logo
Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025

Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025

Yahooa day ago

Your wallet might get a little break at the grocery store. According to EggPrices.org, the average price of a dozen eggs is $4.26.
The average has been the lowest it has been since its March peak of $6.23, according to a report published on June 3 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service.
According to the USDA, retail prices tend to follow wholesale prices with a delay due to several factors.
'Retail egg prices are influenced by wholesale egg prices, but additional factors such as pricing strategies and contracts can mute the impact of short-term fluctuations,' the USDA report said.
'As a result, retail price movements tend to lag directional changes made by wholesale prices. When wholesale prices spike, retailers occasionally and temporarily have sold eggs at a loss. As wholesale prices retreat, retail prices are slower to decline and often remain elevated for a longer period."
Here's what to know about egg prices in Texas.
Last time we reported on egg prices in Texas, the average price for a dozen was $5.43. Today, those prices remain largely unchanged, according to the World Population Review.
The decline in national egg prices comes as the USDA reported fewer cases of bird flu last month. Bird flu cases declined significantly to 2.1 million cases in March, according to the USDA, compared to 12.64 million in February and 23.19 million in January.
Yes, bird flu is still spreading, particularly the H5N1 strain. While the risk to the general public remains low, experts emphasize the need for continued surveillance and precautions. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are 70 total national cases. However, in Texas, no reports have been made of poultry farms or other animals being affected.
-USA Today Network reporter Betty Lin-Fisher contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Egg prices are down in the US. How much does a dozen cost in Texas?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Calavo Growers attracts takeover interest from unnamed party
Calavo Growers attracts takeover interest from unnamed party

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Calavo Growers attracts takeover interest from unnamed party

Calavo Growers, the Nasdaq-listed fresh produce business, has received a takeover approach from an unidentified suitor. The Santa Paula, California-based supplier of avocados, tomatoes, papayas and guacamole, said the 'non-binding, indicative proposal' has been put on the table at $32 a share. Calavo Growers added in an official statement yesterday (11 June) that the offer consists of shares in the interested party and a cash portion. The proposal is subject to due diligence and financing, the company said. 'This non-binding proposal may or may not lead to a transaction and the company does not intend to comment or update further unless warranted,' it noted. However, the board of Calavo Growers is 'reviewing' the proposal in consultations with its legal and financial advisors. Calavo Growers' shares closed up 1.7% at $23.58 on the Nasdaq exchange yesterday, trimming a decline this year to 7.5%. Founded in 1924, the business markets its fresh fruit range under the Calavo brand and also supplies retailers with private label. Other customers include club stores, wholesalers and the foodservice channel. As well as guacamole, it also offers valued-added products such as salsas and dips. Led by president and CEO Lee Cole, the business sources avocados from USDA-certified growers in Mexico, Peru, Colombia, Chile, and the Dominican Republic, according to Calavo Growers' 2024 annual report. It operates a facility in Uruapan, Mexico, as well as the site in California. Earlier this week, the company issued its second-quarter results. Sales climbed 3.3% to $190.5m and were up 10.6% for the year so far at $344.9m. For the quarter to 30 April, adjusted EBITDA dropped 17.3% to $11.4m but increased 22.4% over the six months to $20.7m. Net income rose 13% to $6.9m for the quarter and turned to a year-to-date profit of $11.3m compared to a $0.2m loss a year earlier. Diluted EPS came in at $0.38 versus $0.36, and $0.63 against $0.22, for the quarter and year so far, respectively. "Calavo Growers attracts takeover interest from unnamed party" was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Complimentary Webinar: Regulatory Shifts Ahead: What You Need To Know Now for Food Safety & Product Development
Complimentary Webinar: Regulatory Shifts Ahead: What You Need To Know Now for Food Safety & Product Development

Associated Press

time6 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Complimentary Webinar: Regulatory Shifts Ahead: What You Need To Know Now for Food Safety & Product Development

Complimentary Webinar Regulatory Shifts Ahead: What You Need to Know Now for Food Safety & Product Development June 17, 2025 | 12:00 PM ET / 9:00 AM PT REGISTER Join SCS Global Services for a mid-year Regulatory review update, as the shifting priorities and focus by both the FDA and USDA is having a significant impact on how we develop and manufacture products. This webinar will provide you with an update on the key changes and give you the tools to navigate current requirements and compliance with the timelines. We will also explore how it starts with product development and considerations for food safety, quality and regulatory compliance from allergens, ready-to-eat status, to considering upcoming banned ingredients and reformulations. Lastly, you will take away a stronger understanding of actions your company should take now and those that can help to improve your current programs to achieve regulatory compliance and meeting customer expectations. REGISTER HERE FOR THE WEBINAR By registering, you will get access to the webinar recording. For inquiries, contact: Shyama Devarajan Senior Marketing Analyst, SCS Global Services [email protected] Visit 3BL Media to see more multimedia and stories from SCS Global Services

Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers

It should be clear by now that, despite the assurances from President Donald Trump and his allies in government, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—which passed the U.S. House of Representatives last month—not only won't reduce the federal budget deficit but will in fact increase the nation's debt load by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Given that Trump came into office promising to cut federal spending, it's worth looking at how Trump's bill does the opposite of what he and other Republicans say it does. And one of the more egregious things it does is boost corporate welfare for wealthy farmers. "The government provides agricultural subsidies—monetary payments and other types of support—to farmers or agribusinesses," says the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). "While some subsidies are given to promote specific farming practices, others focus on research and development, conservation practices, disaster aid, marketing, nutrition assistance, risk mitigation, and more." "In reality, this support is highly skewed toward the five major 'program' commodities of corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice," according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), an environmental advocacy organization. "Despite the rhetoric of 'preserving the family farm,' the vast majority of farmers do not benefit from federal farm subsidy programs and most of the subsidies go to the largest and most financially secure farm operations." The new bill will only make the problem worse: According to an analysis by the American Farm Bureau Federation, the bill "would increase agriculture-facing programs spending by $56.6 billion over the next decade," of which "$52.3 billion is tied to enhancements in the farm safety net." That "farm safety net" comprises most agricultural subsidy spending in any given year. It includes price and revenue guarantees for certain crops, ensuring farmers earn a set minimum on staples like corn and soybeans, as well as crop insurance assistance, covering up to 60 percent of farmers' insurance premiums in the event of price declines or poor harvests. The programs are a bad deal for taxpayers—indeed, for anybody but the very wealthiest agribusinesses. "Just in the last 10 years, crop insurance agents and the 14 companies the USDA allows to sell and service crop insurance policies…received almost $33.3 billion from the federal Crop Insurance Program," EWG Midwest director Anne Schechinger wrote in 2023. "In some years, up to one-third of crop insurance payments are made to companies and agents, not farmers." The new bill would make the program even more generous, tying payouts to inflation and putting taxpayers on the hook for even more insurance company operating costs. The bill would also increase the price minimums for many staple crops, though the increases for those grown in southern U.S. states go up exponentially: While corn would go up by 18 percent, and wheat and soybeans by more than 70 percent each, minimum prices for seed cotton, peanuts, and rice—grown primarily in the southern states—would each more than double, with the minimum price of rice going up 185 percent. Price minimums inherently distort the market, causing farmers to prioritize favored crops even if others would be better suited to the growing conditions—after all, if you're guaranteed a minimum price for what you sell, and you're covered for what doesn't grow, what do you have to lose? At the same time, "subsidies increase land prices, which benefits wealthy landowners at the expense of the many farmers who rent," writes Nan Swift of the R Street Institute. "Young farmers can't afford to rent or buy land at inflated prices. Likewise, young farmers often have smaller farms that don't benefit from the primary federal subsidy programs." Not only does the "Big Beautiful Bill" keep these programs intact, it expands them; it even introduces an "insurance pilot program" for "poultry growers." "The farm subsidy increases in the reconciliation bill are brazen. The GOP lavished the biggest subsidy increases on GOP parts of the country," writes Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute. "More importantly, in a supposed spending reform bill, the GOP doesn't just spare millionaire farmers from cuts, they aggressively expand inefficient farm giveaways by $57 billion." The post Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store