Born in the U.S., Green Party leader Elizabeth May says she would 'die for Canada any day of the week'
Yahoo News Canada presents 'My Canada," a series spotlighting Canadians — born-and-raised to brand new — sharing their views on the Canadian dream, national identity, and the triumphs and tribulations that come with life inside and outside these borders.
Many may not realize it, but Green Party Leader Elizabeth May isn't Canadian by birth. 'I came to this country as an intentional Canadian,' she says.
A family vacation to Cape Breton compelled May's parents to leave their home in Hartford, Connecticut in the late 1960s. At the time, May and her brother were teenagers. 'My father was British so he never really liked living in the U.S.,' she tells me from Ottawa. 'But my mother was from there so he was kind of stuck when he married her.'
Being on the island inspired the family to make Canada their home. 'My parents decided they didn't want to live in the U.S. anymore,' she says. 'They loved Cape Breton and they loved Canada.'
The young May — an activist even back then — recalls having rose-coloured glasses about what she expected Canada would be like. 'I thought it would be perfect because of Pierre Trudeau not wanting to encourage or support the U.S. in the war with Vietnam,' she says.
Canada wasn't perfect, but it was — and continues to be — quite profoundly, a work in progress. 'I have always loved the Canadian narrative,' May says. 'The U.S. has this notion of a melting pot. Sure they'll put up with immigrants, but they're expected to emerge from that pot homogenized.'
In contrast, May fell in love with the imagery of Canada being a mosaic. 'The country is beautiful in its diversity.'
She believes what is truly embedded in the fabric of our nation — and what sets us apart — is our community spirit. The ever-environmentalist at heart gives the example of the bravery and community spirit during the Fort McMurray wildfires to illustrate her point: 'I like to contrast the difference between Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the Fort McMurray fires in 2016.' As the Hurricane Katrina floods approached New Orleans, as much as half the police department took off in their police cars to protect themselves, asserts May. 'In Fort McMurray [Alberta], not a single first responder left to save themselves. They safely evacuated 80,000 people. They didn't leave anyone behind.'
Compare this to the reaction of everyday Canadians during the fires. If a car trying to leave Fort McMurray ran out of gas, residents would jump out of their own cars, push it aside, and say: 'Jump in with us!' May says.
Community spirit is often put to the test in times of crisis, and United States President Donald Trump's ongoing tariff threats have done just that. Since he took office early this year, it has only succeeded in invoking a fervent sense of national pride and patriotism.
'If there's one thing Donald Trump has done for which Canadians may want to thank him, it's for bringing [us] together and to stop beating up on the country.' May thinks it's really good to be aware of how lucky we are. 'Our pride in our country is tempered with not the boasting and bullying bravado you get from the U.S., but about gratitude and renewed sense of care and concern for every other Canadian. We may be under threat and menace from Donald Trump, but we're also pulling together.'
May, who has been the Member of Parliament for Saanich—Gulf Islands since 2011 — that's five election wins in a row — says the Canada-U.S. tensions have changed her perspective on her country of birth.
'One of the things it has drawn into sharp focus for us as Canadians is that we've allowed multinational corporations to run our economy for a very long time,' she says. This starts way back when the first industry was based on Canadian trappers and beaver pelts, she says. 'We revolutionized our economy during the Second World War but we have basically allowed ourselves to be an economic colony of the United States. It's not just that we're dependent on them, but we've also allowed them to exploit us.'
It doesn't make sense to anyone in the U.S., and it doesn't make sense to Canadians.
She never would have imagined a U.S. president who decided his first order of business would be to take on Canada.
'It doesn't make sense to anyone in the U.S., and it doesn't make sense to Canadians,' she says. 'But it's a good wake up call. We have to expand our understanding of how many friends we truly have. You can't just pick one.'
But May says she most certainly can 'pick just one' when it comes to love of country — a choice she would make over and over again. '
Being Canadian means everything to me, and I wouldn't want to live anywhere else,' May proclaims. 'Our values are deeply connected to Canadians like Tommy Douglas who gave universal healthcare, and what Lester B. Pearson did in making us a country known for peacekeeping. We have an amazing reputation around the world.'
But we have to live up to these values and not just rest on our laurels, she reminds us. 'I would give up my life for this country any day of the week.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration sues all 15 Maryland federal judges over order blocking removal of immigrants
The Trump administration on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against all 15 federal judges in Maryland over an order blocking the immediate deportation of migrants challenging their removals, ratcheting up a fight with the federal judiciary over President Donald Trump's executive powers. The remarkable action lays bare the administration's determination to exert its will over immigration enforcement as well as a growing exasperation with federal judges who have time and again turned aside executive branch actions they see as lawless and without legal merit. 'It's extraordinary,' Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola Law School, said of the Justice Department's lawsuit. 'And it's escalating DOJ's effort to challenge federal judges.' At issue is an order signed by Chief Judge George L. Russell III and filed in May blocking the administration from immediately removing from the US any immigrants who file paperwork with the Maryland district court seeking a review of their detention. The order blocks the removal until 4 p.m. on the second business day after the habeas corpus petition is filed. The administration says the automatic pause on removals violates a Supreme Court ruling and impedes the president's authority to enforce immigration laws. The Trump administration has been locked for weeks in a growing showdown with the federal judiciary amid a barrage of legal challenges to the president's efforts to carry out key priorities around immigration and other matters. The Justice Department has grown increasingly frustrated by rulings blocking the president's agenda, accusing judges of improperly impeding the president's powers. 'President Trump's executive authority has been undermined since the first hours of his presidency by an endless barrage of injunctions designed to halt his agenda,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement Wednesday. 'The American people elected President Trump to carry out his policy agenda: this pattern of judicial overreach undermines the democratic process and cannot be allowed to stand.' A spokesman for the Maryland district court declined to comment. Democratic Rep. Glenn Ivey of Maryland slammed the lawsuit, writing in a post on X, 'This is absurd and an unprecedented attack on the federal judiciary in Maryland. The Trump Administration will stop at nothing to undermine judicial rulings and delegitimize the courts.' Trump has railed against unfavorable judicial rulings, and in one case called for the impeachment of a federal judge in Washington who ordered planeloads of deported immigrants to be turned around. That led to an extraordinary statement from Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who said, 'Impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.' Among the judges named in the lawsuit is Paula Xinis, who has called the administration's deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador illegal. Attorneys for Abrego Garcia have asked Xinis to impose fines against the administration for contempt, arguing that it ignored court orders for weeks to return him to the US. The order signed by Russell says it aims to maintain existing conditions and the potential jurisdiction of the court; ensure immigrant petitioners are able to participate in court proceedings and access attorneys; and give the government 'fulsome opportunity to brief and present arguments in its defense.' In an amended order, Russell said the court had received an influx of habeas petitions after hours that 'resulted in hurried and frustrating hearings in that obtaining clear and concrete information about the location and status of the petitioners is elusive.' The Trump administration has asked the Maryland judges to recuse themselves from the case. It wants a clerk to have a federal judge from another state hear it. James Sample, a constitutional law professor at Hofstra University, described the lawsuit as further erosion of legal norms by the administration. Normally when parties are on the losing side of an injunction, they appeal the order — not sue the court or judges, he said. On one hand, he said, the Justice Department has a point that injunctions should be considered extraordinary relief; it's unusual for them to be granted automatically in an entire class of cases. But, he added, it's the administration's own actions in repeatedly moving detainees to prevent them from obtaining writs of habeas corpus that prompted the court to issue the order. 'The judges here didn't ask to be put in this unenviable position,' Sample said. 'Faced with imperfect options, they have made an entirely reasonable, cautious choice to modestly check an executive branch that is determined to circumvent any semblance of impartial process.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bezos spoke to Trump as he tries to seeks more government contracts for Blue Origin, WSJ reports
(Reuters) -Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos spoke to U.S. President Donald Trump at least twice this month as he tries to capitalize on a feud between rival SpaceX founder Musk and Trump and bag more government contracts, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday. The CEO of Blue Origin, Dave Limp, also made a trip to the White House to meet with Trump's chief of staff, the WSJ said, citing people familiar with the matter. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fed chief Powell is starting to worry about the reliability of economic data
Jerome Powell raised concerns over economic data quality affecting Fed policy. Budget cuts and staffing shortages at the Bureau of Labor Statistics impact data accuracy. Increased data imputations may lead to misleading inflation and employment figures. For a Federal Reserve operating with a data-driven approach to monetary policy, what happens when the data is wrong? Chairman Jerome Powell has been receiving rising pressure from President Donald Trump — and more recently, other Fed officials — to cut rates, but there's another issue that Powell's worried about: the quality of economic data collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Economists have been raising concerns about this topic for the last few months, and Powell voiced his own concerns on Tuesday during his testimony to Congress. "I wouldn't say that I'm concerned about the data today, although there has been a very mild degradation of the scope of the surveys," Powell said when Rep. Sam Liccardo asked him about his thoughts on data quality. "But I would say the direction of travel is something I'm concerned about." "It's really important not just for the Fed, but for Congress and for businesses, frankly, to know what really is going on in the economy," Powell continued. "I don't like to see the kind of stories I'm reading and the idea being that the data is going to become more volatile and less reliable. That'll make it more difficult for the private sector and for you and for us. That means inflation, employment, and other economic measures that the Fed and other institutions depend on to determine policy might be less accurate than they were in the past. DOGE cuts on government funding could be a culprit. BLS was not spared from budget cuts earlier this year, and a proposal in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill is aiming to further reduce the agency's budget by $56 million. Staffing shortages at the BLS have resulted in reduced data availability. BLS teams calculate CPI numbers by collecting price quotes across 75 urban areas in 200 item categories. On June 16, BLS announced it had suspended data collection in Buffalo, NY. This follows the agency's April suspension of CPI data collection in Lincoln, Nebraska, and Provo, Utah. BLS said the number of imputations, or estimated values, in CPI data increased in April due to these changes, but affirmed that these exclusions have an overall "minimal impact" on inflation data. Torsten Sløk, Apollo's chief economist, pointed out that imputations have increased significantly in the last few months, reducing data quality. Usually, around 10% of the CPI values are imputed when data is not available. However, the May percentage is estimated to be triple the average, at 30%. "In other words, almost a third of the prices going into the CPI at the moment are guesses based on other data collections in the CPI," Sløk wrote in a note last week. This could be leading to more frequent revisions of economic data, experts say, and the labor market is another area of scrutiny. The May jobs report showed 139,000 new jobs created, but both Peter Berezin, chief global strategist at BCA Research, and Samuel Tombs, chief US economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, believe the final number could be revised down to around 100,000. Increased imputations can mask new developments in the economy, making inflation and jobs data look more optimistic than they actually are. In Tombs' opinion, the jobs numbers are excluding a large swath of the economy: small businesses, which are filing late as they struggle with tariff impacts. "When there's a gap in the data, [the BLS] just interpolates from past trends, but if the trend itself is weakening, once you actually get the data that you previously had interpolated, usually you find that it's weaker than your original estimate had suggested," Berezin told Business Insider. "The response rate to these surveys is very low, so the Fed has to do a lot of guesswork. And in a weakening economy, usually you're going to be guessing too high on payrolls, rather than too low" Berezin added. Read the original article on Business Insider