
Egyptian who ran $16m people-smuggling operation from London jailed for 25 years
An Egyptian fisherman who helped run a £12 million ($16 million) people-smuggling operation, and who once told an associate to kill and throw into the sea any migrants caught with phones, has been jailed for 25 years. Ahmed Ebid, 42, worked out of a house in London, provided for him and his family by the British authorities only three weeks after he arrived by small boat. Ebid, believed to be the first person convicted of organising illegal Mediterranean crossings from the UK, was working with networks in North Africa to organise boats, bringing over hundreds of migrants at a time on dangerous vessels. According to the UK's National Crime Agency (NCA), he was involved in at least seven separate crossings in 2022 and 2023 which carried a total of about 3,800 people into Italian waters. He was initially linked to the smuggling operation after he made calls to satellite phones used by henchmen on board the migrant boats. These were then used to call the Italian coastguard, to relay their position, be towed to safety and taken ashore. Ebid's number was traced to London and the Italians tipped off the NCA, which then bugged his home. In one conversation, he told an associate that migrants were not allowed to carry phones on his boats as he sought to avoid law enforcement. 'Tell them guys anyone caught with a phone will be killed, thrown in the sea,' he said. Ebid was arrested and charged in June 2023 and pleaded guilty to assisting illegal immigration but disputed aspects of the case against him. At a special court sitting known as a Newton Hearing, he claimed he had made only €15,000 ($16,840) from the operation and his involvement was limited to sharing navigational and seafaring advice, which he had learnt as a fisherman in the Mediterranean. He maintained his primary motivation was to move his family to the UK. But prosecutors said he was involved in the sourcing and provision of boats and crews for crossings from Libya to Europe. He was involved in the movement of migrants before the crossings, organised their housing and dealt with paperwork. Two notebooks were seized, one of which contained maritime co-ordinates for the area between Libya and Italy. Ebid's claim to have been a low-level player was rejected by judge Adam Hiddleston, who described him as having a 'significant managerial role within an organised crime group'. Passing sentence, Mr Hiddleston told Ebid that the "conspiracy you were a part of generated millions of pounds" and that he must have been a "beneficiary" of "a significant amount". This "truly staggering" amount of money came from the "hard-earned savings of desperate individuals", who were "ruthlessly and cynically exploited" by Ebid and his fellow criminals. "The treatment of the migrants on your orders and in your name was horrifying,' said the judge. "They were simply a commodity to you. "The important thing to you was that each paid up the exorbitant fare that was charged for their crossing and that nobody did anything to compromise your operation – such as by carrying a mobile phone.' Speaking after sentencing, Tim Burton, for the Crown Prosecution Service, said the Egyptian "played a leading role in a sophisticated operation" that "endangered lives, for his own and others' financial gain". 'Vulnerable people were transported on long sea journeys in ill-equipped fishing vessels completely unsuitable for carrying the large number of passengers who were on board," he added. "His repeated involvement in helping to facilitate these dangerous crossings showed a complete disregard for the safety of thousands of people, whose lives were put at serious risk." Jacque Beer, the NCA's regional head of investigation, explained that many of those Ebid had moved across the Mediterranean would have eventually ended up coming to the UK in small boats. "Ebid was part of a crime network who preyed upon the desperation of migrants to ship them across the Mediterranean in death-trap boats," she said. 'The cruel nature of his business was demonstrated by the callous way he spoke of throwing migrants into the sea if they didn't follow his rules. To him they were just a source of profit." The court was told the calculation for the amount of money Ebid had made came from interviews with the migrants carried out by Italian authorities, who passed on that information to the NCA as part of its investigation into Ebid. The average paid by the 3,781 migrants whose passage he organised was £3,272, meaning he made £12,375,212. During a search of his home, two Italian mobile phones were seized along with other devices, on which were found images of boats, conversations about the possible purchase of vessels, videos of migrants making the journey and screenshots detailing money transfers. There were also photographs showing a large amount of cash on a bed. In October 2022, more than 640 migrants were rescued by the Italian authorities after they attempted to cross in a wooden boat from Libya. It was taken into port in Sicily and two bodies were recovered. In another crossing, 265 migrants were rescued by the Italian coastguard from a 20-metre fishing boat found adrift in the Mediterranean after leaving Benghazi, Libya, in early December 2022. In April 2023, two separate search-and-rescue operations were mounted following distress calls to the coastguard. More than 600 migrants were on board each boat. Ebid has a previous conviction for attempting to smuggle a tonne of cannabis into Italy, for which he was sentenced to six years in jail. Police recently arrested suspected people smugglers they say made €30 million ($33.7 million) from taking migrants across the Mediterranean. According to Europol, Egyptians have increasingly been involved in smuggling on routes into and throughout the European Union, including the Mediterranean and western Balkan routes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
2 days ago
- The National
Dozens of charred bodies found buried in militia-controlled area of Libya, UN says
The UN human rights office on Wednesday raised alarm over 'gross human rights violations' in Libya after the discovery of dozens of bodies, some of them charred, that were buried and others left in hospital morgues in an area of Tripoli controlled by an armed militia. Volker Turk, the UN's high commissioner for human rights, said in a statement that he was 'shocked' by the discoveries at detention facilities run by the Stabilisation Support Authority (SSA), one of the western city's most powerful militant groups, whose commander, Abdel Ghani Al Kikli, died in clashes with rival militias in May. He said the discoveries confirm the long-standing findings by the UN Support Mission in Libya (Unsmil) and the former Independent Fact-Finding Mission, as well as various witness accounts regarding the existence of such sites and the extent of abuses committed, including torture and forced disappearances. The SSA has been accused of committing atrocities and crimes against humanity during the country's long-running conflict. 'Our worst-held fears are being confirmed: dozens of bodies have been discovered at these sites, along with the discovery of suspected instruments of torture and abuse, and potential evidence of extrajudicial killings,' Mr Turk said. His office said it had received information about the excavation of 10 burnt bodies at the SSA headquarters in Tripoli's Abu Salim district, as well as 67 more bodies found in refrigerators at two local hospitals. Mr Turk also said a burial site was discovered at the SSA-run Tripoli Zoo. The identities of the deceased remain unclear, he added. Mr Turk called on Libyan authorities to grant the UN access to the sites as part of its mandate to document human rights abuses and urged them to seal the area to preserve the evidence. He also noted continuing efforts to uphold the truce, facilitated by Unsmil, and reminded all parties of their obligations to respect international human rights and humanitarian law. Libya has been plagued by factional violence since the 2011 Nato-backed uprising against Muammar Qaddafi, with armed groups vying for power and control over territory. 'I call on all responsible political and security actors in the country to use their leadership and authority to protect and fulfil the human rights of all Libyans,' said Mr Turk. 'I further urge these actors and those with influence over them to redouble their efforts to end the recurring cycle of transitional arrangements and establish a full and inclusive democracy.'

The National
2 days ago
- The National
US plan to deport migrants to Libya 'will put them in extreme danger'
Plans to deport migrants from the US to Libya would put them in extreme danger and destabilise the already fragile North African nation, a report has warned. The Trump administration has been in talks to deport asylum seekers to Libya, as well as migrants living in the US who hold criminal records, though a judge has temporarily halted any removals. But a report from the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime (GI-TOC) has raised fears that any migrants sent to Libya face being put in violent detention centres where their lives would be at risk. The study's author Matt Herbert, head of research for North Africa and the Sahel, said Libya's competing governments – the Tripoli-based Government of National Unity (GNU) and the Government of National Stability (GNS) – both run migration detention facilities. These were set up to hold migrants, mainly from sub-Saharan Africa but also from the Middle East, who arrive in the country to pay people smugglers to take them across the Mediterranean, as part of an agreement with the EU nations to reduce migration. Conditions in the 'migrant detention facilities are extremely poor, with limited food and water and frequent overcrowding', says Mr Herbert. 'The centres are also sites of chronic and grave human rights abuses, which have been widely recorded over the years. Physical abuse, beatings, verbal humiliation and psychological torture are commonplace, and are often used during interrogations or as punishment.' Migrants also face extortion and kidnapping by 'predatory' criminal gangs, which involves 'torture until a ransom is paid'. In many detention centres 'guards systematically demand ransoms from detainees, under threat of torture or death, mirroring the actions of criminal extortion gangs operating elsewhere. 'In some cases, there is collusion with criminal gangs or armed groups that engage in similar activities outside the facility, with detainees being transferred off-site for the purpose of extortion.' Mr Herbert warns that 'migrants deported from the US risk becoming entangled in this' should the deportations eventually go ahead. His report also highlights the impact any deportations would have on the political situation in Libya, where there is 'significant anti-migrant rhetoric, both online and from key political actors'. Migration has become a 'lightning rod' for criticism of the Tripoli-based GNU government of Hamid Dabaiba and there was 'significant tension' when it was alleged Libya would be accepting large numbers of Palestinian refugees. 'If US deportations to Libya were to route to GNU-controlled areas, they would feed into the ongoing highly politicised debate surrounding migration in the region,' says Mr Herbert. 'This would pose a particular risk to Prime Minister Dabaiba, giving his opponents a potent line of rhetorical attack and poisoning public opinion against him.' The GNU's authority is challenged by powerful militias, so 'any perceived foreign pressure to host migrants could inflame public anger, put additional strain on Prime Minister Dabaiba and his already fragile governance structures'. When it comes to the GNS, the report states that the control of Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar is more "robust", which would make deportations to there more manageable. But Mr Herbert warns 'they could embolden Haftar, a strongman whose forces have been repeatedly accused of human rights abuses, possibly incentivising him to pursue deeper military ambitions or political repression'. He concludes that: 'In short, deporting migrants to Libya – regardless of which faction accepts them – would not only endanger the people involved but also feed the systems of impunity and conflict that have long plagued the country.' After American officials had said the US military could fly the migrants to the North African country as soon as mid-May but stressed that plans could change, US District Judge Brian Murphy issued an order restricting their removal. When the proposals became public, both Libyan governments publicly denied reports that the US wants to send migrants to the country. Immigration rights advocates said in court filings that individuals potentially subject to deportation to Libya also included Filipino, Laotian and Vietnamese migrants. The relatives of one Mexican national have said he had been instructed to sign a document allowing for his deportation to Libya.

Zawya
3 days ago
- Zawya
‘They target our reputation': Online attacks force Libyan journalists to self-censor
Journalists in Libya face frequent online harassment, which impedes their ability to fulfil their function as watchdogs against corruption, human rights abuses and other issues, journalists said last week during a round table discussion with the United Nations Support Mission in Libya. Thirty-one journalists from Libya's east, west and south joined the online discussion Thursday as part of the Basirah professional development programme, organised in coordination with UNSMIL's Human Rights Section. It will inform an upcoming workshop on 19 June, led by a digital safety expert from the international non-governmental organisation Committee to Protect Journalists, about ways journalists can shield themselves from online harassment. 'Discussing the online harassment of journalists is essential because it threatens the right to expression and leads some to retreat or self-censor,' said Eman Ben Amer, a journalist who attended the event. 'Ignoring it means silencing free voices.' The journalists, during the meeting, shared their personal experiences with harassment, shedding light on the form, frequency, and causes. Ninety-two per cent of participants, in a post-workshop survey, said they had personally experienced online harassment. The most reported form of harassment was abusive comments or messages on social media, including Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. Journalists also described how harassers had taken photos or videos of them, manipulated them using deceitful editing or artificial intelligence, and then shared them widely. The harassment often escalated to death threats and, sometimes, actual physical attacks, they said. In some cases, mobilisation appeared to be coordinated, with some journalists noting that they 'trended' on social media because of harassment. 'They distorted my reputation to the point I found myself under investigation by state intelligence,' said one journalist, who was dismissed from their job after such an online attack. 'The recording is still on YouTube and now, even years later, people will post it in the comments when I publish anything.' The attacks were provoked by everything from the topic of a story to the sex, age or cultural background of the reporter. Sometimes the stories that sparked abuse were sensitive from a political or human rights perspective. One journalist related how they were attacked for promoting 'foreign agendas' when they covered a story about violence against women. But at other times, the stories were seemingly non-controversial. For example, one journalist recounted how they were attacked for broadcasting a sports match on accusations of 'supporting the opposing team.' Another was harassed for reporting on flood victims in Derna. Female journalists reported particular trouble, saying they were harassed for nearly everything they published—regardless of topic. "Being a female journalist in Libyan society is very difficult,' one journalist said. 'They target a woman's reputation and honour – make things personal.' Eighty-six per cent of journalists, in the post-workshop survey, said harassment had impacted their work in some way. Thirty per cent reported reducing their social media presence to avoid backlash – a major handicap in the media sector. Thirty per cent said they 'censored or softened' their language to avoid offending certain parties. Others said they avoided writing about controversial topics altogether. 'Journalists need a safe space to work freely and honestly,' said journalist Mohammed Fozy. 'Without that, free media can't exist.' Journalists and other media professionals are invited to register for the Basirah programme, including the upcoming Basirah workshop on how journalists can protect themselves from online harassment, here: (link) Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL).