India ‘will never accept' third-party mediation on Kashmir
India will never accept mediation to resolve its dispute with Islamabad over Jammu and Kashmir, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has told US President Donald Trump. New Delhi's long-stated position on bilateral issues was reaffirmed by Modi in a 35-minute telephone conversation with Trump on Tuesday, following the US president's unscheduled early exit from the G7 summit in Canada.
'PM Modi stressed India has never accepted mediation, does not accept and will never accept it,' Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said at a press briefing on Wednesday. 'There is complete political unanimity in India on this,' Misri added.
During the call, which the Indian foreign secretary said was initiated by the Americans, Trump invited Modi to visit the US after attending the G7 Summit. However, due to prior commitments, the Indian leader had to decline the invitation, Misri added.
BREAKING: PM Modi declines President Trump's invitation to visit America on the way back from the G7 Summit in Canada pic.twitter.com/FGMit3kLW8
India's statements rejecting mediation come in the wake of last month's military conflict between the South Asian neighbors.
On May 7, India struck suspected terrorist facilities in Pakistan-controlled territory in response to a terror attack (blamed on Islamabad) in the Indian union territory of Jammu and Kashmir in April. Pakistan retaliated to the Indian strikes and a confrontation ensued till a ceasefire was announced on May 10.
Trump took credit for the ceasefire, a claim which he has since made repeatedly. New Delhi has refuted the US president's claim. The phone call between Modi and Trump on Tuesday, takes on added significance in light of a confirmed lunch meeting on Wednesday between the US president and Pakistan Army Chief General Syed Asim Munir, who is currently visiting the US.
After the ceasefire was announced by the two South Asian neighbors in May, Trump said that he used 'trade' as a bargaining chip to broker peace. Modi clarified in the Tuesday call with Trump that the India-US trade deal had no role to play in the ceasefire, Misri added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Canadian state media explains absence of G7 Ukraine statement
G7 leaders did not issue a joint statement on the Ukraine conflict following the group's recent summit in Canada, because the US refused to sign off unless it was 'watered down,' Canadian state broadcaster CBC and other media outlets have reported. The summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, ran from Sunday to Tuesday. US President Donald Trump left the gathering early, and did not meet with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky, who also attended. On Tuesday, CBC cited an anonymous official from Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's office admitting that plans for a group statement on Ukraine were dropped. The Americans reportedly opposed wording referencing Russia, due to concerns that it could jeopardize US-brokered diplomatic efforts to settle the conflict between Moscow and Kiev. The Canadian PM's office later rejected the reports, with its spokesperson Emily Williams insisting that 'no proposed joint statement regarding Ukraine was distributed. Canada's intention was always for the important language to be a part of the G7 Chairs' Summary Statement, and it was.' Carney's Summary statement said that the 'G7 leaders expressed support for President Trump's efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine' and backed Kiev's call for 'an unconditional ceasefire.' Russia has repeatedly rejected Ukraine's sudden demand, calling it a ploy to allow Ukrainian forces regroup and resupply. According to Carney, the G7 is 'resolute in exploring all options to maximize pressure on Russia, including financial sanctions.' Commenting on the summit on Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the event was 'rather unremarkable and meaningless.'
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
40% of Americans expect civil war in next decade
Forty percent of Americans believe a civil war in the US is 'somewhat' or 'very' likely within the next decade, a new YouGov poll released on Tuesday suggests. The poll, which surveyed 3,375 adults, underscores widespread anxiety over the nation's deepening divisions. It also follows a wave of unrest in the country, including violent protests against federal deportations and nationwide demonstrations aimed at President Donald Trump. Women were more likely than men to consider civil conflict plausible, with 45% indicating it was likely. Views also varied by political affiliation: 48% of Democrats, 39% of independents, and 32% of Republicans said a civil war was at least somewhat probable. While respondents were more or less split on the likelihood of a civil war, just over 20% were unsure or declined to answer. The data also suggested racial disparities. Among white respondents, 10% said a civil war was 'very likely,' compared to 18% of black respondents. Hispanics were the least likely to completely dismiss the idea, with only 11% saying a conflict was 'not likely at all,' while 15% called it 'very likely.' Earlier this month, riots erupted across California in response to federal immigration enforcement actions. Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines after a public clash with California Governor Gavin Newsom over his handling of the crisis. Last week, Minnesota State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband were fatally shot and State Senator John Hoffman and his wife injured in what officials called 'politically motivated' attacks. On Saturday, an estimated 5 million people participated in 'No Kings' marches across all 50 states. Organizers described the protests as a stand against 'authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics, and the militarization of our democracy.' Meanwhile, some Republican allies have warned that Trump is losing support for deviating from his 'America First' platform, particularly after backing Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump dismissed the criticism in an interview with The Atlantic, saying he alone defines what 'America First' means.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump eyeing conflict with Iran
US President Donald Trump is considering involving the US directly in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, Axios has reported, citing three anonymous officials familiar with the situation. The US president left the G7 summit early on Monday and is scheduled to meet with his national security team on Tuesday. Trump has lauded the Israeli bombing campaign against Iran's nuclear facilities, but has so far held off on taking part in offensive operations. 'Trump was seriously considering joining the war and launching a US strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, especially its underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordow,' Axios wrote. West Jerusalem believes that the US will 'enter the war in the coming days,' the outlet said, citing Israeli officials. While a potential intervention will be discussed at Tuesday's meeting, there are differences of opinion among Trump's closes advisers, CBS News wrote, citing five sources familiar with the matter. US forces deployed in the region have the bunker-buster bombs Israeli lacks that could destroy Iran's uranium enrichment plant at Fordow, Axios wrote on Sunday. There is no indication that the facility, built deep inside a mountain, has been damaged, according to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Rafael Grossi. According to Israeli National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi, the campaign against Iran 'will not end without damaging the Fordow nuclear facility.' Israel is in constant communication with Washington on the matter, he said in an interview on Tuesday. A few hours prior to Tuesday's security meeting, Trump delivered a chain of posts on Truth Social, claiming that the US now has unobstructed primacy in Iranian airspace, boasting that he could assassinate Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and demanding that Tehran capitulates.
