
DISCOs fail to slash losses
The boards of all DISCOs have been reconstituted, except for Sepco and Hesco, where the process is being finalised. The boards are structured to ensure enhanced corporate governance, strategic oversight and operational efficiency. photo: file
Listen to article
Pakistan's economic managers have expressed serious concerns over the newly appointed boards of power distribution companies (DISCOs), which have failed to meet loss reduction targets.
The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC), in a recent meeting, voiced grave concern that the targets assigned to DISCOs regarding reduction in transmission and distribution (T&D) losses had not been met. Specifically, the ECC members noted that the losses of Lahore Electric Supply Company (Lesco) had increased over the year. They stressed the need to adopt a robust plan to reverse the trend.
The members of the economic decision-making body also underlined the need to make interventions to improve operations of the public power utility and slash losses.
During discussions, the ECC was informed that boards of directors of all DISCOs, except for Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (Hesco) and Sukkur Electric Power Company (Sepco), had been reconstituted.
It was also noted that under the oversight of the newly reconstituted boards, the entities had shown signs of improvement. The ECC was informed that Pakistan Power Management Company (PPMC), being the technical arm of the Power Division, was regularly monitoring the performance of DISCOs.
In line with the National Electricity Policy, strategic roadmaps were formulated and signed in February 2025 by the respective chairpersons of the boards and the CEOs of all DISCOs.
These roadmaps outline plans for T&D/AT&C (aggregate commercial and technical) loss reduction, bill collection, theft prevention, load-shedding management, consumer services, safety compliance, Scada implementation, GIS mapping, ERP system automation, computerised energy audits up to the distribution transformer level, execution of service-level agreements (SLAs) and operation and maintenance (O&M) framework.
The Power Division briefed the meeting that to accomplish those objectives, a structured action matrix has been developed by DISCOs. This covers key initiatives such as feeder rehabilitation, distribution transformer addition/ augmentation, grid station expansion, capacitor installation, HT and LT line additions, transmission line upgrades, aerial bundled cable (ABC) deployment and advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) installation.
In light of the directive issued in the ECC meeting held on April 11, 2024, the status regarding the governance of all DISCOs whose boards had been reconstituted, with a view to improving governance, was submitted to the ECC in the form of a summary under Rule 18(1) read with Rule 23(4) of the Rules of Business, 1973.
Eleven DISCOs operate under the administrative control of the Power Division and are governed by the provisions of the State-Owned Enterprises (Governance and Operations) Act, 2023 and the State-Owned Enterprises (Operations and Management) Policy, 2023. The matters of boards of directors are also governed under the aforementioned law and policy.
The boards of Faisalabad Electric Supply Company (Fesco), Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco), Lesco, Multan Electric Power Company (Mepco) and Hazara Electric Supply Company (Hazeco) were reconstituted on July 24, 2024. Moreover, the boards of Gujranwala Electric Power Company (Gepco), Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco), Quetta Electric Supply Company (Qesco) and Tribal Areas Electric Supply Company (Tesco) were reconstituted on August 31, 2024.
Summaries for the reconstitution of Hesco and Sepco boards, with appropriate representation of independent and ex-officio directors as per relevant provisions of the State-Owned Enterprises (Governance and Operations) Act, 2023 and State-Owned Enterprises (Operations and Management) Policy, 2023, were submitted to the Prime Minister's Office.
The boards of all DISCOs have been reconstituted, except for Sepco and Hesco, where the process is in the finalisation stage. The reconstituted boards are structured to ensure enhanced corporate governance, strategic oversight and operational efficiency.
PPMC has implemented a monthly performance monitoring mechanism for all DISCOs, evaluating key operational, commercial and financial parameters. This framework ensures accountability and alignment with the sector's strategic goals.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Nepra's KE MYT decision: Power Div. submits review motion
ISLAMABAD: The Power Division on Monday submitted the much-talked about review motion challenging the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority's recent Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) determinations for K-Electric (KE) for 2024-25 to 2029-30. The government is urging Nepra to revise key assumptions, performance benchmarks and profit margins in line with real-world data and standards applied to other power utilities. According to Power Division, Nepra allowed KE several cost items and profit margins that are more generous than those granted to other utilities across the country. As a result, electricity bills for Karachi consumers are set to rise disproportionately, and public finances will bear an unnecessary burden. Total financial impact is in excess of Rs 300 billion of the intervention identified for review by GoP in KE MYT. Power Minister, Sardar Awais Khan Leghari, in his tweet said that the power sector of Pakistan cannot afford any inefficiencies encouraged through tariff structure of any company, irrespective of whether it is private or public. 'Our review supports a sustainable and healthy environment in the distribution system of Pakistan in a responsible manner. Power Division hopes that the review process is carried out in a transparent and fair manner,' he added. The key concerns in the Review Petition are as follows: Supply (fuel and fuel related costs): Nepra set KE's fuel-cost rate at Rs. 15.99/kWh, whereas other utilities buy power at lower rates from the national grid. This gap shifts about Rs. 28 billion (FY 2024) and Rs. 13 billion (FY 2025) of extra costs onto the federal budget rather than onto KE customers. Recovery Loss Allowance: KE was permitted to include 'recovery losses' in its tariff even though its own records show it recovers more than the level Nepra allowed. No other utility received this special allowance. This adds roughly Rs. 36 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35 billion in FY 2025 to KE's revenue that consumers end up paying. Cumulative impact over a 7-year period is more than Rs 200 billion. Working Capital Allowance: NEPRA permitted KE a 24 percent markup on working capital, a much higher percentage than in its previous tariff and higher than any other power distributor. This increased KE's allowable revenue by about Rs. 2.4 billion in FY 2024 and is projected to total around Rs. 15 billion over the control period of 7 years Higher Allowed Distribution Loss: Nepra set KE's allowed loss at 13.90 percent, instead of the 13.46 percent KE had planned. Losses are electricity that is generated but not billed, due to leaks or theft, or kunda. Around 7 percent of all such leakages can be attributed to theft. By permitting a higher loss level, KE passes on an extra Rs. 3.1 billion in FY 2024, rising to about Rs. 21 billion over the control period. 'Law & Order' Margin: KE received a special 2 percent margin to offset security costs in Karachi—a perk not granted to any other utility, even those operating in equally or more volatile regions. Moreover, Law & Order in Karachi has improved considerably over the last few years, and thereby there exists no reason for such a margin. This margin adds approximately Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period to KE's revenue requirement. Retention of 'Other Income': KE is allowed to keep money from fines imposed on its contractors, interest on bank deposits, and profits from side businesses. In effect, consumers have already paid for the assets that generate these incomes, so these funds should reduce KE's costs to customers, not pad its revenue. Effectively, it is being proposed that any such gain on assets that has been financed by consumers needs to be shared with consumers. Transmission (Moving Power from Grid to KE): High transmission loss Target & skewed sharing; NEPRA allowed KE a 1.30 percent loss target, even though KE's historical losses are closer to 0.75 percent. KE keeps 75 percent of any savings if it performs better than 1.30 percent, passing only 25 percent of savings to consumers. This encourages inefficiency and keeps bills high. Financial impact is about Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024, rising to roughly Rs. 28 billion over the control period. Excessive Return on Equity (RoE): KE was granted a 12 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 24.46 percent in rupee terms). Other national utilities (like NTDC) receive only 15 percent RoE in rupees. This difference costs consumers around Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024 and approximately Rs. 37 billion over the control period. Distribution (delivering power to homes & businesses)- High distribution - RoE disparity: KE's distribution arm was allowed 14 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 29.68 percent in rupees). By comparison, other Discos like FESCO get only about 14.47 percent RoE in rupees. This adds roughly Rs. 3.7 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35.6 billion over the control period to KE's revenue. Distribution Loss & Special Allowance: KE was granted an extra 2 percent 'law & order' margin on top of its allowed losses, even though Karachi's security situation is similar to or better than other regions. KE also keeps 25 percent of any savings if it performs better. These practices cost consumers about Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period. Working Capital Markup: A 23.91 percent markup was approved for KE's distribution working capital—far higher than any other utility. This adds about Rs. 0.8 billion in FY 2024 and roughly Rs. 10 billion over the control period to KE's revenue requirement. Generation (KE's Own Power Plants), Payments to Idle Power Plants (Take-or-Pay): Nepra approved capacity payments to several KE power plants (BQPS-I, KCCP, KGTPS, SGTPS) even though these plants will run at minimal or no output because KE sources cheaper power from the national grid. Consumers and the government pay for capacity that is not used. This costs about Rs. 12.7 billion in FY 2025 and roughly Rs. 82.5 billion over the multi-year period. Favorable indexation &RoE for KE's plants: Under a hybrid 'take-or-pay' model, KE's plants keep full inflation adjustments (indexed to U.S. CPI or USD/PKR), while independent power producers (IPPs) do not receive equally generous terms. RoE for KE's plants was set at 17 percent (using PKR 168/USD), higher than typical IPP terms, costing Rs. 7 billion in FY 2024 and about Rs. 57.3 billion over the control period. This will result in overall higher bills for Karachi customers; KE's allowed costs, profit margins, and extra allowances will cause Karachi consumers' electricity bills to rise significantly compared to other regions. Several KE cost items—especially the inflated fuel benchmark and payments to idle plants—are effectively covered by the government, stretching public finances. The determinations are unfair treatment & efficiency discouraged: Granting KE advantages not given to other utilities creates a 'two-tier' system. This discourages KE from boosting efficiency, and it undermines transparent, consistent tariff-setting nationwide. The Government maintains that all utilities should be treated equally. KE should not receive special cost or profit allowances unavailable to other power companies and tariffs must reflect actual costs and reasonable returns. Extra allowances for inefficiency and high profit rates must be removed to keep bills affordable. For regulatory accountability Nepra should revise assumptions, benchmarks, and profit margins so they align with real performance data and the standards used for other utilities. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Nepra's KE MYT decision: PD submits review motion
ISLAMABAD: The Power Division on Monday submitted the much-talked about review motion challenging the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority's recent Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) determinations for K-Electric (KE) for 2024-25 to 2029-30. The government is urging Nepra to revise key assumptions, performance benchmarks and profit margins in line with real-world data and standards applied to other power utilities. According to Power Division, Nepra allowed KE several cost items and profit margins that are more generous than those granted to other utilities across the country. As a result, electricity bills for Karachi consumers are set to rise disproportionately, and public finances will bear an unnecessary burden. Total financial impact is in excess of Rs 300 billion of the intervention identified for review by GoP in KE MYT. Power Minister, Sardar Awais Khan Leghari, in his tweet said that the power sector of Pakistan cannot afford any inefficiencies encouraged through tariff structure of any company, irrespective of whether it is private or public. 'Our review supports a sustainable and healthy environment in the distribution system of Pakistan in a responsible manner. Power Division hopes that the review process is carried out in a transparent and fair manner,' he added. The key concerns in the Review Petition are as follows: Supply (fuel and fuel related costs): Nepra set KE's fuel-cost rate at Rs. 15.99/kWh, whereas other utilities buy power at lower rates from the national grid. This gap shifts about Rs. 28 billion (FY 2024) and Rs. 13 billion (FY 2025) of extra costs onto the federal budget rather than onto KE customers. Recovery Loss Allowance: KE was permitted to include 'recovery losses' in its tariff even though its own records show it recovers more than the level Nepra allowed. No other utility received this special allowance. This adds roughly Rs. 36 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35 billion in FY 2025 to KE's revenue that consumers end up paying. Cumulative impact over a 7-year period is more than Rs 200 billion. Working Capital Allowance: NEPRA permitted KE a 24 percent markup on working capital, a much higher percentage than in its previous tariff and higher than any other power distributor. This increased KE's allowable revenue by about Rs. 2.4 billion in FY 2024 and is projected to total around Rs. 15 billion over the control period of 7 years Higher Allowed Distribution Loss: Nepra set KE's allowed loss at 13.90 percent, instead of the 13.46 percent KE had planned. Losses are electricity that is generated but not billed, due to leaks or theft, or kunda. Around 7 percent of all such leakages can be attributed to theft. By permitting a higher loss level, KE passes on an extra Rs. 3.1 billion in FY 2024, rising to about Rs. 21 billion over the control period. 'Law & Order' Margin: KE received a special 2 percent margin to offset security costs in Karachi—a perk not granted to any other utility, even those operating in equally or more volatile regions. Moreover, Law & Order in Karachi has improved considerably over the last few years, and thereby there exists no reason for such a margin. This margin adds approximately Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period to KE's revenue requirement. Retention of 'Other Income': KE is allowed to keep money from fines imposed on its contractors, interest on bank deposits, and profits from side businesses. In effect, consumers have already paid for the assets that generate these incomes, so these funds should reduce KE's costs to customers, not pad its revenue. Effectively, it is being proposed that any such gain on assets that has been financed by consumers needs to be shared with consumers. Transmission (Moving Power from Grid to KE): High transmission loss Target & skewed sharing; NEPRA allowed KE a 1.30 percent loss target, even though KE's historical losses are closer to 0.75 percent. KE keeps 75 percent of any savings if it performs better than 1.30 percent, passing only 25 percent of savings to consumers. This encourages inefficiency and keeps bills high. Financial impact is about Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024, rising to roughly Rs. 28 billion over the control period. Excessive Return on Equity (RoE): KE was granted a 12 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 24.46 percent in rupee terms). Other national utilities (like NTDC) receive only 15 percent RoE in rupees. This difference costs consumers around Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024 and approximately Rs. 37 billion over the control period. Distribution (delivering power to homes & businesses)- High distribution - RoE disparity: KE's distribution arm was allowed 14 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 29.68 percent in rupees). By comparison, other Discos like FESCO get only about 14.47 percent RoE in rupees. This adds roughly Rs. 3.7 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35.6 billion over the control period to KE's revenue. Distribution Loss & Special Allowance: KE was granted an extra 2 percent 'law & order' margin on top of its allowed losses, even though Karachi's security situation is similar to or better than other regions. KE also keeps 25 percent of any savings if it performs better. These practices cost consumers about Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period. Working Capital Markup: A 23.91 percent markup was approved for KE's distribution working capital—far higher than any other utility. This adds about Rs. 0.8 billion in FY 2024 and roughly Rs. 10 billion over the control period to KE's revenue requirement. Generation (KE's Own Power Plants), Payments to Idle Power Plants (Take-or-Pay): Nepra approved capacity payments to several KE power plants (BQPS-I, KCCP, KGTPS, SGTPS) even though these plants will run at minimal or no output because KE sources cheaper power from the national grid. Consumers and the government pay for capacity that is not used. This costs about Rs. 12.7 billion in FY 2025 and roughly Rs. 82.5 billion over the multi-year period. Favorable indexation &RoE for KE's plants: Under a hybrid 'take-or-pay' model, KE's plants keep full inflation adjustments (indexed to U.S. CPI or USD/PKR), while independent power producers (IPPs) do not receive equally generous terms. RoE for KE's plants was set at 17 percent (using PKR 168/USD), higher than typical IPP terms, costing Rs. 7 billion in FY 2024 and about Rs. 57.3 billion over the control period. This will result in overall higher bills for Karachi customers; KE's allowed costs, profit margins, and extra allowances will cause Karachi consumers' electricity bills to rise significantly compared to other regions. Several KE cost items—especially the inflated fuel benchmark and payments to idle plants—are effectively covered by the government, stretching public finances. The determinations are unfair treatment & efficiency discouraged: Granting KE advantages not given to other utilities creates a 'two-tier' system. This discourages KE from boosting efficiency, and it undermines transparent, consistent tariff-setting nationwide. The Government maintains that all utilities should be treated equally. KE should not receive special cost or profit allowances unavailable to other power companies and tariffs must reflect actual costs and reasonable returns. Extra allowances for inefficiency and high profit rates must be removed to keep bills affordable. For regulatory accountability Nepra should revise assumptions, benchmarks, and profit margins so they align with real performance data and the standards used for other utilities. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Ministries & Divs: ECC clears TSG summaries
ISLAMABAD: A meeting of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the Cabinet was held on Monday under the chairmanship of Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue, Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb. The ECC took up a number of summaries from various ministries and divisions seeking Technical Supplementary Grants (TSGs) besides some other crucial matters brought to the Cabinet body. For the summaries submitted for grant of TSGs, the ECC considered and decided the following: Rs. 1.259 billion TSG for Ministry of Finance to return the amount to the Government of Sindh as un-utilized funds from wheat seed cash reimbursement programme. Rs. 5.6 billion TSG for the Ministry of Finance as rupee cover for ADB funded Women Inclusive Finance (WIF) project Rs. 231.893 million TSG for Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control to meet the additional funds requirement of civil armed forces Rs. 64 million TSG for Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control on account of staff transferred to CDA from the Pak. PWD Rs. 50 million TSG for the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs to support PILDAT for promotion of democracy by focusing on governance and public policy. Rs. 90 million TSG for Petroleum Division for execution of gas schemes in the province of Punjab. Rs. 100 million TSG for Ministry of Poverty Alleviation and Social Safety as grant-in-aid to release the funds to SOS Children's Villages Pakistan. Rs. 1.889 billion TSG for Ministry of Information and Broadcasting for clearing advertising liabilities and other expenditures Rs. 2.150 billion TSG for Ministry of Housing and Works for onward transfer to Pakistan Infrastructure Development Company Limited for execution of development schemes of District Swabi. Rs. 1.70 billion TSG for Ministry of Defence for technological upgradation of ISPR. Rs. 400 million TSG for Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control for development expenditure under the Sustainable Development Goals Achievement Programme (SAP). Rs. 40.34 billion TSG for Economic Affairs Division on account of revised budget estimates for FY2024-25 for repayment of short-term foreign loan credits. Rs. 2.232 million TSG for Ministry of Law and Justice for reimbursement of funds to CDA in respect of project covering establishment of district courts in Islamabad. Rs. 2.750 million for Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training for the Prime Minister's Youth Skill Development Programme. Rs. 750 million TSG for Power Division for development expenditure. Rs. 1.2 billion TSG for Ministry of Interior for arrangement of 23rd meeting of the Council of the Heads of State of the Shanghai Corporation Organisation (SCO) in Islamabad. Rs. 14 million TSG for Ministry of Kashmir Affairs &Gilgit Baltistan for employees related expenditure. Rs. 294 million TSG for Ministry of Finance for merged Ministry of KAGB and SAFRON. The ECC also took up and approved a summary by Power Division for approval of a tripartite power purchase agreement of 1145 MG Karachi Nuclear Plant Unit-2 (K-2) and Unit-3 (K-3) at Karachi. On a summary of the Petroleum Division regarding the Machike-Thallian - Tarrujabba White Oil Pipeline, the ECC accorded full backing to the project but deferred the matter until the next ECC meeting for detailed working by the Finance, Planning and Petroleum Divisions on the financial and operational modalities of the proposal. The ECC also considered a summary by the Ministry of Commerce and approved amendment in import policy order (IPO) for state-owned defence production entities and their wholly owned commercial subsidiaries. The ECC discussed and approved a proposal by the Finance Division for establishment of 'Women Inclusive Finance Support Fund' Trust under the Asian Development Bank funded women inclusive finance project. The ECC also considered a summary by the Ministry of National Food Security & Research seeking notification of minimum indicative prices of tobacco crop (2025) and revision of cess rates on tobacco for the year 2025-26. The cabinet body discussed the matter and approved the proposal with the instruction to the Ministry to come up with a plan to do away with the existing regime in future in line with the government policy of promoting deregulation in the crop sector. The ECC also considered and approved a summary by the Ministry of Housing and Works for withdrawal of directives transfer Hyderabad Package (PSDP#223) and Karachi (PSDEP#222) from the Government of Sindh to PIDCL. The Cabinet body also considered and approved a summary by the Finance Division, outlining the policy for the grant of honourarium to the government employees. The meeting was attended by Minister for Power SardarAwais Ahmed Khan Leghari, Minister for Investment Mr. Qaiser Ahmed Sheikh, Special Assistant to the Prime Minister (SAPM) on Industries and Production Haroon Akhtar Khan, Chairman SECP along with federal secretaries and senior officials from relevant ministries and divisions. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025