep elite education in his crosshairs as part of a wider culture war that defines his political brand and raise fresh questions about whether they will be able to survive an onslaught that does not appear to have an off-ramp. With many governmental measures targeting international students – or those from mainland China and Hong Kong, in particular – on national security grounds before US courts, the price that America's most prestigious universities will pay is unclear. Advertisement Muddying the picture even more, Trump has made comments over the past week suggesting that Chinese students are welcome, topping them off with an all-caps green light for Chinese students when, on Wednesday, he trumpeted a long-awaited trade deal with China as 'done', once Chinese President Xi Jinping approves. 'WE WILL PROVIDE TO CHINA WHAT WAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING CHINESE STUDENTS USING OUR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD WITH ME!),' he posted on his Truth Social account.


South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Protests spread across US despite Trump threats, Los Angeles crackdown
Protests against Donald Trump's harsh immigration policies spread Wednesday across the United States despite a military-backed crackdown in Los Angeles and a threat by the Republican president to use 'heavy force'. Advertisement In Los Angeles, where the unrest began last Friday, an overnight curfew in the downtown area saw police make 25 arrests by morning. Heavily armed officers patrolled near government buildings, and storekeepers boarded up windows to protect against vandalism. US Marines – ordered by Trump to deploy in addition to more than 4,000 National Guard soldiers – were expected to make their first appearance on the streets on Wednesday. The mostly peaceful protests ignited over a sudden escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants who were in the country illegally. Advertisement Pockets of violence – including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling stones at police – triggered a massive response from authorities using tear gas and other crowd-control weapons.


South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Viewed from China, Trump's crackdown on LA unrest seems a risky ‘political gamble'
Chinese analysts have been closely monitoring the Los Angeles unrest , which they said had been exploited by US President Donald Trump for political theatre, jeopardising public safety and stability. One high-profile commentator also predicted that Trump's heavy-handed tactics could escalate into a constitutional crisis. The remarks followed days of protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids, which led to a curfew in some downtown areas of the city aimed at cracking down on vandalism. The comments also came after a breakthrough in US-China trade talks on Tuesday, when the two countries agreed on a framework pending approval from their leaders. The Los Angeles demonstrations have prompted Trump to mobilise thousands of National Guard troops and the US Marines The protests, held in response to a sweeping operation to arrest and deport unauthorised immigrants, have spread to other US cities, including San Francisco, Chicago, Houston and New York. Shi Yinhong, an international relations professor at Beijing's Renmin University, said the deployment of troops by Trump made his 'despotic nature' much clearer to Americans and added nothing to his domestic prestige.