A timeline of the embattled Brooklyn Village project
Nine years ago, Mecklenburg County selected The Peebles Corporation to redevelop 17 acres for Brooklyn Village, a project designed to honor what was once Charlotte's largest Black neighborhood.
Today, the prime land on Uptown's edge is unmoved dirt.
Why it matters: Brooklyn Village is intended to be a transformative development, breathing fresh life into the neighborhood and attempting to make amends to the Brooklyn community, which was razed in the 1960s and '70s. Surviving descendants have waited decades for some form of restitution.
Yes, but: In recent years, The Peebles Corporation has pushed off construction, sought more public funding and reworked site plans. The lack of progress has frustrated community members and leaders.
The latest: In April, the company informed the county that it expects to miss a contractual deadline to demolish an old, empty school board building on the site. The latest delay could be the final breaking point in the county and developer's shaky partnership.
Meanwhile, a separate redevelopment deal with Peebles has fallen through with the city of Durham.
Here's a timeline to catch up with Peebles' increasingly complicated history in Mecklenburg County and North Carolina.
June 2025: Durham cuts ties with Peebles
Durham cancels its agreement with Peebles to redevelop its former downtown police headquarters.
Similar to the situation in Charlotte, Peebles has gone back and forth with Durham on how much affordable housing would be included in the project and how the city would subsidize construction.
April 2025: Peebles seeks to postpone demolition of on-site Brooklyn building
Peebles sends a letter to the county explaining that the 1969 Board of Education building on the Brooklyn site contains asbestos. The firm seeks an extension until July 31, 2026, to demolish the building.
However, Peebles' contract with the county states the building must be torn down by July 28, 2025. WFAE reports that the county intends to uphold the deadline, possibly signaling a breakup in the long-drawn-out public-private partnership.
Earlier in April, City of Charlotte staff advises city council not to fulfill a $13.5 million request to help fund Brooklyn Village. They refer to "challenges" with Peebles' financials, WFAE reports.
February 2025: Peebles pitches new plan
Following a poorly received presentation to county leaders months prior, The Peebles Corporation presents a new plan to build 250 all-affordable units at Brooklyn Village. The previous plan was for 550 housing units, with only 55 set aside as affordable.
Peebles says the firm would seek Housing Trust Fund dollars from the city, federal tax credits and $2.5 million in gap financing from Mecklenburg County.
Some commissioners say they're excited about more affordable housing, while others are skeptical of further commitments with Peebles. They say they will look at the proposal with a "fine-tooth comb."
August 2024: Construction postponed until 2026
The Peebles Corporation says construction on two multi-family buildings won't begin until June 2026 — nearly a year after the required start date in the contract with Mecklenburg County.
The contractual deadline is "conditioned upon a favorable financing and marketability climate," a county spokesperson tells Axios. Peebles cites economic challenges, from record-high interest rates to an "oversupply" of multi-family housing in Charlotte.
Vilma Leake, a senior commissioner who went to church in Brooklyn, asks Peebles: "Will we ever finish it? Will I get to see it?"
Also in August 2024, the City of Durham selects Peebles to redevelop its former downtown police headquarters.
July 2024: Mecklenburg County sells land
Mecklenburg County finalizes its discounted sale of 5.7 acres at Brooklyn Village to the developer for $10.3 million. The land, on the edge of Uptown and near The Pearl, has risen in value since the price was agreed to in 2016.
2016-2023: Construction start prolonged
The project timeline is prolonged due to negotiations over contracts and site plans, developer due diligence and an extended closing period, according to statements from Mecklenburg County.
The developer starts "horizontal" construction work on the site, including demolishing the Walton Plaza building and relocating underground utilities.
2016: Mecklenburg County chooses developer
Of three bidders, Mecklenburg County chooses BK Partners — a partnership between New York-based The Peebles Corporation and Charlotte-based Conformity Corporation — to develop Brooklyn Village.
The first phase is anticipated to finish in 2021 (but never breaks ground).
1960s and '70s: Brooklyn is razed
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
EPA set to roll back rules that limit greenhouse gases and mercury from US power plants
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency is poised to eliminate rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, part of a wide-ranging rollback of environmental regulations that Administrator Lee Zeldin has said would remove trillions of dollars in costs and 'unleash' American energy. The EPA also plans to weaken a regulation that requires power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults. The planned rollbacks, set to be announced Wednesday, are meant to fulfill President Donald Trump's repeated pledge to "unleash American energy" and make it more affordable for Americans to power their homes and operate businesses. If approved and made final, the plans would reverse efforts by President Joe Biden's administration to address climate change and improve conditions in areas heavily burdened by industrial pollution, mostly in low-income and majority Black or Hispanic communities. The power plant rules are among about 30 environmental regulations that Zeldin targeted in March when he announced what he called the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' He said the actions would put a 'dagger through the heart of climate-change religion' and introduce a 'Golden Age' for the American economy. Environmental groups vowed to challenge the rules in court. 'Power plants are among the largest sources of dangerous pollution in the nation. We have modern technologies that allow these plants to reduce pollution with available and cost-effective solutions,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel of the Environmental Defense Fund. The clean-air standards targeted by the EPA under Trump, a Republican, "are protecting people across America today and will safeguard future generations,'' Patton said. 'Ignoring the immense harm to public health from power plant pollution is a clear violation of the law,'' added Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'Our lawyers will be watching closely, and if EPA finalizes a slapdash effort to repeal those rules, we'll see them in court.' The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments and a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated — they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. Even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems, the AP analysis found. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. Biden, a Democrat, had made fighting climate change a hallmark of his presidency. Coal-fired power plants would be forced to capture smokestack emissions or shut down under a strict EPA rule issued last year. Then-EPA head Michael Regan said the power plant rules — the Biden administration's most ambitious effort to roll back planet-warming pollution from the power sector — would reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting a reliable, long-term supply of electricity. The power sector is the nation's second-largest contributor to climate change, after transportation. In its proposed regulation, the Trump EPA argues that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel-fired power plants 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution' or to climate change and therefore do not meet a threshold under the Clean Air Act for regulatory action. A paper published earlier this year in the journal Science found the Biden-era rules could reduce U.S. power sector carbon emissions by 73% to 86% below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with a reduction of 60% to 83% without the rules. 'Our research shows that EPA's power plant rules make substantial strides to protect human health and the environment,'' said Aaron Bergman, a fellow at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research institution and a co-author of the Science paper. 'Carbon emissions in the power sector drop at a faster rate with the (Biden-era) rules in place than without them,'' Bergman said in an email. 'And we also would have seen significant reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, pollutants that harm human health."
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Americans pay trillions in rent, but few get credit score boost for it
An estimated $1.4 trillion is paid to landlords of residential properties every year in America, but only 20% of those landlords choose to report the rent paid. That has big implications for the credit scores and credit histories of millions of Americans. Reporting rent paid on time to credit bureaus can significantly boost credit scores, but since it has not traditionally been a common practice, some renters end up having no credit history at all, making them "credit invisible," limiting their ability to get a loan, a car, a house and a lot more. Over 50 million Americans lack a credit history with the three major credit bureaus: Experian, Equifax and TransUnion. "We're leaving over $5.3 trillion on the table, we've got to do better," said Wemimo Abbey, the CEO and co-founder of Esusu, which was named to the 2025 CNBC Disruptor 50 list, in an interview on CNBC's "Worldwide Exchange" on Wednesday. Esusu is a credit score reporting service which has partnered with 75% of the largest rental companies and more recently created a direct line for renters to report their rent payments. "We have democratized access because you have a long tail of people who don't live in commercially managed housing," Abbey said. Esusu has deals with Goldman Sachs, Mercy Housing, and Cushman & Wakefield, and partnerships with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to increase the number of units nationally that report rent as part of credit. Credit scores, which range on a scale of 300-850, indicate the ability to pay back bills such as credit cards, and manage and limit debt owed. The lower a score, or the lack of any credit score at all, makes lenders hesitant to extend money, or they might charge extreme interest rates on a loan. Some landlords require a credit score on file to determine eligibility for a rental application, and while it's not the only considered data point, it may influence the landlord to not approve an application. This financial inequity significantly impacts minorities, with approximately 26% of Hispanic consumers and 27% of Black consumers being credit invisible or unscorable, compared to 16% of White and Asian consumers, according to data from Oliver Wyman. Immigrants are also more susceptible to invisibility as their credit file in the U.S. does not take into account their credit history in their origin country. Esusu founders Abbey and Samir Goel grew up watching their families struggle financially as immigrants from Lagos, Nigeria, and New Delhi, India, respectively, which was a founding motivation for Esusu. "When we came here, we didn't have a credit score. We went to one of the biggest financial institutions to borrow money; we were turned away and had to go borrow from a predatory lender who wanted to lend at over 400% interest rate," Abbey said. "My mother sold my dad's wedding ring. We borrowed money from church members and that's how we got started." Abbey said when Esusu started, only 10% of rent payments were reported to credit bureaus. Esusu has established credit scores for 250,000 Americans leading to $50 billion in credit activity, Abbey said. The startup's valuation has now reached $1 billion based on demand for the services. Rent is one of the largest expenditures for most Americans who do not own a home. More than 90% of renters pay rent on time, but since it's not reported, there's no record of it. Reports can be initiated either by the landlord or by the tenant. Commercially managed housing services may already have connections with one or all three credit report services, but may charge a fee to report it. Renters also have the option to directly connect with rent reporting services like Esusu, which charges a monthly fee of $2.50 to report timely payment on the renter's behalf. The record of the amount paid is expected to show up roughly 30 days after it's been paid. But paying rent is not enough; it needs to be paid on time. While some agencies may give 30 days to make up for the missed payment, others may not, and that can negatively impact a credit score. There are some other ways to build credit in addition to the rent reporting for those who lack credit histories or are looking to increase their credit scores. Becoming an authorized user on a family member or friend's credit card is one way. Getting a secured credit card, that has no annual fee, is another option. Using a credit-builder loan, in which banks provide the total loan amount after you've made a certain number of payments, and report your payment activity to the credit bureaus, is also an option for those with limited credit history and those who are credit invisible.
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
EPA set to roll back rules that limit greenhouse gases and mercury from US power plants
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency is poised to eliminate rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, part of a wide-ranging rollback of environmental regulations that Administrator Lee Zeldin has said would remove trillions of dollars in costs and 'unleash' American energy. The EPA also plans to weaken a regulation that requires power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults. The planned rollbacks, set to be announced Wednesday, are meant to fulfill President Trump's repeated pledge to 'unleash American energy' and make it more affordable for Americans to power their homes and operate businesses. If approved and made final, the plans would reverse efforts by President Joe Biden's administration to address climate change and improve conditions in areas heavily burdened by industrial pollution, mostly in low-income and majority Black or Hispanic communities. The power plant rules are among about 30 environmental regulations that Zeldin targeted in March when he announced what he called the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' He said the actions would put a 'dagger through the heart of climate-change religion' and introduce a 'Golden Age' for the American economy. Environmental groups vowed to challenge the rules in court. 'Power plants are among the largest sources of dangerous pollution in the nation. We have modern technologies that allow these plants to reduce pollution with available and cost-effective solutions,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel of the Environmental Defense Fund. The clean-air standards targeted by the EPA under Trump, a Republican, 'are protecting people across America today and will safeguard future generations,'' Patton said. 'Ignoring the immense harm to public health from power plant pollution is a clear violation of the law,'' added Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'Our lawyers will be watching closely, and if EPA finalizes a slapdash effort to repeal those rules, we'll see them in court.' The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments and a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated — they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. Even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems, the AP analysis found. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. Biden, a Democrat, had made fighting climate change a hallmark of his presidency. Coal-fired power plants would be forced to capture smokestack emissions or shut down under a strict EPA rule issued last year. Then-EPA head Michael Regan said the power plant rules — the Biden administration's most ambitious effort to roll back planet-warming pollution from the power sector — would reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting a reliable, long-term supply of electricity. The power sector is the nation's second-largest contributor to climate change, after transportation. In its proposed regulation, the Trump EPA argues that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel-fired power plants 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution' or to climate change and therefore do not meet a threshold under the Clean Air Act for regulatory action. A paper published earlier this year in the journal Science found the Biden-era rules could reduce U.S. power sector carbon emissions by 73% to 86% below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with a reduction of 60% to 83% without the rules. 'Our research shows that EPA's power plant rules make substantial strides to protect human health and the environment,'' said Aaron Bergman, a fellow at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research institution and a co-author of the Science paper. 'Carbon emissions in the power sector drop at a faster rate with the (Biden-era) rules in place than without them,'' Bergman said in an email. 'And we also would have seen significant reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, pollutants that harm human health.' Daly writes for the Associated Press.
