
In Tech, Everyone Loves A Unicorn—Here's Why Running A Zebra Is Better
Wietse Van Ransbeeck is the CEO and Co-Founder of Go Vocal, on a mission to make democracy more inclusive, participatory and responsive.
When my team and I co-founded Go Vocal in 2015, it was because we wanted to be part of reinvigorating democracy for the 21st century. Of course, there were many avenues we could have pursued to be part of achieving this. Launching a nonprofit might have seemed like an obvious choice, but that's not where we landed.
Today, Go Vocal is a SaaS company, supporting more than 500 local governments worldwide. We're also a B Corp, committed to meeting ambitious social impact targets as well as delivering profit for our shareholders.
B Corps like us are required to meet standards of verified "social and environmental performance, transparency and accountability." And we're in good company, with almost 10,000 businesses like Patagonia and Ben & Jerry's all certified by B Lab to balance profit and purpose.
Another way you might describe us is as a zebra.
Zebras are social animals that tend to live together in groups. More interested in collaboration than competition, they graze on the tough, dry grass that other animals are unable to digest, helping out their neighboring species in the process.
In tech, unicorns are shiny new startups worth over $1 billion, while zebras are the businesses willing to take on the chewy challenges of making our world a better place. And we're in it for the long game, valuing sustainable solutions over a quick, lucrative exit.
We're driven to serve our shareholders and our stakeholders.
While unicorns famously 'move fast and break things,' zebras tend to be more graceful. We don't want to cause damage to people or the planet—in fact, quite the opposite. We don't want to prioritize growth at all costs. We know the world's biggest challenges require long-term commitment.
That's why, when making our product roadmap, we prioritize developments that serve citizens over short-term client-focused monetization. And we're selective about who we work with—we only work with governments that are genuinely interested in championing democracy.
What we've found at Go Vocal is that our results are circular: When we deliver results for our shareholders, their trust in us grows, and their financial backing enables us to keep innovating in service of our clients and their communities.
Our economic system tends to favor binaries—business or nonprofit, profitable or socially conscious. With our distinct mix of black and white, zebras offer the world the best of both.
That doesn't mean it's always sunshine and rainbows in the Serengeti.
Because we value sustainable growth over the long term, it can be harder for zebras to attract new investment when competing with those sparkly unicorns. At the same time, as a company, we aren't eligible to apply for the grants offered to nonprofits working on similar social challenges.
Optimizing at both ends takes a lot of energy because we have both financial and impact goals to meet. But we know that our financial health is a prerequisite to prioritizing our impact. In challenging years, we must give more weight to the financials to ensure the longevity of our company, and then in the growth years, we can build on that financial buffer to think bigger about our impact.
These days, it feels like we're able to strike a comfortable balance. We reached profitability last year, and we have the ambition to keep growing. As our whole team knows, that's what's going to enable more meaningful impact.
Critics of social impact businesses like ours are quick to say that our values are only a marketing ploy, with no substance behind them. Or that our competing priorities of profit and purpose lead to inefficiencies.
Our company is proof positive that we can offer substance and profit at the same time. And we don't have anything to hide—the administrators of our B Corp certification, B Lab, help keep us honest about our impact, offering industry benchmarking for a healthy sense of perspective.
As an employer, we also know that the generation entering the workforce today is driven by the need for a sense of purpose at work, and we have plenty of that to offer. Companies wanting to retain employees will need to find ways to act like a zebra and offer something more than just a paycheck.
So, what can we do to grow our modest stripy herd?
1. Enact policies for purpose. Governments could offer tax incentives or subsidies for businesses with proven social or environmental impact and prioritize zebras in the public procurement process. If the purpose of government is to compensate for certain externalities, why not support zebras to be more competitive, so they can deliver even more impact?
2. Educate the next generation of zebras. Integrate social entrepreneurship into school curricula and entrepreneurship programs to encourage big-picture thinking about purpose alongside profit.
3. Celebrate businesses championing purpose and profitability. Currently, zebras don't attract any of the hype of unicorns. What would it look like if there were fewer headlines about record-breaking startup valuations and more about the tangible good being offered by zebras?
As we dream of a new zebra economy, we need to find new measures of success. That doesn't have to mean letting go of profit as a success indicator but making space for a new generation of foals who can balance profit and purpose for more meaningful work, shaping a more equitable world.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


TechCrunch
43 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Clean energy investment hits new highs and shows no sign of slowing
The world is set to invest nearly twice as much in clean energy as fossil fuels this year, according to a new International Energy Agency report. While fossil fuel outlays are still significant — about $1.15 trillion this year — they'll be dwarfed by clean energy, which is expected to receive $2.15 trillion in 2025. But the real takeaway is that the energy transition doesn't show signs of slowing. Plotting the two investments trends is revealing. Over the last decade, fossil fuel investment has been relatively steady, if declining slightly. There has been an uptick since a drop that coincided with the pandemic, but even that shows signs of softening this year. But clean energy investment follows a different path, a far more aggressively positive trend: The curve is up and to the right. Global clean energy investment has outpaced fossil fuel outlays for the last decade. Image Credits:Tim De Chant/TechCrunch For data nerds: A second-order polynomial fit to the fossil fuel investment does a reasonable job of explaining the variance (R2 = 0.74), suggesting the world might be extracting a bit more oil, coal, and gas in the near future. But the same type of equation applied to clean energy figures fits the data far better (R2 = 0.94). Unless the world takes a U-turn — something that hasn't happened in the 10 years the IEA has collected this data, pandemic included — expect bigger clean energy numbers next year. The big question is whether it'll be too little, too late. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW To hit net zero by 2050, the world has to invest an average of $4.5 trillion annually, according to a report from the World Economic Foundation. That's double this year's investment, which sounds like a lot. But analysts have previously issued overly cautious clean energy investment forecasts. The trend in the new IEA data suggests that the goal is within reach. Clean energy's exponential growth won't last forever; the trend is likely to taper off in the coming years, just like it did in the mid-2010s. But as I've written before, these sorts of fits and starts are not unusual, and adoption of new technologies is never continuous. Instead, it's influenced by global economic trends and the learning curve that companies face when incorporating them into their businesses. Ultimately, by 2050, I suspect average annual investment will probably meet or exceed the $4.5 trillion annual rate that the World Economic Forum calls for. Clean energy technologies are cheaper by the year, which makes them more accessible. Indeed, 85% of electricity demand growth in the next two years is going to come from developing and emerging economies, and while cheap coal has driven the narrative in many of those, solar and wind shouldn't be counted out. The wildcard, of course, is data centers. In the U.S., at least, utilities are confronting demand forecasts with enormous error bars. Those forecasts may fall short, but utilities tend to err on the side of caution, which means finding more power. Some will turn to gas turbines, others will bet on nuclear. But in the next few years — and likely over the long term — renewables paired with energy storage will have the upper hand. They're probable winners not just because they're getting cheaper, but because they're modular. They can be deployed at a range of scales and prices. It's easy for them to be everywhere, and that's something investors love to see.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Musk's Empire at Risk After Trump Feud Opens Multi-Front Fight
What began as Elon Musk's embrace of right-wing populism has become a defining — and potentially harmful — chapter in his business career. By endorsing Donald Trump's MAGA movement and far-right parties in Europe, Musk alienated a big portion of his original customer base, eroding Tesla's brand, sales and market share around the globe. Then came this week's rupture: a personal and public breakup with Trump that prompted threats of retaliation from a man with control over the world's most powerful government.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
China OKs Rare Earth Exports to US Carmakers, Reuters Says
China has approved temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top US automakers, Reuters reported on Friday, citing unidentified people familiar with the matter. It's unclear what materials are covered by the licenses and at least some are valid for six months, Reuters said. China's restrictions on exports of rare earths, the dormant source of the materials, pose risks to global automakers' supply chains.