Virginia Stage Company loses $15,000 to NEA funding cuts
NORFOLK , Va. (WAVY) — Another local arts organization faces a significant loss of funding due to federal cuts, as Norfolk's Virginia Stage Company works to navigate forward short of needed grants.
Virginia MOCA loses federal education grant
The Virginia Stage Company, which has been in existence since 1978, is one of many arts groups nationwide affected by the withdrawal of National Endowment for the Arts funding. Its producing artistic director fears things may only get worse.
'This is the first time where grants have been rescinded because of a political agenda,' said Tom Quaintance, Virginia Stage Company's producing artistic director. 'And, that's scary.'
Those emotions echo among arts groups who received the same email early this month about previously awarded grants by the National Endowment for the Arts — now terminated. Quaintance said they were blindsided by the email. but this was certainly not the first indication of this funding being under attack.
Loss of funding to federal agencies could impact Va. libraries, museums
The NEA's correspondence stated that VSC's programs do not meet funding standards that 'reflect the nation's rich artistic heritage and creativity as prioritized by the President.'
'We got notification that an NEA grant that we had already been approved for, for $15,000 to support 'Every Brilliant Thing,' a play that we tour around all of Virginia, that is a piece that deals with mental health and suicide prevention,' Quaintance said.
The loss of the NEA funding entirely would also dissolve funding for the Virginia Commission for the Arts and city of Norfolk, who receive financial backing from the NEA to support organizations like the VSC.
'The fact [is] that the NEA has been instrumental in some of the most interesting and important work we've done here at Virginia Stage Company,' he said. 'And the idea that art should fit a certain agenda and then that it is not important enough to include in the federal budget, those ideas are important.'
Approximately half of the Virginia Stage Company's budget comes from donations, whether state, federal or individual.
'Our mission is to serve our broadly diverse community to to be a place for people to come together and grow as a community,' Quaintance said. 'And that takes funding. It takes funding from individuals. It takes funding from corporations. It takes funding from the government. And if that funding disappears, you're going to see, theaters, operas, symphonies, museums, you're going to start seeing folks closing.'
President Trump has proposed eliminating the NEA entirely from the 2026 federal budget, which would be the end of the largest annual supporter of the arts in the U.S.
The Virginia Stage Company has appealed the rescinded offer and is waiting to hear back. If you would like to donate to VSC, click .
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
2 days ago
- Washington Post
DC/DOX enters its third year amid a changing world for nonfiction film
As it enters its third year, DC/DOX, the Washington-based nonfiction film festival founded by Jamie Shor and Sky Sitney in 2023, finds itself in a world of dizzying change. In April hundreds of grant recipients — many of them documentary filmmakers — received notice that the National Endowment for the Humanities was terminating their funding, putting several projects in limbo. The following month, President Donald Trump announced that he was considering eliminating both the NEH and the National Endowment for the Arts; soon thereafter, the NEA announced that it was withdrawing or canceling grant offers to arts nonprofits around the country that have been critical sources of financing.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Les Misérables actors to boycott Kennedy Center performance over Trump attendance
At least 10 cast members from the current North American touring production of Les Misérables are choosing not to participate in an upcoming performance at the Kennedy Center in Washington DC, in order to boycott the anticipated attendance of Donald Trump, according to CNN. Cast members were reportedly given the option to opt out of the 11 June show. The production has not publicly identified which individuals will not be performing. This performance coincides with a fundraising event Trump is hosting to support the Kennedy Center. Since becoming chair of the theater's board in February, the president has reshaped the board with his own appointees, and the former Kennedy Center president Deborah Rutter has been replaced by the Trump ally Richard Grenell. Related: Kennedy Center director snipes at musician for 'vapidness' over DEI concerns In a statement shared with the Guardian, Grenell said that those at the Kennedy Center 'haven't heard this rumor'. He added that the center 'will no longer fund intolerance. Any performer who isn't professional enough to perform for patrons of all backgrounds, regardless of political affiliation, won't be welcomed.' Grenell continued: 'In fact, we think it would be important to out those vapid and intolerant artists to ensure producers know who they shouldn't hire – and that the public knows which shows have political litmus tests to sit in the audience. 'The Kennedy Center wants to be a place where people of all political stripes sit next to each other and never ask who someone voted for but instead enjoys a performance together.' It was reported by the New York Times that on 6 May, a House committee approved a proposed $257m budget allocation for the Kennedy Center, after Trump had publicly criticized the condition of the building. The president's request for funding follows his recent moves to cut federal support for the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). These cuts could result in rescinded grants for non-profit theaters across the country if approved by Congress. Several arts organizations have sued the NEA over its new requirements following Trump's executive order barring the use of federal funds for the promotion of 'gender ideology'. The boycott by Les Misérables cast members is the latest in a string of stars pulling out of shows and positions at the center since Trump assumed control. Several shows have been called off, including a stop of the Hamilton tour that was canceled by the production itself, and Finn, a coming-of-age story about a young shark, which was canceled by the Kennedy Center. Trump had previously posted on social media expressing his desire to eliminate 'drag shows' and 'woke' content from the venue, but did not clarify which productions he was targeting. During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump had used music from Les Misérables during his campaign rallies, which the co-creators of the musical publicly decried.
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
I Helped Pick National Endowment for the Arts Grant Recipients. Trump Eliminated Many of Them
At this year's Cannes Film Festival, Palme d'Or winner Jafar Panahi delivered the ultimate rebuke to the attempted censorship of art: His acclaimed It Was Just an Accident, in which a group of ex-prisoners kidnap their torturer, was made only a short time after his seven-month prison sentence. Over the years, Panahi has confronted attempts to restrict his work through various clandestine methods that may be instructive to Americans in the present climate. If that sounds extreme, look at the evisceration of recent National Endowment for the Arts grants that have proved vital to America's film culture. These decisions suggest an effort to suppress all but the most overt nationalistic efforts from American artists, a fool's errand given the outspoken nature of the creative community, and one that is not unfamiliar around the globe. Censorship has wormed its way into American cinema. More from The Hollywood Reporter Bono Weighs in on Trump-Bruce Springsteen Drama: "There's Only One Boss in America" Trump Pardons Rapper NBA Youngboy, Who Was Sentenced for Gun-Related Charges Trump Plans to Pardon Reality TV Stars Todd and Julie Chrisley In many other countries, efforts to reduce creativity to propaganda often lead to filmmakers navigating the system in unique ways, with some recent examples on display at this year's Cannes. We'll get to that shortly, but first, it's worth considering the immediate impact of the assault on the NEA. The organization's effects may register as minimal relative to film-financing efforts overseas. Watch any random movie in the Cannes selection and you're bound to see a parade of opening credits signaling production resources from across Europe, including many national film funds. America has never possessed any public financing body on that scale, but for years, at least it had the NEA. A week before Cannes, the Trump administration eliminated countless NEA grants that recipients — from theaters to arts organizations — expected to receive. Last summer, I served on an NEA panel that selected a few of these finalists. While I'm not at liberty to reveal those entities, many of them were critical to the support system necessary for cinema to thrive on America's margins: The list included film clubs, festivals, screening series and other collective efforts to sustain an expansive presence for moviegoing beyond the biggest commercial offerings. These funds rarely exceed tens of thousands of dollars, but they help sustain organizations that foster filmmaking on the local level, efforts that help ensure both audiences and artists continue to engage with movies as a part of America's entertainment infrastructure. The decision to disburse these funds unfolded under circumstances rarely discussed in public due to a confidentiality arrangement that, as far as I'm concerned, has been nullified by the cancellations. It was a democratic process the whole way through. NEA administrators shared dozens of applications for panelists to review and required that we share not only numerical scores, but also written comments for each one. This was followed by a series of Zoom conversations that allowed for greater nuance in the decisions made. In essence, the American government outsourced its support of the arts to the creative community. Throughout the deliberations, nobody used the letters 'DEI' to justify their decisions, though the future administration would later claim such logic was behind many of the canceled grants in the months to come. Instead, many of the conversations centered around geographic balance, as applicants from underserved arts communities in states ranging from New Mexico to Florida received special attention, even as established entities in big cities sailed through based on their obvious institutional needs. Because panelists had to provide written feedback with each application, it wasn't possible to simply skim applications for appealing buzzwords. By paying close attention to each submission, panelists grappled with not only the specific needs, but also how each organization or entity made the case. As a result, in early June, we convened to discuss a final top 10 that included a major university as well as several film festivals and financing bodies from across the country. Sure, some of them supported underrepresented communities — but they did more than that. Ironically, given the rhetoric around tariffs and overseas filmmaking taking away American jobs, these resources would have provided a valuable foundation for more production to take place on the local level. Instead, their cancellations amount to explicit censorship, as well as missed opportunities for economic growth. In light of that, this year's Cannes lineup was instructive in unexpected ways, as it demonstrated the way certain filmmakers navigate their own autocratic threats to freedom of expression. Only at Cannes could one find immediate parallels between Iran, Israel and Ukraine. All three countries produced major cinematic works that contend with life under oppressive leadership, despite those countries having oversight on the stories they tell. Panahi's It Was Just an Accident is a searing indictment of the country's regime. It's safe to say that no major filmmaker has courted the animus of his government as much as Panahi, who has found savvy ways to direct movies even while officially banned from making them. His diary-like home production This Is Not a Film was produced under house arrest, while the masterful Taxi was shot within the confines of a cab that the director himself drove around Tehran. Panahi was jailed for nearly seven months between 2022 and 2023, but stuck around upon his release to make It Was Just an Accident with his usual savviness. According to sources on the production, Panahi submitted the project to Iran's Ministry of Culture for shooting permits by describing it as a documentary. Sometimes you have to break the rules to produce the art worth fighting for. Then there is Nadav Lapid's Yes, which follows a hard-partying Tel Aviv couple conflicted over the war in Gaza. Lapid has long cast a critical gaze on his country with celebrated works such as Policeman and Syndromes, but Yes marks his first undertaking since the Oct. 7 attack. It's a brazen and shocking satire of a nation living comfortably while unspeakable horrors take place on their doorstep. Directing the movie in the immediate aftermath of Israel's Gaza invasion, Lapid had to work under guerrilla conditions, outsourcing his financing needs to France, and finding additional support from the independent financing body the Israel Film Fund. Lapid reportedly gained a secondary citizenship in France to receive international financing as a means of overcoming the limited support he received on the homefront, where the government was wary of his production during such divisive times. Censorship has gradually crept into Israeli society, with the government often taking a hard line against even the hint of pro-Palestinian sentiments in locally produced art. Lapid's new movie certainly has that, though it couches the perspective within a pair of protagonists clearly divided over their allegiances. This appears to have been a storytelling tactic that allowed the movie to sneak through the hurdles necessary to get made. One last example stems from a subtler form of censorship. In 2023, Ukrainian director Sergei Loznitsa was booted from the Ukrainian Film Academy after he voiced opposition to the decision to exclude Russian films from the European Film Awards. 'Many friends and colleagues, Russian filmmakers, have taken a stand against this insane war,' Loznitsa wrote in an open letter at the time. 'They are victims, as we are, of this aggression.' Loznitsa's latest movie, Two Prosecutors, serves as the next stage of that response. Set in the Soviet Union circa 1937, the bracing drama finds a newly graduated law student attempting to exonerate an imprisoned prosecutor falsely accused by Stalin's regime. An idealist who believes in the law, the young prosecutor finds himself lost in a Kafkaesque labyrinth of prison cells in his efforts to locate and assist the prisoner — who has resigned himself to his fate. Despite the gloomy overtones, Loznitsa's powerful movie asserts that goodness hides within the confines of institutional control, worming its way through the boundaries of bureaucratic red tape in an effort to do some good. In America, there is no shortage of similar stories demanding to be told, no matter the economic censorship that might slow them down. Seek international support, bury the lead or hide in the shadows to make the work as pure as possible: These are the global lessons for America from this year's Cannes Film Festival. Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More
