logo
Trump Takes Aim at a Key Cuban Export: Its Worldwide Medical Missions

Trump Takes Aim at a Key Cuban Export: Its Worldwide Medical Missions

New York Times14-04-2025

As a newly minted U.S. citizen, Ramona Matos, once a doctor in Cuba, did not hesitate when deciding whom to vote for last year.
She chose Donald J. Trump, the candidate who promised to be tough on Cuba's communist government.
She hoped he would help free the Cuban people and, in particular, put an end to a tool the government in Havana has used to soften its image around the world — one that Ms. Matos found particularly repugnant for personal reasons.
For decades, the Cuban government has sent thousands of health professionals to work in remote villages and cities in dozens of countries, where they get just a fraction of what the countries pay Cuba for their services.
'Those doctors are slaves to the Cuban dictatorship,' said Ms. Matos, 63, who, after posts at Cuban medical missions in Bolivia and Brazil, is a factory worker in South Florida.
Beginning on his first day in office, Mr. Trump has started tightening the screws on Cuba, including on its global medical program.
With a Cuban American secretary of state and an envoy to Latin America known as a longtime hawk on Cuba policy, the Trump administration quickly imposed tougher measures. It was the latest twist in the back-and-forth approach toward Cuba, which shifts from aggression to softening, depending on who occupies the White House.
The Trump administration reversed moves made by the Biden administration, returning Cuba to the list of state sponsors of terrorism, which limits its ability to do business around the world, and restoring the right of Americans to sue over property confiscated on the island decades ago.
Cuban officials have had their visas yanked and the administration has prohibited business transactions with companies controlled by Cuba's military, intelligence and security services, which manage vital interests such as tourism and imports.
Republican administrations have tried to target Cuba's medical missions before, but Mr. Trump is taking a harder line: In February, for the first time, the U.S. government said it would withdraw the travel visas of officials in countries that host the medical brigades.
The measure threatens one of Cuba's main sources of currency, just as the nation grapples with a huge wave of migration, widespread power outages and food shortages.
It's difficult to figure out exactly how much the medical program generates for Cuba — experts note that the government's figures are often unclear, because it frequently changes the descriptions of the payments and lumps together different kinds of services.
Overall, Cuba earns more than $4 billion a year by exporting health care employees, construction workers, educators and other types of skilled workers, according to a study by Cuba Archive, a Miami-based human rights organization, which produced the findings for the State Department's annual Trafficking in Persons report.
Four government officials, two from Venezuela and two from Cuba, have lost their travel visas to the United States over the new medical brigade policy, the U.S. State Department said.
'I don't agree with everything Trump does, but on the subject of Cuba, I find it wonderful,' Ms. Matos said.
Cuba's medical brigades work in dozens of countries from Africa to South America and the Caribbean.
Though they are often depicted as humanitarian missions for nations in need of health care, the countries pay Cuba for doctors, nurses, technicians and other service providers, helping the Cuban government fund its own health care system.
Cuban officials say the country currently has 24,000 people posted in 56 countries. The program peaked in 2014 but has declined over the past decade because of disputes with Brazil and cutbacks in Venezuela.
The health workers, who study medicine for free in Cuba, generally participate in the program willingly because they earn far more than they would at home.
But they only receive a portion — human rights activists say 2 to 15 percent — of what governments pay Cuba for their services. Half of the workers' pay is held in a devalued local currency account in Cuba, from which they can withdraw only after returning home from their assignments.
Doctors who served overseas say their passports were taken from them, they were not allowed to socialize with locals and, in some communities, had to keep a 6 p.m. curfew. They also could not bring their families. Under the administration of President George W. Bush, doctors who fled the program were offered fast-track entry into the United States, and many deserted.
One doctor who fled in 2019 said the monthly salary she received in Venezuela's local currency during a period of hyperinflation was enough to buy just a loaf of bread and a can of soda. She worked 48-hour shifts, often without electricity, and bunked with three other Cuban doctors.
'It's a Cuban government business, literally,' said the doctor, who asked that she only be identified by her first name, Leydy, because the government sometimes harasses her family at home. 'The truth is, it's exploitation.'
Leydy is now studying to be a nurse practitioner in Florida. Because she never returned to Havana, the Cuban government kept the $10,000 she earned in Venezuela over 15 months, she said.
Maria Werlau, the executive director of Cuba Archive, the Miami-based human rights group, described the program as 'a scheme for forced labor.'
The amount governments have paid Cuba per doctor varies, ranging from $900 in Guatemala to $5,000 in Kenya. In Equatorial Guinea, doctors received $1,000 of the $10,000 the government paid for them, Cuba Archive's report said.
Ms. Werlau noted that U.S. federal law calls for sanctions against countries that participate in trafficking. While the State Department has accused Cuba of labor trafficking for years, Ms. Werlau believes the United States should also penalize governments that participate in the program.
The Cuban government insists that the medical program does not meet the international legal definition of labor trafficking because employees are not tricked and know where they are going.
The employees receive a salary, pension and a 'decent' stipend in the destination country, where their lodging, transportation and often food expenses are covered, Cuba's deputy foreign minister, Carlos F. de Cossío, said in an emailed response to questions.
'The Cuban professionals who participate do so voluntarily,' he said.
Mr. de Cossío said they have 'complete freedom of movement,' an assertion human rights activists say hundreds of doctors who have left the program have disputed.
No countries have withdrawn from the program because of the new policy, Mr. de Cossío said.
Mr. Trump's policy to cancel visas from officials of countries that participate in the program 'is aimed at strangling the Cuban economy by means of threats and coercion on governments and entities of third countries, thus reinforcing the siege they have imposed for decades,' he said.
'Predictably,'' Mr. de Cossío added, 'it has affected our people's standard of living, restricting income, damaging essential services such as electricity, water, transportation and health care.'
Leaders of several Caribbean countries have balked at the new visa rule and said they'd happily forfeit trips to the United States.
Jamaica has up to 400 Cubans, mostly nurses, who have filled important gaps in the nation's medical care, said Christopher Tufton, Jamaica's minister of health and wellness.
'We don't have any evidence that there is trafficking taking place,' Mr. Tufton said in an interview.
In Trinidad and Tobago, where 87 nurses and nine doctors from Cuba work, the authorities have ensured that the program meets labor standards, Prime Minister Stuart Young said.
'We remain grateful to Cuban health care providers who provide service in key areas to people of Trinidad and Tobago in conditions that they and we can be proud of,' said Amery Brown, a medical doctor who serves as minister of foreign affairs. 'The conditions are actually excellent.''
But a Cuban doctor who had been posted in Port of Spain, the capital of Trinidad and Tobago, and who spoke on the condition her name not be published because she fears reprisals, said so much of her $3,500 monthly payment was kept in a Cuban account that it was difficult to survive.
Mauricio Claver Carone, Mr. Trump's envoy for Latin America and a longtime advocate for tough sanctions on Cuba, said more countries needed to use a model like the one in Barbados, where the government hires doctors directly.
'We want to basically have a united voice against indentured servitude, against human trafficking,' he said.
In 2018, Ms. Matos sued the PanAmerican Health Organization, a U.N. agency that had a role in managing the program in Brazil. She considers it 'modern slavery.'
'Isn't that a slave, that you restrict a person from going wherever they want, talking to whoever they want?' she said. 'Not to mention the salaries.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Korea Plans $22 Billion Extra Budget as Tariffs Hit Growth
South Korea Plans $22 Billion Extra Budget as Tariffs Hit Growth

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

South Korea Plans $22 Billion Extra Budget as Tariffs Hit Growth

(Bloomberg) -- South Korea unveiled an extra budget worth billions of dollars, in a bid to support an economy struggling with sluggish consumption and mounting trade headwinds from Donald Trump's tariffs. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports The 30.5 trillion won ($22.2 billion) proposal includes 15.2 trillion won for economic stimulus and 5 trillion won for supporting livelihoods like small businesses, the finance ministry said in a statement. Another 10.3 trillion won is set aside to cover revenue shortfall for this year's existing budget, as taxation income fell due to weaker corporate performance and consumer spending. The proposal comes after President Lee Jae Myung took office earlier this month, vowing to boost growth and improve livelihoods. He had pledged over 30 trillion won in fresh spending through extra budgets to support small businesses and offset trade shocks. Before the election, 13.8 trillion won had already been approved as part of the first supplementary budget. Lee has inherited an economy already under pressure from weakening demand, compounded by months of political turmoil triggered by former President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law bid. The country's gross domestic product shrank in the first quarter, prompting the Bank of Korea to slash its 2025 growth forecast to 0.8% from 1.5%. The central bank also cut its key interest rate to 2.5% and signaled more easing may follow. Of the 10.3 trillion won tax revenue shortfall, nearly 9 trillion won stemmed from declines in corporate and value-added taxation income. The figures point to deepening economic strain, and help explain why policymakers are leaning more heavily on fiscal stimulus. As a leading semiconductor manufacturer and a key player in global supply chains, South Korea remains particularly vulnerable to trade risks from US tariffs. Exports are equivalent to more than 40% of the country's GDP, and are a key driver of the the country's growth rate. Trump's across-the-board tariffs for South Korea, which are set to jump to 25% in early July from a baseline 10%, are among the highest imposed on US allies. Other sector-specific levies by the Trump administration threaten key South Korean industries, including semiconductors, cars, steel, and aluminum. 'Bold and timely fiscal support is essential for the economy to return to a solid upward trajectory,' second Vice Minister of Finance Lim KiKeun said in a briefing Wednesday. 'While the supplementary budget cannot solve all challenges at once, it represents the first crucial step forward.' The government plans to fund the extra budget through a mix of spending cuts and debt issuance. About 5.3 trillion won will come from restructuring existing outlays, while 2.5 trillion won will be drawn from surplus balances in public funds. Another 3 trillion won will come from changes to foreign exchange stabilization bonds, while the bulk — 19.8 trillion won — will be financed through new sovereign bond sales. The fiscal push will raise the nation's debt-to-GDP ratio to 49% this year, from 47.4% in 2024, as total government spending climbs 6.9%, the ministry said. Even before the election, the need for more fiscal stimulus was clear. BOK Governor Rhee Chang-yong warned that additional measures would likely be required in 2025, underscoring the challenges facing Asia's fourth-largest economy. As part of the stimulus package, the government plans to distribute vouchers worth between 150,000 and 500,000 won per person. The payments will be provided to the general population rather than targeted groups. The issuance of regional gift certificates will also be expanded to encourage spending, with policymakers hoping the combined measures will deliver a swift injection of cash into the real economy. The proposal still needs parliamentary approval, and opposition lawmakers have raised concerns about the rapid debt buildup and potential inefficiencies in spending. Song Eon-seog, a lawmaker from the People Power Party, warned that 'reckless extra budgets' could actually harm both livelihoods and the broader economy. Earlier this month, the central bank stressed the importance of swiftly drafting and implementing an extra budget to boost domestic demand, saying the stimulus would have only a limited impact on inflation. --With assistance from Seyoon Kim and Shinhye Kang. Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Zillow says it's fighting for buyers. Compass says it's fighting for sellers. What if neither is fighting for you?
Zillow says it's fighting for buyers. Compass says it's fighting for sellers. What if neither is fighting for you?

Miami Herald

time13 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Zillow says it's fighting for buyers. Compass says it's fighting for sellers. What if neither is fighting for you?

As two real estate giants escalate a war over how homes should be listed for sale online, both sides say they're acting in the interest of consumers. Both sides also stand to make a lot of money if they win. The issue intensified at the end of 2024, when Compass, the country's largest brokerage by sales volume, began advising its sellers to use a three-phased marketing approach - making their homes visible only to Compass agents and clients as a "private" listing, making them viewable only via and reserving the option to later make them public on popular house-hunting sites like Redfin and Zillow. In the real estate industry, listings are currency. Faced with thousands of them disappearing from its site, Zillow punched back. The Seattle-based company, starting at the end of June, plans to block any former private listings from appearing on its site - an ultimatum it hopes brings an end to Compass's practice of selectively sharing listings before they appear on big search portals. Redfin will follow with a similar ban in September. Each of these players pitches itself as a pro-consumer brand. Compass says its selective marketing approach offers sellers privacy and control. Some sellers want to market to more exclusive groups before their home appears on big listing sites, which feature details like days on market and price cuts, which can signal a seller is willing to negotiate on price. Zillow and Redfin say they are for transparency in the market, which is good for both homebuyers and sellers. The only way to know a home's true price, they argue, is to advertise it as broadly as possible. But Brian Boero, chief executive of 1000watt, a marketing agency for residential real estate companies, says their pro-consumer stances are largely just messaging. "These companies are using the consumer as almost like a human shield here to protect their business interests," Boero said. "They may believe these things sincerely, but this is first and foremost about rational self-interest." Should Compass win the private listings war, it would upend the paradigm in home listings that buyers have grown used to over the last two decades. When Zillow and Redfin arrived in the mid-2000s, they promised to democratize the home search, pulling back the curtain on a market once controlled by agents and the local databases they operated called multiple listing services. For buyers, the experience changed overnight: Homes that were once buried in classified ads or hidden in books that could only be viewed alongside a broker were suddenly just a click away. Sellers' agents at first rejoiced - they didn't have to work as hard to advertise their properties, and listing on the sites was free. But someone was paying: buyers' agents. When a prospective buyer clicks a listing's "Contact an Agent" button, Zillow or Redfin sells that inquiry to a paying agent. They also take as much as 40% of the agent's commission if they close the sale. Brokerages like Compass have long bristled at the steep fee. But as home sales drag for a third straight year, Compass is trying to change the game. By publishing listings exclusively on it cuts out the referral middlemen. "Organized real estate has been implementing rules that have been stripping homeowners and their agents of flexibility and choice," Rory Golod, president of Growth and Communications at Compass, said in an interview. "They are trying to monopolize where inventory goes and how people sell." Redfin and Zillow, of course, have their own interests to protect - as well as the model that's come to shape the modern home-buying experience. "This isn't just about Zillow or Redfin - the internet has changed home search for the better, where every buyer can have access to all of the inventory," said Joe Rath, Redfin's head of industry relations. "Gatekeeping in any form is antithetical to the internet." Matt Kreamer, Zillow's spokesperson, said that transparency is core to Zillow's philosophy: "We believe that home listings that are available to some buyers should be available to all buyers," he said. Their calls for openness also happen to preserve their business: more listings, more traffic, more fees. Ultimately, Boero, the marketing chief, believes that Zillow's market power will force Compass to blink. "Zillow is the most powerful brand in the history of housing," Boero said. "You just can't imagine not having your home on Zillow as a home seller - it sounds like a stupid thing to have happen." But others see an opportunity for Compass to prevail in bringing traffic directly to its site. "Southwest Airlines didn't sell tickets on any of the online aggregators for years, and they're doing great," said Mike DelPrete, a real estate tech consultant. "People look at multiple sources." The dispute appears to be heading toward a compromise that would allow both Compass and the listing aggregators to uphold their business models, rather than a solution centered around buyers and sellers. Redfin's Joe Rath said his company would be open to hiding certain data, like days on market and price drops, if that's what it took to keep listings public. "We would much rather give ground there and have the listing," he said, "than not have the listing at all." Because all of these companies are paid a percentage of a home's ultimate sales price, it benefits both the brokerages and the search portals to keep buyers in the dark about details that might lead to a lower price. The battle over transparency, it seems, has limits. Whether Compass or the search portals win, both victories would also preserve an as-yet unshakable status quo in real estate: a 2% to 3% commission for buyers' agents. A landmark legal settlement earlier this year threatened that fee structure paradigm - but so far, traditional models have held, although a few flat-fee agencies have broken the mold. So why are the rules governing home listings decided by two major corporations that stand to benefit from pushing prices as high as possible? "With how important housing is to our economy, society and individuals, there is a question of why the information about homes for sale isn't federally regulated," Boero said. But government intervention in home sales isn't likely to happen at the federal level under President Donald Trump, who has promoted deregulation and free markets. The state's regulator, the California Department of Real Estate, lacks the legal authority to make a ruling on private listings that would tip the scales toward either Compass or Zillow. But it can, for example, require agents to give sellers adequate warning on the financial consequences of not appearing on the major home listing sites, said Summer Goralik, a former investigator with the department who now works as a compliance consultant to brokerages. "They'll need to explore whether brokers are breaching fiduciary duty to sellers," Goralik said. "Are they giving all of the information that seller needs to make an informed decision about listing privately?" For her part, Goralik doesn't believe the push for private sales and putting listings back into the brokerages' hands helps buyers or sellers. "A wide-scale campaign for private listings seems to do more harm than good," she said. "It seems like we'd be going back in time. I'm for the future." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Trump's immigration crackdown straining labor force for Minnesota ag, food operations
Trump's immigration crackdown straining labor force for Minnesota ag, food operations

Miami Herald

time13 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Trump's immigration crackdown straining labor force for Minnesota ag, food operations

As agricultural and canning operations are ramping up for the summer, they are trying to figure out the possible repercussions of stepped-up immigration enforcement. The workforce for these businesses has become tighter over the past few years, and many were worried that the threat of raids coupled with increased security at the Mexican border would further deplete summer help. "It's kind of a freak-out time [for the agriculture supply line]," said Fernando Quijano, economics educator with the University of Minnesota educator in Moorhead. "We're talking about agriculture, man, some of the most serious business we have in the United States." This week many farm groups and commodity associations are staying quiet about the latest guidance from the Department of Homeland Security. Just a week ago, DHS reportedly paused raids on rural areas, after pressure from those same groups. But on Monday, the Trump administration reversed course. DHS officials said there would be "no safe spaces" for companies that use undocumented labor. The policy whipsaw came after a meatpacking plant raid in Nebraska last week and heavy lobbying of U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and other officials by farm and food companies. The mixed signals carry another level of worry for those who rely on immigrant labor, say Minnesota rural economic experts. Most of these dairy and pork farms, meat processors and vegetable canneries are in rural Minnesota, where support for President Donald Trump remains close to 50%. Still, many believed last week the behind-the-scenes pleadings had softened the administration's stance, Quijano said. "It seems to me Trump is realizing that we need some sort of protections (for farm workers)," he said. Tracking undocumented labor is difficult. Minnesota was home to anywhere between 50,000 to 70,000 unauthorized immigrant workers in 2022, according to estimates from the Center for Migration Studies and the Pew Research Center. A large share of them work on farms or food and meat processing. But those numbers are down significantly from previous estimates a decade ago. Immigration policies have affected how willing undocumented laborers are to seek jobs in the state, and businesses hiring those labors are struggling to make up the difference. "A lot of those industries have been dealing with a really tight labor market since 2017," said Cameron Macht, a regional labor analyst manager for the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. "Constraining the number of available workers is a challenge ... they're already looking for more workers and so not having access to a portion of workers is going to create an extra challenge." Only 27% of farms hire outside help in Minnesota, according to the USDA census, said Lauren Heers, a University of Minnesota extension educator for the central part of the state. A good number of those workers are immigrants. "Depending on who you ask, you'll hear different experiences - many migrant workers, documented or not, report fears of workplace immigration raids," she said. "Some operators are seeing this reflected in day-to-day labor availability, while some operators report this isn't an issue." In southwestern Minnesota's Lyon County, farmer Dennis Fultz, 78, said Trump's change of course regarding the food and ag industries is another example of how inconsistent federal government policies are this year. "It's frustrating," said Fultz, who describes himself as a lifelong Republican who voted for Kamala Harris last November. But he also said that he and other farmers in Lyon County, which is home to a turkey processing site among other food operations, are finding the workers they need. Yet for areas in the state starting to see a tightening, the anxiety immigrants have felt this year is another barrier to finding enough workers. And in Minnesota, fear is spreading that the first, big raid of a packing house or farm site could be near. "The Trump administration's whiplash approach to immigration enforcement is creating uncertainty all across rural communities," said Sen. Tina Smith, the Democrat from Minnesota. "Families, farmers and food workers deserve stability, not political stunts that disrupt lives and hurt rural economies." Last week, Immigrations and Custom Enforcement agents detained 100 workers at a JBS meatpacking plant outside Omaha. In Worthington, Minn., home to a large pork slaughterhouse owned by JBS, the Brazilian-owned meat giant, residents reported ICE knocking on doors. Of the 120,448 job openings in 2024, according to a state website, over 18,000 were in food preparations. Fewer than 500 were in farming. When the HyLife pork plant in Windom, Minnesota, shuttered two years ago, roughly half of its 1,000-person workforce was on foreign labor visas, including many from the same hometown of Salvatierra, Mexico. As of 2024, Minnesota has around 4,000 ag workers with H-2A visas, meaning they're temporarily employed for seasonal work as farmers and ag concerns can't find enough domestic workers. H2A visa records in the state show Stevens County, home to mega dairy farms, as the largest recipient of H2A labor. But experts say these populations often are different. H2A workers may come from eastern Europe or South Africa. Meanwhile, a majority of undocumented workers, often those working livestock operations, hail from Mexico or Central America. Various statewide business and community groups are lobbying for immigration and visa reform to bring in more foreign workers, arguing Minnesota won't be able to continue growing without foreign-born labor. A Minnesota Chamber of Commerce report in February highlighted how the state's immigrant population is driving population and labor gains. Employment among immigrant workers increased by 7% between 2019 and 2023, compared to less than 1% for native Minnesotans. "Over the past 10 years, half of the new labor force in the state has come from foreign-born workers," said Macht, the DEED analyst. "The match with job vacancies and available openings in the state and the industries that they have helped fill jobs in is just incredibly important to the vitality of the state." Nationwide, the number of certified H-2A workers grew by 64.7%, from 224,965 to 370,628, according to numbers from the Washington-based American Immigration Council. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store