Prince Harry's nuclear interview would have ‘horrified' late Queen Elizabeth II: expert
Prince Harry declared on Friday that he wants to reconcile with his family after losing a court battle over his publicly funded security – but for the royal family, it's too little, too late.
The claim was made by British royals expert Hilary Fordwich, who told Fox News Digital that everyone who knew the Duke of Sussex's beloved grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, believed she would have been 'truly horrified' by his latest tell-all.
Advertisement
'For her, it would indeed have been felt as a violation of both discretion and privacy,' Fordwich explained. 'She valued the little privacy her family members could maintain in such an exposed role. Being betrayed by a family member, publicly airing grievances was abhorrent to her. She was particularly private regarding matters of health and family disputes.'
A similar sentiment was previously shared by unnamed sources with ITV News.
The 'exasperated' palace insiders told the outlet that the 40-year-old's words about his father's cancer were in 'poor taste' and noted that his new outburst only shows there is 'nothing that can be trusted to remain private.'
During his sit-down with BBC News, Harry said, 'I don't know how much longer my father has.' King Charles, 76, was diagnosed with an undisclosed form of cancer in February 2024.
Advertisement
The 40-year-old also told the network that the king wouldn't speak to him due to the 'security stuff.'
5 Queen Elizabeth stands next to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry during a celebration marking the centenary of the Royal Air Force from the balcony of Buckingham Palace on July 10, 2018.
Getty Images
Fordwich said the late queen would have been heartbroken over Harry's repeated willingness to air his grievances.
It was the late queen, Fordwich pointed out, who agreed to let Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, step back as senior members in 2020 and move to California.
Advertisement
England's longest-reigning monarch died in 2022 at age 96.
'Queen Elizabeth at the time of 'Megxit' hoped for the best, for family unity and discretion,' said Fordwich. 'She was focused on protecting the future of the monarchy. She guarded its reputation and continuity her entire life, focusing on stability.'
ITV reported that Harry's comments about his father's cancer 'went down very badly in royal circles.' Insiders noted that Harry's decision to talk about his father's health would have 'appalled' the late queen.
'The king is a kind man with a warm heart and quite enough on his plate to deal with, without all this from his own son,' a royal source told the outlet.
Advertisement
5 Meghan Markle, Prince Harry and Queen Elizabeth pose for a picture with some of Queen's Young Leaders at a Buckingham Palace on June 26, 2018.
REUTERS
'The remarks about his illness were in particularly poor taste and, of course, suggest something entirely contrary to the reality.'
Harry has been estranged from his family since he and his wife quit royal duties. They alleged hostility and racist attitudes by the press and the royal establishment.
Since their exit, the couple has publicly spoken out in interviews and documentaries.
Harry's tell-all 2023 memoir 'Spare,' stuffed with private details and embarrassing revelations, made things worse.
But Harry said what's souring the relationship now is a decision to remove his police protection detail after he stopped being a working royal.
On Friday, the Court of Appeal in London rejected Harry's bid to restore the protection, saying a government committee was justified in deciding that security should be assessed on a case-by-case basis whenever Harry visits the UK.
Advertisement
Harry blamed the palace, alleging that the decision to withdraw his security had been made at the direction of royal officials, who sit on the committee alongside police and government representatives. He said they were 'knowingly putting me and my family in harm's way,' hoping that the sense of threat 'would force us to come back.'
He suggested his father was part of the problem, saying he'd asked the king 'to step out of the way and let the experts do their job.'
British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard claimed that what should have been a 10-minute interview about Harry's court case turned into a 'delusional, damning, self-absorbed moan.'
'The queen will especially be turning in her grave,' Chard claimed to Fox News Digital. '[Harry] has shown complete disrespect for the lifelong work of the late Queen Elizabeth II… The majority of people, even non-monarchists, held the highest admiration for the late Queen Elizabeth and the unifying role she played.'
Advertisement
5 Prince Harry speaks ouot during his interview with BBC on May 2, 2025.
BBC News
According to Chard, the late queen had high hopes for Meghan, in particular, who was seen as a breath of fresh air for the monarchy.
According to multiple reports, the queen was said to be hurt and saddened by the couple's departure and how it was handled both personally and publicly.
'At first, the late queen was very impressed by Meghan and believed she would be an asset to the monarchy,' Chard explained. 'She took her under her wing, offering help where needed. She even advised her that Sophie, now Duchess of Edinburgh, would help her with anything she may need.'
Advertisement
'Meghan didn't utilize the favor,' Chard claimed.
'She made it clear that all she needed was her husband… Meghan struggled to adjust to life in the royal fold… She was reluctant to take advice. She hoped to do things her way after her marriage, not the royal way. However, Meghan was quick to detail a lack of support by the royal family for her mental health issues and media intrusion. So, Harry and Meghan stepped down as working royals and moved abroad. But it was a very quick turnaround. Conditions were agreed as they were off.'
5 King Charles III walks with his son Prince Harry at they arrive at St. George's Chapel inside Windsor Castle before the Committal Service for Queen Elizabeth on Sept. 19, 2022.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
'If they had given more notice, not the knee-jerk race that Queen Elizabeth was forced to work with, I believe the queen, along with her family, may have worked out an alternative agreement for Harry and Meghan,' Chard continued. 'Harry and Meghan wanted the best of both worlds. They were unhappy and unhealthily preoccupied with their problems.'
Advertisement
Harry and Meghan first detailed their struggles with royal life to Oprah Winfrey in 2021.
Their explosive televised interview was viewed by nearly 50 million people globally. At the time, Harry's grandfather, Prince Philip, battled poor health.
'He wasn't against TV interviews, it was part of the modern royal job,' Chard pointed out. 'But the family was taught to never forget that discretion and modesty were integral to being a member of the British royal family… The interview resulted in significant fallout, with serious allegations of racism and bullying… Prince Philip was disappointed with how they handled situations.'
5 Queen Elizabeth and Prince Harry share a laugh as the two talk after leaving the wedding of Lady Gabriella Windsor and Thomas Kingston at St. George's Chapel in May 18, 2019.
REUTERS
'Queen Elizabeth was sad… [but] she battled on,' Chard added.
Royal author Robert Hardman told People magazine that the queen 'adored Harry right to the end.' He said that 'one of her dearest wishes' was for the family to patch things up.
Chard doesn't see that happening anytime soon.
'Prince William will never forgive Prince Harry for the hurt he caused their grandmother, let alone anything else,' said Chard. 'Prince Harry has burnt his bridges. He's not apologized and has blown all trust… the royal family will not reply to his comments, contradictions and deep-seated resentment.'
Fordwich agreed.
'Harry has inadvertently made further communication and reconciliation even more unlikely,' she said. 'Perhaps he's just oblivious to family norms or simply too self-centered to realize reality.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'All-in': GOP lawmakers divided on US involvement as Trump pushes Iran for diplomatic end
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., called for the president to go "all-in" for Israel should a diplomatic end to the conflict with Iran not be met. Earlier in the day, President Donald Trump called on Iranian leaders to return to the negotiating table to strike a nuclear deal to avoid "even more brutal" attacks. Graham lauded Trump's desire to bring Iran back to the table but countered that "if Iran refuses this offer, I strongly believe it is in America's national security interest to go all-in to help Israel finish the job." "One of the benefits of this approach is that it would substantially undo the damage done to our reputation by Biden's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan," Graham said on X. "If diplomacy fails, going all-in for Israel shows that America is back as a reliable ally and a strong force against oppression. It would strengthen our hand in all corners of the world, as well as all other conflicts we face." Fetterman Calls For Us To Supply Anything Israel Needs For Iran Attack: 'Military, Intelligence, Weaponry' Read On The Fox News App His zeal to support the Jewish State came before Fox News reported that two U.S. Navy Destroyers, the USS Sullivans and USS Arleigh Burke, were assisting Israel to shoot down incoming missile volleys from Iran. However, other pro-Israel lawmakers were not ready to see American troops deployed in the region and believed Trump would be the key to preventing any action from the U.S. Israel Launches 'Operation Rising Lion' On Iran, Targeting Nuclear Facilities, Tehran "I can't imagine a world in which that happens," Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told Fox News Digital. "I'd be opposed to that. The president is adamantly opposed to that. I trust President Trump here to keep our troops and other personnel safe in the region." Hawley said Trump "has offered Iran an off-ramp here for a long time" through the nuclear agreement negotiation and noted the president again offered an out. Mccaul Says Israel Strikes Are 'Perfect Opportunity' For Iranians To Overthrow Islamic Regime "You know, they ought to take that off-ramp," he said. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Jim Risch, R-Idaho, told Fox News Digital in a statement that "no one hates to see U.S. troops put at risk more than our president." "President Trump has worked tirelessly to end wars and stop killing. And, in this case, I know he will continue to do all he can to keep U.S. troops out of harm's way as the war between Israel and Iran unfolds," he said. Israel's strike on Iran was intended to take out the country's nuclear enrichment program and carry out targeted attacks on a number of top Iranian officials. Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., said the strike was "warranted" given Iran's years of aggression against Israel, but he agreed with the president that negotiations needed to resume. "A regime that chants 'Death to America' and 'Death to Israel' can never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon," he said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "Israel has every right to defend itself, and America stands with Israel." But others, like Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., accused Trump of killing the Iran nuclear agreement and contended that the end of negotiations "accelerated Iran's development towards a bomb." Still, he hoped a deal could be made to prevent further "escalation in the region that could endanger American citizens, troops and our interests." "As we support Israel in protecting their people from Iran's response, everyone needs to be focused on de-escalation," Kelly said in a statement. Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for article source: 'All-in': GOP lawmakers divided on US involvement as Trump pushes Iran for diplomatic end
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
FTSE 100 closes at record high as Trump's tariffs shake faith in US
Britain's main stock market index closed at an all-time high on Thursday as investors seeking refuge from America's market slump turned towards the UK. The FTSE 100 index of London's largest companies ended 0.2pc higher on Thursday at 8,834.92 points amid a backlash against Donald Trump's economic policies, which investors fear will hinder American companies' profits. The flagship British index, which had performed poorly in recent years compared with the US, is up by 8.7pc since the start of the year, beating America's S&P 500's which has risen by 2.7pc. Neil Wilson, of Saxo Bank, said: 'We have clearly seen a rotation in global equity markets as investors have for the first time in years questioned the 'Tinata' – there is no alternative to America.' He said clients were talking about 'reducing exposure to the US'. The FTSE 100's record high came as the value of the dollar plunged to a three-year low after President Trump sparked fresh fears about global trade. The US currency sank on Thursday to its lowest level since March 2022 against a group of major peers, leaving it down by nearly 10pc so far this year. Investors have turned away from the dollar after the US president said he would send out letters to countries outlining the terms of trade deals. That sent the pound to a three-year high above $1.36 and pushed the euro to close at $1.16, its highest level since 2021, as the president's comments renewed concerns that US tariffs could hit global growth. In a further sign of his mixed signals on trade, President Trump sought to calm nerves by talking up the prospects of a US-China trade agreement, following two days of talks between Washington and Beijing officials in London this week. He wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'THE CHINA DEAL IS GREAT!' He later told reporters: 'I love China. We just made a deal, and I respect President Xi a lot, and we made a deal that's good for both countries. The deal we made with China good for both countries. Going to be a lot of money made, and it's going to ultimately open up China, which is the ultimate thing.' Charu Chanana, of Saxo Bank, said: 'Markets may have no choice but to respond to Trump's tariff threat – even if it's just posturing to bring others to the table.' The dollar was also hit by a flurry of data, which suggested the global economy was beginning to show signs of strain. Britain's goods exports to the US plunged at a record pace after President Trump launched his tariff onslaught in April, official figures showed. UK exports to the United States fell by £2bn compared with the previous month, according to the Office for National Statistics, which was the largest drop since official records began in 1997. The value of goods exports to the United States during the month – totalling £4.1bn – fell to its lowest level since February 2022. The US president hit Britain with 10pc tariffs under plans announced on April 2, a date which Mr Trump had long touted as his so-called 'liberation day'. Businesses dramatically changed their investment plans in response, bringing forward orders in an effort to get ahead of higher import taxes before they were announced. Official figures showed UK manufacturing output fell by 0.9pc in April, a further drop from 0.8pc in March but a sharp reversal from a 2.4pc surge in February. This was despite the high-profile announcement by Sir Keir Starmer of a trade agreement with the US last month, which is yet to be finalised. Robert Wood, an economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said: 'Exports should begin to stabilise in May now that the front-running has unwound and after President Trump began walking back some of his more ruinous tariffs. 'That said, the UK-US trade deal 'agreed' in May is yet to fully come into force so there could be further export weakness still ahead.' In a further sign of strain in the US, wholesale inflation ticked higher last month. The producer price index – which measures inflation before goods hit consumers – rose by 2.6pc in May, according to the Labor Department. This was up from 2.4pc in April but in line with expectations. Separate data showed US filings for jobless benefits were unchanged last week. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Israel likely launched its attack on Iran after learning the Islamic Republic was close to building a nuke
Israel launched its missile barrage on Iran this week because the theocratic regime was on the brink of building a crude nuclear device, experts said. Iran was pulling together materials 'in a secret place near Tehran to make a primitive warhead,' Beni Sabti of the Institute of National Security Studies told Fox News Digital, the likely impetus for Israel's launch of 'Operation Rising Lion' — a plan that has been ready to go since April. Tehran also recently announced that it had built and would activate a third nuclear enrichment facility — prompting the UN's atomic watchdog agency to censure Iran. 4 Israel fired airstrikes against Iran as experts say the theocratic regime was on the verge of building a nuclear device. Airbus defense and space. Experts further claim that Iran has recently continued a concerning level of weapons production. 'Iran reactivated an explosives manufacturing line, which could only be used to help that needed nuclear weapon… efforts to put the fissile material into a shape which could be used for a nuclear weapon — that was reactivated as well,' Gregg Roman, executive director of the Middle East Forum, told Fox. Just hours before Israel's historic strike Thursday, Iran announced the creation of a new enrichment facility, and the beefing up of existing enrichment operations, in a defiant response to a UN watchdog's report that censured the nation for shirking nonproliferation agreements. 'The President of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran has issued necessary directives for launching a new enrichment facility in a secure location,' the statement issued jointly by Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and AEO on Thursday read. 'And replacing first-generation centrifuges at the Martyr Ali Mohammadi (Fordo) enrichment center with advanced sixth-generation machines.' Later that same day, Israel launched its onslaught — striking key nuclear infrastructure sites across Iran, including in Tehran, in an attack that targeted the 'heart' of Iran's weaponization program, according to Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu revealed that Israel has been prepared to strike Iran since April — after issuing such threats for the past 20 years — and that the plans were conceived to address the 'clear and present danger to Israel's very survival.' 4 Tehran recently stated that they have built a third nuclear enrichment facility. AFP via Getty Images Earlier Thursday, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nation's nuclear watchdog, passed a resolution declaring Iran in non-compliance with nuclear non-proliferation agreements — the first resolution against Iran in 20 years. The resolution was put forth by the United States, Britain, France and Germany and passed with 19 out of 35 votes with only Russia, China and Burkina Faso voting against the condemnation. Of the remainder, 11 nations abstained and two did not vote. IAEA alleged that Iran has consistently failed to demonstrate to agency inspectors that its nuclear material was not being diverted for military use, United Nations news reported. The agency wrote in the statement that it found man-made uranium particles at three sites in Iran during inspections in 2020 and 2019 — and that the nation has repeatedly failed to explain their presence and even attempted to sanitize the facilities to forestall investigators. Iran has further stockpiled over 881 pounds of highly enriched uranium which the IAEA stated was 'of serious concern and adds to the complexity' of the issues. Iran condemned the IAEA's report and resolution as 'highly politicized and biased' and suggested the resolution was a stain on the watchdog's reputation. 4 Merrill Sherman / NY Post Design 'The move by these four countries severely undermines the credibility and standing of the IAEA, further exposing the politicized nature of the international body,' Thursday's statement from the MoFA and AEO read. President Trump is imploring Iran to make a deal on its nuclear energy program following the failure to come to terms in recent weeks. 'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done,' Trump wrote on Truth Social Friday. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!,' the president concluded. 4 Israel launched the airstrike on Thursday after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said they had been prepared to strike the neighboring country since April. X/IsraeliPM Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei blasted the recently offered nuclear deal in a television address last week, calling US leaders 'arrogant' and the stipulated terms of the deal '100% against' the interests of Tehran. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters A sixth round of nuclear talks between Iran and the US were set to take place Sunday in Oman. Following Israel's airstrikes Thursday on Iranian nuclear sites, the IAEA issued a statement condemning the attacks. 'This development is deeply concerning. I have repeatedly stated that nuclear facilities must never be attacked, regardless of the context or circumstances, as it could harm both people and the environment,' IAEA Director General Mariano Grossi, said in a statement Friday. 'Such attacks have serious implications for nuclear safety, security and safeguards, as well as regional and international peace and security,' Grossi added. The agency reported it was in contact with Iranian nuclear officials and that there have been no reports of elevated radiation levels near the Natanz enrichment site, which was targeted in Thursday's bombings.
